Journal of Diabetes & Clinical Practice
Open Access

Diabetes is a widespread, chronic condition that poses a significant burden on public health globally. The prevalence of diabetes continues to rise, driven by factors such as aging populations, sedentary lifestyles, and poor dietary habits. However, beyond individual behaviors, social determinants of health (SDOH) the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age also play a crucial role in diabetes prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. These social factors, including socioeconomic status, education, access to healthcare, and environmental influences, contribute to the disparities in diabetes rates and outcomes observed across different populations. This article examines the influence of social determinants of health on diabetes, highlighting how these factors impact the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the disease and exploring potential strategies to address these challenges [1].

Socioeconomic Status and Diabetes

Socioeconomic status (SES), often measured by income, education level, and occupation, is one of the most significant social determinants of health influencing the risk of developing diabetes. Individuals with lower SES are at a higher risk of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes due to a range of factors, including limited access to healthcare, unhealthy living conditions, and higher levels of stress. People with lower incomes are less likely to afford preventive healthcare services, such as regular check-ups, screenings, and management programs for diabetes, which can lead to delayed diagnoses and poor outcomes. The relationship between SES and diabetes is also influenced by diet and physical activity. Individuals with lower SES often have limited access to healthy food options, particularly in food deserts areas with few affordable grocery stores that offer fresh fruits and vegetables. Instead, they may rely on processed, high-calorie foods that contribute to obesity and increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Additionally, lower-income neighborhoods may lack safe spaces for physical activity, limiting opportunities for exercise and further exacerbating the risk of diabetes [2]. Moreover, lower SES is associated with higher levels of chronic stress, which can lead to insulin resistance and other metabolic disturbances that contribute to the onset of diabetes. Stress can also hinder individuals from effectively managing diabetes once diagnosed, as they may face barriers to accessing medications, healthy foods, and consistent medical care [3].

Education and Health Literacy

Education, particularly health literacy, is another critical factor influencing diabetes prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Health literacy refers to an individual’s ability to understand, process, and act on health-related information. People with lower levels of education or health literacy may struggle to comprehend the importance of preventive measures such as regular screening for diabetes, healthy eating, and physical activity. This lack of understanding can lead to delayed diagnoses, poorer adherence to treatment plans, and a higher likelihood of complications from diabetes. Education also plays a role in self-management, which is essential for individuals with diabetes to maintain good control over their condition. Those with higher levels of health literacy are more likely to understand how to monitor their blood glucose levels, take their medications correctly, and make lifestyle changes that support their diabetes management. In contrast, individuals with low health literacy may have difficulty following complex medical instructions or understanding how different factors, such as diet, exercise, and stress, impact their blood sugar levels [4]. Health literacy is also shaped by factors such as access to health education programs and culturally relevant materials. For individuals from marginalized communities, there may be a lack of targeted, accessible resources that meet their specific needs, further contributing to disparities in diabetes care [5].

Access to Healthcare and Medical Services

Access to healthcare is a crucial determinant of diabetes prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Individuals with limited access to healthcare services are less likely to receive timely screenings for diabetes, leading to higher rates of undiagnosed or poorly managed diabetes. In rural or underserved urban areas, healthcare facilities may be scarce, and individuals may face long wait times, lack of transportation, or financial barriers that prevent them from seeking medical care. Insurance coverage is another significant factor that affects access to healthcare. People without health insurance or with inadequate coverage may not have access to essential diabetes medications, devices like glucose meters, or necessary healthcare visits. Even when individuals do have insurance, high out-of-pocket costs for diabetes management such as the cost of insulin or specialist visits can make it difficult to afford necessary treatments [6]. In addition to financial barriers, cultural factors and language differences can affect the accessibility of healthcare services for certain populations. For example, non-English-speaking patients may face difficulties navigating the healthcare system or understanding medical instructions, leading to missed appointments, poor adherence to treatment, and a lack of preventive care. Furthermore, mistrust of the healthcare system, often rooted in historical and systemic discrimination, can contribute to underutilization of healthcare services among certain racial and ethnic groups.

Environmental Influences on Diabetes Risk

The built environment, which includes the physical surroundings where people live, work, and play, has a significant impact on diabetes prevention and management. For example, neighborhoods that are designed to encourage physical activity, with safe parks, walking paths, and recreational spaces, promote healthier lifestyles and reduce the risk of obesity and diabetes. On the other hand, environments that lack access to green spaces, sidewalks, or recreational facilities contribute to sedentary behavior, which is a major risk factor for diabetes. Environmental pollution is another factor that can influence the development of diabetes. Studies have shown that exposure to certain environmental pollutants, such as air pollution and chemicals in food or water, may increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes by contributing to inflammation, insulin resistance, and metabolic dysfunction. For individuals living in areas with high levels of pollution, these environmental factors may interact with other social determinants, such as poor nutrition and limited healthcare access, to further increase their risk of diabetes [7]. Housing conditions, including the presence of mold, poor ventilation, or inadequate heating, can also contribute to health problems that affect diabetes risk and management. For example, poor housing conditions are linked to higher levels of stress, which can exacerbate insulin resistance and complicate diabetes control. Individuals living in overcrowded or unstable housing situations may also face barriers to adhering to diabetes treatment regimens due to the lack of a stable environment [8].

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Diabetes Outcomes

Racial and ethnic disparities are a well-documented aspect of diabetes prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Certain populations, particularly African Americans, Hispanic/Latino Americans, and Native Americans, are disproportionately affected by diabetes. These groups are more likely to develop diabetes at younger ages, experience more severe complications, and have worse overall health outcomes compared to their white counterparts. These disparities are influenced by a combination of social determinants, including socioeconomic factors, access to healthcare, cultural differences, and discrimination. Structural racism and social inequities have led to reduced access to quality healthcare for many racial and ethnic minorities, contributing to higher rates of undiagnosed diabetes and less effective treatment. Additionally, cultural beliefs and practices may affect health behaviors, such as dietary choices or the use of traditional medicine, which can influence diabetes risk and management [9]. Moreover, these populations may face additional barriers, such as language differences, lack of culturally competent care, and historical mistrust of the healthcare system, which further complicate efforts to reduce diabetes-related health disparities [10].

Strategies to Address the Influence of Social Determinants

Addressing the influence of social determinants on diabetes requires a multi-faceted approach that involves policy changes, healthcare system reforms, and community-based initiatives. One potential solution is improving access to affordable, culturally competent healthcare for underserved populations. Expanding health insurance coverage, particularly through Medicaid and other public health programs, can help ensure that individuals have access to necessary screenings, medications, and diabetes management services. Increasing health literacy and education is also crucial. Public health campaigns that focus on the prevention and early detection of diabetes can help raise awareness and empower individuals to take control of their health. Tailoring educational materials to specific cultural and linguistic needs can improve understanding and adherence to health recommendations. Community based initiatives that focus on creating healthier environments such as improving access to nutritious food, promoting physical activity, and reducing environmental pollutants can help reduce the social and environmental risk factors associated with diabetes. Local governments and organizations can work together to develop policies that address food deserts, increase access to green spaces, and reduce pollution, particularly in underserved neighborhoods. Finally, addressing the systemic inequalities that contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in diabetes outcomes is essential for reducing health inequities. This includes implementing policies that promote economic equality, improve access to education, and combat discrimination within the healthcare system.

Conclusion

Social determinants of health play a fundamental role in shaping the risk of developing diabetes, as well as the ability to effectively prevent, diagnose, and treat the condition. Socioeconomic status, education, access to healthcare, environmental factors, and racial and ethnic disparities all contribute to the complexities of diabetes care. Addressing these factors through targeted interventions, policy changes, and community initiatives is essential for reducing diabetes-related health disparities and improving outcomes for individuals affected by the disease. By focusing on the broader social context in which diabetes occurs, we can create a more equitable healthcare system that supports better prevention, management, and treatment of diabetes for all populations.

1. Marshall JC (2014)Why have clinical trials in sepsis failed?Trends Mol Med 20: 195-203.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Deutschman CS, Tracey KJ (2014)Sepsis: current dogma and new perspectives.Immunity 40: 463-475.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Pilcher D, Cooper DJ, Bellomo R, et al. (2015)Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis.N Engl J Med 372: 1629-1638.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Singer M (2016)The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock.JAMA. 315: 801-810.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Gaieski DF, Edwards JM, Kallan MJ, Carr BG (2013)Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States.Crit Care Med 41: 1167-1174.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Coopersmith CM (2012)A comparison of critical care research funding and the financial burden of critical illness in the United States.Crit Care Med 40: 1072-1079.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Moss M (2006)The effect of age on the development and outcome of adult sepsis.Crit Care Med 34: 15-21.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Kahn JM (2015)The epidemiology of chronic critical illness in the United States.Crit Care Med 43: 282-287.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Ward PA, Bosmann M (2012)A historical perspective on sepsis.Am J Pathol 181: 2-7.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Tracey KJ (1987)Anti-cachectin/TNF monoclonal antibodies prevent septic shock during lethal bacteraemia.Nature 330: 662-664.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref