Epidemiology: Open Access
Open Access

Cancer prevention; Vaccination; HPV vaccine; HBV vaccine; Global epidemiology

Introduction

Cancer prevention has emerged as a critical public health priority, with vaccination playing a significant role in reducing the incidence of virus-related cancers. Two primary vaccines, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine and the hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine, have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in preventing cancers associated with these viruses. HPV is linked to cervical, anal, oropharyngeal, and other cancers, while HBV is a major cause of liver cancer [1]. This article explores the epidemiological impact of these vaccines on cancer prevention globally, discusses the mechanisms by which they confer protection, and addresses the challenges in achieving widespread vaccination coverage.

Discussion

Impact of HPV vaccination on cancer incidence

HPV is a sexually transmitted virus responsible for the majority of cervical cancer cases and a substantial proportion of other anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers. The introduction of the HPV vaccine has significantly reduced the incidence of HPV infections and precancerous lesions. Countries with high vaccination coverage, such as Australia and Sweden, have reported substantial declines in cervical cancer rates among vaccinated cohorts. The vaccine's effectiveness in preventing high-risk HPV infections, which are precursors to cancer, underscores its pivotal role in cancer prevention [2].

Despite these successes, HPV vaccination coverage varies widely across different regions. High-income countries generally have higher vaccination rates, while low- and middle-income countries face challenges such as vaccine accessibility, cost, and public awareness. Efforts to improve vaccination rates in these regions are critical to reducing the global burden of HPV-related cancers.

Impact of HBV vaccination on cancer incidence

HBV infection is a leading cause of liver cancer, particularly in regions with high endemic rates such as sub-Saharan Africa and East Asia. The HBV vaccine, typically administered as part of childhood immunization programs, has been highly effective in preventing HBV infections and subsequent liver cancer. Countries with widespread HBV vaccination programs have seen dramatic reductions in HBV infection rates and liver cancer incidence [3].

Challenges to HBV vaccination include ensuring birth dose administration to prevent mother-to-child transmission, especially in resource-limited settings. Additionally, catch-up vaccination programs for older children and adults who missed early vaccination are essential to achieving comprehensive protection.

Mechanisms of vaccine-induced cancer prevention

Vaccines prevent cancer by eliciting an immune response that targets and eliminates the causative viruses before they can establish persistent infections. The HPV vaccine induces the production of neutralizing antibodies that prevent HPV from infecting epithelial cells, thereby stopping the initial steps of cancer development. Similarly, the HBV vaccine generates antibodies that neutralize HBV, preventing chronic infection and the associated risk of liver cancer [4].

These vaccines are most effective when administered before exposure to the viruses, highlighting the importance of vaccinating individuals at a young age, typically before the onset of sexual activity for HPV and at birth for HBV [5].

Challenges and opportunities in vaccine implementation

Despite the proven efficacy of HPV and HBV vaccines, several challenges hinder their widespread implementation. These include vaccine hesitancy, logistical barriers in distribution, and limited healthcare infrastructure in low-resource settings. Addressing these challenges requires coordinated efforts to improve public awareness, ensure vaccine affordability, and strengthen healthcare systems [6].

Opportunities for expanding vaccination coverage include integrating vaccines into routine immunization schedules, leveraging community health workers for outreach, and utilizing technology for tracking and reminder systems. Global initiatives and partnerships, such as those led by the World Health Organization and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, play a crucial role in supporting these efforts [7,8].

Conclusion

Vaccination against HPV and HBV represents a powerful tool in the global fight against cancer. By preventing infections that lead to cervical, liver, and other cancers, these vaccines have the potential to significantly reduce cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. However, achieving this potential requires overcoming challenges related to vaccine coverage, accessibility, and public acceptance. Continued investment in vaccination programs and public health strategies is essential to harness the full benefits of these life-saving vaccines and move towards a future with lower cancer burden globally.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Hauptmann M, Frederickx F, Struyf H, Mertens P, Heyns M, et al. (2013) Enhancement of cavitation activity and particle removal with pulsed high frequency ultrasound and supersaturation. Ultrason. Sonochem 20: 69-76.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Yamashita T, Ando K (2019) Low-intensity ultrasound induced cavitation and streaming in oxygen-supersaturated water: role of cavitation bubbles as physical cleaning agents. Ultrason Sonochem 52: 268-279.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Kang BK, Kim MS, Park JG (2014) Effect of dissolved gases in water on acoustic cavitation and bubble growth rate in 0.83 MHz megasonic of interest to wafer cleaning. Ultrason Sonochem 21: 1496-503.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Koo H, Cury JA, Rosalen PL, Ambrosano GMB (2002) Effect of a mouthrinse containing selected propolis on 3-day dental plaque accumulation and polysaccharide formation. Caries Res 36: 445-448.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Carmen JC, Roeder BL, Nelson JL, Ogilvie RLR, Robison RA, et al. (2005) Treatment of biofilm infections on implants with low-frequency ultrasound and antibiotics. Am J Infect Control 33: 78-82.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Dhir S (2013) Biofilm and dental implant: the microbial link. J Indian Soc Periodonto l7: 5-11.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Qian Z, Stoodley P, Pitt WG (1996) Effect of low-intensity ultrasound upon biofilm structure from confocal scanning laser microscopy observation. Biomaterials 17: 1975-1980.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Vyas N, Pecheva E, Dehghani H, Sammons RL, Wang QX, et al. (2016) High speed imaging of cavitation around dental ultrasonic scaler tips. PLoS One 11: e0149804.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref