Journal of Pulmonology and Respiratory Diseases
Open Access

Diagnostic criteria; Fungi; Imaging; Therapy; Type 2 inflammation

Introduction

An inflammation of the upper respiratory tract caused by type 1 and 3 hypersensitive reactions to fungus is known as allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS).1 The first instance of AFRS was recorded by Safirstein in 1976 in a patient who had nasal polyps, significant mucosal edema, type 1 allergy, and positive gel diffused precipitins against A. fumigatus, which was later confirmed by culture [1].

This patient's condition was aggravated by allergic Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), which shares these clinical and immunologic symptoms.2 Katzenstein3 and Robson, respectively, proposed the names "allergic aspergillus sinusitis" and "allergic fungal sinusitis" in 19833 and 1989, respectively.4 Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), a diverse the requirements that presents with persistent symptoms such nasal obstructions, discoloured discharge, and sinus pressure, is defined as having AFRS as a subtype [2]. Face pressure or anxiety, as well as a lengthy decrease or loss of scent12 weeks. According on whether a CRS is primary or secondary in origin, and according to either a subtype is localized or disperses,

Disease’s anatomic distribution. Primary CRS can be categorized as either a type 2 or non-type 2 inflammatory endotype based on endotype dominance. AFRS can be classified as main localized or scattered type 2 endotypic CRS, and ECRS is categorized as primary diffuse type 2 endotypic CRS, both of which are morphologies marked by eosinophilic activation [3].1 Sino-bronchial allergic mycosis (SAM) is the term used to describe AFRS and asthmatic Bronchopulmonary fungi (ABPM) including ABPA in the same entity.15 SAM is actually fairly common, despite the fact that the number of identified events of AFRS are typically rising and that many AFRS cases have previously been documented [4]. Given both the AFRS and ABPA in the first report both demonstrated concurrent medical features, it was assumed that their pathogeneses were identical. Their uncommon co-occurrence, however, raises the possibility that their physiological mechanisms may differ in some ways. In order to get better knowledge of the pathophysiology of both AFRS and ABPA, the current review compared the clinical manifestations of both diseases. It is significant to highlight that up until the 2000s, several clinical investigations identified AFRS without satisfying type 1 hypersensitivity to fungi or the Bent and Kuhn diagnostic criteria [5, 6].

The current evaluation discusses an AFRS that satisfies the traditional Bent and Kuhn standards.

One of the phenotypes of CRS is AFRS

Clinical characteristics

In comparison to chronic sinusitis with polyps in the nose (CRSwNP) and eosinophilic-dominant CRS (i.e., ECRS), AFRS presents itself younger, in the 20s and 30s.28e34 Males seem to develop the disorder somewhat more frequently than females, even though this tendency is not significant.28e30,32,33,35,36 It has also been shown to be more prevalent in those with lower socioeconomic status, such as those with lower income, those with assurance, and Medicaid patients, in the US, where it is more prevalent in African-Americans29,32e35,37.29,32,33 A common adverse effect of CRSwNP is bronchial asthma, particular in cases with ECRS with sinuses covered in eosinophilic mucus. However, AFRS is significantly less frequently linked to bronchial asthma than CRSwNP and ECRS [7,8].

Pathogenic fungus

Initially, it believed that warm, humid builds like those bordering the river's basin and the south-central US were where AFRS was widespread.9, 50, 51 Contrary to common opinion, an in-depth study has revealed that places with greater temperatures have a higher prevalence of AFRS whereas regions with more humidity had a lower incidence.52 That systematic review, however, focused on the climate in particular cities, which could differ from where all patients live. In addition to geographic and climatic factors the living environment is additionally significantly affected by socioeconomic problems, chronic mucosal irritation from air pollution, and refrigeration in warm climates.51, 52 Furthermore, the effects of climate change may enhance the likelihood that AFRS incidence may grow in areas with low levels of this illness now [9,10].

Conclusion

AFRS and ABPM are two related conditions that share common features in terms of their allergic response to fungal organisms. Understanding the similarities and differences between these conditions can help healthcare professionals improve their diagnosis and treatment strategies. Additionally, raising awareness about the potential overlap in symptoms between AFRS and ABPM can lead to more accurate diagnoses and better patient outcomes.

1. Wang L, Wang Y, Jin S, Wu Z, Chin DP, et al. (2008). Emergence and control of infectious diseases in China. Lancet 372: 1598-1605.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Stark K, Niedrig M, Biederbick W, Merkert H, Hacker J, et al. (2009)  [Climate changes and emerging diseases. What new infectious diseases and health problem can be expected?]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 52: 699-714.

Indexed at, Google Scholar                      Crossref

3. Choi EK, Lee JK (2016) Changes of Global Infectious Disease Governance in 2000s: Rise of Global Health Security and Transformation of Infectious Disease Control System in South Korea. Uisahak 25:489-518.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Desai AN, Madoff LC (2019) Bending the epidemic curve: advancements and opportunities to reduce the threat of emerging pathogens. Epidemiol Infect 147: 168.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Heymann DL, Rodier GR (2001) Hot spots in a wired world: WHO surveillance of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Lancet Infect Dis 1:345-353.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Beer K (2013) News from the IAEH. Discussion on the role of national public health agencies in the implementation of ecohealth strategies for infectious disease prevention. Ecohealth 10:111-114.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Rathore MH, Runyon J, Haque TU (2017) Emerging Infectious Diseases. Adv Pediatr. 2017 64: 2771.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Pastakia S, Njuguna B, Le PV, Singh MK, Brock TP, et al. (2015)  To address emerging infections, we must invest in enduring systems: The kinetics and dynamics of health systems strengthening. Clin Pharmacol Ther 98: 362-364.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Peetermans WE, De Munter P (2007) Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Acta Clin Belg 62: 337-341.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Gonzalez JP, Lambert G, Legand A, Debré P (2011) Toward a transdisciplinary understanding and a global control of emerging infectious diseases. J Infect Dev Ctries 5: 903-905.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref