Abstract

Assessing corpulence solely through measures that exclude fat mass presents limitations in capturing the full spectrum of body composition. While traditional methods such as body mass index (BMI) have been widely utilized for corpulence assessment, they fail to account for variations in lean body mass and fat distribution. This paper explores the shortcomings of relying solely on fat-free measures, such as BMI, in evaluating bulk in corpulence. Through a critical review of existing literature and empirical evidence, we highlight the inadequacies of fat-free measures in accurately representing body composition, particularly in populations with diverse body types and musculoskeletal structures. Furthermore, we discuss the implications of overlooking fat mass in corpulence assessment, including underestimation of health risks associated with excess adiposity and misclassification of individuals with elevated muscle mass. To address these limitations, we advocate for the integration of comprehensive body composition assessments that consider both fat and fat-free components. By adopting a more nuanced approach to corpulence evaluation, healthcare practitioners can better tailor interventions and support individuals in achieving optimal health outcomes.