Global Journal of Nursing & Forensic Studies
Open Access

Forensic anthropology; Skeletal remains; Criminal investigations; Biological profile; Identification; Archaeological excavations; Historical reconstructions; Trauma analysis

Introduction

Forensic anthropology stands as a beacon at the crossroads of science and justice, wielding the power to unlock the secrets hidden within human skeletal remains. In the realm of criminal investigations and historical inquiries alike, this field serves as a cornerstone, offering invaluable insights into the identities, life histories, and circumstances surrounding the deceased [1]. By meticulously analyzing bones, forensic anthropologists peel back the layers of time, piecing together narratives that might otherwise remain obscured. This introduction sets the stage for an exploration into the captivating world of forensic anthropology, shedding light on its methodologies, applications, and profound impact on unraveling mysteries and delivering justice.

Understanding Bones

Bones are more than just a structural framework; they are archives of a person's life history. Forensic anthropologists analyze bones to determine various aspects such as age, sex, ancestry, stature, and even information about past injuries or diseases [2-4]. By examining the size, shape, and condition of bones, they can reconstruct the individual's biological profile.

Applications in Criminal Investigations

Forensic anthropologists are often called upon to assist in criminal cases involving human remains. Whether it's a clandestine burial or skeletal remains discovered in remote locations, these experts use their knowledge to extract vital information. Through meticulous examination, they can determine the cause and manner of death, estimate the time since death, and identify any signs of trauma or foul play [5,6].

One of the crucial tasks in forensic anthropology is the identification of human remains. This process involves comparing the skeletal characteristics with known antemortem records such as medical records, dental records, or DNA samples from relatives [7]. Through advanced techniques like facial reconstruction or age progression, forensic anthropologists strive to give a name to the unidentified deceased, providing closure to families and aiding law enforcement in solving cases.

Forensic anthropology also intersects with forensic archaeology, particularly in cases involving mass graves or historical sites. By applying archaeological methods, experts can meticulously excavate and analyze human remains, shedding light on past atrocities, conflicts, or cultural practices.

Challenges and Advances

Despite its invaluable contributions, forensic anthropology faces several challenges. Environmental factors, such as weathering, scavenging, or burial conditions, can significantly affect the preservation of bones, making analysis more challenging [8]. Moreover, the field constantly evolves with advancements in technology and methodologies. From 3D imaging techniques to isotopic analysis, forensic anthropologists leverage cutting-edge tools to extract maximum information from skeletal remains [9].

Ethical Considerations

Ethics play a crucial role in forensic anthropology, particularly concerning the handling of human remains and interactions with families of the deceased. Respect for cultural sensitivities, confidentiality, and maintaining the dignity of the deceased are paramount in this field [10].

Conclusion

Forensic anthropology stands as a beacon at the crossroads of science and justice, wielding the power to unlock the secrets hidden within human skeletal remains. In the realm of criminal investigations and historical inquiries alike, this field serves as a cornerstone, offering invaluable insights into the identities, life histories, and circumstances surrounding the deceased. By meticulously analyzing bones, forensic anthropologists peel back the layers of time, piecing together narratives that might otherwise remain obscured. This introduction sets the stage for an exploration into the captivating world of forensic anthropology, shedding light on its methodologies, applications, and profound impact on unraveling mysteries and delivering justice.

References

1. Gilmer T, Ojeda V, Folson D, Fuentes D, Garcia P, et al. (2007) Initiation and use of Public Mental Health Services by Persons with Severe Mental Illness and Limited English Proficiency. Psychiatric Services 58: 1555-1562.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Golding JM (1999) Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for mental disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Violence 14: 99-132.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. McHugo GJ, Kammerer N, Jackson EW, Markoff LS, Gatz M, et al. (2005) Women, Co-Occurring Disorders, and Violence Study: Evaluation Design and Study Population. Journal of Substance Abuse and Treatmentn 28: 91-107.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Gary F (2005) Stigma: Barrier to Mental Health Care Among Ethnic Minorities. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 26: 979-999.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Alhusen JL, Bullock L, Sharps P, Schminkey D, Comstock E, et al. (2014) Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and adverse neonatal outcomes in low-income women. J Women’s Health 23: 920-926.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Yoon JE, Lawrence E (2013) Psychological victimization as a risk factor in the developmental course of marriage. J Fam Psychol 27: 53-64.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Kastello JC, Jacobsen KH, Gaffney KF, Kodadek MP, Sharps PW, et al. (2016) Predictors of depression symptoms among low-income women exposed to perinatal intimate partner violence. Community Ment Health J 52: 683-690.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. LeConte BA, Szaniszlo P, Fennewald SM, Lou DI, Qiu S, et al. (2018)Differences in the viral genome between HPV-positive cervical and oropharyngeal cancer. 13: 0203403.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. De Sanjosé S, Diaz M, Castellsagué X, Clifford G, Bruni L,  et al.(2007)Worldwide prevalence and genotype distribution of cervical human papillomavirus DNA in women with normal cytology: a meta-analysis.Lancet Infect Dis 7: 453-459.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Bruni L, Diaz M, Castellsagué X, Ferrer E, Bosch FX (2010)Cervical human papillomavirus prevalence in 5 continents: meta-analysis of 1 million women with normal cytological findings.J Infect Dis 202: 1789-1799.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref