Transplant Reports : Open Access
Open Access

Xenotransplantation; Organ shortage; Immunological barriers; Genetic modification; Pig; Primates; Cross-species transmission; Ethical considerations; Public perception

Introduction

The gap between the demand for and the availability of human organs for transplantation remains a critical challenge in modern medicine. This persistent organ shortage has driven the exploration of alternative sources, most notably xenotransplantation [1]. Xenotransplantation, the transplantation of organs, tissues, or cells from animals into humans, offers a potential solution to this critical problem. However, significant hurdles, primarily immunological barriers and the risk of cross-species disease transmission (xenozoonosis), have historically hampered its clinical application [2]. The primary focus of xenotransplantation research has been on using pigs as donor animals due to their physiological similarities to humans, ease of breeding, and large litter sizes [3].

Description

Significant advancements have been made in overcoming the immunological barriers to xenotransplantation. One of the major obstacles is hyperacute rejection, a rapid and severe immune response mediated by pre-existing antibodies in the human recipient that target antigens on the pig cells [4]. Genetic modification of pigs, particularly the knockout of genes encoding xenoantigens such as α-1,3-galactosyltransferase (GGTA1), has significantly reduced hyperacute rejection [5]. Further genetic modifications, such as the expression of human complement regulatory proteins and other immunomodulatory molecules in pigs, have further improved graft survival [6].

Beyond genetic engineering, advancements in immunosuppressive strategies have also played a crucial role in improving xenograft survival. These strategies include the use of conventional immunosuppressive drugs, such as calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil, as well as novel approaches, such as costimulatory blockade and the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting specific immune pathways [7].

Several preclinical studies using non-human primates as recipients have demonstrated promising results with genetically modified pig organs. For example, heart and kidney xenotransplants from genetically modified pigs into baboons have achieved significant long-term graft survival, paving the way for clinical trials in humans [8]. Recently, there have been a few cases of successful pig kidney xenotransplants into brain-dead human recipients, providing further evidence of the potential of this technology [9].

Discussion

The progress in overcoming immunological barriers has brought xenotransplantation closer to clinical reality. However, the risk of xenozoonosis remains a significant concern. While pigs are considered relatively low risk for transmitting infectious diseases to humans, the possibility of transmitting porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) or other unknown pathogens cannot be entirely ruled out. Rigorous screening of donor animals and careful monitoring of recipients are crucial to minimize this risk.

Ethical considerations surrounding xenotransplantation are complex and multifaceted. Concerns have been raised about animal welfare, the potential for unintended consequences of genetic modifications, and the equitable allocation of xenografts. Public perception and acceptance of xenotransplantation are also important factors to consider. Open and transparent communication about the risks and benefits of xenotransplantation is essential to foster public trust and acceptance.

The choice of donor species also raises ethical questions. While pigs are currently the preferred donor species, some argue that using non-human primates, which are phylogenetically closer to humans, might be more advantageous from an immunological perspective. However, the use of non-human primates raises significant ethical concerns related to animal welfare and the potential for greater risk of disease transmission [10].

Future research in xenotransplantation should focus on several key areas. Further refinement of genetic modifications of donor animals is needed to minimize the need for long-term immunosuppression. Development of more sensitive and specific methods for detecting xenozoonosis is crucial to ensure recipient safety. Long-term studies in non-human primates are needed to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of xenotransplantation before widespread clinical application.

Standardized protocols for donor animal breeding, organ procurement, and recipient monitoring need to be established. International guidelines and regulations are also needed to address the ethical and safety concerns related to xenotransplantation. Public education and engagement are essential to promote a better understanding of xenotransplantation and address public concerns.

Conclusion

Xenotransplantation holds significant promise as a potential solution to the critical shortage of human organs for transplantation. Significant progress has been made in overcoming immunological barriers and reducing the risk of xenozoonosis. However, important ethical and safety concerns remain. Continued research, rigorous preclinical testing, and careful clinical trials are essential to ensure the safety and efficacy of xenotransplantation. Open and transparent discussions about the ethical implications are also crucial for fostering public trust and acceptance. The future of xenotransplantation depends on a multidisciplinary approach that combines scientific innovation with careful ethical considerations.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Siddiky A (2016) A Career in Transplant Surgery. BMJ 354: i4356.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Romagnoli J, Casanova D, Papalois V (2017) Tranplant Surgery Training in Europe Board Examinations in Transplant Surgery and the Accreditation of Transplant Centers. Transplantation 101: 449-450.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Tan J, Khalil MAM, Ahmed D, Pisharam J, Lim CY, et al. (2021) The Living-Related Transplant Program in Brunei Darussalam – Lessons Learnt from A Nascent National Program in A Small, Muslim and Asian Country. J Transplant 20: 8828145.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Majeed MH, Ali AA, Saeed F (2017) International Medical Graduates: From Brain Drain to Potential Gain. Int J Med Educ 8:37-39.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Chan-On C, Sarwal M. M (2017) A Comprehensive Analysis of the Current Status and Unmet Needs in Kidney Transplantation in Southeast Asia.Front Med 4: 84.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Wolff T, Schumacher M, Dell-Kuster S, Rosenthal R, Dickenmann M, et al. (2014) Surgical Complications in Kidney Transplantation: No Evidence for A Learning Curve. J Surg Educ 71: 748-755.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Thomas M, Rentsch M, Drefs M, Andrassy J, Meiser B, et al. (2013) Impact of Surgical Training and Surgeon's Experience on Early Outcome in Kidney Transplantation. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398: 581-585.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Cash H, Slowinski T, Buechler A, Grimm A, Friedersdorff F, et al. (2012 ) Impact of Surgeon Experience on Complication Rates and Functional Outcomes of 484 Deceased Donor Renal Transplants: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study. BJU Int 110: E368-E373.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Bauer H, Honselmann K (2017) Minimum Volume Standards in Surgery- Are we There Yet?. Visc Med 33: 106-116.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Sivathasan C, Lim CP, Kerk KL, Sim DK, Mehra MR, et al. (2017) Mechanical circulatory support and heart transplantation in the Asia Pacific region. J Heart Lung Transplant 36: 13-18.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref