Optometry: Open Access
Open Access

Traumatic optic neuropathy (TON) may be a vision-threatening clutter that can be caused by either visual or head injury and is categorized into coordinate and circuitous TON. Coordinate TON is regularly related with serious visual misfortune and a lower chance of recuperation compared to circuitous TON [1]. Coordinate TON regularly happens when the optic nerve is slashed with bone parts or when wound or concussion causes anatomical disturbance. In differentiate, backhanded TON regularly happens when a limit head or visual traumatic stretch is transmitted through the oculofacial delicate tissues and skeleton to the optic nerve; this harms the judgment of the optic nerve, driving to mild-to-severe vision misfortune. It usually occurs at the junction of the intraorbital and intracanalicular segments causing compression and disruption of the pial vessels, thereby reducing the vascular supply of the optic nerve [2].

Materials and Methods The literature published from 1950 to Walk 2020 was reviewed by looking the ISI Web of Information database, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The following catchphrases were utilized: “traumatic optic neuropathy,” “TON,” “treatment,” “direct TON,” “indirect TON,” “pathogenesis,” and “prognosis.” No dialect limitations were connected. Articles and metaanalyses that published information almost TON was chosen through audit of abstracts, references, and titles [3].

Results

Epidemiology

TON is an abnormal cause of visual disability after limit or entering head injury. The overall incidence of TON is 0.7–2.5%. Circuitous TON has a higher predominance than coordinate TON. It happens in 0.5% to 5% of all patients with closed head harm and 2.5% of patients with midfacial breaks. Intracanalicular portion is the most common location of roundabout TON, taken after by the orbital pinnacle. Association of both the intracanalicular portion and orbital summit was found in 11.9% of the cases. The intracranial parcel of the optic nerve adjacent to the falciform tendon is another common location for optic nerve traumatic damage [4].

TON encompasses sexual orientation prevalence. Up to 80% of patients with TON have been detailed to be male with a middle age of 31 a long time, and 21% are more youthful than 18 a long time. Having a drop (26%), engine vehicle mishaps (21%), and assaults (21%) are common etiologies of TON within the general population. However, in injury settings, engine vehicle accidents (63%) and falling down are the most etiologies [5,6]. TON happens in 0.4% of patients with any kind of trauma. There may be a conspicuous affiliation between TON and head harm, wherein all patients with TON have head injuries. Epidemiologic features of TON in pediatric patients are similar to those in adults. Having a fall (50%) and motor vehicle accidents (40%) are the most common causes of TON in the pediatric population.

Pathogenesis

The pathophysiology of TON isn't yet fully caught on, but a few components have been proposed. TON cases can be categorized as essential or auxiliary. Mechanical shearing of the optic nerve axons and contusion rot due to quick ischemia from damage to the optic nerve microcirculation are essential mechanisms, while apoptosis of both harmed and at first intaglio adjacent neurons is the pillar of auxiliary TON. Many patients have the inclusion of both instruments to a certain degree [7].

A fundamental portion of the pathophysiology of roundabout TON is the impact of traumatic loads on the biomechanical reaction of the cranial substance. One consider utilizing holographic interferometry on human skulls recommended that harm to the frontal locale misshapes the ipsilateral orbital roof, causing harm to the optic nerve and its supporting vasculature, particularly where the nerve enters the optic canal [8]. Based on an anatomic ponder of cadaveric circles and optic nerves, coordinate shearing harm to axons, disturbance of the blood supply, and weight from microhematomas and edema due to the harm of anastomoses running between the dura and pia are the conceivable instruments of optic nerve damage.

Diagnosis

Clinical Finding

In patients with craniofacial trauma and typical globe and optic nerve head appearance, any evidence of optic nerve brokenness recommends the determination of indirect TON. Clinical discoveries that offer assistance diagnose TON incorporate (1) visual harm, (2) a relative afferent pupillary deformity (RAPD), (3) variable degrees of vision loss, (4) color vision clutter, and (5) distinctive degrees of visual field absconds. RAPD may be a important finding, and in cases with mellow TON, it may be the as it were clinical finding before unmistakable optic nerve decay [9, 10, 11]. The truth that RAPD is negative in reciprocally symmetric cases ought to be considered.

Visual keenness (VA) may run from typical to no light recognition, and 40–60% of cases have light discernment or more regrettable at the time of to begin with ophthalmic visit [12, 13]. Although the destitute VA of the patients may not permit the ophthalmologist to achieve profitable comes about, automated visual field testing ought to be advertised in doable circumstances.

CT scan

CT is the leading and most open imaging method for recognizing optic canal breaks, orbital wall fractures, and the nearness of blood within the circle. It is very helpful in diagnosing coordinate or backhanded TON and can too be used as a direct outline for surgical intercessions [14]. It is observed that in patients with backhanded TON and back orbital fractures, the guess is poorer than that in patients with indirect TON and front orbital breaks, recommending a prognostic esteem for CT check.

Doppler Sonography

Ultrasound Doppler has been employed in patients with TON to assess the hemodynamic indices of the central retinal artery (CRA). The reduction of peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and time-average mean velocity (TAMX) have been reported in TON eyes. This finding was confirmed by another study that showed reduction of PSV and EDV in the CRA of the injured eye [15, 16].

Treatment

Medical Treatment of TON

A visual recuperation rate of about 50% is anticipated taking after preservationist management in circuitous TON, where pattern VA plays the most part in the expectation of last visual result. To gauge the brilliant time of restorative or surgical treatment, a longitudinal consider by Kanamori et al. was performed to analyze the diminish in ganglion cell populace and nerve fiber layer thickness taking after TON [17, 18]. They detailed that the diminish begun two weeks after injury and stopped changing after 20 weeks. Appropriately, it was recommended that the treatment ought to be begun inside 20 weeks following the rate of TON [19].

The pharmacological rationale of using corticosteroids for TON arose from their benefits in the management of CNS injuries in animal models. According to these studies, it was hypothesized that steroids exert neuroprotective effects through their antioxidant properties [20, 21]. Animal models of steroid efficacy for the treatment of TON, however, yielded inconclusive observations. Ohlsson et al. failed to show any effectiveness of steroid therapy on retinal axon and ganglion cell survival. In another study, it was found that steroids exacerbated axonal loss following optic nerve damage in a dose-dependent fashion. However, Lew et al. reported an improved optic nerve blood flow following high-dose corticosteroid therapy in 10 rabbits with experimental TON [22].

Considering human studies, the use of high-dose corticosteroids for TON was extrapolated from the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study results. Although the debate surrounding the NASCIS results has never come to a conclusion, a review by one of the investigators of the NASCIS supported the idea that steroids help in neurological salvage when administered within 8 hours of spinal cord injury [23].

Conclusions

TON is an uncommon vision-threatening disorder that should be considered in a patient with ocular or head trauma and decreased VA. Detection of an afferent pupillary defect in the presence of an intact globe and clear media strongly suggests TON, and neuroimaging must be performed in this clinical setting. Although there is no definitive treatment for TON, the use of EPO can be beneficial in some patients.

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

1. Mensher J (1979) Duke-Elder’s Practice of Refraction. Arch Ophthalmol 97: 1999–1999.

Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Lai YH, Sheu SJ, Wang HZ (2020) A simple and effective protective shield for the ophthalmoscope to prevent COVID-19. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 36: 570-571.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Sheehan M, Goncharov A, Sheehan M, Goncharov A (2011) Unwanted reflections during slit lamp assisted binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy. JMOP 58: 1848–1856.

Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Deshmukh A.V, Badakere A, Sheth J, Bhate M, Kulkarni S, et al.(2020) Pivoting to teleconsultation for paediatric ophthalmology and strabismus: Our experience during COVID-19 times. Indian J Ophthalmol 68: 1387–1391.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Sharma M, Jain N, Ranganathan S, Sharma N, Honavar SG, et al. (2020) Tele-ophthalmology: Need of the hour. Indian J Ophthalmol 68: 1328–1338.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Pandey N, Srivastava R, Kumar G, Katiyar V, Agrawal S (2020) Teleconsultation at a tertiary care government medical university during COVID-19 Lockdown in India – A pilot study. Indian J Ophthalmol 68: 1381-1383.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Shih KC, Chau CYC, Chan JCH, Wong JKW, Lai JSM (2020) Does the COVID-19 Pandemic Spell the End for the Direct Ophthalmoscope? Ophthalmol Ther 9: 689-692.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Lai THT, Tang EWH, Chau SKY, Fung KSC, Li KKW (2020) Stepping up infection control measures in ophthalmology during the novel coronavirus outbreak: an experience from Hong Kong. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 258: 1049–1055.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Johnson AT, Dooly CR, Brown EY (1994) Task performance with visual acuity while wearing a respirator mask. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 55: 818-822.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Yánez Benítez C, Güemes A, Aranda J, Ribeiro M, Ottolino P, et al.(2020) Impact of Personal Protective Equipment on Surgical Performance During the COVID-19 Pandemic. World J Surg 44: 2842–2847.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

11. Clamp PJ, Broomfield SJ (2020) The challenge of performing mastoidectomy using the operating microscope with Covid-19 personal protective equipment (PPE). J Laryngol Otol 134: 1.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

12. Rincón Sánchez RA, Concha Mejía A, Viaña Ríos LM (2021) Quality of vision in endoscopy in the midst of a pandemic: Does PPE influence quality of vision during gastrointestinal endoscopy? Gastroenterol Hepatol 44: 637-643.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref


13. El-Nimri NW, Moghimi S, Fingeret M, Weinreb RN (2020) Visual Field Artifacts in Glaucoma With Face Mask Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Glaucoma 29: 1184–1184.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

14. Dooly CR, Johnson AT, Brown EY (1994) Performance Decrement Due to Altered Vision While Wearing a Respiratory Face Mask. Mil Med 159: 408–411.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

15. Moshirfar M, West WB, Marx DP (2020) Face Mask-Associated Ocular Irritation and Dryness. Ophthalmol Ther 9: 397–400.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

16. Arriola-Villalobos P, Burgos-Blasco B, Vidal-Villegas B, Oribio-Quinto C, Ariño-Gutiérrez M, et al. (2021) Effect of Face Mask on Tear Film Stability in Eyes With Moderate-to-Severe Dry Eye Disease. Cornea 40: 1336–1339.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

17. Aksoy M, Simsek M (2021) Evaluation of Ocular Surface and Dry Eye Symptoms in Face Mask Users. Eye Contact Lens 47: 555–558.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

18. YF T, EWT C (2020) Face Mask-Associated Recurrent Corneal Erosion Syndrome and Corneal Infection. Eye Contact Lens 47: 573–574.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

19. Rosner E (2020) Adverse Effects of Prolonged Mask Use among Healthcare Professionals during COVID-19. J Infect Dis Epidemiol 6: 130-139.

Google Scholar

20. Choudhury A, Singh M, Khurana DK, Mustafi SM, Sharma S, et al. (2020) Physiological Effects of N95 FFP and PPE in Healthcare Workers in COVID Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 24: 1169–1173.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

21. Marinova E, Dabov D, Zdravkov Y (2020) Ophthalmic complaints in face-mask wearing: prevalence, treatment, and prevention with a potential protective effect against SARS-CoV-2. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 34: 1323–1336.

Google Scholar, Crossref

22. Lim ECH, Seet RCS, Lee KH, Wilder-Smith EPV, Chuah BYS, et al. (2006) Headaches and the N95 face-mask amongst healthcare providers. Acta Neurol Scand 113: 199–202.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

23. Wolffe M (2015) How safe is the light during ophthalmic diagnosis and surgery. Eye 30: 186-187.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref