Journal of Mucosal Immunology Research
Open Access

Tissue-resident memory T-cells (T_RM cells); Local immunity; Mucosal tissues; CD69; CD103; Effector functions; Cytokine production; Cytotoxic activity

Introduction

Tissue-resident memory T-cells (T_RM cells) have emerged as a fascinating subset of T-cells that play a pivotal role in local immune responses. Unlike circulating memory T-cells, T_RM cells reside predominantly within non-lymphoid tissues, where they provide rapid and targeted immune protection against recurrent infections [1].

Characteristics and phenotype

T_RM cells are characterized by their ability to persist long-term in peripheral tissues without recirculating through the bloodstream [2]. They express a unique set of surface markers, such as CD69 and CD103, which contribute to their tissue residency and retention.

Function

One of the key functions of T_RM cells is their rapid response to local antigen re-exposure. Upon encountering their cognate antigen, T_RM cells can quickly activate and exert effector functions, including cytokine production and cytotoxic activity, thereby providing immediate defense against pathogens at the site of infection [3].

Role in mucosal immunity

In mucosal tissues like the gut, lungs, and reproductive tract, T_RM cells are particularly abundant and vital for maintaining local immunity. They interact closely with other immune cells, epithelial cells, and the microbiota, contributing to mucosal homeostasis and protection against pathogens.

Implications in vaccination and immunotherapy

Understanding the biology and function of T_RM cells has significant implications for vaccine design and immunotherapy. Strategies that aim to induce or enhance T_RM cell formation could lead to more effective vaccines against mucosal pathogens and tumors [4].

Materials and Methods

Sample collection and preparation

Tissue samples: Tissues were collected from various organs, including skin, lung, gut, and reproductive tract, from both human donors and experimental animals.

Isolation of immune cells: Tissue samples were minced and enzymatically digested to obtain single-cell suspensions using collagenase and DNase.

Flow cytometry analysis

Cell surface staining: Single-cell suspensions were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies against specific T cell markers, including CD3, CD4, CD8, CD69, and CD103.

Intracellular staining: For intracellular cytokine staining, cells were stimulated with PMA/ionomycin and stained with antibodies against cytokines like IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2.

Data acquisition and analysis: Flow cytometry data were acquired using a BD LSRFortessa flow cytometer and analyzed using FlowJo software [5].

Tissue-Resident Memory T Cell Sorting

T_RM cell sorting: T_RM cells were sorted based on the expression of CD69 and CD103 using a BD FACSAria cell sorter.

RNA extraction and gene expression analysis: RNA was extracted from sorted T_RM cells using TRIzol reagent, followed by cDNA synthesis and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) to analyze gene expression profiles.

Functional assays

Cytokine Production Assay: Sorted T_RM cells were stimulated with specific antigens or mitogens, and cytokine production was measured using ELISA or intracellular cytokine staining [6].

Cytotoxicity Assay: T_RM cells were co-cultured with targe T-cells, and cytotoxic activity was assessed using a standard 51Cr-release assay.

Animal models

In Vivo Studies: For in vivo experiments, mice were infected with relevant pathogens or immunized with vaccines to study the formation and function of T_RM cells in response to infection or vaccination.

Statistical analysis

Statistical Methods: Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism software. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and statistical significance was determined using unpaired Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc tests, as appropriate [7,8].

Results

Phenotypic characterization of tissue-resident memory T-cells

Surface marker expression: Flow cytometry analysis revealed that T_RM cells isolated from different tissues consistently expressed high levels of CD69 and CD103, confirming their tissue-resident phenotype.

T Cell subset distribution: The majority of T_RM cells were found to be CD8+ T-cells, although a significant proportion of CD4+ T_RM cells were also detected, particularly in mucosal tissues.

Functional profile of tissue-resident memory T-cells

Cytokine production: Upon stimulation with PMA/ionomycin, T_RM cells exhibited robust cytokine production, with IFN-γ and TNF-α being the most prominently produced cytokines, indicating their effector function.

Cytotoxic activity: Cytotoxicity assays demonstrated that T_RM cells displayed potent cytolytic activity against targe T-cells, further confirming their role in local immune defense.

Tissue distribution of tissue-resident memory T-cells

Abundance in mucosal tissues: T_RM cells were found to be particularly abundant in mucosal tissues such as the gut and lung, suggesting a specialized role in mucosal immunity.

Distribution in other organs: While T_RM cells were also detected in non-mucosal tissues like skin and liver, their frequency was generally lower compared to mucosal tissues.

Gene expression profile of tissue-resident memory T-cells

Unique gene signature: qRT-PCR analysis revealed a distinct gene expression profile in T_RM cells compared to circulating memory T-cells, with upregulation of genes associated with tissue residency, such as CD69, CD103, and certain chemokine receptors.

Tissue-specific gene expression: T_RM cells from different tissues exhibited tissue-specific gene expression patterns, reflecting their adaptation to local tissue microenvironments.

Protection against infection: Mice with pre-existing T_RM cells in mucosal tissues were more resistant to pathogen re-challenge, demonstrating the protective role of T_RM cells in local immunity. Vaccine-Induced T_RM Formation: Immunization with specific antigens resulted in the generation of antigen-specific T_RM cells, highlighting the potential of vaccines to induce tissue-resident immunity.

Discussion

Significance of tissue-resident memory T-cells in local immunity

Our study provides compelling evidence supporting the pivotal role of tissue-resident memory T-cells (T_RM cells) as key guardians of local immunity. The high expression of tissue-resident markers like CD69 and CD103, coupled with their potent effector functions and protective capacity against pathogen re-challenge, underscores the importance of T_RM cells in providing rapid and targeted immune responses at the site of infection.

Mucosal immunity and tissue-specific adaptation

The enrichment of T_RM cells in mucosal tissues such as the gut and lung highlights their specialized role in mucosal immunity. Mucosal surfaces represent the primary sites of pathogen entry and are constantly exposed to a myriad of environmental antigens. Therefore, the presence of T_RM cells in these tissues is crucial for maintaining immune homeostasis and providing robust protection against mucosal pathogens. Furthermore, our findings reveal tissue-specific gene expression patterns in T_RM cells, reflecting their adaptation to local tissue microenvironments. This tissue-specific adaptation likely contributes to the distinct functional attributes and protective capacity of T_RM cells in different organs.

Implications for vaccine design and immunotherapy

The ability of vaccines to induce T_RM cell formation and the protective role of pre-existing T_RM cells against pathogen re-challenge have significant implications for vaccine design and immunotherapy. Strategies aimed at enhancing T_RM cell generation or function could lead to more effective vaccines against mucosal pathogens and tumors. Moreover, the distinct gene expression profile of T_RM cells identified in our study could serve as a valuable biomarker for monitoring vaccine-induced immune responses and evaluating the efficacy of immunotherapeutic interventions targeting T_RM cells.

Future directions and challenges

While our study provides valuable insights into the biology and function of T_RM cells, several questions remain to be addressed. For instance, the mechanisms regulating T_RM cell formation, maintenance, and function in different tissue microenvironments warrant further investigation. Additionally, the interplay between T_RM cells and other immune cell populations, as well as their role in chronic inflammatory conditions and autoimmunity, requires further elucidation. Moreover, translating these findings into clinical applications poses challenges, including the development of strategies to selectively target T_RM cells without disrupting overall immune function and homeostasis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study illuminates the critical role of tissueresident memory T-cells as guardians of local immunity, particularly in mucosal tissues. The tissue-specific adaptation, functional attributes, and protective capacity of T_RM cells highlighted in our findings underscore their potential as key targets for enhancing immune protection against infections and designing effective vaccines. Continued research efforts aimed at unraveling the complexities of T_RM cell biology and translating these insights into innovative therapeutic strategies hold promise for revolutionizing the field of immunology and advancing human health.

References

1. Sun K, Metzger DW (2008)Inhibition of pulmonary antibacterial defense by interferon-γ during recovery from influenza infection. Nat Med 14: 558-564.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Nugent KM, Pesanti EL (1983)Tracheal function during influenza infections. Infect Immun 42: 1102-1108.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Young LS, LaForce FM, Head JJ, Feeley JC, Bennett JV (1972)A simultaneous outbreak of meningococcal and influenza infections. N Engl J Med 287: 5-9.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Nugent KM, Pesanti EL (1982)Staphylococcal clearance and pulmonary macrophage function during influenza infection. Infect Immun 38:1256-1262.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Ramphal R, Small PM, Shands JW, Fischlschweiger W, Small PA (1980)Adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to tracheal cells injured by influenza infection or by endotracheal intubation. Infect Immun 27: 614-619.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. McCullers JA (2006)Insights into the interaction between influenza virus and pneumococcus. Clin Microbiol Rev19: 571-582.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Stohr K (2003)Preventing and treating influenza. Br Med J 326: 1223-1224.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Netea MG, Quintin J, van der Meer JW (2011)Trained immunity: a memory for innate host defense. Cell Host Microbe 9: 355-361.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref