Preventing Spam Practice through Open Access

A spam in its true sense is defined as an unsolicited email that the customer receives from unwanted vendors. In most of the cases, a spam might be against the wish of the intended recipient and eats into precious time for going through the e-mail without any expected benefit from the point of view of the recipient. The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 approved a more precise definition from legal perspective, by the federal government. To maintain the modus operandi in avoiding spam, the OMICS International follows the most probable mailing list comprising the scientific scholars and prospective research scientists who wanted to make their work published

OMICS International is glad to announce its recent initiative of acquiring journals from reputed publishers. So far journals have been acquired from Aston Journals (USA), Ashdin Publishers (USA), LibPubMedia (UK), La Prensa Medica (Argentina) & Oral Health and Dental Management (Romania), respectively.
To know more:

• Dailyherald.com
• News-medical.net
• Sacbee.com
• Yahoo Finance

The open access journals are peer-reviewed and undergo a stringent quality procedure enabled and supported by Editorial Manager® application from a recognised vendor. OMICS International assures that the open access journals consist of manuscripts submitted from research scholars who wish to get their works published though consent.

The accusations of spam faced by a scientific organization hamper the overall prospects of research, and the exchange of emails that leads to the dissemination of knowledge sees a dark tunnel. This is because more number of researchers and university professors have an e-mail account, blog, and a large number of these learned scholars would solicit communication from publishers. An email drafted and sent properly would allow the recipient to come across the right options to register for any scientific event and submit papers for the same.

Wary of the word spam, the internet sellers and even promoters of certain services have seen some kind of a bleak picture that could hamper the market of learning and even educational service promotions, and looking out for newer strategies other than the e-mail might not serve the desired purpose at both ends.

The concept of open access publishing has been labelled by certain groups as fake or dubious, and that those are into active spam, while a scientific organization does not have the means for safeguarding itself from recurring complaints. The wiki pages and the content in Wikipedia about open access publishing speak volumes of its benefits. Nevertheless, it is high time for the publishing entities and open access advocates to maintain reputation and utilize their resources to preventing of scam and building more positive review and tackling fake claims. As with any other system in place, the open access movement has witnessed its own bad times with its opponents targeting the industry with the blame of predatory approach.