Abstract

Mental health evaluations play a critical role in the criminal justice system, serving as a bridge between psychological assessment and legal processes. This paper explores the various practices employed in conducting mental health evaluations, highlighting the methodologies utilized by forensic psychologists to assess competency, criminal responsibility, and risk of reoffending. The evaluation process is examined in the context of its implications for individuals involved in the justice system, including defendants, victims, and legal professionals. However, the practice faces numerous challenges, including ethical dilemmas, the potential for bias, and the complexities of diagnosing mental disorders within a legal framework. Additionally, we discuss the impact of inadequate mental health resources and training on the effectiveness of evaluations. This paper emphasizes the need for enhanced collaboration between mental health professionals and legal entities to ensure accurate assessments and fair outcomes. Ultimately, addressing these challenges is essential for improving the integration of mental health considerations into the criminal justice system and promoting a more equitable approach to justice for individuals with mental health disorders.