Journal of Fisheries & Livestock Production
Open Access

Biodiversity; Fish stock recovery; Fishing practices; Economic stability

Introduction

Marine ecosystems are critical to global biodiversity, economic stability, and food security, yet they face unprecedented pressures from overfishing, habitat degradation, and climate change. Traditional fisheries management approaches, often characterized by open access and minimal regulation, have struggled to address these challenges effectively, leading to overexploitation and ecological decline [1]. In response, rights-based fisheries management (RBM) has gained prominence as a strategic alternative aimed at reconciling the need for sustainable resource use with the socio-economic needs of coastal communities. Rights-based fisheries management refers to a suite of approaches that allocate exclusive access rights to individuals or groups, thereby creating a sense of ownership and responsibility for resource stewardship. This paradigm shift from open access to regulated access is designed to incentivize sustainable fishing practices, reduce overfishing, and promote long-term conservation goals. RBM frameworks, such as individual transferable quotas (ITQs) and territorial user rights (TURFs), have been implemented in various regions worldwide, with varying degrees of success [2].

The impact of RBM on marine ecosystems and communities is a critical area of inquiry. On one hand, RBM has the potential to enhance the resilience of marine ecosystems by promoting more responsible and sustainable fishing practices. On the other hand, the socio-economic implications for fishing communities such as changes in income distribution, access to resources, and social dynamics are equally significant [3]. Understanding these impacts requires a comprehensive examination of both ecological outcomes and community experiences under RBM regimes. This paper aims to explore the effects of rights-based fisheries management on marine ecosystems and coastal communities. By reviewing relevant case studies and analyzing empirical data, this study seeks to provide a nuanced understanding of how RBM influences ecological health, resource sustainability, and socio-economic well-being. The findings will offer valuable insights for policymakers, fisheries managers, and stakeholders seeking to design and implement effective RBM strategies that balance environmental and human needs [4].

Discussion

The implementation of rights-based fisheries management (RBM) represents a significant departure from traditional fisheries management approaches, aiming to address both ecological sustainability and socio-economic challenges. The discussion below synthesizes findings from various case studies and empirical analyses to evaluate the impact of RBM on marine ecosystems and coastal communities [5].

Ecological impacts

Rights-based management has generally shown positive outcomes for marine ecosystems. By restricting access to fisheries and allocating rights to specific entities, RBM reduces overfishing and allows for the recovery of depleted fish stocks. For instance, the introduction of individual transferable quotas (ITQs) in several fisheries has led to notable improvements in fish stock health and biodiversity [6]. Studies indicate that ITQs can reduce fishing pressure, enhance the size and age structure of fish populations, and support ecosystem recovery. However, the ecological benefits of RBM are not uniform across all contexts. The success of RBM in promoting ecosystem health depends on factors such as the adequacy of the rights allocated, the enforcement of regulations, and the responsiveness of the management system to ecological changes. In some cases, RBM schemes have struggled with issues such as quota overfishing, illegal fishing activities, and ecosystem-based management challenges [7].

Socio-economic impacts

The socio-economic impacts of RBM on coastal communities are multifaceted. On one hand, RBM can enhance economic stability for fishing communities by providing secure access to resources and reducing the volatility of fishery incomes. The creation of exclusive rights can incentivize investments in sustainable fishing practices, improve market access, and support the development of local businesses. On the other hand, RBM can also lead to unintended socio-economic consequences. The allocation of rights may concentrate benefits among a small number of stakeholders, potentially marginalizing small-scale or subsistence fishers. In some cases, the initial distribution of rights has been criticized for favoring more affluent or politically connected individuals and groups, exacerbating inequalities within communities. Furthermore, the transition to RBM often requires substantial administrative and regulatory frameworks, which can place a burden on local governance structures. The effectiveness of RBM in improving socio-economic outcomes is contingent upon fair and transparent rights allocation processes, effective enforcement mechanisms, and support for affected communities during transitions [8].

Balancing environmental and human needs

The dual objectives of RBM promoting ecological sustainability and enhancing socio-economic well-being—present inherent tensions. Achieving a balance between these objectives requires careful design and implementation of RBM frameworks [9]. Key considerations include the adequacy of rights allocation, the robustness of monitoring and enforcement systems, and the inclusivity of decision-making processes. Successful RBM schemes often incorporate adaptive management practices, stakeholder engagement, and mechanisms for conflict resolution. By involving local communities in decision-making and ensuring equitable access to resources, RBM can foster a sense of ownership and collaboration, ultimately supporting both environmental and socio-economic goals [10].

Conclusion

Rights-based fisheries management holds significant promise for advancing sustainable fisheries and supporting coastal communities. However, its impacts are context-dependent and require nuanced understanding and careful implementation. By addressing ecological and socio-economic dimensions simultaneously, RBM can contribute to the resilience of marine ecosystems and the well-being of fishing communities. Future research and policy efforts should focus on optimizing RBM frameworks, addressing challenges, and ensuring equitable outcomes for all stakeholders involved.

References

1. CSA (2021) Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency Agricultural Sample Survey 2020/21[ 2013 E.C.]. Volume II Report On. II (March).
2. Deribe B, Taye M (2013) Growth performance and carcass characteristics of central highland goats in Sekota District, Ethiopia. Agricultural Advances 2: 250–258.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Rekik M, Haile A, Mekuriaw Z, Abiebie A, Rischkowsky B, et al. (2016) Review of the reproductive performances of sheep breeds in Ethiopia. Review Paper 6: 117–126.

Google Scholar, Indexed at

4. Banerjee A, Getachew A, Earmias E (2000) Selection and breeding strategies for increased productivity of goats in Ethiopia. The Opprotunities and Challenges for Enhancing Goat Production in East Africa. Proceedings of a Conference Held at Debub University, Awassa.

Google Scholar, Indexed at

5. Africa F (1996) Husbandry, Productivity and Producers Trait Preference of Goats in North Western Lowlands of Ethiopia. Open Journal of Animal Sciences 10: 313–335.

Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Amare B, Gobeze M, Wondim B (2020) Implementation of Community Based Breeding Program to Improve Growth Rate and Milk Production Performance of Abergelle Goat.  Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

7. Minister B (2018) Performance evaluation of Abergelle goat under community based breeding program in selected districts, Northern Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 30.

Google Scholar

8. Abegaz S, Sölkner J, Gizaw S, Dessie T, Haile A, et al. (2013) Description of production systems and morphological characteristics of Abergelle and Western lowland goat breeds in Ethiopia: implication for community-based breeding programmes. Animal Genetic Resources/Ressources Génétiques Animales/Recursos Genéticos Animales 53: 69–78.

Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Solomon A (2014) Design of community based breeding programs for two indigenous goat breeds of Ethiopia Design of community based breeding programs for two indigenous goat breeds of Ethiopia Co-supervisors.

Google Scholar, Indexed at

10. Taye M, Deribe B, Melekot MH (2013) Reproductive Performance of central highland goat under tradational managment in sekota district, Ethiopia. Asian Journal of Biological Sciences.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at