Journal of Pulmonology and Respiratory Diseases
Open Access

Pulmonary edema; Diagnosis; Treatment; Mechanisms; Cardiogenic; Non-cardiogenic

Introduction

Pulmonary edema (PE) refers to the abnormal accumulation of fluid within the lung interstitium and alveolar spaces, which results in impaired oxygen exchange and respiratory distress. It is a serious medical condition with significant morbidity and mortality rates if not treated promptly. The pathophysiology of PE is diverse, with two main categories: cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic [1,2]. In cardiogenic pulmonary edema, left ventricular dysfunction leads to increased hydrostatic pressure in the pulmonary vasculature, causing fluid leakage into the alveoli. In contrast, non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema occurs due to a variety of causes, including inflammation, capillary leakage, and altered permeability of the alveolar-capillary barrier [3]. Conditions like acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), high-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE), and neurogenic pulmonary edema fall under this category [4]. The clinical presentation of pulmonary edema varies depending on the etiology and severity but commonly includes symptoms such as severe dyspnea, orthopnea, cough with frothy sputum, and cyanosis. Hypoxemia is a hallmark sign, and the patient may exhibit tachypnea, tachycardia, and crackles on auscultation of the lungs [5]. Diagnosing PE involves a combination of clinical evaluation and diagnostic tests, including chest X-rays, echocardiography, and pulmonary function tests, which help confirm the presence of fluid in the lungs and assess cardiac function. Treatment strategies for pulmonary edema are aimed at addressing the underlying cause and alleviating symptoms [6]. In cardiogenic PE, management typically includes diuretics, vasodilators, and medications to improve cardiac function. For non-cardiogenic causes, interventions like positive pressure ventilation, mechanical ventilation, and anti-inflammatory agents may be necessary [7]. Overall, early recognition and a tailored treatment approach are essential in improving patient outcomes. This review delves into the mechanisms, diagnostic methods, and treatment approaches for pulmonary edema, as well as the latest developments in clinical care [8].

Results

Pulmonary edema can manifest through a variety of clinical symptoms and diagnostic findings. In cases of cardiogenic pulmonary edema, imaging studies such as chest X-rays typically reveal bilateral alveolar infiltrates with a characteristic "butterfly" pattern. Elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels and abnormal echocardiography findings can indicate left ventricular dysfunction as the underlying cause. Conversely, non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema, such as ARDS, may show diffuse pulmonary infiltrates without the typical cardiogenic signs. Arterial blood gas analysis in PE often demonstrates hypoxemia, and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio is an important marker for assessing the severity of ARDS. In clinical trials, early use of diuretics and vasodilators in patients with cardiogenic PE has been shown to reduce fluid overload and improve symptoms more rapidly. Additionally, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has been increasingly used in cases of acute pulmonary edema to support gas exchange, especially in patients with COPD or heart failure exacerbations. Mechanical ventilation, particularly in ARDS patients, is often required in severe cases to maintain oxygenation and prevent further lung injury. The overall success of these treatments is contingent upon timely intervention and appropriate monitoring, including continuous pulse oximetry and arterial blood gas measurements. Advancements in treatment protocols, such as the use of ultrafiltration techniques for fluid removal and tailored ventilation strategies, have led to improved survival rates and reduced complications in PE patients. Long-term outcomes also depend on managing the underlying cause, including chronic heart failure or ARDS.

Discussion

Pulmonary edema remains a challenging clinical syndrome that demands a multifaceted approach to management. Its diverse etiology necessitates a tailored treatment strategy that targets the underlying cause, while also focusing on symptom relief and supportive care. Cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) is commonly caused by left ventricular dysfunction, which leads to elevated pulmonary venous pressures, promoting the extravasation of fluid into the alveolar spaces. This results in impaired gas exchange and respiratory distress. Early intervention with diuretics, such as furosemide, and vasodilators like nitroglycerin, can significantly improve symptoms by reducing fluid overload and optimizing cardiac output. In non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema, the pathophysiology involves increased permeability of the alveolar-capillary barrier, as seen in ARDS, HAPE, or neurogenic pulmonary edema. These conditions often require advanced respiratory support, such as mechanical ventilation, and pharmacological agents that reduce inflammation and modulate the immune response. For instance, corticosteroids may be used in some cases of ARDS, although their role remains controversial. One of the critical advancements in PE management is the use of positive pressure ventilation techniques. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) are commonly used to improve oxygenation in patients with acute pulmonary edema. These non-invasive methods have been shown to reduce the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation, offering a less invasive and more comfortable alternative for patients with milder forms of PE. Despite these advancements, challenges remain in the timely diagnosis and management of PE. Delays in initiating treatment or misdiagnosis, particularly in the case of non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema, can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, the use of biomarkers such as BNP and procalcitonin in distinguishing between different types of PE and guiding therapy requires further investigation.

Conclusion

Pulmonary edema is a complex condition that can arise from a variety of causes, including both cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic mechanisms. The key to improving patient outcomes lies in early recognition, accurate diagnosis, and prompt intervention. While advancements in treatment, such as the use of diuretics, vasodilators, and positive pressure ventilation, have significantly improved clinical management, the condition continues to pose challenges due to its multifactorial nature. Ongoing research into the pathophysiology of PE and the development of targeted therapies may offer new avenues for better management in the future. Clinicians must remain vigilant in identifying the underlying cause of pulmonary edema and apply evidence-based interventions to optimize patient care. With timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment, the prognosis for patients with pulmonary edema has improved, though further work is needed to refine treatment protocols and ensure more effective management

References

1. Abdelaal M, Roux CW, Docherty NG (2017) Morbidity and mortality associated with obesity. Ann Transl Med 5: 161.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Pedraza F, García R, Andrés A, Barrera HV, Esteban JH, et al. (2018) Comorbidities and risk of mortality among hospitalized patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Spain from 2002 to 2014. Respir Med 138: 137-143.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Han MK, Murray S, Fell CD, Flaherty KR, Toews GB, et al. (2008) Sex differences in physiological progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J 31: 1183-1188.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Mooney J, Raimundo K, Chang E, Michael S (2016) Association between Clinical Characteristics and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am Thorac Soc.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Gannon WD, Lederer DJ, Biscotti M, Javaid A, Patel NM, et al. (2018) Outcomes and Mortality Prediction Model of Critically Ill Adults With Acute Respiratory Failure and Interstitial Lung Disease. Chest 153: 1387-1395.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Alakhras M, Decker PA, Nadrous HF, Clavell MC, Ryu JH, et al. (2007) Body mass index and mortality in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 131: 1448-1453.

 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Kishaba T, Nagano H, Nei Y, Yamashiro S (2016) Body mass index-percent forced vital capacity-respiratory hospitalization: new staging for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients. J Thorac Dis 8: 3596-3604.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Jouneau S, Rousseau C, Lederlin M, Lescoat A, Kerjouan M, et al. (2022) Malnutrition and decreased food intake at diagnosis are associated with hospitalization and mortality of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients. Clin Nutr 41: 1335-1342.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref