Environment Pollution and Climate Change
Open Access

Deep sea mining; Ocean floor; Minerals

Introduction

Deep sea mining involves extracting minerals from the ocean floor, which can be found in various forms, including polymetallic nodules, seafloor massive sulphides, and cobalt-rich crusts. These minerals contain a variety of metals, including copper, nickel, cobalt, and manganese, which are essential for the production of electronic devices and renewable energy technologies [1].

Methodology

One of the potential benefits of deep sea mining is the access to a new source of minerals and metals. With the increasing demand for these resources, particularly for the production of electronic devices and renewable energy technologies, deep sea mining could provide a new supply of these materials that are not readily available on land [2, 3].

However, there are also significant drawbacks to deep sea mining. One of the main concerns is the potential impact on the marine environment. The ocean floor is home to a diverse array of species, many of which are still unknown to science. Deep sea mining could cause significant damage to these habitats, disrupting the delicate balance of the ecosystem.

Another concern is the potential for pollution and the release of toxic chemicals into the ocean. The process of deep sea mining involves drilling into the ocean floor, which can release sediment and other materials into the water. The use of chemicals in the mining process, such as sulfuric acid, can also have significant impacts on the marine environment [4, 5].

The technology for deep sea mining is also relatively new and untested, which raises questions about the safety and effectiveness of the process. There are also concerns about the economic viability of deep sea mining, as the costs of the technology and infrastructure required for mining in the deep sea are significant.

In response to these concerns, there have been calls for more research into the potential impacts of deep sea mining on the environment. Many scientists argue that more needs to be known about the marine ecosystem before any mining activities take place [6, 7].

There are also calls for greater regulation of deep sea mining activities. The International Seabed Authority, an intergovernmental organization established under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, has been tasked with regulating deep sea mining activities. However, there are concerns about the effectiveness of this regulatory body, and some have called for greater oversight and transparency in the regulation of deep sea mining [8, 9].

Conclusion

Deep sea mining is a complex and controversial issue that raises significant concerns about the potential impacts on the marine environment. While there are potential benefits to deep sea mining, such as access to new sources of minerals and metals, there are also significant drawbacks, including the potential for habitat destruction, pollution, and unknown long-term impacts. More research and regulation are needed to ensure that any deep sea mining activities are conducted in a safe and sustainable manner that protects the marine environment for future generations [10].

1. Akbari H, Pomerantz M, Taha H (2001) Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas. Sol Ener 70: 295-310.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Armson D, Stringer P, Ennos AR (2012) The effect of tree shade and grass on surface and globe temperatures in an urban area. Urb Forest Urb Green 11: 245-255.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Arnberger A, Eder R (2012) Exploring coping behaviours of Sunday and work day visitors due to dense use conditions in an urban forest. Urb Forest Urb Green 11: 439-449.

Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Astbury B, Rogers P (2004) Evaluation of the stronger families and communities strategy: Gilles Plains community garden case study. RMIT Univer Collabor Instit Research.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

5. Heidt V, Neef M (2008) Benefits of urban green space for improving urban climate. Eco, plan, manage urb forest: Internat perspect Springer: New York 23: 84-96.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Duryea ML, Blakeslee GM, Hubbard WG, Vasquez RA (1996) Wind and trees: A survey of homeowners after hurricane Andrew. J Arboricul 22: 44-50.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. CNT (2010) Integrating valuation methods to recognize green infrastructure's multiple benefits. Center Neighbor Tech 11: 245-255.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Nowak DJ, Crane DE (2002) Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environ Pollu 116: 381-389.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Sanders RA (1986) Urban vegetation impacts on the hydrology of Dayton, Ohio. Urb Eco 9: 361-376.

Google Scholar

10. Xiao Q, McPherson EG, Ustin SL, Grismer ME,   Simpson JR (2000) winter rainfall interception by two mature open- grown trees in Davis, California. Hydro Proc 14: 763-784.

 Google Scholar, Crossref