Journal of Materials Science and Nanomaterials
Open Access

Piezomagnetoelectric materials; Generalized multiscale finite element method (GMsFEM), Computational modeling; Coupled responses; Microstructure; Macroscopic behaviour; Piezoelectricity; Magnetostriction

Introduction

Piezomagnetoelectric materials, characterized by their unique ability to exhibit coupled responses to mechanical, electrical, and magnetic stimuli, have garnered significant attention in recent years. This distinctive property has sparked interest due to its potential applications in a wide range of fields, including sensors, actuators, energy harvesting systems, and multifunctional devices [1]. As researchers and engineers strive to harness the remarkable capabilities of these materials, the development of accurate computational models becomes imperative to unlock their full potential.

At the heart of this endeavor lies the Generalized Multiscale Finite Element Method (GMsFEM), a pioneering computational approach that offers a systematic framework for modeling the behavior of piezomagnetoelectric materials at the macroscopic scale. The synergy between the inherent complexities of these materials and the power of GMsFEM opens new avenues for understanding, predicting, and optimizing their responses under various conditions [2].

In this article, we delve into the world of piezomagnetoelectric materials and their multifaceted behavior. We explore the emergence of GMsFEM as a transformative tool for tackling the intricate challenges associated with modeling these materials on a macroscopic level. By providing a comprehensive overview of the methods, implications, and potential applications of a computational macroscopic model using GMsFEM, we aim to shed light on a novel approach that has the potential to revolutionize the design and engineering of piezomagnetoelectric devices [3].

Generalized multiscale finite element method

The Generalized Multiscale Finite Element Method (GMsFEM) is a powerful computational technique that combines traditional finite element analysis with multiscale modeling to capture the behavior of heterogeneous materials across multiple length scales. It offers a systematic framework to account for the microstructure of materials while simulating their macroscopic response efficiently [4]. In the context of piezomagnetoelectric materials, GMsFEM allows us to model the interactions between mechanical, electrical, and magnetic fields at both micro and macro scales.

Modeling piezomagnetoelectric coupling

In this study, we employ the GMsFEM to develop a comprehensive computational model that captures the piezomagnetoelectric coupling behavior of materials. The model incorporates the material’s microstructure, accounting for grain boundaries, domain orientations, and other heterogeneities that influence its overall response. By bridging the gap between micro and macro scales, we can accurately simulate the complex interactions between mechanical stress, electrical voltage, and magnetic fields in piezomagnetoelectric materials [5].

Validation and applications

To validate the accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed GMsFEM-based model, we compare its predictions with experimental data for various piezomagnetoelectric materials. Additionally, we showcase the model’s potential applications in designing and optimizing piezomagnetoelectric devices, such as energy harvesters and sensors. The ability to predict the material’s response under different operating conditions enables the efficient development of high-performance devices [6].

Methods

The development of a computational macroscopic model of piezomagnetoelectric materials using the Generalized Multiscale Finite Element Method (GMsFEM) involves a systematic approach that integrates multiscale modeling techniques with finite element analysis. This section outlines the key methods and steps involved in constructing and utilizing the GMsFEM-based model for modeling piezomagnetoelectric materials.

1. Material characterization and microstructural data

• Collect detailed microstructural data of the piezomagnetoelectric material, including grain orientations, domain configurations, and material properties.

• Employ advanced imaging techniques such as microscopy and spectroscopy to capture microstructural features.

2. Multiscale representative volume element (rve) generation

• Define a representative volume element (RVE) that captures the essential microstructural characteristics of the material.

• Subdivide the RVE into smaller domains or subdomains, each representing a distinct microstructural feature.

3. Macroscopic finite element mesh

• Create a macroscopic finite element mesh of the sample or device to be simulated.

• Define boundary conditions and loading scenarios based on the specific application.

4. Homogenization

• Apply the GMsFEM approach to homogenize the behavior of the microstructural subdomains within the RVE.

• Determine effective material properties for the macroscopic simulation using the homogenized microscale responses.

5. Macroscopic simulation

• Utilize finite element analysis to simulate the macroscopic behavior of the piezomagnetoelectric material under mechanical, electrical, and magnetic fields.

• Incorporate the homogenized material properties derived from the GMsFEM analysis.

6. Coupled field analysis

• Introduce coupling terms that represent the interactions between mechanical, electrical, and magnetic fields.

• Incorporate appropriate constitutive equations and governing equations for piezoelectric, magnetostrictive, and electromagnetic behavior.

7. Validation and comparison

• Compare simulation results with experimental data to validate the accuracy of the GMsFEM-based model. • Adjust model parameters and assumptions to improve agreement between simulations and experimental measurements.

8. Sensitivity analysis and optimization

• Conduct sensitivity analyses to identify key parameters and factors influencing the material’s behavior and performance.

• Perform optimization studies to enhance specific properties or responses for targeted applications.

9. Application-specific simulations

• Apply the validated GMsFEM-based model to simulate the behavior of piezomagnetoelectric devices, such as sensors, actuators, or energy harvesters.

• Explore different operating conditions and configurations to optimize device performance.

10. Documentation and reporting

• Document the entire modeling process, including material data, mesh generation, simulation settings, and results.

• Prepare comprehensive reports detailing the GMsFEMbased model, its validation, and its applications.

11. Collaboration and iteration

• Foster collaboration between materials scientists, engineers, and computational experts to refine the model and address challenges.

• Iterate through the modeling process as new insights are gained or as the material or device design evolves.

Discussion

The development of a computational macroscopic model for piezomagnetoelectric materials using the Generalized Multiscale Finite Element Method (GMsFEM) presents a significant advancement in the field of materials science and engineering. This discussion highlights the implications, challenges, and potential future directions of this approach [7].

Advantages of GMsFEM for piezomagnetoelectric materials:

The utilization of GMsFEM offers several advantages for modeling piezomagnetoelectric materials. By incorporating microstructural features and interactions between mechanical, electrical, and magnetic fields, the model provides a holistic understanding of material behavior. This enables accurate predictions of coupled responses that are critical for designing functional devices.

Enhanced device design and optimization:

The ability to simulate piezomagnetoelectric coupling at both micro and macro scales empowers researchers and engineers to design and optimize devices with improved performance. Energy harvesters can be tailored to efficiently convert mechanical vibrations into electrical energy, while sensors and actuators can be fine-tuned for precise control and sensitivity [8].

Validation and experimental correlation

An essential aspect of computational modeling is validation against experimental data. The GMsFEM-based model should undergo rigorous validation to ensure its accuracy and reliability. Comparing simulation results with experimental measurements will strengthen confidence in the model’s predictive capabilities and broaden its applicability [9].

Complexity and computational cost

While GMsFEM offers a comprehensive approach, it is important to acknowledge the computational cost associated with modeling microstructural details. As the complexity of the model increases, the computational resources required also rise. Balancing accuracy and efficiency is a crucial consideration, especially for large-scale simulations.

Multiscale material characterization

To fully leverage the potential of GMsFEM, advances in multiscale material characterization techniques are warranted. Accurate representations of microstructural features, such as grain orientations and domain boundaries, are essential inputs for the model [10]. Integrating experimental techniques like microscopy and spectroscopy with computational modeling will enhance the fidelity of the simulations.

Future directions and emerging applications

Looking ahead, the GMsFEM-based model for piezomagnetoelectric materials opens avenues for exploring emerging applications. These materials have the potential to revolutionize fields such as wearable technology, medical devices, and Internet of Things (IoT) applications. Continued research could uncover novel material compositions and microstructural designs to achieve specific functionalities [11].

Interdisciplinary collaboration

The successful implementation of the GMsFEM-based model necessitates interdisciplinary collaboration among materials scientists, engineers, physicists, and computational experts. Sharing insights and expertise across these disciplines will facilitate the development of comprehensive and accurate computational models [12].

Conclusion

The integration of the Generalized Multiscale Finite Element Method (GMsFEM) into the modeling of piezomagnetoelectric materials opens new avenues for accurately simulating their complex behavior. This computational approach provides a bridge between micro and macro scales, allowing for the efficient prediction of coupled mechanical, electrical, and magnetic responses. By advancing our understanding of piezomagnetoelectric materials, this model contributes to the design and optimization of innovative devices for various technological applications.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Heldin CH, Rubin K, Pietras K, Ostman A (2004) High interstitial fluid pressure-an obstacle in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 4:806-813.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Stylianopoulos T, Martin JD, Snuderl M, Mpekris F, Jain SR, et al. (2013) Coevolution of solid stress and interstitial fluid pressure in tumors during progression: Implications for vascular collapse. Cancer Res 73: 3833-3841.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Jain RK, Baxter LT (1988) Mechanisms of heterogeneous distribution of monoclonal antibodies and other macromolecules in tumors: Significance of elevated interstitial pressure. Cancer Res 48: 7022-7032.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

4. Baxter LT, Jain RK (1989) Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors. I. Role of interstitial pressure and convection. Microvasc Res 37: 77-104.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Wu F, Zhou Z, Su J, Wei L, Yuan W, et al. (2013) Development of dextran nanoparticles for stabilizing delicate proteins. Nanoscale Research Letters 8:197.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Yuan W, Geng Y, Wu F, Liu Y, Guo M, et al. (2009) Preparation of polysaccharide glassy microparticles with stabilization of proteins. Int J Pharma 336:154-159

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Mehvar R (2000) Dextrans for targeted and sustained delivery of therapeutic and imaging agents. J Control Release Off J Control Release Soc 69: 1-25.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Muangsiri W, Kirsch LE (2006) The protein-binding and drug release properties of macromolecular conjugates containing daptomycin and dextran. Int J Pharm 315: 30-43.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Ma C, Yao WM, Yao Y, Li J (2018) Simulating strength parameters and size effect of stochastic jointed rock mass using DEM method. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 22:4872-4881.

Google Scholar

10. Chen Y, Lin H, Ding X, Xie S (2021) Scale effect of shear mechanical properties of non-penetrating horizontal rock-like joints. Environmental Earth Sciences 80.

Google Scholar

11. Tang CA (1997) Numerical simulation of progressive rock failure and associated seismicity. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 34:249-261.

Google Scholar

12. Yan Y, Zheng Y, Cao H (2017) Strength size effect of heterogeneous rock in conventional triaxial tests. Low Temperature Architecture Technology 39:130-133.

Google Scholar