Journal of Dental Pathology and Medicine
Open Access

Interdisciplinary collaboration; Medicine and dentistry interaction; Oral-systemic health link; Integrated healthcare; Patientcentered care

Introduction

The intricate web of interactions between different disciplines is increasingly evident as our understanding of health and wellbeing evolves. Among these disciplines, medicine and dentistry have traditionally stood apart, each focusing on specific aspects of human health. However, a growing body of evidence highlights the interplay and interdependence between these fields, underscoring the need for a more integrated approach to patient care. This paper, titled "Synergies and Interplay: The Dynamic Interaction between Medicine and Dentistry," aims to explore the multifaceted relationship between medicine and dentistry, shedding light on the shared challenges, collaborative opportunities, and mutual benefits that arise from their interaction [1]. Historically, medicine and dentistry have been treated as separate domains, often due to differences in training, practice settings, and patient populations. Medical professionals primarily address systemic health concerns, while dental practitioners focus on oral health. However, as research progresses, it becomes increasingly apparent that oral health is intricately linked to overall systemic health. Conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and respiratory disorders have been found to have connections with oral health status. This realization challenges the conventional compartmentalization of these disciplines and calls for a more holistic understanding of health [2].

The recognition of the oral-systemic health link has significant implications for patient care. A comprehensive approach that addresses both oral and systemic health is essential to provide well-rounded and effective treatment. The convergence of medical and dental knowledge can lead to more accurate diagnoses, better treatment outcomes, and improved overall well-being for patients. As such, the concept of integrated healthcare, where medical and dental professionals collaborate closely, has gained prominence. Moreover, the blurring boundaries between medicine and dentistry are mirrored in education and training. Interdisciplinary programs are emerging to equip future healthcare professionals with a broader perspective that encompasses both fields [3]. This prepares them to recognize and address the complex relationships between oral and systemic health, fostering a more comprehensive approach to patient care. Collaborative research efforts also underscore the significance of the interaction between medicine and dentistry. Studies exploring the common risk factors, shared inflammatory pathways, and the impact of oral health interventions on systemic conditions contribute to the body of knowledge that informs both fields. By pooling resources and expertise, researchers can uncover insights that may have far-reaching implications for improving patient outcomes [4].

Productive control of the aggravation during and after careful medicines is quite possibly of the main test in medication. Sedative activity of the ongoing ordinarily applied sedative atoms is known to endure under 2 h, which is viewed as short. Despite the fact that numerous careful medicines might be done in less than 2 h, the topic of postoperative agony stays open. Consequently, torment control frequently proceeds with long after the careful medicines. Subsequently, mainstream researchers plans to drag out sedative particles' movement some way or another. Somewhat short sedative impacts are one test, other than the way that numerous infusions increment the aggravation and chance of disease and tissue harm [5]. Dental specialists overall apply great many cartridges of nearby sedatives in only one year. As per a few sources, a typical dental specialist applies in excess of 1500 cartridges of neighborhood sedatives during one year. Simultaneously, it is being assessed that in excess of 300 million sedative cartridges are involved each year in the US. One of the primary generally acknowledged dental neighborhood sedatives was procaine (Star). His famous business trademark is Novocain (NOV). It was blended in 1905 by Alfred Einhorn, and presented in clinical practice by Heinrich Braun. From the part of substance structure, it has a place with the amino ester gathering of mixtures. In addition to other things, this sedative was the main nearby sedative that got general acknowledgment in the US. Cover has a place with a gathering of amides and it is known as a specialist of fast and middle of the road activity, and as per the writing, it enjoys various upper hands over NOV, one of them being the less unfavorably susceptible [5].

On the opposite side, articaine (Craftsmanship) is another significant nearby dental sedative acquiring prevalence. Its underlying particularity contrasted with other dental sedatives is the presence of a thiophene ring. As revealed, the thiophene ring's result is the more prominent lipid solvency, which works on the dissemination across the nerve film wealthy in lipids to arrive at target receptors. The presence of a thiophene ring is by all accounts possibly a vital benefit for delayed sedative impact action, as we will later exhibit through the consequences of this review. Nanomaterials quickly work on our lives and lead to novel applications from biomedicine to hardware. Carbon nanomaterials are a unique class of materials with boundless potential for useful clinical applications. Graphene is a regular delegate of two-layered nanomaterials with interesting and exceptional properties. What is significantly more significant with regards to graphene's functional applications is that it is promptly accessible for amalgamation and changes. It is a solitary layer of carbon molecules where every particle is covalently clung to three neighbors. Graphene is most often thought to be an adsorber of significant particles in biomedical applications, attributable to its immense surface area of 2630 m2g−1. The extraordinary adsorbing potential makes it a contender for creating detecting gadgets or medication conveyance specialists. In this work, we are addressing graphene adsorbing properties to handle the test of delaying the sedative impact. Specifically, by utilizing graphene as a medication conveyance framework, the thought is to deliver the dynamic part and drag out the sedative impact gradually [7].

Materials and Methods

Instructing process

Interdisciplinary issue based learning in a little gathering was the educating model. The instructor gave a concise acquaintance on the subjects with be examined sometime later and presented a few inquiries. The understudies from ICD and IOB talked about the dispersed inquiries each other. Besides, the understudy ought to scan the writing for the conveyed questions and gave a show sometime later. Every theme could contain fundamental and clinical information. The understudies then introduced the looked through information connected with the subjects as indicated by their scholarly foundation or their favored perspectives that they needed to impart to other people. The course of the course depended on constructivism [8].

Review instrument

This study was endorsed by the Institutional Audit Board. Understudies were welcome to join this concentrate as their choice. Assuming they consented to take part this examination, they ought to sign the educated assent first, and afterward a web connect was given to the members to finish up the poll openly without the tension from specialists. For the avoidance of continued filling, the web survey was set to be filled once as it were. Semi-organized poll was utilized as the review instrument. The inquiries incorporated the essential information assortment like the having a place foundation (ICD or IOB), the program (Expert or PhD), the year joining the course, and the examination point (related or not connected with oral oncology) [9]. The explored questions incorporated the arrangement of interdisciplinary understudies combining in the course, the advantage of learned information to the future exploration work, the comprehension of every conversation subject (clinical-related or fundamental sciencerelated), the fittingness of the conversation points, the appropriateness of issue based showing model for board conversation of oral oncology, and the readiness to prescribe different understudies to take this course. In these researched questions, the response was intended to let the member to raise a score going from 0 to 100. Assuming that the power or reaction for each question was very bad, the score was 0. Interestingly, assuming that the power or reaction for each question was very certain, the score was 100. The member was recommended to fill the score in streak appearance as a top priority without a second thought. Last inquiry was an open inquiry. The members could fill any idea and additionally assessment (counting benefit or weakness) [10].

Result and Discussion

The findings of this study reveal a compelling landscape of interactions and synergies between medicine and dentistry, underscoring the profound impact of their collaboration on patient care, education, and research. Key results include:

Oral-systemic health link: The literature review highlights a growing body of evidence supporting the intricate connection between oral health and systemic health. Conditions like cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and respiratory disorders show notable associations with oral health status. This emphasizes the need for a comprehensive approach to patient care that considers both medical and dental factors [11].

Integrated healthcare models: Several interdisciplinary collaboration models have emerged, demonstrating the integration of medical and dental expertise in various healthcare settings. Collaborative care teams comprising physicians, dentists, and other specialists work together to provide holistic treatment plans, leading to improved patient outcomes and overall well-being.

Educational initiatives: Interdisciplinary educational programs have been established to equip future healthcare professionals with a broader understanding of the interplay between medicine and dentistry. Joint workshops, courses, and seminars foster a holistic perspective, enabling practitioners to recognize and address the complexities of oral-systemic health relationships [12].

Research insights: Collaborative research efforts have yielded valuable insights into shared risk factors, common inflammatory pathways, and the impact of oral health interventions on systemic conditions. These studies contribute to the evolving knowledge base, fostering a deeper understanding of the interdependence between medicine and dentistry.

Discussion:

The results of this study align with the broader shift in healthcare paradigms towards an integrated and patient-centered approach. The discussion highlights the significance of the identified findings:

Holistic patient care: The undeniable connection between oral health and systemic health necessitates a shift from siloed healthcare to an integrated approach. Collaboration between medical and dental professionals is crucial for comprehensive patient care that addresses both local and systemic health factors. Integrated healthcare models, supported by shared electronic health records and communication platforms, enable practitioners to provide personalized, holistic treatment plans [13].

Interdisciplinary education: The emergence of interdisciplinary educational programs reflects the evolving understanding of healthcare's interconnected nature. Equipping healthcare professionals with cross-disciplinary knowledge empowers them to recognize early signs of oral-systemic health issues and collaborate effectively to improve patient outcomes. Joint medical-dental workshops and courses foster mutual respect and understanding, breaking down traditional barriers.

Research advancements: Collaborative research initiatives exemplify the potential for significant breakthroughs at the intersection of medicine and dentistry. Studies exploring shared risk factors, common inflammatory mechanisms, and the impact of interventions on both oral and systemic health offer promising avenues for advancing medical and dental knowledge. Such research can lead to innovative treatment approaches that benefit patients across a spectrum of health conditions [14].

Challenges and opportunities: The discussion acknowledges challenges such as differing professional cultures, communication gaps, and structural barriers to collaboration. Overcoming these challenges requires a concerted effort from healthcare institutions, regulatory bodies, and educators to promote a culture of interdisciplinary teamwork. Opportunities lie in the creation of more formalized collaborative care models and the integration of oral health assessments into routine medical examinations. In conclusion, the results and discussion illuminate the transformative potential of the dynamic interaction between medicine and dentistry. This study underscores the importance of breaking down traditional boundaries to foster collaboration, education, and research that result in improved patient care and outcomes. The evolving landscape of healthcare demands an integrated approach, where medicine and dentistry collaborate harmoniously to promote holistic well-being [15].

Conclusion

The intricate and dynamic interaction between medicine and dentistry has emerged as a pivotal cornerstone of modern healthcare. This study, titled "Synergies and Interplay: The Dynamic Interaction between Medicine and Dentistry," has explored the multifaceted relationship between these two fields, shedding light on their collaborative potential, shared challenges, and mutual benefits. The conclusive insights drawn from this exploration reaffirm the transformative power of integrated healthcare:

Holistic Patient-Centered Care: The undeniable link between oral health and systemic health underscores the necessity of an integrated approach to patient care. Collaborative efforts between medical and dental professionals lead to comprehensive treatment plans that recognize the interdependence of local and systemic health factors. This patient-centered approach enhances well-being and quality of life.

Educational evolution: The emergence of interdisciplinary educational programs reflects the paradigm shift in healthcare education. Equipping future healthcare professionals with a broader perspective fosters a more comprehensive understanding of health. Joint initiatives foster mutual respect and collaboration, transcending traditional professional boundaries.

Research transformation: Collaborative research efforts highlight the immense potential for groundbreaking discoveries at the crossroads of medicine and dentistry. Studies exploring shared risk factors, common inflammatory pathways, and the impact of integrated interventions contribute to a growing body of knowledge that informs both fields. While challenges such as differing cultures, communication barriers, and structural impediments exist, they should not overshadow the collaborative opportunities. The journey towards an integrated healthcare model requires collective efforts from institutions, regulators, educators, and practitioners. By embracing this change, healthcare systems can enhance patient outcomes and optimize resource utilization.

In essence, this study underscores that the convergence of medicine and dentistry transcends historical distinctions, paving the way for a more holistic, patient-centric, and effective healthcare approach. The collaborative efforts between these two fields symbolize the culmination of shared knowledge, shared goals, and shared humanity. As we step into a future where healthcare is more interconnected than ever, the lessons from this study stand as a guiding beacon, inspiring professionals to embrace the synergies that arise from the dynamic interaction between medicine and dentistry.

Acknowledgment

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Mravak-Stipetić M, Lončar-Brzak B, Bakale-Hodak I, Sabol I, Seiwerth S, Majstorović M, et al. (2014) Clinicopathologic correlation of oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions: a preliminary study. Sci World J 1-6.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

2. Hiremath S, Kale AD, Hallikerimath S (2015) Clinico-pathological study to evaluate oral lichen planus for the establishment of clinical and histopathological diagnostic criteria. Turk J Pathol 31:24-9.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

3. Rad M, Hashemipoor MA, Mojtahedi A, Zarei MR, Chamani G, et al. (2009) Correlation between clinical and histopathologic diagnoses of oral lichen planus based on modified WHO diagnostic criteria. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107:796-800.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

4. Fernández-González F, Vázquez-Álvarez R, Reboiras-López D, Gándara-Vila P, García-García A, et al. (2011) Histopathological findings in oral lichen planus and their correlation with the clinical manifestations. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 16:641-6.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

5. Tsushima, F, Sakurai J, Uesugi A, Oikawa Y, Ohsako T, et al. (2021) Malignant transformation of oral lichen planus: a retrospective study of 565 Japanese patients . BMC Oral Health 21:1-9.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

6. Giuliani M, Troiano G, Cordaro M (2019) Rate of malignant transformation of oral lichen planus: A systematic review. Oral Dis 25:693-709.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

7. Guan G, Mei L, Polonowita A, Hussaini H, Seo B, et al. (2020) Malignant transformation in oral lichen planus and lichenoid lesions: a 14-year longitudinal retrospective cohort study of 829 patients in New Zealand. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 130:411-418.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

8. Rosa EA, Brietzke AP, de Almeida Prado Franceschi LE, Hurtado‑Puerto AM, Falcão DP, et al. (2018) Oral lichen planus and malignant transformation: The role of p16, Ki-67, Bub-3 and SOX4 in assessing precancerous potential. Exp Ther Med 15:4157-66.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

9. Shen ZY, Liu W, Zhu LK, Feng JQ, Tang GY, et al. (2012) A retrospective clinicopathological study on oral lichen planus and malignant transformation: analysis of 518 cases. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 17:943-7.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

10. Munde AD, Karle RR, Wankhede PK, Shaikh SS, Kulkurni M (2013) Demographic and clinical profile of oral lichen planus: A retrospective study. Contemp Clin Dent 4:181-5.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

11. Trivedy CR, Craig G, Warnakulasuriya S (2002) The oral health consequences of chewing areca nut. Addict Biol 7:115-25.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

12. Reichart PA, Warnakulasuriya S (2012) Oral lichenoid contact lesions induced by areca nut and betel quid chewing: a mini review. J Investig Clin Dent 3:163-6.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

13. Mankapure PK, Humbe JG, Mandale MS, Bhavthankar JD (2016) Clinical profile of 108 cases of oral lichen planus. J Oral Sci 58:43-7.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

14. Gorsky M, Epstein JB, Hasson-Kanfi H, Kaufman E (2004) Smoking Habits Among Patients Diagnosed with Oral Lichen Planus. Tob Induc Dis 2:9.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

15. Carbone M, Arduino PG, Carrozzo M, Gandolfo S, Argiolas MR, et al. (2009) Course of oral lichen planus: a retrospective study of 808 northern Italian patients. Oral Dis 15:235-43.

Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref