Clinical Research on Foot & Ankle
Open Access

Sprained ankle; Ligament injury; Ankle sprain; Diagnosis; Treatment; Rehabilitation; Prevention

Introduction

Sprained ankle injuries are ubiquitous in both athletic and non-athletic populations, representing a significant burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Despite their frequency, misconceptions and inadequate management strategies often lead to prolonged recovery times and increased risk of recurrence. Understanding the underlying mechanisms, appropriate diagnostic approaches, and evidence-based treatment interventions is essential for optimizing patient outcomes and reducing long-term sequelae associated with sprained ankles. The ankle joint is a complex structure composed of bones, ligaments, tendons, and muscles, facilitating stability and mobility. The most commonly affected ligaments in ankle sprains are the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), calcaneofibular ligament (CFL), and posterior talofibular ligament (PTFL). Sprains occur when these ligaments are subjected to excessive stress beyond their physiological limits, resulting in varying degrees of injury ranging from microscopic tears to complete ruptures. The pathophysiology involves a cascade of inflammatory responses, including edema, hemorrhage, and cellular infiltration, which contribute to pain, swelling, and impaired function [1].

The clinical presentation of a sprained ankle typically includes pain, swelling, bruising, and instability, with the severity varying depending on the extent of ligament damage. Healthcare professionals employ various diagnostic tools, such as physical examination maneuvers, imaging modalities (e.g., X-ray, MRI), and functional assessments, to accurately evaluate the injury and determine its classification (e.g., grade I, II, III). The management of sprained ankles encompasses both conservative and surgical approaches, with the choice of treatment influenced by factors such as injury severity, patient characteristics, and functional goals. Conservative measures often include the R.I.C.E. protocol (rest, ice, compression, elevation), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), immobilization (e.g., bracing, taping), physical therapy, and proprioceptive training. In cases of severe ligamentous damage or persistent symptoms, surgical intervention may be warranted to restore anatomical integrity and functional stability through techniques such as ligament repair or reconstruction [2].

Rehabilitation plays a crucial role in the recovery process following a sprained ankle injury, aiming to restore strength, flexibility, proprioception, and neuromuscular control while minimizing the risk of reinjury. Gradual progression through rehabilitation phases, guided by a structured exercise program and functional goals, facilitates safe return to pre-injury activity levels and reduces the likelihood of long-term sequelae. Preventing sprained ankles requires a multifaceted approach targeting modifiable risk factors and promoting injury mitigation strategies. Key preventive measures include pre-participation screening, appropriate footwear selection, neuromuscular training, balance and proprioceptive exercises, and environmental modifications (e.g., playing surface assessment). Educating athletes, coaches, and the general population on proper injury prevention techniques and early recognition of injury signs is essential for reducing the incidence and severity of sprained ankles [3].

Advancements in medical technology continue to shape the landscape of sprained ankle management. Novel imaging modalities, such as ultrasound and dynamic MRI, offer enhanced visualization of soft tissue structures, allowing for more accurate diagnosis and assessment of ligamentous integrity. Furthermore, regenerative medicine approaches, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy and mesenchymal stem cell injections hold promise in promoting tissue healing and reducing recovery times. Additionally, wearable sensors and biomechanical monitoring devices enable real-time assessment of gait mechanics and movement patterns, facilitating personalized rehabilitation programs and reducing the risk of reinjury [4].

The psychological impact of sprained ankle injuries extends beyond physical impairment, often encompassing emotional distress, fear of reinjury, and loss of confidence in one's abilities. Integrating psychological interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and motivational interviewing, into rehabilitation protocols can address psychological barriers and promote positive coping strategies. Furthermore, fostering a supportive environment within sports teams and community settings can enhance athlete resilience and facilitate successful return to play transitions [5].

Certain populations may present unique challenges in the management of sprained ankles. Pediatric patients, for example, require age-appropriate interventions considering growth plate involvement and developmental considerations. Pregnant individuals may experience biomechanical changes and hormonal influences affecting ligament laxity, necessitating tailored rehabilitation strategies. Additionally, individuals with comorbidities such as diabetes or peripheral neuropathy may exhibit delayed healing and heightened risk of complications, requiring vigilant monitoring and multidisciplinary collaboration in their care [6].

Sprained ankle injuries impose a considerable economic burden on healthcare systems, workplaces, and society at large. Direct medical costs associated with initial treatment, rehabilitation services, and surgical interventions are compounded by indirect costs related to lost productivity, absenteeism, and long-term disability. Implementing injury prevention programs and promoting early intervention strategies can mitigate the societal and economic impact of sprained ankles, thereby preserving individual well-being and optimizing resource allocation within healthcare systems. As our understanding of sprained ankle injuries continues to evolve, future research endeavors should focus on addressing knowledge gaps and exploring innovative solutions. Longitudinal studies examining the long-term outcomes and recurrence rates following different treatment modalities can inform evidence-based practice guidelines and refine prognostic indicators. Additionally, investigating the role of genetic predisposition, biomechanical factors, and environmental influences in ankle injury susceptibility may elucidate personalized risk profiles and guide targeted prevention strategies [7].

Ethical considerations in the management of sprained ankle injuries encompass patient autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. Healthcare providers must prioritize informed consent, shared decision-making and patient-centered care throughout the treatment process. Furthermore, ensuring equitable access to quality healthcare services and advocating for injury prevention initiatives promotes social justice and reduces health disparities among diverse populations. Sprained ankle injuries represent a multifaceted clinical entity with far-reaching implications for individuals, healthcare systems, and society. By embracing a holistic approach encompassing technological innovations, psychological support, special considerations, and societal impact assessment, and ethical considerations, healthcare providers can deliver comprehensive care that addresses the diverse needs of patients with sprained ankles. Through interdisciplinary collaboration and continued research endeavors, the field can strive towards optimal outcomes, improved quality of life, and enhanced societal well-being [8].

Sprained ankle injuries present unique challenges and considerations across different geographical regions and cultural contexts. Variations in healthcare infrastructure, access to resources, socioeconomic disparities, and cultural attitudes towards injury management can influence the prevalence, presentation, and outcomes of sprained ankles. Collaborative efforts between local healthcare providers, community leaders, and international organizations are essential for implementing culturally sensitive interventions, promoting health equity, and addressing the global burden of musculoskeletal injuries [9].

Environmental factors, such as weather conditions and terrain characteristics, play a significant role in the occurrence and severity of sprained ankle injuries. Adverse weather conditions, uneven surfaces, and inadequate footwear increase the risk of slips, trips, and falls, particularly in outdoor recreational activities and occupational settings. Climate change-related phenomena, including extreme weather events and ecological disruptions, may further exacerbate injury risks and necessitate adaptive strategies to mitigate environmental hazards and promote safety. Athletes participating in various sports disciplines face distinct challenges in the prevention and management of sprained ankles. Sports with high levels of cutting, pivoting, and jumping, such as basketball, soccer, and volleyball, carry elevated injury risks due to rapid directional changes and dynamic loading patterns. Tailoring injury prevention programs to address sport-specific movement patterns, biomechanical demands, and equipment requirements can reduce the incidence of sprained ankles and optimize athletic performance [10].

Education and public awareness campaigns play a crucial role in disseminating accurate information, dispelling myths, and promoting proactive measures to prevent sprained ankle injuries. Targeted educational initiatives aimed at athletes, coaches, parents, healthcare providers, and the general public can increase awareness of injury risk factors, early recognition of warning signs, and implementation of preventive strategies. Leveraging digital platforms, social media, and community outreach programs enhances the reach and effectiveness of educational interventions, empowering individuals to take ownership of their musculoskeletal health.

Interdisciplinary collaboration among healthcare professionals, researchers, policymakers, educators, and community stakeholders is essential for translating evidence into practice and bridging the gap between research and implementation. Multidisciplinary teams can facilitate knowledge exchange, interdisciplinary learning, and consensus-building around best practices in sprained ankle management. Furthermore, fostering partnerships between academic institutions, healthcare organizations, and industry stakeholders accelerates innovation, promotes evidence-based decision-making, and enhances the scalability and sustainability of interventions [11].

Central to effective sprained ankle management is a patient-centered approach that prioritizes individual preferences, values, and goals. Shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers fosters collaborative relationships, promotes informed choices, and enhances treatment adherence and satisfaction. Empowering patients with comprehensive information, clear communication, and support throughout the care continuum fosters resilience, self-efficacy, and engagement in their recovery journey.

As sprained ankle injuries continue to pose significant challenges to individuals, healthcare systems, and societies worldwide, a concerted call to action is warranted to address this public health concern. By leveraging interdisciplinary collaboration, technological innovations, cultural competence, environmental stewardship, and patient-centered care principles, stakeholders can collectively work towards reducing the incidence, mitigating the impact, and optimizing outcomes associated with sprained ankles. Together, we can promote musculoskeletal health, enhance injury prevention efforts, and empower individuals to lead active and fulfilling lives free from the burden of sprained ankle injuries [12].

Conclusion

Sprained ankle injuries represent a significant clinical concern with implications for both individual health and healthcare resource utilization. By understanding the anatomy, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment modalities, rehabilitation principles, and prevention strategies associated with sprained ankles, healthcare providers can deliver optimal care and empower patients to achieve favorable outcomes. Continued research efforts aimed at refining diagnostic methods, therapeutic interventions, and preventive measures are warranted to further advance the management of sprained ankle injuries.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Singer AJ, Tassiopoulos, Kirsner RS (2018) Evaluation and Management of Lower-Extremity Ulcers.N Engl J Med 378(3): 302-303.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA (2017) Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence.N Engl J Med 376(24): 2367-2375.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Mutluoglu M, Uzun G, Turhan V, Gorenek L, Ay H et al. (2012) How reliable are cultures of specimens from superficial swabs compared with those of deep tissue in patients with diabetic foot ulcers?J Diabetes Complications 26(3): 225-229.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Malhotra R, Chan CS, Nather A (2014) Osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot.Diabet Foot Ankle 5: 24445-24456.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Mutluoglu M, Uzun G, Sildiroglu O, Turhan V, Mutlu H et al. (2012) Performance of the probe-to-bone test in a population suspected of having osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetes.J Am Podiatr Med Assoc102(5): 369-373.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Eneroth M, Apelqvist J, Stenström A (1997) Clinical characteristics and outcome in 223 diabetic patients with deep foot infections.Foot Ankle Int 18(11): 716-722.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Lipsky BA, Pecoraro RE, Larson SA, Hanley ME, Ahroni JH (1990) Outpatient management of uncomplicated lower-extremity infections in diabetic patients.Arch Intern Med 150(4): 790-797.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

8. Hudish LI, Reusch JE, Sussel L (2019) Β cell dysfunction during progression of metabolic syndrome to type 2 diabetes. J Clin Investig 129: 4001-4008.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Jung CH, Son JW, Kang S, Kim WJ, Kim H et al. (2021) Diabetes fact sheets in korea, 2020: An appraisal of current status. Diabetes Metab J 45: 1-10.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Yano K, Ikari K, Inoue E, Sakuma Y, Mochizuki T, et al (2018) Features of patients with rheumatoid arthritis whose debut joint is a foot or ankle joint: a 5,479-case study from the IORRA cohort.PLoS One 13(9): 2-63.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

11. Rousseau J-C, Delmas PD (2007) Biological markers in osteoarthritis. Nature clinical practice.Rheumatology3: 346-356.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

12. Robinson WH (2016) Low-grade inflammation as a key mediator of the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis.Nature Reviews Rheumatology12: 580-592.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref