ISSN: 2161-119X
Otolaryngology: Open Access
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
  • Research Article   
  • Otolaryngol (Sunnyvale) 2017, Vol 7(3): 306
  • DOI: 10.4172/2161-119X.1000306

The Impact of Metabolic Syndrome and Vitamin D on Hearing Loss in Qatar

Abdulbari Bener1,2,3*, Abdulla OAA Al-Hamaq4, Khalid Abdulhadi5, Ahmed H Salahaldin5 and Loida Gansan5
1Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Cerrahpa?a Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
2Department of Evidence for Population Health Unit, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
3Medipol International School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
4Qatar Diabetic Associations and Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar
5Department of ENT, Audiology Unit, Rumailah Hospital & Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar
*Corresponding Author: Abdulbari Bener, PhD, Advisor to WHO, Professor of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34098 Cerrahpasa-Istanbul, Turkey, Tel: 902124143041/5356639090, Fax: 902126320033, Email: abdulbari.bener@istanbul.edu.tr

Received: 21-Apr-2017 / Accepted Date: 09-May-2017 / Published Date: 16-May-2017 DOI: 10.4172/2161-119X.1000306

Abstract

Aim: The aim of present study to investigate association between metabolic syndrome [MetSyn] and vitamin D deficiency on hearing loss among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Subjects and methods: This is an observational cohort study based on 528 subjects aged between 20 and 59 years who visited the Hamad Medical Corporation with hearing difficulty during from January 2013 to July 2014. MetSyn was assessed using the revised NCEP-ATP III criteria. Vitamin D level was evaluated from reported serum 25 (OH) D. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed to evaluate the relation between selected lifestyle factors, MetSyn, vitamin D and presence of hearing loss. Results: The mean age (± SD, in years) for metabolic hearing loss versus normal subjects was 47.7 ± 10.2 vs. 48.5 ± 9.1. Over 90% of the s patients were using phones devices and 13.4% had hearing impairment watching TV. The consanguineous marriages were observed higher in Hearing loss (32.9%) than in normal hearing (23.0%) (p=0.028). The waist circumference, hip circumference, waist hip ratio and body mass index were significantly higher among the participants with MetSyn versus without MetSyn (p<0.001). The mean of diabetes onset duration (9.03 ± 4.35 years), sleeping disorder (5.76 ± 1.32 h), cigarette smoking (16.4%) and sheesha smoking (20.7%) were higher among hearing impairment. The associated risk factors were significantly higher in T2DM with hearing loss, hypoglycemia, retinopathy, Nephropathy and Neuropathy diabetic foot ulcer, Tinnitus, Vertigo and headache than in normal hearing diabetes. There were statistically significant differences between hearing impairment versus normal hearing for vitamin D [18.91 ± 7.65 ng/ml vs 22.85 ± 9.00 ng/ml; p=0.018], magnesium, phosphorous, HDL, ceatinine, albumin, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Further, there were highly statistically significant differences between hearing impairment versus normal for both side right and left ear frequency in Db unit (p<0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed vitamin D Deficiency (OR 2.59 95% CI 1.65-4.72; p<0.001), Head ache (OR 1.97 95% CI 1.30-2.85; p<0.001), sleeping disturbance (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.23-2.71, p=0.002), systolic blood pressure (OR 1.66 95% CI 1.20-2.48; p=0.009), cigarette smoking (OR 1.90 95% CI 1.23-2.95; p=0.004), age in years (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.30-2.54; p=0.026), nationality (Qatari) (OR 1.55 95% CI 1.10-2.17; p=0.014), diastolic blood pressure (OR 1.69 95% CI 1.14-2.52; p=0.012), age in years (OR 1.45 95% CI 1.30-2.54; p=0.026) and sheesha smokers (OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.32-3.11, p=0.038) were considered at higher risk as a predictors of hearing loss among diabetic patients. Conclusion: The current study results suggests that the impact of metabolic syndrome and vitamin D among diabetic patients were significantly associated with the hearing loss in the Qatari's population

Keywords: Epidemiology; Metabolic syndrome; Hearing loss; Diabetes; Vitamin D; Risk factors

255047

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), one of the main threats to ageing population health in the 21st century, is described as a worldwide epidemic as it affects the health and economy of almost all countries regardless of socioeconomic status or geographic location [1-3]. Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolicdisease with abnormal blood glucose levels affects the health and quality of patient’s life [4-8]. There have also been studies that patients with Metabolic Syndrome [MetSyn] diabetes have hearing loss greater than those without [4,5]. Severeal reports stated MetSyn and vitamin D deficiency which may act as important risk factors for the hearing impairment [1,9-12]. More recently some authors have reported that hearing loss has been influenced by diabetes MetSyn [13-17], which hearing loss can affect even the simplest tasks of daily life [16]. Most of authors agree that diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome can lead to hearing impairment [1,10,13].

The relation between hearing loss and different health conditions among middle aged population is documented and reported in detailed [9-15]. The aim of present study to investigate association between metabolic syndrome [MetSyn] and vitamin D deficiency on hearing loss among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.

255050

Subjects and Methods

This is an observational cohort study which was conducted during the period from January 2013 to July 2014 among diabetic patients aged between 20 and 59 years and registered in diabetic and ENT clinics of Hamad General Hospital in Qatar. IRB ethical approval was obtained from Hamad Medical Corporation.

Sampling procedure

The current sample size was determined by considering prevalence rate of 10%-12% impaired hearing loss among diabetes patients in Qatar [1,7], assuming 99% confidence interval and 2% bound on the error of estimation. The minimum sample size detected as 730 subjects. Finally, of the 700 registered with diagnosed diabetes and showed indications, only 528 (72.3%). agreed to participate this study in Hamad General Hospital.

National Cholesterol Education Program–Third Adult Treatment Panel (ATP III) [18,19].

According to ATP III criteria, a participant has the metabolic syndrome [MetSyn] if she/he has three or more of the following criteria : (1) Fasting Plasma Glucose test FPG ≥ 100 mg/dl (5.6 mmol/L) (2) Blood Pressure ≥ 130/85 mm Hg (3) Triglyceride ≥ 150 mg/dl (1.7 mmol/L) (4) high-density lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol: Men<40 mg/dl (1.03 mmol/L); Women<50 mg/dl (1.29 mmol/L (5) Men with waist circumference>102 cm and women with waist circumference>88 cm.

Questionnaire

The questionnaire, included socio-demographic, age, gender, nationality, education level, lifestyle habits, Body Mass Index (BMI), co-morbid symptoms, diabetic complications, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, Clinical biochemistry serum triglyceride, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and FPG, were collected.

Physical examination and measurements

BMI was calculated as; weight in kilogram divided by the square of height in meters. According to World Health Organization [WHO] criteria [20], if it is greater than 25 kg/m2, the subjects were assumed as overweight and greater than to 30 kg/m2, the subjects were considered as obese [20]. WHO [20] International Society of Hypertension Writing Group defined standardized criteria of hypertension when Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mm Hg or Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mm Hg or using anti-hypertensive medication.. Patients who walking or cycling for more than 30 min/day were classified as physically active.

Hearing evaluation procedures

Pure-tone audiometry is a behavioral test used to measure hearing sensitivity. This measure involves the peripheral hearing assessment [20,21]. The clinical digital audiometers (Grason Stadler gsi 61 clinical audiometer was used by pre-trained technicians to test patients' hearing level and calibrated according to ANSI 1996. Hearing loss evaluation described [21-23] as follows: Normal hearing: less than 25 dB in adults and 15 dB in children; Mild hearing loss: 25-39 dB; Moderate hearing loss: 40-69 dB; Severe hearing loss: 70-94 dB; and Profound hearing loss: 95+ dB.

The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version #22) performed for analysis. Student-t test was used to ascertain the significance of differences between two means of a continuous variable. Chi-square test Fisher’s exact test (two-tailed) were performed to test for differences in proportions of categorical variables between two or more groups. Pearson's matrix correlation determines the degree to which a relationship is linear or, it determines whether there is a linear component of association between variables. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the impact and predictors of selected factors on the presence of hearing loss. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Table 1 shows the socio-demographic studied subjects with MetSyn hearing loss and normal hearing among T2DM. The mean age (± SD, in years) for metabolic hearing loss versus normal hearing subjects was 47.7 ± 10.2 vs. 48.5 ± 9.1. The prevalence of hearing impairment was higher in Qataris than in non-Qataris (52.1% vs. 47.9%, p<0.001). Over 90% of the studied patients were using phone devices very frequently and 13.4% had hearing impairment watching TV. The consanguineous marriages were observed higher in Hearing loss (32.9%) than in normal hearing (23.0%) (p=0.028).

            Variables Metabolic Syndrome Hearing Loss ≥ 26 dB n=140 Without metabolic Normal Hearing<26 dB n=388 p-value significance
Age Group in years 47.7 ± 10.2 48.5 ± 9.1 0.403
  <35 years 13 (9.7) 31 (9.5)  
  35-44.9 years 25 (18.7) 74 (22.8) 0.05
  45-55 years 60 (44.8) 118 (51.7)  
  >55 years 36 (26.9) 52 (16)  
Gender        
  Male 55 (41) 146 (44.9) 0.446
  Female 79 (59) 179 (55.1)  
Nationality        
  Qatari 80 (59.7) 151 (46.5) <0.001
  Non Qatari 54 (40.3) 174 (53.5)  
Educational level        
  Illiterate 22 (16.4) 59 (18.2)  
  Primary 30 (22.4) 70 (21.5)  
  Intermediate 20 (14.9) 68 (20.9) 0.298
  Secondary 43 (32.1) 100 (30.8)  
  University 19 (14.2) 28 (8.6)  
Occupation        
  Housewife 87 (64.9) 191 (58.8)  
  Sedentary 32 (23.9) 77 (23.7)  
  Manual 10 (7.55) 47 (14.5) 0.216
  Businessman 5 (3.7) 10 (3.1)  
Do you use a mobile phone frequently        
  Yes 121 (90.2) 268 (82.5) 0.044
  No 13 (9.8) 57 (17.5)  
Do you hear TV sounds normally        
  Yes 112 (86.6) 292 (89.8) 0.045
  No 22 (13.4) 33 (10.2)  
Income        
  <$2,000 49 (36.6) 112 (34.5)  
  $2,000-$4,999 48 (35.8) 127 (39.1) 0.806
  >$5,000 37 (27.6) 86 (26.5)  
Consanguineous marriage        
  Yes 43 (32.1) 71 (21.8) 0.028
  No 91 (67.9) 254 (78.2)  

Table 1: Socio demographic characteristics of the subjects with MetSyn hearing impairment comparison with normal hearing among diabetics patients (N= 528).

Table 2 presents the evaluation of the MetSyn hearing loss and normal hearing among T2DM. Average (standard deviation) waist circumference, hip circumference, waist hip ratio and body mass index were significantly higher among the participants with MetS as compared to those without MS (p<0.001). The mean of diabetes onset duration (9.03 ± 4.35 years), sleeping disorder (5.76 ± 1.32 h), cigarette smoking (16.4%) and sheesha smoking (20.7%) were higher among hearing impairment. The associated risk factors were significantly higher in MetSyn with hearing loss such as including hypoglycemia, retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, diabetic foot ulcer, tinnitus, vertigo and headache than in normal hearing T2DM. Similarly, the history of MetS among first degree and second degree relatives were significantly higher among the patients with MetS hering loss compared to those normal hearing.

Variables Metabolic Syndrome Hearing Loss ≥ 26 dB n=140 Without metabolic Normal Hearing <26 dB n=388 P value
  n (%) n (%)  
Waist circumference (cm) [total sample] 103.40 ± 10.06 99.85 ± 9.50 <0.001
Hip circumference (cm) 114.15 ± 10.10 112.0075 ± 91 <0.001
Waist Hip Ratio (WHR) [total sample] 0.90 ± 0.05 0.88 ± 0.06 <0.001
Body Mass index [BMI] (Kg/m2) 28.54 ± 5.35 27.55 ± 4.08 0.024
BMI categories: n (%)      
<25 35 (25) 98 (25.3)  
25-30 56 (40) 177 (45.6) 0.387
≥ 30 49 (35) 113 (29.1)  
Exposure to sun 44 (32.0) 159 (41.0) <0.001
Walking time per/day      
<30 min 32 (23.0) 93 (24.2) 0.817
<60 min 40 (28.8) 97 (25.3) 0.432
Hours of sleep (Mean ± SD) 5.76 ± 1.32 6.07 ± 1.31 0.02
Duration of diabetes 9.03 ± 4.35 8.06 ± 4.29 0.025
Cigarette smoking 20 (15.0) 37 (11.4) 0.478
Sheesha Smoking 27 (20.1) 41 (12.6) 0.039
Diabetes complications and symptoms      
Hypoglycemia 35 (25.3) 63 (16.2) 0.022
Retinopathy 25 (17.9) 41 (10.6) 0.025
Nephropathy 20 (14.3) 48 (12.4) 0.281
Neuropathy 18 (12.9) 25 (6.4) 0.017
Macro vascular disease 16 (11.4) 32 (8..2) 0.13
Diabetic foot ulcer 21 (15.0) 58 (14.9) 0.988
Tinnitus 71 (50.8) 155 (39.9) 0.027
Vertigo 46 (32.9) 91 (23.5) 0.03
Headache 68 (48.6) 132 (34) 0.006
Family history of morbidities      
MS in first degree relatives 33 (23.6) 64 (16.5) <0.001
MS in second degree relatives 29 (20.5) 47 (12.1) <0.001
Hypertension 40 (28.57) 71 (18.3) 0.011
CHD 30 (21.4) 59 (15.2) 0.034

Table 2: Co-morbidities and family history of morbidities according to metabolic syndrome (N=528), MS=Metabolic syndrome (ATPIII criteria).

Table 3 shows baseline chemistry biomarker values among the two groups. There were statistically significant differences between hearing impairment versus normal hearing for vitamin D [18.91 ± 7.65 ng/ml vs. 22.85 ± 9.00 ng/ml; p=0.018], magnesium [0.81 ± 0.10 mmol/L vs. 0.89 ± 0.08 mmol/L; p<0.001], phosphorous [1.23 ± 0.25 mmol /L vs. 1.36 ± 0.56 mmol/L; p=0.048], HDL [1.33 ± 0.35 mmol /L vs. 1.23 ± 0.32 mmol/L; p=0.002], ceatinine [72.72 ± 17.6 mmol/L vs. 69.1 ± 17.84 mmol/L; p=0.047], albumin [45.37 ± 8.7 mmol/L vs. 40.97 ± 8.52 mmol/L; p=0.044], systolic blood pressure [131.1 ± 12.60 Hg vs. 128.2 ± 11.16 Hg; p=0.025] and diastolic blood pressure [82.69 ± 6.73 mm Hg vs. 81.23 ± 7.38 mm Hg; p=0.041].

Variables Metabolic Syndrome Hearing Loss ≥ 26 dB n= 140 Mean ± SD Without metabolic Normal Hearing <26 dB Mean ± SD P value
Vitamin D (ng/ml) 19.32 ± 7.84 21.15 ± 7.74 0.018
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 12.89 ± 2.28 12.60 ± 2.03 0.296
Magnesium (mmol/L) 0.81 ± 0.10 0.87 ± 0.08 <0.001
Potassium (mmol/L) 4.57 ± 0.59 4.50 ± 0.63 0.503
Calcium (mmol/L) 1.92 ± 0.44 1.90 ± 0.40 0.62
Phosphorous (mmol/L) 1.23 ± 0.25 1.30 ± 0.56 0.048
Creatinine(mmol/L) 72.70 ± 17.67 69.18 ± 17.84 0.047
Fasting Blood Glucose(mmol/L) 9.26 ± 3.01 9.53 ± 2.93 0.355
HbA1c 8.88 ± 1.42 8.44 ± 1.57 0.003
Cholesterol (mmol/L) 4.81 ± 1.30 4.79 ± 1.02 0.821
HDL (mmol/L) 1.33 ± 0.35 1.237 ± 0.32 0.002
LDL (mmol/L) 2.80 ± 0.88 3.00 ± 0.79 0.465
Albumin (mmol/L) 45.36 ± 8.70 40.97 ± 6.52 0.044
Billirubin (mmol/L) 7.10 ± 3.71 8,47 ± 4.70 0.009
Triglyceride (mmol/L) 1.79 ± 0.62 1.59 ± 0.47 0.001
Uric Acid (mmol/L) 335.0 ± 101.7 332.0 ± 114.0 0.845
Systolic Blood Pressure mm Hg 131.1 ± 12.6 128.1 ± 11.16 0.025
Diastolic Blood Pressure mm Hg 82.6 ± 6.7 81.2 ± 7.3 0.041
Vitamin D Level n (%) n (%)  
Deficiency      
25 (OH) D <20 ng/ml 76 (54.3) 164 (42.3)  
Insufficiency      
25 (OH) D 20-29 ng/ml 42 (30.0) 150 (38.7) 0.049
Optimal      
25 (OH) D 30-80 ng/ml 22 (15.7) 74 (19.0)  

Table 3: Clinical biochemistry baseline value among hearing loss and normal hearing subject (N=528).

Table 4 shows correlation matrix between hearing loss, metabolic syndrome, tinnitus, vertigo, systolic and diastolic BP and headache. As can be seen from this table the hearing loss was highly significantly correlated with variables such as metabolic syndrome, tinnitus, vertigo, systolic and diastolic BP and headache.

  Hearing Loss Metabolic Syndrome Tinnitus Vertigo Vitamin D Systolic BP Diastolic BP Headache
Hearing Loss 1.00 0.462** 0.359** 0.477** 0.333** 0.229** 210** 0.265**
Metabolic Syndrome   1.00 0.561** 0.336** 0.340** 0.186* 0.335** 0.270**.
Tinnitus     1.00 0.539** 0.246** 0.458** 0.322** 0.328**
Vertigo       1.00 0.345** 0.354** 0.478** 0.465**.
Vitamin D         1.00 0.195* 0.243** 0.281**
Systolic BP           1.00 0.554** 0.213**
Diastolic BP             1.00 .294**
Headache               1.00

Table 4: Correlation matrix between hearing loss, Metabolic Syndrome, tinnitus, vertigo, ystolic and diastolic BP and headache, **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed), *Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Table 5 presents multivariate logistic regression analysis of variables for predictors of hearing loss among diabetic patients. Vitamin D Deficiency (OR 2.59 95% CI 1.65-4.72; p<0.001), Head ache (OR 1.97 95% CI 1.30-2.85; p<0.001), sleeping disturbance (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.23-2.71, p=0.002), systolic blood pressure (OR 1.66 95% CI 1.20-2.48; p=0.009), cigarette smoking (OR 1.90 95% CI 1.23-2.95; p=0.004), age in years (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.30-2.54; p=0.026), nationality (Qatari) (OR 1.55 95% CI 1.10-2.17; p=0.014), diastolic blood pressure (OR 1.69 95% CI 1.14-2.52; p=0.012), age in years (OR 1.45 95% CI 1.30-2.54; p=0.026) and sheesha smokers (OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.32-3.11, p=0.038) were considered at higher risk as a predictors of hearing loss among diabetic patients.

Variables Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value
Vitamin D deficiency 2.59 (1.65-4.72) <0.001
Head ache 1.97 (1.30-2.85) 0.001
Sleep disturbance 1.83 (1.23-2.71) 0.002
Systolic blood pressure 1.66 (1.20-2.48) 0.009
Cigarette smoking 1.90 (1.23-2.95) 0.004
Diastolic blood pressure 1.69 (1.14-2.52) 0.012
Age in years 1.45 (1.30-2.54) 0.026
Sheesha Smoking 1.79 (1.32-3.11) 0.038

Table 5: Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis of the association between selected lifestyle factors and presence of hearing loss (n = 528).

255051

Discussion

The current study has revealed hearing loss as an important consequence of diabetes indicating metabolic assessment. Nearly one fourth of the studied diabetics patients suffered from hearing loss which is similar to the findings in some other studies [1,9,10]. MetSyn is a major public health concern because it is associated with hearing loss [1]. Present study revealed evidence that vitamin D deficiency and higher prevalence of MetSyn effect hearing loss [1,16,22,23].The findings of this study concerning symptoms and risk factors are consistent with rates reported elsewhere [1,9-14].

Most recently the results presented by Sun et al. [13] from modelling the association between the presence of metabolic syndrome components and the hearing thresholds are confirmed that there was a strong linear increase in the hearing threshold with the presence of metabolic syndrome components and an increasing number of components of metabolic syndrome. This is consistent with present obtained results.

The impact of vitamin D and MetSyn which influences the hearing loss are not fully understood [1]. Several population-based studies has evaluated the association between diabetes and hearing loss [7-15] and a number of clinical studies have confirmed an association of MetSyn diabetes mellitus and hearing loss [11-15,17,22,23]. This is consistent with the current study. Audiometric data obtained in this study revealed that hearing became worse as blood sugar increased in subjects. The present study revealed a big percent of the subjects of hearing loss were diabetic (26.50%) and hypertensive (28.57%).

Other associated risk factors in our middle aged subjects with hearing loss were tinnitus (50.8%), retinopathy (17.9%), nephropathy (14.3%), neuropathy (12.9%), macro vascular disease (11.4%) , vertigo (32.9%) and head ache (48.6%). Those results are consistent with the previous reported studies [9-16]. Overall, diabetes is very complex and co-morbid disease that can affect multiple organs and physiological functions, on the biochemical and molecular levels [1,17,23]. The current investigation showed that MetSyn patients with vitamin D deficiency had poorer hearing levels when compared with normal subjects.

255053

Conclusion

The current study results suggests that the impact of metabolic syndrome and vitamin D among diabetic patients were significantly associated with the hearing loss in the Qatari's population.

255055

Contributors

AB designed and supervised the study and was involved in data collection, statistical analysis the writing of the paper. AOAA , KA and LG were involved in data collection, interpretation of data and writing manuscript. All authors approved the final version.

Acknowledgment: This work was generously supported and funded by the Qatar Diabetes Association, Qatar Foundation. The authors would like to thank the Hamad Medical Corporation for their support and ethical approval (HMC RP # 10213/10 HMC RP # 11147/13 and13234/13, IRB# 13-00063).

255056

Competing Interests

None to declare

255058

References

  1. Bener A, Al-Hamaq AOAA, Abdulhadi K, Salahaldin AH, Gansan L (2016) Interaction between hearing loss and type 2 diabetes mellitus in highly endogamous population. Diabetes Metab Syndr pii: S1871-4021(16)30203-X.
  2. Bener A, Kim E, Mutlu F, Eliyan A, Delghan H, et al. (2014) Burden of diabetes mellitus attributable to demographic levels in Qatar: An emerging public health problem. Diabetes Metab Syndr 8: 216-220.
  3. Bener A, Al-Laftah F, Al-Hamaq AOAA, Daghash M, Abdullatef WK (2014) A study of diabetes complications in an endogamous population: An emerging public health burden: Diabetes Metab Syndr. Clin Res Rev 8: 108-114.
  4. Frisina ST, Mapes F, Kim S, Frisina DR, Frisina RD (2006) Characterization of hearing loss in aged type II diabetics. Hear Res 211: 103–113.
  5. Bainbridge KE, Hoffman HJ, Cowie CC (2008) Diabetes and hearing impairment in the United States: Audiometric evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2004. Ann Intern Med 149: 1-10.
  6. Kakarlapudi V, Sawyer R, Staecker H (2003) The effect of diabetes on sensorineural hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 24: 382-386.
  7. Bener A, Salahaldin AH, Darwish SM, Gansan L (2008) Association between hearing loss and type 2 diabetes mellitus in elderly people in rapidly developed society. Biomed Research 19: 187-193.
  8. Akinpelu OV, Mujica-Mota M, Daniel SJ (2014) Is type 2 diabetes mellitus associated with alterations in hearing? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 124: 767-776.
  9. Austin DF, Konrad-Martin D, Griest S, McMillan GP, McDermott D, et al. (2009) Diabetes-related changes in hearing. Laryngoscope 119: 1788-1796.
  10. Kang SH, Jung da J, Cho KH, Park JW, Lee KY, et al.(2016) Association between HbA1c level and hearing impairment in a non-diabetic adult population. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 14: 129-134
  11. Konrad-Martin D, Austin DF, Griest S, McMillan GP, McDermott D, et al. (2010) Diabetes-related changes in auditory brainstem responses. Laryngoscope 120: 150-158.
  12. Ren J, Zhao P, Chen L, Xu A, Brown SN, et al. (2009) Hearing loss in middle-aged subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Med Res 40: 18-23.
  13. Sun YS, Fang WH, Kao TW, Yang HF, Peng TC, et al. (2015) Components of metabolic syndrome as risk factors for hearing threshold shifts. PLoS ONE 10: e0134388.
  14. Park M, Lee JS, Lee JH, Oh SH, Park MK (2015) Prevalence and risk factors of chronic otitis media: The Korean national health and nutrition examination survey 2010-2012. PLoS ONE 10: e0125905.
  15. Kumari MS, Meganadh KR, Madhavi J, Jyothy A (2016) Prevalence of otological disorders in diabetic cases with hearing loss. J Diabetes Metab 7: 666.
  16. Bener A, Al-Hamaq AO, Kurtulus EM, Abdullatef WK, Zirie M (2016) The role of vitamin D, obesity and physical exercise in regulation of glycemia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus patients. Diabetes Metab Syndr 10: 198-204.
  17. Díaz de León-Morales LV, Jáuregui-Renaud K, Garay-Sevilla ME, Hernández-Prado J, Malacara-Hernández JM (2005) Auditory impairment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Med Res 36: 507-510.
  18. Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J (2006) Metabolic syndrome-a new world-wide definition. A consensus statement from the international diabetes federation. Diabet Med 23: 469-480.
  19. Teppala S, Madhavan S, Shankar A (2012) Bisphenol A and metabolic syndrome: Results from NHANES. Int J Endocrinol 1-5.
  20. Debonis DA, Donohue CL (2007) Survey of audiology: Fundamentals for audiologists and health professionals. Allyn and Bacon.
  21. Campbell KC (1998) The basic audiologic assessment. Essential audiology for physicians. Singular Publishing Group Inc.
  22. Diaz GM, González L, Ramos-Trautmann G, Pérez CM, Palacios C (2016) Vitamin D status is associated with metabolic syndrome in a clinic-based sample of hispanic adults. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 14: 259-264.
  23. Helzner EP, Contrera KJ (2016) Type 2 diabetes and hearing impairment. Curr Diab Rep 16: 3.

Citation: Bener A, Al-Hamaq AOAA, Abdulhadi K, Salahaldin AH, Gansan L (2017) The Impact of Metabolic Syndrome and Vitamin D on Hearing Loss in Qatar. Otolaryngol (Sunnyvale) 7:306. DOI: 10.4172/2161-119X.1000306

Copyright: © 2017 Bener A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distributionand reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top