Journal of Dementia
Open Access

Alzheimer’s disease; Traumatic brain injury; Risk factors

Introduction

There is increasing evidence that people with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) are more likely to develop neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease (DAT) and other dementias throughout their lives, and. Albeit a large part of the exploration has zeroed in on the expanded gamble related with moderate-to-serious cerebrum wounds, arising proof recommends that gentle head wounds, especially rehashed gentle wounds, may likewise act as a gamble factor [1]. Given the growing evidence of dementia risk after TBI, emotional disorders, and other nonspecific factors, as well as concern for the implications of these factors on the aging service member, both the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) have recognized the importance of better understanding this relationship. This article examines neurocognitive and neuropathologic changes following a traumatic brain injury (TBI), focusing on the potential for cognitive decline across the lifespan in military personnel with a TBI history [2]. We will begin by defining TBI and describing the anticipated cognitive and behavioral short- and long-term outcomes. After that, we will go over the evidence that having a history of TBI increases the risk of dementia, particularly DAT and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). We will go over TBI assessment protocols, the results, and lessons learned in the military. At the end, we will talk about the implications for cognition monitoring in the aging military population [3].

Method

The VA/DoD defines traumatic brain injury (TBI) as a traumatically induced structural injury and/or physiological disruption of brain function resulting from an external force that is indicated by new onset or worsening of at least one of the following clinical signs immediately following the event similar to the definition of TBI provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. any time of loss of or diminished degree of cognizance; any memory loss for the events that occurred either immediately before or after the injury; any mental state change at the time of the injury (for example, confusion, disorientation, slowed thinking); deficits in the brain (weakness, inability to balance, shifts in vision, praxis, paresis/plegia, sensory loss, aphasia, and other similar symptoms) that could conceivably be transient; or an injury inside the skull [4]. This definition adds that external forces may include the head striking an object, the brain experiencing acceleration and deceleration movement without external trauma to the head, a foreign body penetrating the brain, or forces generated by events such as a blast or explosion [5]. This is relevant to the military and veteran populations. Cognitive, behavioral, emotional, or physical functioning may be affected in some way by a TBI, which can be mild, moderate, or severe. Depending on the characteristics of the injury and its severity, these effects may be brief, long-lasting, or permanent [6]. Starting show of TBI fluctuates extraordinarily; Consequently, injury severity classification is one of the most significant immediate and long-term outcome predictors. The Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), duration of unconsciousness following injury (e.g., loss of consciousness [LOC] or time to follow commands), or duration of confusion following injury (e.g., length of posttraumatic amnesia [PTA]) are typically used to determine the severity of a TBI [7]. GCSs are usually used to characterize injury seriousness, with postinjury GCS scores <8 demonstrating an extreme physical issue and GCS scores somewhere in the range of 9 and 12 showing a moderate physical issue [8].

Result

The majority of TBIs that are diagnosed in the DoD and VA (82%) are consistent with mTBI, with blast-related injuries being the primary cause. Accidents involving motor vehicles or land transport, falls, and injuries sustained in sports and recreation are among the other primary causes of TBI, which are in line with those seen in the general population [9]. The four most common causes of severe and penetrating traumatic brain injury are blast, motor vehicle accident, falls, and head or neck gunshots [10]. An estimated 1.7 million civilians in the United States suffer from traumatic brain injury (TBI) each year, making it the leading cause of death and disability. However, military personnel who sustained a TBI abroad or who received treatment in federal, military, or VA hospitals are not included in these rates. Between January 2000 and the first quarter of 2013, more than 270,000 TBIs were recorded in military medical records, according to the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center [11]. Although combat- or weapon-related traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are frequently regarded as the most common type of injury among service members deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan since 2001, the rate of TBIs in the no deployed population actually exceeds that of TBIS [12].

Most people with moderate-to-severe TBI continue to have cognitive and neurobehavioral impairments after PTA is over. These impairments vary depending on the severity of the injury, premorbid functioning, comorbid neurologic and psychiatric status, and time since the injury. impairments in fine motor speed are typical of cognitive impairments; attention; learning, memory, and speed of cognitive processing; complex discourse and language; and executive functions, for instance, Individuals with focal injuries may exhibit circumscribed or localized cognitive impairments, such as language or visual spatial impairment, but these impairments typically occur overlaid on global cognitive dysfunction caused by diffuse injury. In addition to these cognitive changes, moderate-to-severe TBI may also cause a number of neurobehavioral changes, which are not covered in detail in this article but include, but are not limited to, impaired social pragmatics, decreased judgment, and decreased awareness [13].

Discussion

Monitoring programs need to take into account and incorporate anticipated change and variability in targeted areas of functioning, particularly those that are affected by age, in order to determine whether there are changes that may indicate the onset of dementia. This is particularly valid for comprehension, in which there are known explicit impacts of ordinary maturing in different mental spaces. The creation of normative reference databases that make use of longitudinal modeling and risk ratios based on performance decrements compared to an individual’s own premorbid performance and to the performance of similar demographic groups could be used to incorporate the effects of normal aging (as well as other relevant demographic factors) into ongoing monitoring. Despite the fact that carrying out such checking projects may at first increment the expenses related with TBI treatment for the DoD and VA, the advantages of early recognition of mental changes and more exact comprehension of potential causal elements consider prior and more engaged treatment and would be supposed to further develop result and diminish long haul costs by and large.

Conclusion

TBI is known to prompt transient or constant consequences for neurobehavioral and mental working, which change as per seriousness, mechanics, and timing of injury. Developing examination records that a background marked by TBI might put a few people in danger for dementia further down the road, either in light of hereditary weakness or decreasing of mental hold prompting prior beginning of neurodegenerative changes. Military assistance individuals are at specific gamble for TBI, prompting huge ramifications for observing projects not exclusively to identify these wounds and their belongings at their beginning yet in addition for checking likely long haul impacts across the life expectancy. This article features research on the mental impacts and endangers for later life dementia from TBI in regular citizen and military populaces. Numerous illustrations have been gained from current military TBI observing and the executives programs with critical ramifications for kept checking of maturing administration individuals and veterans.

1. Crystal S, Sambamoorthi U, Walkup JT, Akincigil A (2003) Diagnosis and treatment of depression in the elderly medicare population:  Predictors, disparities, and trends. J Am Geriatr Soc 51: 1718. 

 Google Scholar, Cross Ref, Indexed at

2. Palmer BW, Heaton SC, Jeste DV (1999) Older patients with schizophrenia:  challenges in the coming decades. Psychiatric Services 50: 1178–1183. 

Google Scholar, Cross Ref, Indexed at 

3. Robine J-M, Paccaud F (2005) Nonagenarians and centenarians in Switzerland, 1860–2001: a demographic analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health 59: 31–37.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Ankri J, Poupard M (2003) Prevalence and incidence of dementia among the very old. Review of the literature. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 51: 349–360.

Google Scholar, Indexed at

5. Wilkinson TJ, Sainsbury R (1998) The association between mortality, morbidity and age in New Zealand’s oldest old. Int J Aging Hum Dev 46: 333–343.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Miles TP, Bernard MA (1992) Morbidity, disability, and health status of black American elderly: a new look at the oldest-old. J Am Geriatr Soc 40: 1047–1054.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

7. Gueresi P, Troiano L, Minicuci N, Bonafé M, Pini G, et al. (2003) The MALVA (MAntova LongeVA) study: an investigation on people 98 years of age and over in a province of Northern Italy. Exp Gerontol 38: 1189–1197.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

8. Nybo H, Petersen HC, Gaist D, Jeune B, Andersen K, et al. (2003) Predictors of mortality in 2,249 nonagenarians—the Danish 1905-Cohort Survey. J Am Geriatr Soc 51: 1365–1373.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

9. Silver MH, Newell K, Brady C, Hedley-White ET, Perls TT (2002) Distinguishing between neurodegenerative disease and disease-free aging: correlating neuropsychological evaluations and neuropathological studies in centenarians. Psychosom Med 64: 493–501.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

10. Stek ML, Gussekloo J, Beekman ATF, Van Tilburg W, Westendorp RGJ (2004) Prevalence, correlates and recognition of depression in the oldest old: the Leiden 85-plus study. J Affect Disord 78: 193–200.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

11. von Heideken Wågert P, Rönnmark B, Rosendahl E, Lundin-Olsson L, MC Gustavsson J, et al. (2005) Morale in the oldest old: the Umeå 85+ study. Age Ageing 34: 249–255.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

12. Von Strauss E, Fratiglioni L, Viitanen M, Forsell Y, Winblad B (2000) Morbidity and comorbidity in relation to functional status: a community-based study of the oldest old (90+ years). J Am Geriatr Soc 48: 1462–1469.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

13. Andersen HR, Jeune B, Nybo H, Nielsen JB, Andersen-Ranberg K, et al. (1998) Low activity of superoxide dismutase and high activity of glutathione reductase in erythrocytes from centenarians. Age Ageing 27: 643–648.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at