Environment Pollution and Climate Change
Open Access

Chlorofluorocarbons, generally appertained to as CFCs, are non-combustible liquids that were, at one time, constantly used as refrigerants and aerosol forces, as well as for drawing products. Since scientists linked CFCs to the reduction of the ozone sub caste, they’ve been largely phased out, but old refrigerators and other bias that uses CFCs might still be in service. Through inhalation, digestion or other physical contact, as well as from exposure to dangerous situations of ultraviolet shafts, CFCs can have a negative impact on mortal health [1].

Inhalation of CFCs affects the central nervous system, according to the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Lore’s. The result is intoxication analogous to that produced by alcohol, including light headedness, headaches, temblors and storms. Inhalation of CFCs can also disturb the heart meter, which can lead to death. Exposure to large quantum of CFCs could potentially beget asphyxiation, according to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention [2].

Humans can come in contact with CFCs through ingestion or skin contact. After dermal commerce with CFCs, some people might have skin vexation, or dermatitis. According to the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Lore’s, exposure to pressurized CFCs, similar as that from a refrigerant leak, can beget frostbite on the skin. Direct skin exposure to CFCs has not been linked to cancer, according to the Scottish Environment Protection Agency. Ingestion of CFCs can beget nausea, puking, diarrhoea or other worried to the digestive tract [3].

CFCs contribute to the loss of the defensive ozone sub caste, which blocks ultraviolet shafts from the sun. This exposes further people to UV radiation, which can beget skin cancer. According to the University of Georgia, one in five Americans develops skin cancer in his or her continuance. Indeed if they do not develop skin cancer, some individualities witness wrinkled, thick or tough skin from too important sun exposure and also, increased contact with ultraviolet shafts can beget cataracts, macular degeneration and other eye damage [4].

Breathing in canvas bank, as anyone who has ever endured the experience well knows, is exceedingly unwelcome. But further than being a flash annoyance, gobbling the smothers created by the combustion of petroleum products can have both short-and longerterm health hazards. Acutely, these goods centre primarily on the respiratory system, whereas over the long term they can affect a variety of organ systems [5]. The hazards affect from both the physical goods of gobbling bank anyhow of its molecular composition and the chemical goods created by the way in which specific motes interact with the body’s cellular outfit; the ultimate are frequently not incontinently apparent and are therefore more insidious [6].

Cuisine in both private and artificial kitchens involves situations of combustion that produce products that can pose respiratory and other health hazards. In some cases, they’re composites created at high temperatures by the breakdown or emulsion of other, substantially benign products; these composites include polycyclic sweet hydrocarbons (PAHs) and analogous substances. But in other cases, it’s the addition of canvases to foods, as with frying, that’s directly dangerous under conditions of poor ventilation. Aerosolized driblets of the fats in the cuisine canvases can enter the respiratory tree and irritate the mucosa, or filling, of the windpipe and bronchi [7]. These goods can be observed in a drop in forced expiratory volume (FEV) in pulmonary function tests administered to people who have been exposed to these processes. Though the long- term goods aren’t known, it’s easily a good idea to use acceptable ventilation when using cuisine canvases or preparing foods at high temperatures. [8].

In the early part of the 20th century, refrigerator manufacturers used such toxic chemicals as ammonia, methyl chloride and sulfur dioxide as refrigerants. Several fatal accidents prompted people to keep their refrigerators outside and manufacturers to search for a better refrigerant. They found one in 1928, when Thomas Midgley, Jr. and Charles Franklin Kettering invented Freon, which was the DuPont Co.’s trade name for chemicals otherwise known as chlorofluorocarbons. As a nontoxic and non-flammable alternative to the chemicals that were in use, Freon was considered a miracle compound up until the 1970s, when scientists discovered its effect on Earth’s ozone layer [9].

Because they are such inert compounds, CFCs can persist in the atmosphere for 20 to 100 yrs. This gives them ample time to migrate up to the upper stratosphere, where the energetic sunlight at that altitude breaks them down and releases free chlorine. Chlorine isn’t usually available in the atmosphere, and it acts as a catalyst to convert ozone, a compound with three oxygen atoms, to molecular oxygen. This reaction thins Earth’s ozone layer and creates a seasonal “hole” over the Antarctic. Besides this, CFCs also contribute to the greenhouse effect, which results in the steady warming of the surface of the planet [10].

Conflict of Interest

None

Acknowledgement

None

1. Mironov OG (1968) Hydrocarbon pollution of the sea and its influence on marine organisms. Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen 17(1-4): 335-339.

Google Scholar, Crossref       

2. Ramanathan V (1975) Greenhouse Effect Due to Chlorofluorocarbons: Climatic Implications. Science New Series 190(4209): 50-52.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Ramanathan V, Feng Y (2009) Air pollution, greenhouse gases and climate change: Global and regional perspectives. Atmos Environ 43(1): 37-50.

Google Scholar, Crossref       

4. Lee Bing Sun, Chiou Chung Biau (2008) The Relationship of Meteorological and Anthropogenic Factors to Time Series Measurements of CFC-11, CFC-12, and CH3CCl3 Concentrations in the Urban Atmosphere. Atmos Environ 42(33): 7707.

Google Scholar, Crossref       

5. Bullister JL, Wisegarver DP, Menzia FA (2002) The solubility of sulfur hexafluoride in water and seawater. Deep Sea Res I Oceanogr Res Pap 49(1): 175-187. 

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Wanninkhof  R, Ledwell JR, Watson AJ (1991) Analysis of sulfur hexafluoride in seawater. J Geophys Res Planets 96(C5): 8733.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

7. Bu X, Warner MJ (1995) Solubility of chlorofluorocarbon 113 in water and seawater. Deep Sea Res I Oceanogr Res Pap 42(7): 1151-1161.

Google Scholar, Crossref       

8. Min DH, Warner MJ, Bullister JL (2010) Estimated rates of carbon tetrachloride removal in the thermocline and deep waters of the East Sea (Sea of Japan). Mar Chem 121(1-4): 100-111.

Google Scholar      

9. Fine Rana A (2011) Observations of CFCs and SF6 as ocean tracers (PDF). Ann Rev Mar Sci 3(1): 173-195. 

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

10. Watanabe YW, Shimamoto A, Ono T (2003) Comparison of Time-Dependent Tracer Ages in the Western North Pacific: Oceanic Background Levels of SF6, CFC-11, CFC-12 and CFC-113. J Oceanogr 59(5): 719-729.

Google Scholar, Crossref