Abstract

Modern dentistry now includes ridge maintenance procedures to ensure that the alveolar ridge structure is preserved after a tooth is extracted. This precise survey expects to give an inside and out investigation of different edge support procedures, their viability, and the key variables impacting the results. The survey features the significance of edge safeguarding and offers bits of knowledge into the present status of the workmanship in this field.

The utilization of L-PRF decreased the size of both the even and vertical crestal bone resorption; nonetheless, the low example size made wide standard deviations between the test and control gatherings. Intrinsic shortcomings were available in the two examinations. Through calculated examination of the two records, the dissimilarities forestalled the conduction of a meta-investigation. Inside the limits of this deliberate survey, L-PRF decreased the greatness of vertical and flat bone resorption, which places L-PRF as an expected material of decision for edge conservation methods. The use of DBB/CF prevented vertical crestal bone resorption within the limitations and weaknesses of both studies, whereas the use of L-PRF prevented both horizontal and vertical crestal bone resorption. More randomized controlled clinical preliminaries are expected to kill every one of the perplexing variables, which predisposition the result of edge protection procedures.