Virulence Repertoire of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from some Poultry Farms with Detection of Resistance to Various Antimicrobials and Plant Extracts

Elsayed MSA^1*, Ammar AM², Al shehri ZS³, Abd-El Rahman H⁴ and Abd-El Rahman NA⁵

¹Department of Bacteriology, Mycology and Immunology, University of Sadat City, Egypt

²Department of Microbiology, Zagazig University, Egypt

³Biomedical Science Department, College of Pharmacy -Shaqra Universty-KSA, Egypt

⁴Department of Physiology, University of Sadat City, Minufia, Egypt

⁵Veterinary Administration Minufia Governorate, Egypt

*Corresponding Author:

Elsayed MSA
Department of Bacteriology, Mycology and Immunology, University of Sadat City, Egypt
Tel: +20 48 2607037
E-mail: mohamed.sabry@vet.usc.edu.eg

Received date: April 01, 2016; Accepted date: August 26, 2016; Published date: August 30, 2016

Citation: Elsayed MSA, Ammar AM, Al shehri ZS, Abd-El Rahman H, Abd-El Rahman NA (2016) Virulence Repertoire of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from some Poultry Farms with Detection of Resistance to Various Antimicrobials and Plant Extracts. Cell Mol Biol 62:124. doi: 10.4172/1165-158X.1000124

Copyright: © 2016 Elsayed MAS, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Cellular and Molecular Biology

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a serious poultry pathogen and zoonotic bacterial agent causes nosocomial infections. The prevalence of virulence determinants among P. aeruginosa appears to be lacking in Egypt. Therefore, this study investigated occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and virulence gene profiling of P. aeruginosa in broiler chicken. Thirty eight cases (22.9%) were infected with P. aeruginosa, high isolation from dead-in-shell embryos 26 (52%) and significantly different (p<0.0001) when compared with that from diseased and freshly dead 12 (12%). Haemolysin and lipase gave highest rates 28 (73.68%) and 28 (73.68%). While, gelatinase, lecithinase and protease represented 24 (63.1%), 26 (68.42%) and 26 (68.42%) respectively. High distribution of Exotoxin A ( Exo A) and Outer membrane protein (opr L) genes 100% with strong uphill correlation (r):1. Strong relationship between OprL and antibiotic resistance. High resistance 100% to Amoxicillin (AMX), E- Moxclav (AMC). While, resistance to Cotrimoxazole (CMX), Ceftriaxone (CRO), Ofloxacin (OFX) showed 90%, 80% and 30%. Besides, no resistance to Ciprofloxacin (CIP) and Gentamycin (CN). Significant difference between efficacy of Formalin, EDTA, Savlon and Thyme (p<0.0001). Although, great efficacy differences between the MIC of EDTA, Formalin, Savlon and Thyme with 1%, 3%, 6% and 8%, Formalin gave the highest efficacy with 10%. Uphill strong correlation between the efficacies and concentrations of Formalin, EDTA, Savlon and Thyme (r): 0.97, 0.91, 0.92 and 0.80. In this study, we focused on elucidating virulence arsenal and resistance of P. aeruginosa to most antimicrobials. Providing evidential clues about efficacy of some antimicrobial compounds and plant extracts.

Keywords

Poultry; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Virulence; PCR; Resistance

Introduction

P. aeuroginosa is a motile, gram negative, oxidase positive, rod shaped with single arrangement or short chains. The organism is a strict aerobe, ubiquitous and often associated with soil, water and humid environment. It affects newly hatched chickens drastically causing high mortality and mass death of embryos [1-8]. P. aeruginosa got a huge arsenal of virulence repertoire implicated in pathogenesis. Attributed to the numbers of extracellular virulence factors and cellular components as lipopolysaccharide, elastase, alkaline proteases, pyocyanin, pyoverdin, haemolysins, phospholipase C, rhamnolipids, biofilm, Pilli, and flagella. The complex type III secretion system recognized virulence determinant of P. aeruginosa capable of injecting proteins and secretion toxins into the host cell. Four secretion toxin identified; exoenzyme S, exoenzyme U, exoenzyme T and exoenzyme Y [9-15].

Outer membrane lipoprotein (OprL) implicated in efflux transport systems and affecting cell permeability (4). The Exotoxin A is produced by most of P. aeruginosa strains with great similarity to diphtheria toxin. It can inhibit eukaryotic protein biosynthesis at the level of polypeptide chain elongation factor 2 [16].

P. aeruginosa is resistant to various antimicrobial agents due to impermeability, multi-drug efflux, and a chromosomal AmpC β-lactamase. Prominent resistance found among α-carboxy- and Amino-penicillins, third and fourth-generation Cephalosporins, Monobactams, Carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and Fluoroquinolones. Resistance to any of these classes could be due to various mutations that result in upregulation of efflux or down regulation of permeability. Besides, hyperproduction of the chromosomal AmpC β-lactamase in case of Aminopenicillins and Cephalosporins [17-23].

Many disinfectants and antiseptics are now commercially available. Great progress made to understand mechanisms of their antimicrobial actions. They include alcohols, aldehydes, halogens, phenols, halogenated phenolic and substituted phenolic compounds. Additional preparations are biguanides, peroxygens, tar acid phenol, quaternary ammonium compounds and chlorohexidine gluconate. Many of them are used extensively for variety of animate and inanimate surface applications. In particular, their application constitutes an essential part of infection control practices and aid in infection prevention [24].

The antimicrobial efficacy of plant extracts and phytochemicals evaluated [25] with antibiotic susceptible and resistant microorganisms. P. aeruginosa showed interesting, results since it was inhibited by clove, jambolan, pomegranate and thyme extracts. This inhibition observed with single extract and when used with lower concentrations of ineffective antibiotics. Many regions of the world privileged with medicinal plants rich in active phytochemicals with potential medicinal values. Even so, many studied species considered promising and representing natural settlement of antibiotic resistance problem [26,27].

Material and Methods

Sampling

A total of 150 broiler cases, 100 from 2-40 days old diseased and freshly dead (Nasal swabs, Throat swabs, Heart blood, Cloacal swabs and Liver tissue) were collected. And 50 from dead-in-shell embryos in hatcheries (Heart blood, Lung tissue, Peritoneal samples, Liver tissue, Intestinal samples and Yolk sac). Added to them 8 water and 8 litter samples.

Media and Biochemical Identification

Cetimide agar medium was used, colonial morphology, microscopic examination and biochemical identification according to [26], then confirmation using API 20 NE (Bio-Meriux) after the producer instructions.

Molecular Identification

DNA extraction

Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted from confirmed cultures by QIAamp DNA extraction Mini prep Kit after manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA stored at -80°C before PCR amplification. For each batch of extractions, a negative control containing reagents minus cultures and positive control of P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853.

PCR amplification

The used primers, PCR protocol and program according to [33]: Targeted primers, sequences, amplicon sizes and accession number listed in Table 1.

Table 1: Targeted primers, sequences, amplicon sizes and accession number.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Detection of bacterial count after 24 hrs growth according to [31] has identified P. aeruginosa cultivated onto Todd-Hewitt broth for 24 hrs. Then concentration of bacterial cells in 1 ml medium by centrifugation. Application of spectrophotometer at 660 nm to adjust the concentration to 1×10⁶ colony forming unit (CFU) per 1 ml sterile TSB for dilution of the concentrated bacterial isolates. From the adjusted 106 CFU /l-1 1 ml taken and spread on the surface of Muller- Hinton agar plates and the excess decanted away. Plates left to dry at 40 0C for 20 minutes in the incubator. Plates adjusted to be enough for antibiotic discs Amoxicillin AMX 25 mcg, Ciprofloxacin CIP 5 mcg, Ceftriaxone CRO 30 mcg, Cefuroxime CXM 30 mcg, E- Moxclav AMC 20 mcg, Cotrimoxazole CMX (Trimethoprim/ Sulphamethoxazole 25 mcg), Gentamycin CN10 mcg and Ofloxacin OFX 5 mcg. Agar plates for chemicals and plant extracts (Formalin, EDTA, Ethyl alcohol Only 70%, Isopropyl alcohol, Chlorohexidine cetramid (Savlon), Iodine, Sodium citrate, Allicin, Basil, Lemon citrus oil, Pomegranate and Thyme [27-31].

Wells made by the wide end of blunted sterile Pasteur pipette. Inserting it and twisting to remove the plug of agar a pair of forceps sterilized by flaming in alcohol used to remove the agar. Wells numbered and filled with 120 μl of chemicals or plant extracts then incubated at 37°C for 24-48hrs. The inhibition zone measured by ruler and efficacy determined after [3].

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of chemicals and plant extracts determined using the broth dilution method in Todd-Hewitt broth [28]. Each compound diluted 1 to 10% (v/v) only Ethyl alcohol was 70%. Transfer 1 ml of bacterial suspension (106CFU/ml) and 0.1 ml of each compound showing antibacterial efficacy added to 2.9 ml of Todd-Hewitt broth. After 24 hrs of incubation at 37°C under agitation in culture tubes, the MIC determined as the lowest concentration inhibit bacterial growth turbidity. To detect the MBC, 10 μL of bacterial inoculum removed from tubes with no turbidity and spread onto Todd-Hewitt agar. These plates incubated at 37°C for 48 hrs. The MBC considered as the lower concentration that shows no bacterial growth on Todd-Hewitt agar plates. Each MIC and MBC value obtained from three independent experiments and controls without test compounds used [32,33].

Statistical Analysis

Data analyzed by Statistical Analysis System software package SAS for Windows, version 8 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Independent t-test assesses the significance of the difference between numbers of isolates, efficacy of different chemicals and plant extracts. Statistical detection of the correlation coefficient of the presence of Exo A and opr L within isolates and efficacies and concentrations of antimicrobials was performed.

Results

Results of bacteriological examination: the total isolation result of P. aeruginosa was 38 /166 (22.9%). High isolation rate from deadin- shell embryos yolk sac 26/50 (52%). This result showed significant difference (p<0.0001) when being compared with that of liver of 2-40 days old diseased and freshly dead 12/100 (12%). Distribution of phenotypic virulence factors, haemolysin and lipase gave highest rates 28/38 (73.68%) and 28/38 (73.68%). While, gelatinase, lecithinase and protease represented 24/38 (63.1%), 26/38 (68.42%) and 26/38 (68.42%) respectively. These results proved high virulence repertoire owned by the P. aeruginosa confirming pathogenicity.

Molecular detection of ExoA, OprL genes, and phenotypic susceptibility to antimicrobials. There located high distribution of both genes within 100% of the obtained isolates with strong uphill correlation (r):1. A strong resistance of P. aeruginosa to screened antimicrobials with strong relationship between the presence of OprL and phenotypic antibiotic resistance (Regression line equation (y): (62.5). All isolates showed complete resistance 100% to Amoxicillin (AMX), E- Moxclav (AMC). While, resistance to Cotrimoxazole (CMX), Ceftriaxone (CRO), Ofloxacin (OFX) showed 90%, 80% and 30% respectively. Besides, no resistance to Ciprofloxacin (CIP) and Gentamycin (CN).

Concerning the results of testing the efficacy of various chemical substances, disinfectants, and essential oil extracts on P. aeruginosa. There located significant difference between the efficacy of Formalin, EDTA, Savlon and Thyme (p<0.0001). Although, great differences between the MIC of EDTA, Formalin, Savlon and Thyme with concentrations of 1%, 3%, 6%, and 8%. Formalin gave the highest efficacy with 10% concentration. Uphill strong correlation expressed between the efficacies and increased concentrations of Formalin, EDTA, Savlon and Thyme with correlation coefficients (r): 0.97, 0.91, 0.92, and 0.80 respectively.

Discussion

The pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa in birds is related to keratitis, keratoconjunctivitis, septicemia, respiratory infections, sinusitis, and soared embryonic death rates in hatcheries [10]. The total isolation rate (Table 1) was 38/166 (22.9%) of them 12/100 (12%) and 26 (52%) from liver of freshly dead and yolk sac of dead -in-shell embryos respectively, these results similar to [14]. While from the dead- in-shell embryos was higher than 2004 records from Egypt [19] which could be interpreted by the increased virulence and antimicrobial resistance which lead to existence of serious types of P. aeruginosa. The high mortalities reflected in high isolation results were due to the colonization of P. aeruginosa in eggs and degradation of yolk proteins making the environment conductive to the proliferation and installation of other pathogens. Localized or septicemic forms of P. aeruginosa infections dependent on its path of entrance, age and resistance of the host. Concerning the results of phenotypic virulence factors (Table 1), gelatinase and Lecithinase activities were like results reported from Romania in 2013 [11]. In addition to that, haemolysin production was similar to data from India in 2006 [18]. P. aeruginosa lipase is an important virulence factor induces harmful effects with other bacterial enzymes, in particular, Phospholipase C. Production of lipase activity by P. aeruginosa isolates contribute to pathogenicity which may suppress the immune response [8]. The result of protease production comes consistent with data from Iraq 2013 [20]. The relative contribution of each of these exoproducts implicated in virulence of P. aeruginosa may vary depending on site and type of infection [32].

The results of virulence factors clarified that most of the isolates expressed high virulence degrees. The interaction between virulence factors and host immune response determines severity and type of infections.

Molecular detection of (OprL) and (ExoA) gene loci confirmed distribution pattern in 38/38 (100%) of all P. aeruginosa with strong uphill correlation (r):1 (Table 2). There located significant resistance of P. aeruginosa to screened antimicrobials (p<0.0001). There found strong relationship between the presence of OprL and phenotypic antibiotic resistance (Regression line equation (y): 62.5. The highest resistance 100% showed to Amoxicillin (AMX), E- Moxclav (AMC). While, resistance to Cotrimoxazole (CMX), Ceftriaxone (CRO), and Ofloxacin (OFX) were 90%, 80%, and 30% respectively. Besides, no resistance to Ciprofloxacin (CIP) and Gentamycin (CN). Furthermore, the high results of ExoA coincides with published data from National Center for Toxicological Research, Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas in 1994 [16]. The results of genetic detection of outer membrane protein L agree with published results from Belgium in 1997 [4]. Regarding the antimicrobial sensitivity testing results, high sensitivity to gentamicin [25], Also the high P. aeruginosa sensitivity to Ciprofloxacin concurred with reported results from Iraq in 2013 [20] while, ceftriaxone like stated data from Lagos Nigeria in 2002 [23]. Resistance to Amoxicillin, E- Moxclav similar to data published on isolated P. aeruginosa from cattle in Bangladesh in 2013 [13]. Sensitivity to Cotrimoxazole agree with [30] while, resistance to Cefuroxime like published results from Tamale teaching hospital at the north of Ghana in 2013 (Table 3) [1].

Table 2: Genotypic detection of Exo A and opr L with relation to sensitivity to various antimicrobials.

Table 3: Susceptibility testing of P. aeruginosa with chemical substances, disinfectants and essential oil extracts from some medicinal herbs.

Meditating in results of antimicrobial effect of chemical substances (Table 4). Formalin gave notable efficacy with a concentration of 3% concurred with stated data from Al-Hilla teaching hospital Iraq in 2012 [9]. P. aeruginosa was sensitive to 1% of EDTA with a proportional relationship between concentrations and efficacies [2]. Resistance to Ethanol and Isopropyl alcohols disagree with [12]. While, susceptibility to Savlon with concentration of 6% agrees with their results. Essential oils produced no efficacy except Thyme at a concentration of 8% concurred with [21]. The presence of outer membrane proteins increased resistance to various tested antibiotics, chemicals, and plant extracts. Outer membrane proteins implicated in interaction with an environment, efflux transport systems, and cell permeability [22].

Table 4: Antimicrobial effect of chemical substances.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the gained results proved high virulence repertoire owned by the P. aeruginosa confirming pathogenicity. Outer membrane protein is responsible for most of resistance expressed by P. aeruginosa. Expressed sensitivity to EDTA, Formalin, Savlon and Thyme with a proportional relationship between concentrations and efficacies. Further investigations are required for new antibacterial components and vaccine formulation.

References

1. Acquah S.E., Quaye L., Sagoe K., Ziem J.B., Bromberger P.I. & Amponsem A.A. Susceptibility of bacterial etiological agents to commonly-used antimicrobial agents in children with sepsis at the Tamale Teaching Hospital. BMC Infect. Dis. 2013, 13: 89-96.
2. Asbell M.A. & Eagon R.G. Role of multivalent cations in the organization, structure and assembly of the cell wall of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 1996, 92: 380-387.
3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial 5 Disk and Dilution susceptibility testing of bacteria isolated from animals approved 6 standard; 4th Edition. CSLI document Vet 01-A4 . Wayne, USA, 2013: 33(7).
4. De Vos D., Lim A.J., Pirnay J.P., Struelens M.,Vandenvelde C., Duinslaeger L., Vanderkelen A. & Cornelis P. Direct detection and identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in clinical samples such as skin biopsy specimens and expectorations by multiplex PCR based on two outermembrane lipoprotein genes, oprI and oprL. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35: 1295-1299.
5. Dinev I., Denev S. & Beev G. Clinical and morphological studies on spontaneous cases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in birds. Pak. Vet. J. 2013, 33: 398-400.
6. Engel J. & Balachandran P. Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III effectors in disease. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2009, 12: 61-66.
7. Finlayson E. A. & Brown P. D. Comparison of antibiotic resistance and virulence factors in pigmented and non-pigmented Pseudomonas aeruginosa. West Indian. Med. J. 2011, 60: 24.
8. Friedl P., Konig B. & Konig W. Effects of mucoid and non-mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients on inflammatory mediator release from human polymorphonuclear granulocytes and rat mast cells. Immunology. 1992, 76: 86-94.
9. Habeeb R.H., Saad S.N. & Al-Jubory A. A study of efficacy of disinfectants and bacterial contamination in Al-hilla teaching hospital. Med. J. Babylon. 2012, 9: 890-900.
10. Hai-ping H. E. Isolation and identify of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chicken dead-embryos Chinese Qingha . J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2009, 3: 25-27.
11. Holban A. M., Chifiriuc M. C., Cotar A. I., Bleotu C., Grumezescu A. M., Banu O. & Lazar V. Virulence markers in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from hospital acquired infections occurred in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease. Rom. Biotech. Letters. 2013, 18: 8843-8845.
12. Hossain M.D., Rahman S.M., Bhuiyan R.H., Islam M.S. Chowdhury A.M. & Alauddin M. Isolation of bacteria from various sites of a pharmaceutical industry and evaluation of their susceptibility to some commonly used disinfectants. The Chittagong Univ. J. B. Sci. 2010, 5: 77-89.
13. Hossain M. G., Saha S., Rahman M. M., Singha J. K. & Mamun A. A. Isolation, identification and antibiogram study of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from cattle in Bangladesh. J. Vet. Adv. 2013, 3:180-185.
14. John B. H. Other bacterial diseaes: Pseudomonas. In diseases of poultry, edited by Calnek B.W., John Barnes H., Beard C.W., Mcdougald L.R. & Saif Y. M., (10th edition) 1997, 4: 291 -292.
15. Kebede F. Pseudomonas infection in chickens. J. Vet. Med. Anim. Health. 2010, 2: 55-58.
16. Khan A. A. & Cerniglia C. E. Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from clinical and environmental samples by amplification of the exotoxin A gene using PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994, 60: 3739-3745.
17. Khattab M.A., Nour M.S. & ElSheshtawy N.M. Genetic identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence genes among different isolates. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2015, 7: 274-277.
18. Mittal R., Khandwaha K. R., Gupta V., Mittal P. K. & Harjai K. Phenotypic characters of urinary isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and their association with mouse renal colonization. Indian J. Med. Res. 2006, 123: 67-72.
19. Mohamed H. A. Some studies on Pseudomonas species in chicken embryos and broilers in Assiut governorate. Ass. Univ. Bull. Environ. Res. 2004, 7: 1-9.
20. Mohammad H. H. Phenotypic investigation for virulence factors of pyocine producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn wounds. Iraq Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2013, 4: 2114.
21. Nascimento G.G., Locatelli J., Freitas P.C. & Silva G.L. Antibacterial activity of plant extracts and phytochemicals on antibiotic resistant bacteria. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2000, 31: 247-256.
22. Nikaido H. Prevention of drug access to bacterial targets: permeability barriers and active efflux. Science.1994, 264: 382-388.
23. Odusanya M. D. Antibiotic susceptibility of microorganisms at a general hospital in Lagos Nigeria. J. Natl. Med. Assoc. 2002, 94: 994-998.
24. Ogbulie. J. N., Adieze I. E. & Nwankwo N. C. Susceptibilty pattern of some clinical bacterial isolates to selected antibiotics and disinfectants. Polish J. Microbiol. 2008, 57: 199-204.
25. Osman O. F., Mansour J. S. & El-Hakim S. Honey compound for wound care: A preliminary report. Ann. Burns Fire Disasters. 2003, 16: 131-134.
26. Quinn P.J.,Markey B.K., Carter M.E., Donnelly W.J. & Leonard F.C. Veterinary microbiology and microbial disease. Text book MPG books Ltd, comwell. 2002; 11: 111.
27. Sabharwal N., Dhall S., Chhibber S. & Harjai K. Molecular detection of virulence genes as markers in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from urinary tract infections. Int. J. Mol. Epidemiol. Genet. 2014, 5: 125-134.
28. Sfeir J., Lefrançois C., Baudoux D., Derbré S. & Licznar P. In vitro antibacterial activity of essential oils against Streptococcus pyogenes. Evid. Based Complement Alternat. Med. 2013. 4: 269161.
29. Ulloa-Urizar G., Aguilar-Luis M.A., De Lama-Odr´Ä±a M.C., Camarena-Lizarzaburu J. & Mendoza J.V. Antibacterial activity of five Peruvian medicinal plants against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2015, 5: 928-931.
30. Vijayanarayana K., Rau N. R., Naik A. N., Bhavani Y., Girish T., Nair S. & Chama S. An appraisal of sensitivity and resistance pattern of organisms isolated from hospital acquired pneumonia patients. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5: 384-398.
31. Wiegand I., Hilpert K. & Hancock R.E. Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3:163-175.
32. Williams D. H. & Schaeffer A. J. Current concepts in urinary tract infections. Minerva Urol. Nefrol. 2004, 56: 15-31.
33. Xu J., Moore J.E., Murphy P.G., Millar B.C. & Elborn J.S. Early detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa comparison of conventional versus molecular (PCR) detection directly from adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF).  Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2004, 3: 21.