ISSN: 2329-910X

Clinical Research on Foot & Ankle
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Research Article   
  • Clin Res Foot Ankle,
  • DOI: 10.4172/2375-4494.S4.004

Comparison of Double Row Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy Repair with or without Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendon Transfer

J George Devries1*, Taylor Romdenne2 and Brandon M Scharer1
1Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, University of Bay Care Clinic, Green Bay, USA
2Department of Orthopedics, Aurora Advocate Research institute, Green Bay, USA
*Corresponding Author : Dr. J George Devries, Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, University of Bay Care Clinic, Green Bay, USA

Received Date: Apr 25, 2024 / Published Date: May 27, 2024

Abstract

Purpose: Insertion achilles tendinitis recalcitrant to conservative care may require surgical interventiodouble-row repair technique has been shown to have biomechanical advantages in cadaveric studies and rehabilitation advantages in clinical studies. The addition of a flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer has been advocated in certain instances, but studies have called into question the benefit of this transfer. A retrospective study of patients that had undergone a double-row achilles tendon reattachment was performed comparing those with and without an adjunctive transfer. Fifty-one patients were included, 19 in the group with transfer and 32 in the group without transfer. Time to weight bearing in a boot and a brace were similar between groups but return to normal activity was faster in the group without transfer (145 days vs. 186 days, p=0.05). The group with the transfer was similar in regards to BMI but did skew older (52.3 years vs. 59.5 years, p=0.01). No other differences between the groups were found, including satisfaction, complications/revisions, and other demographics. The addition of a flexor hallucis longus transfer did not lead to increased complications but did not show a clear benefit either. The recovery was slower with the transfer, but this may correlate with the increased age in this group.

Citation: Devries JG, Romdenne T, Scharer BM (2024) Comparison of Double Row Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy Repair with or without Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendon Transfer. Clin Res Foot Ankle S4:004. Doi: 10.4172/2375-4494.S4.004

Copyright: © 2024 Devries JG, et al. Comparison of Double Row Insertional achilles Tendinopathy Repair with or without Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendon Transfer.

Top