Archives of Science
Open Access

Anaerobic; Pig slurry; Veterinary Medicine

Introduction

Additionally, in some parts of the world, veterinary antibiotics are also utilised to enhance the growth of animals. Veterinary drugs are regularly used in animal husbandry to improve/protect animal health, large quantities of biologically active compounds are frequently found in animal manures and urine as a result of high percentages of prescribed veterinary drugs and their metabolites being expelled. Animal manures are typically utilised as organic fertilisers to increase soil quality, nutrient cycling, and soil enrichment. This is also a good way to dispose of trash. However, doing so could result in veterinary medications getting into the environment.

Given the social effects, including antibiotic resistance, as well as the effects on land and aquatic ecosystems, this is concerning. Directive 2004/28/EC mandated the environmental risk assessment because of the veterinary medications’ previously noted environmental impact. Testing the degradability of veterinary drugs while being stored on a farm in a laboratory setting is common. In a nutshell, these investigations examine the analyte concentration over time, often over 120 days, however this depends on the veterinary medicine Such evaluations are necessary to comprehend the concentrations of veterinary medicines applied to land, as they are vulnerable to changes in concentration during storage. Various dissipative activities, such as microbial mineralization, sorption, and hydrolysis, are experienced by veterinary pharmaceuticals during storage and have the ability to lower the parent chemical concentration [1, 2].

Currently, published veterinary drug degradation rates in manures vary; this is most likely due to variations in slurry characteristics and the unidentified impact these have on degradation rates. Tyrosine, for instance, has been observed to degrade between 2 and 45 days (DT50) in pig manures. Despite acknowledged ambiguity and inconsistency in the literature, the risk assessment allows the use of just one manure per animal type. As a result, these analyses might be biassed and have inadequate environmental representation. We hypothesise that this variability is caused by variations in characteristics like redox potential [3].

Redox potential control

Due to variations in storage conditions, water content, animal feed, age, use of biocides, and physical manure additives, manure characteristics are exceedingly heterogeneous. Due to the different microbiological activities (methanogenic vs. aerobic), animal manures have a highly heterogeneous redox potential, and the oxidativereductive state is controlled by and connected with pH, temperature, moisture, and manure age. For instance, Park et al. (2006) explored how temperature and moisture affected redox and found that summertime redox values were lower (333 mV) than those of wintertime (232 mV), likely due to higher microbial activity. Despite being a common practise, the redox potentials of pig slurries are rarely documented in the scientific literature. Despite being a necessity within manure degradation trials under the risk assessment (250 mV to 400 mV), redox potentials of pig slurries are hardly documented in scientific literature. When redox potentials are reported, they can be anywhere from slightly decreased aerobic values (i.e., +50 to 189 mV) to more frequently reported anaerobic circumstances (i.e., 285 to 410 mV). Contaminants such nutrients, metals, organic matter, industrial chemicals, phenolic compounds, and endocrine disruptors can be removed by controlling the redox potential of environmental matrices/wastes. For instance, redox potential control is frequently used to treat wastewaters, and biological nutrient removal (BNR) is established by using a series of anaerobic, anoxic, and aerobic phases. Different microorganisms predominate during different phases, resulting in diverse biological processes that happen at particular ORP ranges that have previously been described in animal wastes. Nitrification takes place between +100 and +350 mV, sulphuration between +25 and +250 mV, denitrification between +50 and 50 mV, biological phosphorus release between +100 and 225 mV, and methane production between 175 and +400 mV [4, 5, 6].

Additionally, membrane bioreactors frequently use aeration of wastewaters to accelerate the transformation of developing pollutants. Given the advantages of redox regulation, researchers have also thought about how it may be used in animal dung to control nutrient levels and odours showed that the removal of tylosin in dairy lagoon sediment was increased under aerobic (+350 mV) compared to reduced (100 mV) conditions, and Bachmann et al. (1988) reported that oxic conditions promoted degradation of A/B-Hexachlorocyclohexane. Redox conditions and veterinary medicine fate have only been the subject of a few studies. These studies show how redox potential affects the fate of. Understanding this link is crucial for harmonising laboratory assessments and reducing variability in risk assessments. More accurate assessments with higher environmental [7].

This work attempts to fill this information gap and enhance our comprehension of variability within manure degradation trials by addressing the influence of anaerobic pig slurry redox potentials on the degradation of veterinary drugs. Researchers have long struggled with controlling the redox potentials of wastes and other environmental factors. Previous redox control techniques have been described in the literature, but they are frequently expensive, time-consuming, and complex the main components of controlling systems were self-built platinum electrode probes and a relay system made up of a complex self-made calomel half-cell, millivolt metre, and metre relay. To distribute the oxygen into the matrix solution, the devices commonly use magnetic stirrers. Here, we offer a practical and affordable method of redox regulation [8, 9, 10].

Acknowledgement

First and foremost, I would like to thank Fera Science Ltd. and the National Environmental Research Council for their support of this research (grant reference NE/R009368/1). I want to express my gratitude to the CCSS team at Fera Science Ltd for their assistance and support throughout this experiment as well as for providing enough room for me to conduct my research at a time when laboratory availability was limited as a result of COVID-19 disruptions.

Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors state that they are clear of any financial conflicts of interest or personal ties that might have appeared to affect the research presented in this paper.

1. Albrich JM, McCarthy CA, Hurst JK (1981) Biological reactivity of hypochlorous acid: Implications for microbiocidal mechanisms of leukocyte myelperoxidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 210-214.

Indexed at

2. APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th edn American Public Health Association; Washington, DC, USA.

Indexed at

3. Bessems E (1998) The effect of practical conditions on the efficiency of disinfectants. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 41: 177-183.
4. Beuvink JM, Spoelstra SF, Hogendrop RJ (1992) An automated method for measuring the time course of gas production of feedstuffs incubated with buffered rumen fluid. Netherlands J Agric Sci 40: 401-407.
5. Chmielewski RAN, Frank JF (2003) Biofilm formation and control in food processing facilities. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2: 22-32.
6. Ducan S, Daniele T (1996) Hypochlorous acid stress in Escherichia coli: Rresistance, DNA damage, and comparison with hydrogen peroxide stress. J Bacteriol 178:6145-6150.

Indexed at

7. Garcia MT, Campos E, Sanchez-Leal J, Ribosa I (1999) Effect of the alkyl chain length on the anaerobic biodegradability and toxicity of quaternary ammonium based surfactants. Chemosphere 38: 3473-3483.

Indexed at

8. Kitis M (2004) Disinfection of wastewater with peracetic acid: A review. Environ Int 30:470-55.

Indexed at

9. KME (1999) The discharging unit of livestock wastes. Korean Ministry of Environment; Seoul, Korea. Notification number 1999-109.
10. Lambert RJW, Johnston MD (2001) The effect of interfering substances on the disinfection process: a mathematic model. J Appl Microbiol 91: 548-555.

Indexed at