ISSN: 2161-0711

Journal of Community Medicine & Health Education
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Review Article   
  • J Community Med Health Educ,
  • DOI: 10.4172/2161-0711.1000708

Community-Academic Collaboration and Ethics-Concepts, Principles, and Processes: Building on the Center for Promoting Health and Health Equity-Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health

John R. Stone*, Sade Kosoko-Lasaki, Stephen B. Jackson and Doris Lassiter
*Corresponding Author : John R. Stone, Center for Promoting Health and Health Equity, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, U.S.A, Tel: +650-704-2921, Email: johnstone@creighton.edu

Abstract

This paper employs a literature review, an ethical/philosophical analysis, and authors experience to develop a framework for guiding community-academic partnerships in collaborating to pursue health equity. The framework involves dynamic and interactive categories of Core Concepts, Guiding Principles, and Key Processes. Core Concepts are that collaboration involves partners in-relation who walk and explore together, ethics involved throughout. Guiding Principles are to honor community rights and well-being, primarily promote community health equity, secondarily advance academic interests, ensure justice throughout, and sustain principles involving mutuality (respect, transparency, authenticity, trustworthiness, care, humility (cultural and epistemic/knowledge), and solidarity). Key Processes are periodic reflexivity with framework critical review; deliberation, discussion, and decision; and negotiation and conflict resolution. The literature review only addressed publications in English. Most articles focused on the United States, as does much of the authors experience. Thus, the analysis could overlook aspects that a more global examination might reveal. Thus, the framework is provisional.

Keywords: Collaboration; Partnership; Ethics; Health equity; Community; Academy

Top