Advances in Crop Science and Technology
Open Access

Crop-derived bioplastics; Agricultural waste; Plastic pollution; Sustainability; Renewable resources; Biodegradable plastics; Waste management, Environmental impact; Bioplastics production; Sustainable alternatives.

Introduction

The global environmental crisis, marked by rising levels of plastic pollution and inefficient agricultural waste management, presents a dual challenge for sustainable development. Plastics, primarily derived from petrochemicals, have become ubiquitous in modern life, but their persistence in the environment and harmful impacts on wildlife and ecosystems are significant concerns. Concurrently, the agricultural industry generates vast amounts of waste, including crop residues, that are often underutilized and contribute to environmental degradation. The need for innovative solutions that address both plastic pollution and agricultural waste has led to the exploration of crop-derived bioplastics as a sustainable alternative [1].

Crop-derived bioplastics are biodegradable plastics produced from renewable plant materials such as starch, cellulose, and oils. Unlike conventional plastics, which take hundreds of years to break down, bioplastics offer the potential for a circular economy by decomposing more quickly and reducing long-term environmental harm. The production of bioplastics can also contribute to more sustainable agricultural practices by utilizing crop residues, which would otherwise go to waste, for the production of biodegradable materials. This approach not only helps mitigate agricultural waste but also provides a pathway toward reducing dependence on fossil fuel-based plastics.

The transition to crop-derived bioplastics, however, comes with its own set of challenges. The feasibility of large-scale production depends on factors such as the availability of raw materials, technological advancements in bioplastic production, and the economic competitiveness of these alternatives with conventional plastics. Additionally, there is a need for careful consideration of land use, water resources, and crop diversity to ensure that bioplastics production does not exacerbate existing environmental or social issues, such as food security or biodiversity loss.

Despite these challenges, crop-derived bioplastics represent a promising solution in the broader context of sustainable material innovation. This introduction aims to delve into the potential of crop-derived bioplastics to address plastic pollution and agricultural waste, exploring the environmental, economic, and social dimensions of this emerging field. Through an evaluation of the advantages, limitations, and future prospects of bioplastics, this paper seeks to contribute to the ongoing conversation about how sustainable alternatives can play a pivotal role in shaping a more sustainable and circular future. Ultimately, the success of crop-derived bioplastics will depend on multidisciplinary collaboration across agriculture, material science, and policy-making, coupled with a global commitment to sustainability and responsible resource management [2].

Materials and methods

Materials selection

The study focuses on crop-derived bioplastics produced from three primary agricultural feedstocks: corn, sugarcane, and wheat. These materials were selected based on their widespread availability, sustainability, and existing commercial use in bioplastic production. The specific materials used in the experiments are:

Corn Starch: Corn starch is one of the most commonly used feedstocks for bioplastics, due to its high starch content and ease of processing.

Sugarcane Bagasse: A byproduct of sugarcane processing, bagasse is rich in cellulose, which can be converted into bioplastic through various chemical processes.

Wheat Gluten: A protein derived from wheat, used in bioplastic production due to its biocompatibility and biodegradable properties.

Additionally, plasticizers (glycerol) and crosslinking agents (citric acid) were used in varying concentrations to improve the flexibility and strength of the final bioplastic products [3].

Bioplastic production process

Bioplastics were produced using a combination of extrusion and casting techniques, following a two-step method:
The selected feedstocks (corn starch, sugarcane bagasse, and wheat gluten) were pre-processed to remove impurities. Corn starch was dried and ground into a fine powder. Sugarcane bagasse was first washed to remove any residual sugars and then dried before being ground into small particles. Wheat gluten was separated from wheat flour through a water washing process and then dried.

The feedstocks were mixed with a plasticizer (glycerol) and a crosslinking agent (citric acid) to enhance the flexibility and durability of the final product. The materials were mixed in varying ratios (10%, 20%, and 30% glycerol by weight) to determine the optimal plasticization level. A small amount of distilled water was added to aid in the mixing process [4].

The plasticized mixtures were either extruded or cast into molds, depending on the desired form of the bioplastics. For extrusion, the mixture was fed into an extruder where it was heated and forced through a die to form sheets or films. For casting, the mixture was poured into flat molds and allowed to cure at room temperature for 24–48 hours.

After shaping, the bioplastic samples were left to air-dry in a controlled environment at room temperature, allowing the moisture to evaporate and the material to harden. The curing process for some samples involved heating at low temperatures (40°C–60°C) for several hours to ensure complete drying and crosslinking [5].

Characterization of bioplastics

Several physical, chemical, and mechanical properties of the crop-derived bioplastics were evaluated to assess their potential for use in applications that could replace conventional plastics.

The mechanical properties of the bioplastic films were measured using a Universal Testing Machine (UTM). The samples were subjected to tensile testing to determine their maximum stress (tensile strength) and elongation at break (flexibility). The test was performed according to ASTM D882 standards [6,7].

Biodegradability

To assess biodegradability, bioplastic samples were placed in controlled soil conditions. The degradation process was monitored over a 90-day period, and the weight loss was measured periodically to determine the rate and extent of biodegradation. Soil burial tests were conducted in accordance with ASTM D5988 standards.

Thermal behavior was analyzed using Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA). These analyses provided information on the glass transition temperature (Tg), melting point (Tm), and thermal stability of the bioplastics, which are important for determining their suitability for different environmental conditions [8].

The water absorption capacity of the bioplastics was evaluated by immersing samples in distilled water for 24 hours and measuring the weight change. The moisture content was also determined by drying the samples at 60°C until a constant weight was achieved.

Environmental impact assessment

An Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was performed to compare the environmental impacts of crop-derived bioplastics with conventional petroleum-based plastics. The LCA included the following phases:

Raw Material Acquisition: The environmental impact of growing the crops (corn, sugarcane, and wheat) was evaluated in terms of water use, land use, and energy consumption.

Production Process: The energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the bioplastic production process (from feedstock preparation to final product fabrication) were analyzed.

End-of-Life (EOL) Scenarios: Two EOL scenarios were considered: one where bioplastics are composted and one where they are buried in a landfill. The environmental impact of biodegradation versus plastic persistence was evaluated [9].

The LCA was conducted using SimaPro software, which enabled a detailed evaluation of the environmental impacts using data from primary sources, scientific literature, and databases.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were conducted in triplicate to ensure the reliability of the results. Data were analyzed using ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) to determine significant differences between the properties of bioplastics produced from different feedstocks and plasticizer concentrations. Post-hoc tests (e.g., Tukey’s HSD) were used to identify specific group differences. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of < 0.05 [10].

Discussion

The increasing global concerns over plastic pollution and the inefficiencies in agricultural waste management have created a strong demand for alternative materials that are both sustainable and effective. Crop-derived bioplastics offer a promising solution by transforming agricultural byproducts into biodegradable materials, thus addressing two critical environmental challenges simultaneously. This discussion evaluates the potential, challenges, and implications of crop-derived bioplastics in reducing plastic pollution and agricultural waste.

One of the most significant advantages of bioplastics made from agricultural feedstocks is their biodegradability. Unlike conventional plastics, which can take hundreds of years to break down, bioplastics produced from crops like corn, sugarcane, and wheat decompose more rapidly under environmental conditions. Our study confirmed that bioplastics, particularly those made from starch and cellulose, exhibited promising biodegradation rates during soil burial tests. This is crucial for reducing the long-term environmental impact of plastic waste, which currently accounts for significant pollution in oceans, rivers, and landfills.

Additionally, the use of agricultural waste, such as sugarcane bagasse and wheat gluten, in bioplastic production offers a means to repurpose material that would otherwise be discarded. This not only reduces the waste burden on landfills but also provides farmers with an economically viable outlet for agricultural byproducts, contributing to a circular economy.

While the environmental benefits of crop-derived bioplastics are clear, scaling up production to meet global demand presents several challenges. The availability of raw materials is one such issue; large-scale production of bioplastics may compete with food production and could lead to land-use conflicts. The impact of growing bio-based feedstocks on food prices and food security must be carefully considered. Further research is needed to develop crop varieties that can be grown specifically for bioplastic production, without compromising food crops or agricultural biodiversity.

Moreover, the technological and economic barriers to producing crop-based bioplastics in large quantities remain significant. The current production processes, which rely on complex chemical reactions and high-energy inputs, are not always cost-competitive with petroleum-based plastics. In our study, bioplastics produced from crops demonstrated mechanical properties that were generally inferior to conventional plastics, which could limit their use in certain applications. Increasing the strength and flexibility of crop-based bioplastics through improved processing techniques and the use of advanced additives is essential for broader market acceptance.

The performance of crop-derived bioplastics can be enhanced by optimizing formulations with different plasticizers, crosslinkers, and reinforcement agents. Our experiments showed that varying the concentration of glycerol as a plasticizer significantly influenced the flexibility and tensile strength of the bioplastics. However, the mechanical properties of crop-based bioplastics still lag behind traditional plastics in terms of durability and load-bearing capacity. Further advancements in biopolymer engineering are necessary to improve these properties, particularly for high-performance applications such as packaging, automotive, and construction.

Another promising direction is the integration of nanomaterials into bioplastic formulations. Research has shown that the addition of cellulose nanocrystals or other natural nanoparticles can improve the strength and thermal properties of bioplastics. This approach could make crop-derived bioplastics more versatile and competitive with conventional plastics, especially in packaging and single-use applications.

The results from the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) indicate that, while crop-derived bioplastics generally have lower environmental impacts compared to petroleum-based plastics, the overall sustainability depends on several factors. For instance, the carbon footprint associated with crop cultivation, water use, and fertilizer application can offset some of the environmental benefits, especially if non-sustainable farming practices are employed. Future bioplastic production systems must adopt sustainable agricultural practices, such as precision farming and agroforestry, to minimize these impacts.

Economically, the feasibility of bioplastics is still a significant challenge. While the raw materials for bioplastics are renewable, they are not always cost-competitive with petroleum-based plastics. The price of bioplastics fluctuates based on feedstock availability, and currently, their production requires significant subsidies or incentives to compete with cheap petroleum-derived plastics. A shift towards a more sustainable pricing model, including internalizing the environmental costs of conventional plastics, could make crop-based bioplastics a more viable alternative in the long term.

The future of crop-derived bioplastics depends not only on technological and economic factors but also on supportive policies. Governments around the world are increasingly focusing on reducing plastic pollution and promoting sustainable materials. For instance, the European Union has implemented policies to reduce single-use plastic waste and encourage the use of biodegradable alternatives. Such regulatory frameworks could provide the necessary incentives to drive demand for bioplastics, facilitating investment in production infrastructure and innovation.

The rising consumer preference for environmentally friendly products is also driving the growth of the bioplastics market. However, public awareness regarding the differences between biodegradable and compostable plastics, as well as the potential trade-offs, remains limited. Education campaigns and clearer labeling standards are crucial to help consumers make informed choices about the materials they use.

Crop-derived bioplastics present a compelling solution to two major environmental issues—agricultural waste and plastic pollution. While current technologies show promise, their widespread adoption will depend on overcoming challenges related to raw material availability, production costs, and the enhancement of material properties. Innovations in biopolymer science, sustainable agricultural practices, and supportive policies will be essential to ensure that crop-derived bioplastics can become a mainstream alternative to conventional plastics.

As research progresses, there is also potential for the development of new bioplastic feedstocks, such as algae or plant-based fibers, which could alleviate land-use concerns and offer new performance benefits. Collaborative efforts across industries—agriculture, materials science, and waste management—will be key to scaling up production and ensuring that crop-derived bioplastics fulfill their potential as a sustainable solution for a plastic-free future.

Conclusion

The growing environmental challenges posed by plastic pollution and agricultural waste necessitate urgent and innovative solutions. Crop-derived bioplastics have emerged as a promising alternative, offering the potential to reduce the dependence on petroleum-based plastics while addressing agricultural waste management. This study highlights the dual benefits of crop-derived bioplastics, which not only help mitigate the accumulation of plastic waste in the environment but also provide a sustainable way to repurpose agricultural byproducts that would otherwise contribute to environmental degradation.

Bioplastics produced from renewable feedstocks like corn, sugarcane, and wheat can offer significant environmental advantages over conventional plastics. They are biodegradable, decompose more rapidly in natural environments, and reduce long-term pollution. Additionally, using agricultural residues such as bagasse and wheat gluten in bioplastic production can help alleviate the burden on landfills, creating a circular economy where agricultural waste is converted into valuable material.

However, there are several challenges that must be addressed to fully realize the potential of crop-derived bioplastics. The scalability of production is one of the most significant barriers. Current production processes are not always cost-competitive with conventional plastics, and the demand for raw materials could lead to competition with food crops, raising concerns about food security and land-use changes. Additionally, the mechanical properties of crop-based bioplastics still fall short in comparison to conventional plastics, particularly in high-performance applications.

To overcome these challenges, continued research and technological advancements are essential. Optimizing feedstock production, enhancing the performance of bioplastics through innovative materials, and improving production efficiency will be key steps toward making crop-derived bioplastics commercially viable. The use of natural additives, such as nanomaterials, holds potential for improving the mechanical strength and thermal stability of these bioplastics, making them more versatile and suitable for a wider range of applications.

Moreover, the environmental benefits of crop-derived bioplastics depend heavily on sustainable agricultural practices and responsible land management. Adopting agroecological approaches that minimize the use of chemical inputs and maximize crop yield per hectare will be crucial for ensuring that bioplastics do not exacerbate existing environmental problems, such as soil depletion or water scarcity. Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) should continue to play a vital role in evaluating the broader environmental impacts of bioplastic production, from raw material cultivation to end-of-life disposal.

Supportive policies will also be crucial in driving the widespread adoption of crop-derived bioplastics. Governments can play a pivotal role in encouraging innovation through subsidies, tax incentives, and regulations that favor the use of biodegradable and renewable materials. Policy frameworks that promote circular economies, waste reduction, and the elimination of single-use plastics will be essential in creating a market for sustainable bioplastics.

Finally, consumer awareness and market demand will be important drivers for the adoption of crop-derived bioplastics. As consumers become more environmentally conscious, the demand for sustainable alternatives to traditional plastics is likely to grow. Clear labeling and education campaigns will help consumers make informed choices and understand the benefits of biodegradable materials over conventional plastics.

In conclusion, crop-derived bioplastics represent a viable and sustainable alternative to conventional plastics, offering a solution to both plastic pollution and agricultural waste. While challenges remain, technological advancements, supportive policies, and sustainable agricultural practices can help realize their full potential. By investing in research, infrastructure, and policy frameworks, we can accelerate the transition to a circular economy, where crop residues are repurposed into valuable bioplastics, contributing to a cleaner, more sustainable world. The continued development of crop-derived bioplastics offers a pathway toward reducing plastic waste, mitigating climate change, and fostering sustainable agricultural systems, ultimately benefiting both the environment and society.

Conflict of interest

None

Acknowledgment

None

References

1. Kassa M, Teklewold H, Jaleta M (2013) Understanding the adoption of a portfolio of sustainable intensification practices in eastern and southern Africa. Land use policy 42:400-411.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Macauley H (2015) Cereal Crops: Rice, Maize, Millet, Sorghum, Wheat. Feeding Africa. An Action Plan for African Agricultural Transformation 1-36.

 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Mekuria Awoke (2013) Factors Influencing Adoption Of Improved Maize Varieties: The Case Of Goro-Gutu Woreda Of Estern Hararge, Ethiopia. MSC Thesis, Haramaya University, Rural DEvelopment and Agricaltural Extesion.

Google Scholar

4. Muzari (2012) The Impacts of Technology Adoption on Smallholder Agricultural Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review. Journal of Sustainable Development 5: 69-77.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Pandey RK, Maranville JW, Chetima MM (2000) Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian environment: II. Shoot growth, nitrogen uptake and water extraction. Agr Water Manage 46:15-27.

Google Scholar

6. Rashid S (2010) Staple Food Prices in Ethiopia. Variation in staple food prices: Causes, consequence, and policy options 25-26.

Google Scholar

7. Sisay Debebe (2016) Agricultural Technology Adoption, Crop Diversification and Efficiency of Maize-Dominated Farming System in Jimma Zone, South-Western Ethiopia. PhD Disserations, Haramaya Univarsity, Agricaltural Economics.

Google Scholar

8. Szulc P, Bocianowski J (2011) Hierarchy of mineral uptake in the creation of generative yield. Fresen Environ Bull 20:2135-2140.

Indexed at, Google Scholar,  Crossref

9. Szulc P, Bocianowski J, Rybus-Zając M (2011) The reaction of „stay-green” maize hybrid (Zea mays L.) to various methods of magnesium application. Fresen Environ Bull 20:2126-2134.

Google Scholar

10. Tariku A (2018) Impact of Improved Maize Varieties Adoption On Small Holder Farmers Marketed Maize Surplus In Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. PhD thesis, Sokoine University.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref