Comparative Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Surgery
Received Date: Mar 01, 2024 / Published Date: Mar 30, 2024
Abstract
Radical prostatectomy, the surgical removal of the prostate gland, is a common treatment for localized prostate cancer. With advancements in surgical techniques, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has emerged as an alternative to traditional open radical prostatectomy (ORP). This study aims to compare the outcomes, including perioperative and oncological results, of RARP and ORP. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 500 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer between 2015 and 2020. The cohort was divided
into two groups: those who underwent RARP (n=300) and those who underwent ORP (n=200). Data on patient demographics, perioperative outcomes (operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay), postoperative complications, and oncological outcomes (positive surgical margins, biochemical recurrence) were collected and analyzed.
Citation: Boris B (2024) Comparative Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Versus OpenRadical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Surgery. Cancer Surg, 9: 101.
Copyright: © 2024 Boris B. This is an open-access article distributed under theterms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricteduse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author andsource are credited.
Share This Article
Recommended Journals
Open Access Journals
Article Usage
- Total views: 311
- [From(publication date): 0-2024 - Jan 27, 2025]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 275
- PDF downloads: 36
