Biochemistry & Physiology: Open Access
Open Access

Increased incubation to 84 days with organic residues higher in phenolic acid concentration led to a more noticeable improvement in aggregate size, which was associated with soil phenolic acid and soil carbohydrate content. A quadratic response and plateau function was used to connect the total amount of phenolic acids in the plant residues to MWD, which was determined after 84 days of incubation. The MWD quadratically rose as vanillin-vanillic acid concentrations in the plant residues increased [1]. After 84 days, soil organic C was correlated with MWD and the vanillin-vanillic acid content of the residue, indicating that C that remained in the soil after decomposition may be correlated with a certain phenolic acid content. The findings imply that the interaction with phenolic acids like vanillin or vanillic acid released by microbial decomposition from the structural components of the residue strengthens transient aggregate stability that was initially caused by microbial decomposition of the residue’s carbohydrate and amino acid content.

The creation, stabilisation, and breakdown of soil organic matter depend on microbial reactions. A novel method for tracing metabolic pathways combines position-specific 13C tagging with compoundspecific 13C-PLFA analysis [2-4]. This combination was used to examine how two important monosaccharides, glucose and ribose, changed over a short period of time in soil under field circumstances. The incorporation of 13C from specific molecule locations in bulk soil, microbial biomass, and cell membranes of microbial groups identified by 13C-PLFA allowed for the measurement of sugar transformations.

Compared to all other microbial groupings, the 13C incorporation in the Gram negative bacteria was one order of magnitude higher. The microbial biomass contained all of the 13C that was collected from the soil on day three. On day 10, however, some of the 13C was found in microbial excretions or non-extractable microbial cell components. Sugars quickly mineralize from soil solution as they are not absorbed by mineral particles due to a lack of charged functional groups [5]. Microorganisms, on the other hand, converted carbohydrates into metabolites that had a slower turnover. The 13C incorporation from the various glucose sites into soil and microbial biomass demonstrated that the pentose phosphate route and glycolysis, the two primary mechanisms in which organisms utilise glucose, coexist in soils. The pattern of 13C incorporation into individual glucose sites in PLFAs, however, revealed intense recycling of the extra 13C via gluconeogenesis and a blending of both glucose-utilizing processes. The pentose phosphate route is also initially utilised in the pattern of positionspecific ribose C incorporation, but on day 10 it is overprinted once more as a result of vigorous recycling and mixing. This demonstrates that glucose and ribose, as pervasive substrates, are utilised in a variety of metabolic pathways and that their C is extensively recycled in microbial biomass.

Understanding the destiny of individual C atoms through position-specific labelling greatly expands our knowledge of the processes involved in microbial groups’ consumption of sugars and, consequently, of soil C fluxes.

Between 2001 and 2013, the presence and acceptance rates of hypotheses in papers published in seven influential soil journals were examined. The study’s objectives were to quantify the testing of hypotheses in soil science and look into its historical development. The journals were Soil & Tillage Research, Ganoderma, Plant and Soil, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, European Journal of Soil Science, and Applied Soil Ecology. The seven journals combined to produce 15,344 publications throughout that time. 620 papers were used as a sample, and 74% of those studies tested one hypothesis, 20% tested two or more and 6% presented a hypothesis. All tested hypotheses were ultimately accepted in 66% of cases, and the acceptance rates for the seven journals remained largely stable throughout time [6-8]. Research with just one hypothesis is more likely to be accepted than research with several. Although there were some variations amongst journals, it was determined that soil science has relatively low acceptance rates for hypotheses when compared to other scientific fields.

In science, the word “hypothesis” has several different meanings. A hypothesis is viewed as the predicate of an if-then statement, a conjecture, an explanation of an observed pattern for an observation, phenomenon, or scientific problem that can be verified by additional research, or as an imaginative conjecture that represents the initial stage of scientific inquiry [9]. A hypothesis, in the words of Earman and Salmon, is a claim that is meant to be evaluated in terms of its outcomes. A hypothesis is a conclusion drawn from a particular theory. Ford distinguished a postulate a data assertion made to provide a logical test from a hypothesis. When a hypothesis refers to historical causes that are unlikely to be replicated in an experiment for currently observable phenomena, it is classified as historical rather than experimental. In biology, soil science, and geology, historical assumptions are accepted. The varying definitions have resulted in improper usage, and a hypothesis is occasionally used interchangeably with a theory, a theory’s axioms, or a postulation. A hypothesis is a general assumption that has to be investigated and that can either be confirmed or rejected.

One of the accepted scientific ways of reasoning is the testing of hypotheses using the hypothetic-deductivism framework. Popper’s falsificationist philosophy holds that theories can only be disproved, not confirmed, and that incorrect theories should be eliminated as well as those tests should be chosen so that they might produce disconfirming results rather than confirming ones. In soil science, the idea that science is theory-driven and the application of the hypotheticaldeductive style of reasoning based on the falsification approach is very well-established. For instance, the German soil chemist J. von Liebig asserted that the scientific method in nature is deductive and a priori, meaning that any experiment should be backed by a theory and that an experiment is only important if it tests a hypothesis. The importance of theory for soil microbial ecology was underlined by Prosser et al. In their statement that there must be a means to reject a hypothesis, implicitly referred to Popper’s criterion of falsification. They claimed that the complexity and diversity of soil systems make it difficult to test hypotheses in a rigorous manner. In his discussion of how models might provide hypotheses that can be verified through field observation, Phillips distinguished between testable and falsifiable hypotheses. A falsification technique was made an attempt to be applied by Bradford and Fierer to significant hypotheses in the biogeography of microbial communities. Thomas Kuhn, who established the terms paradigm and revolution in science and noted how scientists typically do not process hypotheses in accordance with the falsification principle, however, has contested the falsification approach.

It has been pretty extensively examined how often articles in different scientific fields support tested hypotheses, and the higher acceptance rate of tested hypotheses is seen as being too good to be true. Studies with noteworthy findings have a higher likelihood of being published in journals with high impact factors. Conversely, studies that present contradictory results are more frequently published in journals with lower impact factors. Additionally, it is commonly known that editors accept papers based on the quality and significance of the research findings, just as researchers frequently submit manuscripts for publication. Because of this, the ideal of science, which is motivated by theories and a spirit of falsification, may be at odds with the reality of science, which is biassed in presenting experimental results [10].

Both the quantity and importance of most journals’ articles in the field of soil science are rising rapidly. This is due in part to the discipline’s energy and in part to the “publish or perish” mentality that seems to permeate colleges and research institutions all around the world. The increase in publications in the field of soil science has been pretty thoroughly recorded, but more research needs to be done on the analysis of hypothesis testing.

In this study, we looked into how hypotheses are tested in soil science articles to answer two questions: (1) is hypothesis testing dominated by confirmation? (2) Are there differences in how hypotheses are tested in soil science and other scientific disciplines? (3) Can testing one or more hypotheses alter the outcome of the hypothesis test? (4) How has the process of evaluating scientific hypotheses changed throughout time?

In this study, the testing of hypotheses in soil science was measured, and its historical development was examined. Seven significant soil journals were surveyed. 655 publications in all were examined between 2001 and 2013. There has never been a thorough examination of soil theories in soil science.

Conclusion

Our research shows that the addition of various C-substrates affects the composition of N2O-reducing communities both directly and indirectly, demonstrating niche partitioning within the two main clades of N2O reducers. Acetate and the combination of C-substrates were generally preferred over HEC by representatives of both nosZ clades of N2O reducing communities, however beta-proteo bacterial species within both clades responded favourably to HEC. Our results show that changes in the nature of the bacterial population that reduces N2O result in significant changes in the C substrate. These findings may help to understand how the type of C substrate affects soil N2O generation and reduction rates as well as the ratio of end products during de-nitrification.

Conflict of Interest

The author declared that there is no conflict of interest

Acknowledgement

None

1. Le Quéré C, Raupach MR, Canadell JG, Marland G, Bopp L, et al. (2009) Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nat Geosci 2: 831–836.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J, Houghton R, Kauppi PE, et al. (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333: 988–993.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304: 1623–1627.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Tilman D (1998) The greening of the green revolution. Nature 396: 211–212.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Fargione JE, Hill JD, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319: 1235–1238.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, et al. (2008) Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319: 1238–1240.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Melillo JM, Reilly JM, Kicklighter DW, Gurgel AC, Cronin TW (2009) Indirect emissions from biofuels: How important. Science 326: 1397–1399.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Fargione JE, Plevin RJ, Hill JD (2010) The ecological impact of biofuels. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41: 351–377.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Donner SD, Kucharik CJ (2008) Corn-based ethanol production compromises goal of reducing nitrogen export by the Mississippi River. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 4513–4518.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Hill J, Polasky S, Nelson E, Tilman D, Huo H (2009) Climate change and health costs of air emissions from biofuels and gasoline. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 106: 2077–2082.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref