Research Article |
Open Access |
|
Bheem Dutt Joshi |
Bheem Dutt Joshi, 10 mdda Colony Rajpur, Dehradun, India |
*Corresponding authors: |
Bheem Dutt Joshi
10 mdda Colony Rajpur
Dehradun, India
E-mail: mahideep71@gmail.com |
|
|
Received October 29, 2012; Published July 07, 2012 |
|
Citation: Joshi BD (2012) Sequence Divergence and Phylogenetic Status of Four Species of Testudinidae Family. 1: 145. doi:10.4172/scientificreports.145 |
|
Copyright: © 2012 Joshi BD. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
|
Abstract |
|
Phylogenetic study is most useful approach for understand the evolutionary history of the species. Sequence divergence and phylogenetic status of four turtle species was estimated and constructed using 12S rRNA mitochondrial gene, for the conservation and as well as in management plans of endangered species of turtle which is highly poached for the human consumption in nation and international trade. All the sequences were obtained from the NCBI, edited and aligned in BioEdit Software for the analysis. Phylogenetic tree and sequence divergence were made in MEGA 5 software package. Sequence divergence between the four turtle species were ranges from 0.021 to 0.064 and within the species was 0.0003 in T. horsfieldii, where as in rest of three species sequence divergence was 0.000. For the identification of species, species specific nucleotides were also reported in the four species of turtle. |
|
Keywords |
|
Turtle; mtDNA; PCR; Sequence divergence; Species specific Nucleotide; phylogeny |
|
Introduction |
|
Molecular phylogenetic analysis is more reliable method for build a phylogenetic trees than the particular other methods; these methods have been used by many authors [1,2]. Genetic comparisons are helpful to understand ancestry of related species at higher taxonomic levels. Consequential morphological characteristics can be difficult to determine ancient divergences of the species, [3-5]. Phylogenetic suggestion must consider the population processes that produced the gene tree by three methods, first methods applied by mathematical population genetic methods, by calculating the conditional probabilities of genealogies given different species trees or population histories [5-7] second, by estimating population genetic parameters using methods that incorporate into the analysis both the large variance inherent in the coalescent process as well as improbability about the genealogical reconstruction [8,9] and third, by calculating outline statistics that do not use the gene tree for parameter estimation [10,11] For instance, pairwise divergence time has been used to infer sister relationships among a group of taxa. 12S rRNA is highly conserved and applied to illustrate the phylogeny of higher categorical levels such as phyla or subphyla [12]. The aim of the present analysis is to provide a preliminary insight into the sequence divergence and phylogenetic status of four turtle species using 12S rRNA and can be used to find unique SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphism) for species identification. |
|
Materials and Methods |
|
All sequence data were obtained from GenBank on the NCBI website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) for the comparisons of 12S rRNA gene, of four turtle species. Sequences were aligned using BioEdit software with Clustal W program. Sequence divergence and phylogenetic trees were constructed for 12S rRNA sequence alignments using the Maximum Parsimony in the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software package version 5.0. |
|
Result and Discussion |
|
Based on the 12S rRNA analysis, sequence divergence in the all four turtle species viz., T. kleinmanni, T. marginata T. graeca graeca and T. horsfieldii were ranged from 0.021 to 0.064, whereas lower sequence divergence were between the T. kleinmanni and T. kleinmanni (0.021) and maximum divergence were between the T. graeca graeca and T. horsfieldii (0.064). Sequence divergence estimated within the four turtle species was (0.000) except T. horsfieldii (0.003) (Table 1). In this study nucleotide diversity in T. kleinmanni and T. graeca graeca were 0.00036 and 0.01020 respectively. In the T. graeca graeca nucleotide diversity estimated high rather than the T. kleinmanni. Nucleotide diversity was found less due to 12S rRNA is much conserved region and hence not suitable for to estimatation genetic diversity within the species but can be used for species identification. |
|
|
Table 1: Sequence divergence of mitochondrial 12S rRNA between the turtle species of Testudinidae family. |
|
|
Based on phylogenetic tree analysis, T. kleinmanni is very closer to the T. marginata with higher bootstrap value of 89 then the T. graeca graeca and T. horsfieldii having bootstrap value of 67 (Figure 1). Unique SNPs for species identification were observed at specific nucleotide positions in the four turtle species (Table 2). But in the species T. kleinmanni and T. marginata no species specific nucleotide were observed due to very closely related species or 12S r RNA have very conserved sequence in species. |
|
|
Figure 1: Maximum parsimony (M-P) tree constructed of 12S rRNA with four turtle species. |
|
|
|
Table 2: Species specific nucleotide position in 12S rRNA gene. Nucleotide positions are as the sequence of T. kleinmanni (Accession no. NC007699.1). |
|
|
Acknowledgements |
|
I would like extend great thank to the following Accession no. NC007699.1, DQ991958.1, DQ991957.1, DQ991956.1, DQ991955.1, DQ991954.1, DQ991953.1, DQ991952.1, DQ991951.1, DQ991950.1, DQ991949.1, DQ991948.1, DQ991947.1, DQ991946.1, DQ991945.1, AF175333.1, AM491031.1, DQ205434.1, DQ205433.1, EU263120.1, EU263113.1, AF175328.1, DQ445844.1 and AB090020.1. |
|
|
References |
|
- Holder M, Lewis PO (2003) Phylogeny estimation: traditional and Bayesian approaches. Nat Rev Genet 4: 275-284.
- Swofford, DL, Olsen GJ, Waddell PJ, Hillis DM (1996) Phylogenetic inference. In Molecular Systematics, ed. DM Hillis, CM Moritz, BK Mable, 407–514. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer
- Buckley-Beason VA, Johnson WE, Nash WG, Stanyon R, Menninger JC, et al. (2006) Molecular evidence for species-level distinctions in clouded leopards. Curr Biol 16: 2371-2376.
- Asher RJ (2007) A web-database of mammalian morphology and a reanalysis of placental phylogeny. BMC Evol Biol 7: 108.
- Tabuce R, Asher RJ, Lehmann T (2008) Afrotherian mammals: a review of current data. Mammalia 72: 2–14.
- Maddison,WP (1997) Gene trees in species trees. Syst Biol 46: 523–536.
- Degnan JH, Salter LA (2005) Gene tree distributions under the coalescent process. Evolution 59: 24-37.
- Kuhner MK, Yamato J, Felsenstein J (1995) Estimating effective population size and mutation rate from sequence data using Metropolis-Hastings sampling. Genetics 140: 1421-1430.
- Beerli P, Felsenstein J (1999) Maximum-likelihood estimation of migration rates and effective population numbers in two populations using a coalescent approach. Genetics 152: 763-773.
- Hey J, Machado CA (2003) The study of structured populations--new hope for a difficult and divided science. Nat Rev Genet 4: 535-543.
- Hey J, Nielsen R (2004) Multilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence time, with applications to the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics 167: 747-760.
- Knowles LL, Maddison WP (2002) Statistical phylogeography. Mol Ecol 11: 2623-2635.
- Aleixo A (2006) Historical diversification of floodplain forest specialist species in the Amazon: a case study with two species of the avian genus Xiphorhynchus (Aves: Dendrocolaptidae). Biol J Linn Soc 89: 383-395.
- Bates JM, Tello JG, Silva JMC (2003) Initial assessment of genetic diversity in ten bird species of South American Cerrado. Stud Neotrop Fauna Envir. 38: 87-94.
- Fleischer RC, Perry EA, Muralidharan K, Stevens EE, Wemmer CM (2001) Phylogeography of the Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) based on mitochondrial DNA. Evolution 55: 1882-1892.
- Gerber AS, Loggins R, Kumar S, Dowling TE (2001) Does nonneutral evolution shape observed patterns of DNA variation in animal mitochondrial genomes? Annu Rev Genet 35: 539-566.
- Hudson RR, Kreitman M, Aquade M (1987) A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics 116: 153-159.
- Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. (2011) MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731-2739.
- Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451-1452.
- Swofford DL, Waddell PJ, Huelsenbeck JP, Foster PG, Lewis PO,et al. (2001) Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst Biol 50: 525-539.
- Tajima F (1989) Statistical methods to test for nucleotide mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585-595.
|
|
|