Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases & Practice
Open Access

Surgical site infections; Antimicrobial prophylaxis; Colon surgery

Introduction

Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a significant concern in elective colon surgery, affecting patient outcomes and increasing healthcare costs. These infections can lead to prolonged hospital stays, delayed wound healing, increased readmissions, and, in severe cases, even mortality. However, by implementing a comprehensive approach to infection prevention, healthcare professionals can significantly reduce the risk of SSIs and improve patient safety and recovery rates [1].

Elective colon surgery continues to have the highest rate of infection at the surgical site among all elective surgical procedures. These infections span a continuum of mild superficial infection to those that are deep-seated within the abdominal cavity and pose a serious threat to the patient’s survival. These infections are associated with considerable patient morbidity as a general rule and frequently require reoperation, prolonged hospitalization, and readmission to the hospital during the course of management. Surgical site infection (SSIs) has proven to be very costly in addition to the attendant patient morbidity [2].

Preoperative measures

The prevention of SSIs starts before the actual surgery takes place. Preoperative measures play a crucial role in reducing the risk of infection. Here are some important steps to consider:

Patient optimization: Evaluate the patient's medical condition thoroughly before surgery, addressing any underlying medical issues that could increase the risk of infection. This includes controlling diabetes, optimizing nutritional status, and ensuring proper bowel preparation.

Antimicrobial prophylaxis: Administering appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis is vital to prevent SSIs. The choice of antibiotics should be based on local antibiograms [3], and the timing of administration should adhere to best practices guidelines, ensuring adequate drug levels in the patient's system at the time of incision. Surgical site preparation: Properly clean and disinfect the surgical site to reduce the microbial load on the patient's skin. Preoperative bathing with chlorhexidine or other antiseptic solutions has been shown to be effective in decreasing bacterial colonization [4].

Microbiology of SSIs following colon surgery

When SSI occurs following colon surgery, it can be anticipated that the bacteriology of the infection will be those organisms that contaminated the site at the time of the operation. For most colon procedures, E. coli and Bacteroides fragilis are the most likely organisms to be encountered. Other gram negative species include Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter spp. The anaerobic species such as B. fragilis have the highest bacterial density in the left and retrosigmoid colon but are inconsistently cultured because they are obligate anaerobes. Enterococcus spp. are common in the colon but are infrequent causes of SSI in the normal host [5]. Unusual gram negative bacteria can be anticipated if the patient has had prior antibiotic exposure or prior exposure to the healthcare environment which has resulted in alteration of their normal microflora. In these later circumstances, Pseudomonas spp., Serratia spp., and even Acinetobacter spp. can be encountered. With up to 20–25% of patients in the U.S. being colonized with Staphylococcus aureus, these organisms will be identified in SSIs following colon surgery and many will be with the community-associated, methicillin-resistant strains. Organ/space infections have similar patterns of identified pathogens. Because abscesses or diffuse peritonitis are direct consequences of intraoperative or luminal contamination, the bacteriology of these abscesses reflects the normal colonization of the human colon and makes E. coli and Bacteroides fragilis the common pathogens. One notable exception can be seen in the patient with intra-abdominal drains where Staphylococcus aureus can be a pathogen in abscesses due to external contamination along the drain tract [6].

Intraoperative strategies

During the surgical procedure, several measures can be taken to minimize the risk of infection:

Aseptic technique: Maintaining strict aseptic technique throughout the surgery is critical. All surgical team members must adhere to proper hand hygiene, wear sterile gloves and gowns, and use sterile instruments.

Proper wound closure: Choose appropriate techniques for wound closure to ensure proper healing. Surgical staples or sutures must be placed carefully to avoid any dead spaces that could accumulate fluid and bacteria [7].

Normothermia: Maintaining normal body temperature throughout the surgery has been shown to reduce the risk of SSIs. Measures such as warming blankets and intravenous fluid warming can be employed to prevent hypothermia.

Postoperative care

The postoperative phase is just as important in preventing SSIs as the surgery itself:

Wound management: Proper wound care and monitoring are essential to detect any signs of infection early. Keep the incision site clean and dry [8], and change dressings as needed.

Early mobilization: Encouraging early mobilization of the patient can help improve blood circulation and prevent complications such as deep vein thrombosis, which could indirectly reduce the risk of infection.

Antimicrobial stewardship: After surgery, continue to use antibiotics judiciously. Avoid prolonged courses of antibiotics and reassess the need for continued therapy regularly [9].

Staff education and training

Education and training are fundamental components of any infection prevention strategy. Ensure that all members of the surgical team are well-informed about the latest guidelines and best practices for preventing SSIs. Regular training sessions and updates can help reinforce the importance of adherence to protocols and improve overall patient safety [10].

Conclusion

The prevention of surgical site infections in elective colon surgery demands a multidimensional approach that encompasses preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative measures. By optimizing patient health before surgery, adhering to strict aseptic techniques during the procedure, and implementing appropriate postoperative care, healthcare professionals can significantly reduce the incidence of SSIs. Furthermore, continuous staff education and training are essential in maintaining a high standard of infection prevention practices. By prioritizing these measures, healthcare facilities can ensure safer surgeries and better outcomes for patients undergoing elective colon procedures.

1.  Kaminker JS, Bergman CM, Kronmiller B, Carlson J, Svirskas R, et al. (2002) The transposable elements of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatin: A genomics perspective. Genome Biol 3: 84-87.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Eickbush TH, Furano AV (2002) Fruit flies and humans respond differently to retrotransposons. Curr Opin Genet Dev 12: 669–674.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Wicker T, Sabot F, Hua-Van A,  Bennetzen JL,  Capy P, et al.( 2007) A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements. Nat Rev Genet 8: 973–982.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Ciota AT, Kramer LD (2010) Insights into arbovirus evolution and adaptation from experimental studies. Viruses 2: 2594–2617.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Terzian C, Pélisson A, Bucheton A (2001) Evolution and phylogeny of insect endogenous retroviruses. BMC Evol Biol 1: 3-5.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Malik H, Henikoff ,  Eickbush TH (2000) Poised for contagion: Evolutionary origins of the infectious abilities of invertebrate retroviruses. Genome Res 10: 1307–1318.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Holt RA, Subramanian GM, Halpern A, Sutton GG, Charlab R, et al. (2002) The genome sequence of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Science 298: 129–149.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Nene V, Wortman JR, Lawson D, Haas B, Kodira C, et al. (2007) Genome sequence of Aedes aegypti, a major arbovirus vector. Science 316: 1718–1723.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref


9. Arensburger  P, Megy K, Waterhouse RM, Abrudan J,  Amedeo P, et al. (2010) Sequencing of Culex quinquefasciatus Establishes a Platform for Mosquito Comparative Genomics. Science 330: 86–88.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10.  Aravin AA, Hannon GJ, Brennecke J (2007) The Piwi-piRNA pathway provides an adaptive defense in the transposon arms race. Science 318: 761–764.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref