ISSN: 2155-6105

Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Research Article   
  • J Addict Res Ther ,
  • DOI: 10.4172/2155-6105.1000394

Self-efficacy for smoking cessation vs. temporary abstinence: two aspects of a complex process

Ineke Keizer1,2*, Corinne Wahl3, Patrice Croquette1, Marianne Gex-Fabry1,2 and Aqal Nawaz Khan1
1Department of Psychiatry, HUG - University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland
2Department of Psychiatry, University of Geneva, Switzerland
3CARRADS Carrefour Addictions/ CIPRET Geneva Tobacco Information and Prevention Center, Geneva, Switzerland
*Corresponding Author : Ineke Keizer, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals of Geneva, 2 Chemin Du Petit‐Bel‐Air, 1225 Chêne‐Bourg, Switzerland, Tel: #4122-305-4762, Fax: #4122-305-4719, Email: Ineke.Keizer@hcuge.ch

Received Date: Mar 20, 2020 / Accepted Date: Jun 23, 2020 / Published Date: Jun 19, 2020

Abstract

Introduction: Smokers receiving mental health care are particularly in need of tailored interventions. Objective: Study of patients enrolled in a specialized smoking cessation program based upon a 26-hour smoking abstinence period aimed better understanding of self-efficacy for smoking cessation and of the decision to quit.

Methods:  A logistic regression predicting success/failure of abstinence included different variables. Self-efficacyfor temporary abstaining from smoking (TASE) and for permanent quitting (QSE) were distinguished.

Results:  In 174 subjects enrolled at baseline, TASE was the only predictor of successful abstinence (OR=1.43; p=.001). Assessment of 138 subjects present 1 week after intervention showed increases in TASE and QSE (median
TASE from 8 to 10, p<.0001; median QSE from 8 to 9, p=.02). In subgroups of successful abstainers and of those engaging into smoking cessation, only TASE increased. Interestingly, for subjects who had planned a quit attempt
already before the intervention, 52% were still abstinent at 1 week vs. 87% of those who decided to quit during theintervention (p=.02).

Conclusion:  A multicomponent program for all smokers can be a powerful method to increase self-efficacy, in particular for temporary smoking abstinence, and trigger unplanned quit attempts, shown here to be more successful than planned attempts.

Keywords: Addiction; Health psychology; Motivational; enhancement intervention; Psychiatry; Self-efficacy; Smoking; cessation; Temporary smoking abstinence

Citation: Keizer I, Wahl C, Croquette P, Gex-Fabry M, Khan AN (2020) Selfefficacy for smoking cessation vs. temporary abstinence: two aspects of a complex process. J Addict Res Ther 11:394. Doi: 10.4172/2155-6105.1000394

Copyright: © 2020 Keizer I, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top