Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography
Open Access

Insects; Environment; Light intensity.

Introduction

Nocturnal insects play vital roles in ecosystem functioning, including pollination, decomposition, and serving as a food source for other organisms. ALAN disrupts their behavior, including foraging, mating, and navigation. High-intensity ALAN may attract insects, leading to increased mortality due to predation, exhaustion, or exposure to unfavourable conditions [1, 2].

Methodology

To assess the impact of ALAN on nocturnal insect communities, a study was conducted in forest-dominated landscapes with varying levels of artificial light. The study sites were categorized into three groups based on ALAN intensity: low, moderate, and high. Insect sampling was conducted using light traps, with data collected on species richness, abundance, and composition [3].

Findings

The study revealed significant differences in nocturnal insect communities among the three ALAN intensity groups. In areas with low ALAN intensity, insect diversity and abundance were relatively high, with a diverse range of species observed. Conversely, high ALAN intensity sites exhibited reduced insect diversity and abundance, dominated by generalist species tolerant to artificial light. Intermediate ALAN intensity areas displayed an intermediate pattern, indicating a dose-response relationship between ALAN and insect community composition.

Ecological implications

The observed shifts in insect communities have several ecological implications. Reduced insect diversity may disrupt ecosystem processes such as pollination and nutrient cycling, leading to cascading effects on plant communities and higher trophic levels. Furthermore, the dominance of generalist species in high ALAN areas may alter trophic interactions and increase competition with native species, potentially leading to ecosystem homogenization [4, 5].

Conservation strategies

To mitigate the negative impacts of ALAN on nocturnal insect communities, conservation strategies are needed. These may include:

Light reduction: Implementing measures to reduce ALAN intensity in forested areas through the use of shielded or low-intensity lighting fixtures.

Habitat restoration: Restoring natural habitats and creating dark corridors to provide refuges for light-sensitive species.

Public awareness: Raising awareness among policymakers, land managers, and the general public about the ecological consequences of ALAN and promoting responsible lighting practices [6-8].

The findings of this study underscore the importance of considering artificial light as a significant driver of ecological change in forest-dominated landscapes. By understanding the effects of ALAN on nocturnal insect communities, conservation efforts can be targeted towards minimizing its impact and preserving biodiversity in these ecosystems. Effective management strategies and public engagement are essential for mitigating the adverse effects of ALAN and promoting sustainable coexistence between human activities and nocturnal biodiversity.

In summary, addressing the challenges posed by ALAN requires interdisciplinary collaboration and proactive conservation measures to ensure the long-term health and resilience of forest ecosystems.

The impact of artificial light at night (ALAN) on nocturnal insect communities in forest-dominated landscapes is a critical aspect of biodiversity conservation. This section presents the results of a study investigating the relationship between ALAN intensity and nocturnal insect communities.

The study examined insect communities in forested areas with varying levels of ALAN intensity. Sites were categorized into low, moderate, and high ALAN intensity groups. Insect sampling was conducted using light traps, and data on species richness, abundance, and composition were collected [9, 10].

Results

Species richness

Low ALAN intensity: Sites with low ALAN intensity exhibited the highest species richness, with a diverse range of nocturnal insects observed.

High ALAN intensity: Conversely, areas with high ALAN intensity showed reduced species richness, with fewer insect species recorded compared to low-intensity sites.

Moderate ALAN intensity: Intermediate ALAN intensity areas displayed intermediate levels of species richness, indicating a gradient effect of ALAN on species diversity.

Abundance

Low ALAN intensity: Insect abundance was highest in areas with low ALAN intensity, with a greater number of individuals captured in light traps.

High ALAN intensity: High ALAN intensity sites exhibited lower insect abundance, suggesting a negative correlation between ALAN intensity and insect populations.

Moderate ALAN intensity: Moderate ALAN intensity areas displayed intermediate insect abundance levels, further supporting the dose-response relationship observed.

Species composition

Low ALAN intensity: Nocturnal insect communities in low ALAN intensity areas were characterized by a diverse assemblage of species, including light-sensitive and specialist taxa.

High ALAN intensity: In contrast, high ALAN intensity sites were dominated by generalist species tolerant to artificial light, with fewer light-sensitive species present.

Moderate ALAN intensity: Intermediate ALAN intensity areas exhibited a mix of light-sensitive and tolerant species, reflecting the transitional nature of these environments.

Community dynamics

Shifts in insect community composition were evident across the gradient of ALAN intensity, indicating the influence of artificial light on nocturnal biodiversity. Generalist species tended to dominate in high ALAN intensity areas, potentially outcompeting light-sensitive species and altering trophic interactions within the ecosystem.

Discussion

The results highlight the significant impact of artificial light intensity on the structure and composition of nocturnal insect communities in forest-dominated landscapes. High ALAN intensity was associated with reduced species richness and abundance, as well as shifts in community composition towards generalist species. These findings underscore the importance of mitigating ALAN effects to preserve nocturnal biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in forest ecosystems. Effective conservation strategies are needed to minimize light pollution and promote sustainable coexistence between human activities and natural habitats.

In forest-dominated landscapes, the dynamics of nocturnal insect communities are influenced by various factors, including habitat alteration, climate change, and human activities. Understanding the changes in these communities is crucial for assessing ecosystem health and biodiversity conservation efforts.

One significant factor driving changes in nocturnal insect communities is habitat alteration. Deforestation, fragmentation, and urbanization can disrupt natural habitats, leading to loss of biodiversity and changes in species composition. Nocturnal insects, which often rely on specific microhabitats and ecological niches, are particularly vulnerable to habitat disturbances. For instance, the conversion of forested areas into agricultural land or urban areas can result in the loss of suitable habitat for nocturnal insects, forcing them to migrate or adapt to new conditions.

Climate change also plays a role in shaping nocturnal insect communities. Shifts in temperature and precipitation patterns can affect insect behavior, phenology, and distribution. Warmer temperatures may accelerate insect development and alter the timing of life cycle events such as emergence, mating, and hibernation. These changes can disrupt ecological interactions and lead to mismatches between insects and their food sources or predators. Additionally, extreme weather events associated with climate change, such as droughts or heavy rainfall, can directly impact insect populations by causing mortality or habitat destruction.

Furthermore, human activities such as artificial lighting and pesticide use can have significant effects on nocturnal insect communities. Light pollution from urban areas, industrial sites, and highways can disrupt natural light-dark cycles, disorienting nocturnal insects and interfering with their navigation, foraging, and reproduction. This can result in decreased population sizes, altered community compositions, and changes in ecosystem functioning. Pesticides, commonly used in agriculture and urban pest control, can also have unintended consequences on non-target insect species, including nocturnal insects. Exposure to pesticides can lead to direct mortality, sublethal effects such as impaired reproduction or behavior, and indirect effects through trophic interactions.

In response to these environmental pressures, some species within nocturnal insect communities may exhibit resilience or adaptability, while others may decline or disappear altogether. Generalist species with broad ecological tolerances may fare better in disturbed or changing environments compared to specialist species with specific habitat requirements. Additionally, invasive species or opportunistic colonizers may thrive in human-altered landscapes, potentially outcompeting native species and disrupting ecosystem dynamics.

Conservation efforts aimed at mitigating the impacts of habitat alteration, climate change, and human activities on nocturnal insect communities are essential for maintaining ecosystem integrity and biodiversity. Strategies such as habitat restoration, land-use planning, pollution reduction, and sustainable pest management can help preserve suitable habitats and minimize anthropogenic disturbances. Furthermore, research on the ecology, behavior, and physiology of nocturnal insects can inform conservation strategies and guide efforts to monitor and protect these important components of forest ecosystems.

Conclusion

In conclusion, changes in nocturnal insect communities in forest-dominated landscapes are driven by a complex interplay of factors, including habitat alteration, climate change, and human activities. Understanding these dynamics is critical for informing conservation and management strategies aimed at preserving biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in a rapidly changing world.

1. de Lima Nascimento TR, de Amoêdo Campos Velo MM, Silva CF, Costa Cruz SBS, Gondim BLC, Mondelli RFL et al.( 2019) Current Applications of Biopolymer-based Scaffolds and Nanofibers as Drug Delivery Systems. Curr Pharm Des 25:3997-4012.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

2. Arif U, Haider S, Haider A, Khan N, Alghyamah AA (2019) Biocompatible Polymers and their Potential Biomedical Applications: A Review. Curr Pharm Des 25:3608-3619.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

3. Costa R, Costa L, Rodrigues I, Meireles C, Soares R, et al. (2021) Biocompatibility of the Biopolymer Cyanoflan for Applications in Skin Wound Healing. Mar Drugs 19:147-149.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

4. Tan C, Han F, Zhang S, Li P, Shang N (2021) Novel Bio-Based Materials and Applications in Antimicrobial Food Packaging: Recent Advances and Future Trends. Int J Mol Sci 22:9663-9665.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

5. Sagnelli D, Hooshmand K, Kemmer GC, Kirkensgaard JJK, Mortensen K et al.( 2017) Cross-Linked Amylose Bio-Plastic: A Transgenic-Based Compostable Plastic Alternative. Int J Mol Sci 18:2075-2078.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Beck Jennifer (2009) Patient-Ventilator Interaction during Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist in Low Birth Weight Infants. Pedia Res 65: 663-668.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Stein, Howard (2012) Synchronized Mechanical Ventilation Using Electrical Activity of the Diaphragm in Neonates. Cli Peri 39: 525-542.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Kallio Merja (2012) Electrical Activity of the Diaphragm during Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist in Pediatric Patients. Pedia Pulmo 50: 925-931.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Dobbin NA, Sun L, Wallace L, Kulka R, You H, et al. (2018) The benefit of kitchen exhaust fan use after cooking - An experimental assessment. Build Environ 135: 286-296.

Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Kang K, Kim H, Kim DD, Lee YG, Kim T (2019) Characteristics of cooking-generated PM10 and PM2.5 in residential buildings with different cooking and ventilation types. Sci Total Environ 668: 56-66.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref