ISSN: 2329-8863

Advances in Crop Science and Technology
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Soil Morphology, Physico-Chemical Properties and Classification of Typical Soils of Abelo Area Masha District South Western Ethiopia

Isreal Z1*, Tana T2, Wogi L3 and Mohammed A4
1Department of Horticulture, Mizan-Tepi University, P.O, Box 260, Mizan Teferi, Ethiopia
2School of Plant Sciences, Haramaya University, P.O, Box 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia
3School of Natural Resources Management and Environmental Sciences, Haramaya University, P.O, Box 138 Dire Dawa, Ethiopia
4Department of Post-harvest Management, College of Agri and Vet Medicine, Jimma University, P.O.Box 37, Jimma, Ethiopia
*Corresponding Author: Isreal Z, Department of Horticulture, Mizan-Tepi University, P.O, Box 260, Mizan Teferi, Ethiopia, Tel: +251 47 336 0035, Email: zewideisreal@gmail.com

Received: 30-Jan-2018 / Accepted Date: 23-Feb-2018 / Published Date: 01-Mar-2018 DOI: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000341

Abstract

A soil profile representative of typical soils of Abelo area Masha District, South-west Ethiopia, was dug to study its morphology, physico-chemical characteristics and to classify it using two internationally known soil classification systems. Disturbed and undisturbed soil samples were taken from designated pedogenic horizons for physical and chemical analysis in the laboratory. Soil morphological observations revealed that the pedon was well drained and very deep with dark brown to dark yellowish-brown topsoil overlying brown to strong brown sandy clay loam to sandy clay subsoil. Clay eluviation - illuviation was a dominant process influencing soil formation in the study area as indicated by the clay gradient between the eluvial and illuvial horizons in the subsoil. The soil was characterized by weak fine sub angular blocky structure throughout its Pedon depth. Laboratory analysis indicates that the soil was very strongly acid (pH 4.49-5.2) throughout the profile, the pedon has low N (0.1-0.13), low to medium OC (1.3-1.87%). Low Av. P (3.4-8.5 mgKg-1), low C:N (13-14.38), Available. K (25–54 mgKg-1), Low to medium Ca (5-7.12 cmol (+) kg-1soil), medium Mg (1.5-2.16 cmol (+) kg-1 soil), medium K(0.32-0.41 cmol (+) kg-1soil), TEB (6.82-9.69), Ac(2.4-3.58), Al(1.8-2.52), moderate CEC(18.8-21.44 cmol (+) kg-1), ECEC (9.22-13.28) CECclay (37.6-46.41 cmol (+) kg-1), high Pals (9.81-13.59%), high PAcs (11.11-16.66%), low (PBS<50%), low Ca/Mg (3.06-3.33), medium Mg/K (4.41-6.68), high K/TEB (0.035-0.05), low Calcium saturation (26.88-34.67%), low Magnesium saturation (8.06-10.80%), Textural class (sandy clay loam-sandy clay), Bd (1.32-1.36 gcm-3), high Pd (2.708-2.766 gcm-3), and porosity (50.83-51.25%). Using field and laboratory analytical data, the representative pedon was classified to the series level of the USDA Soil Taxonomy as Abelo, fine-loamy, siliceous, thermic, Rhodic Paleudults and to Tier-2 of WRB as Rhodic Nitosols Ortho dystric. The general fertility of the soils of the area is discussed highlighting their potentials and constraints.

Keywords: Soil characterization; Soil chemical properties; Soil classification; Soil fertility evaluation; Soil morphological properties; Soil fertility evaluation; Soil physical properties

Introduction

Land degradation is a serious and widespread problem for Sustainable agricultural development and food security in developing countries [1,2]. The soil erosion problem in Ethiopian high land is quite pronounced with soil loss of 137 tons per hectare (t ha-1) and loss of 10 mm soil depth per year [3]. The average annual soil erosion rate nationwide was estimated at 12 tons ha-1, giving a total annual soil loss of 1,493 million tons [4]. As a result, most of the Ethiopian soils, especially in the highlands, are low in nutrient content due to erosion, leaching and absence of nutrient recycling [4].

The major causes of land degradation in Ethiopia high-land areas natural and anthropogenic factors such as rapid population growth, deforestation, overgrazing, low vegetative cover and unbalanced crop and livestock production. Topography, limited recycling of dung and crop residues to the soil, limited application of external sources of plant nutrients, leading to low nutrient content [4]. Due to increase in population, continuous tillage of soil by farmers, burning of crop residues, deforestation, over-grazing, slash and burn, depletion of soil organic matter results in rapid deterioration of the biological, chemical and physical properties of the soil [5,6]. There is land use alteration of natural forests, shrubs, marshes and woodland to cultivated, grazing and settlement land in the Sheka zone [7,8]. In lined with this, in Masha werda sheka zone in south-west Ethiopia, rapid expansion of large-scale private cash crops like coffee, tea, endod, rubber tree, pepper and cereals has resulted in the large-scale destruction of ecologically important forest resources resulting in the large-scale degradation of forestland [9-11]. Continuous mono-cropping of potato, maize, small cereals such as wheat, barley, teff, millet etc. is traditionally practiced resulting in a decline of soil fertility which in turn leads to low tuber yield. This mono-cropping practice coupled with the heavy feeder nature of potato plant and the high rainfall in the area results in soil fertility decline. Farming communities are not well aware of the long-term consequence of continuous mono-cropping practices on soil fertility and productivity. This situation is currently challenging in the study areas where the potato is the main monocropping production systems which threaten sustainable productivity in next generation [12].

The use of fertilizers is essential for mitigation of existing crop nutrient deficiencies, the combination of manure, verm compost, NP, sulfur, and boron-containing fertilizer could increase the yield of the crop. Land productivity or sustained agricultural productivity depends on adequate supply of all the nutrients required for plant growth, the yield potential of the crop, variety grown, the availability and cost of fertilizers [13,14].

The intensification of agriculture on land will require a thorough knowledge of the soil as a resource and attributes of the land, its potential, and constraints for appropriate soil and water management systems [15]. However, acquisition of this information is a challenge due to the limited information on crop nutrient requirements, characteristics of soils and high level of variation in soil properties that are experienced across many areas [16]. Assessment of the potential and limitations of soil for the different land use provides the basis for formulating the appropriate management strategies which target specific management problems to improve crop production and soil and water conservation strategies. This information is generated by detailed biophysical characterization of the soils [16]. Two internationally known soil classification systems have been used to classify soils namely the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Taxonomy and World Reference Base for Soil Resources. The main purpose of any classification is to establish groups or classes of soils under study in a manner useful for practical and applied purposes in (a) Predicting their behavior, (b) Identifying their best uses, (c). Estimating their productivity and (d) providing objects or units for research and for extending and extrapolating research results for this kind of purpose, soil survey forms an essential ink for its practical application. A soil profile or pedon representative of typical soils is dug to study its morphology, soil physico–chemical characteristics and hence classify. The current study is aimed at the characterization of the soils in Masha District south -west Ethiopia and to provide the needed basic information of the soil and ecological conditions. Specifically, the study was done to (i) Characterize the soils based on their morphology, physicochemical properties and hence their general fertility (ii) Classify the soils using the ‘United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Taxonomy’ and the ‘World Reference Base for Soil Resources’ scheme of classification and (iii) provide basic soil information to researchers working in the study area that will guide activities related to the management of the existing land resources.

Materials and Methods

Description of the study site

Masha Woreda is located in Southern Nation, Nationalities and People‟s Regional State (SNNPRS), Sheka Zone. This woreda has 17 Kebeles and one chartered town called Masha and it is the capital of Sheka Zone. And those kebele lays UTM WGCs 1984 Zone 36 N between 861,000 MN-873,000 MN and 105,000-120,000 ME (Figure 1). Attitudinally, those kebele lies between n 1600-2400 m. The woreda is bounded to the west by Sele- Nonno Woreda of Oromia region, to the south by Diddo-Lallo Woreda of Oromia region and to the north by Andracha Woreda of Sheka Zone and has a total land area of 90,802.82 hectares. Out of this land area, about 23.9% is cultivated, 2.8% is grazing the land, 40.5% is covered by forest, 5.5% arable land, 5.9% non-arable land and 21.4% is settled the land area [16]. There is decreasing trend of dense closed forests from 39% to 31%, open forests from 33% to 25% in sheka zone, However, the portion of agriculture and tea plantations increased to 10% and 0.5%, respectively from 1987 to 2009 still continue to decrease forest and increase agricultural land expansion at speed rate due to population pressure Conversion of forest land to other land use types [10].

advances-crop-science-technology-soil-sampling

Figure 1: Map of Ethiopia showing the location of SNNPRS (A), map of SNNPRS showing the location of the study area (B) and map of the study area showing the location of soil sampling points.

Lithology and soils

The south-western Ethiopian highlands developed along the western margin of the Rift Valley as a result of uplifting over the past 18 million years [17,18]. The underlying basement rock is of Precambrian origin. These strongly folded and faulted basement rocks are mostly directly covered by Tertiary volcanic rocks that dominate the geology of the area [19]. Following the uplift, the region has been dissected by rivers, resulting in elevations ranging from 900 to 3500 m a.s.l. Southwest Ethiopia drains partly to the White Nile through the Akobo-Baro river system, and partly to the Omo-Turkana basin [10].

The major reference soil groups of the south-western highland plateaus are Nitisols, Vertisols, Leptosols, Regosols, Cambisols, and Acrisols [20]. Nitisols are the dominant reference soil groups in coffeegrowing areas of southwest Ethiopia. Nitisols have a depth of more than 1.5 m, are clayey and red in color. They primarily occupy slopes steeper than 5%. These soils are well-drained with good physical properties; they have high water-storage capacity, a deep rooting depth, and stable soil aggregate structure. Nevertheless, rates of decomposition of organic matter and leaching of nutrients are extremely fast. Acidity ranges from medium to strong, and pH is generally less than 6 [21,22].

The experiments were conducted at Abelo in Masha district Sheka Zone, of south-western Ethiopia, in 2016 and 2107 ‘belg’ and ‘meher’ cropping seasons. MASHA district is one of the districts in sheka zone and located 677 km southwest from Addis Ababa. The total land area of the Zone is 2387.52 km2. There are three woredas and a Zonal town administration in the Zone with the total population of 222,311 [23]. The altitude of the district varies from 1600-2400 m and receives 2000 mm rainfall annually. Agro climatically, the area is largely Woina dega type covering about 75% of the total area, while 22% and 3% are in Dega and Kola zones respectively. The Woreda receives all the yearround rainfall [24]. There is large forest cover in the Woreda. The relief of the Woreda is a rugged terrain comprising hilly areas which impose their respective influence on agricultural practice and settlement patterns. The Woreda is drained by relatively bigger rivers in the Woreda like Meneshi, Wonani, Tatamayi and Gahamayi [25].

The area is known as the mixed crop-livestock farming system in which majority of working population of Masha Woredas engaged in Agriculture activities. Like Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), enset (Ensete ventricosum Welw Cheesman), cereals such as maize (Zea mays L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), field pea (Pisum sativum L.), are the major cropping activity. In addition, and different kinds of spices, coffee and honey are the major sources of cash. Out of this land area, about 23.9% is cultivated, 2.8% is grazing land, 40.5% is covered by forest, 5.5% is arable land, 5.9% non-arable land and 21.4% is for settlement [26,27]. The worda is known for its regular rainfall providing the opportunity for at least two crop production cycles per year [28].

Results And Discussion

Climate analysis

Historic daily rainfall data of thirty-five years (1983-2017) was used to characterize the study area generally, rainfall follows monomodial pattern which includes short (NDJ) medium (FMAM) long (JJASO) rainy season the mean daily maximum and minimum are 23 and 12.30 c respectively while the average annual rainfall is 1614.91 short (NDJ) medium (FMAM) long (JJASO) rainy season Where SOS is start of seasons. EOS=end of seasons, LGP=length of growing period calculated using instat software 2005.

Rainfall

The climatic condition of the study Woreda is divided into two agroclimatic zones. These are Dega and Woina Dega. Dega part gets the maximum rainfall annually (Table 1). Distribution of rainfall varies from one season to another as that of another area in Ethiopia and basically, the Woreda has monodial rainfall, that is, Belg rainfall (February to may) and Mehar rainfall (June to October).

Year Annual RF FMAM -Masha   JJASO Masha NDJ- Masha SOS EOS LGP
1983 1814 670 917 227 36 344 308
1984 1764.1 634 983 147.1 20 355 335
1985 1548.3 467 784 297.3 28 326 298
1986 1787.8 575 834 378.8 32 321 289
1987 1871.9 569 976 326.9 48 360 312
1988 1833.5 559 952 322.5 46 355 309
1989 1701.2 520 861 320.2 38 338 300
1990 1454.1 469 787 198.1 49 316 267
1991 1731.8 676 926 129.8 45 353 308
1992 1660.3 655 928 77.3 43 360 317
1993 1627.2 518 774 335.2 32 321 289
1994 1512.2 492 716 304.2 48 360 312
1995 1584.2 458 802 324.2 28 355 327
1996 1501.2 520 861 120.2 38 338 300
1997 1482.3 524 851 107.3 34 275 241
1998 1401.2 520 761 120.2 40 323 283
1999 1309.4 418 715 176.4 23 360 337
2000 1309.7 322 706 281.7 32 325 293
2001 1222.3 523 621 78.3 36 328 292
2002 1434.1 562 777 95.1 33 290 257
2003 1483.6 479 802 202.6 50 298 248
2004 1315.3 455 768 92.3 32 290 258
2005 1663.6 577 942 144.6 32 342 310
2006 1677.6 582 949 146.6 35 301 266
2007 1785.8 525 1053 207.8 33 285 252
2008 1688.2 494 1036 158.2 39 316 277
2009 1734.1 532 877 325.1 34 364 330
2010 1522.3 528 871 123.3 34 332 298
2011 1663.6 507 842 314.6 49 355 306
2012 1568.2 404 694 470.2 36 312 276
2013 1551.8 463 736 352.8 29 316 287
2014 1690.6 412 705 573.6 33 333 300
2015 1657.6 570 789 298.6 37 358 321
2016 2071 633 1153 285 35 350 315
2017 1897.71 607.2 953.31 337.2 21 295 274
Average 1614.91 526.26 848.64 240.01 35.94 330 294.06
Stranded deviation 184.78 77.53 115.72 117 7.62 25.05 24.8
Coefficient of variation 11.44 14.73 13.64 48.75 21.21 7.59 8.43

Table 1: Historic daily rainfall data of thirty-five years (1983-2017) in months at Masha south-western Ethiopia . 

Following the rating of stability standard deviation of <1 as very high, 1-2 high, 2-4 Moderate,>4 low as indicated by Reddy (1990) daily rainfall and growing period qualify low stability or highly variable from year to year. From year to year, the length of the growing period, as well as the start and end date of the growing period, show considerable variations This can be seen from Table 1

The study area is getting annually rainfall varying between a minimum of 1222.3 mm and a maximum of 2071 mm per year Analyses of the rainfall and growing period variability was interesting to have an idea on how the quality of the growing period varies from one year to another. It shows to what extent amount of and distribution of rainfall, the start and end, as well as the length of growing period in the Masha changes from one year to another

Start of growing period

When, no occurrence of consecutive more than 9 days dry spells in the next 30 days after the defined date of start of the season to create favorable condition that ensure good for land preparation, seed germination and seedling establishment assuming a fixed sowing date mean start of growing period 21 days of year (21st January) and variable sowing date (start of growing period for each year). Based on the requirement tables, ratings were attributed to the various calculated climatic indices. From year to the other, sowing date was highly variable. This variability was also found in the scoring of individual climatic characteristics of potato

End of growing period

The end of the growing period was determined to extend the end of rains with the number of days required to evapotranspire up to 100 mm of water. With the average end of growing period during the period of study is 330 days of the year (25th of November)

It was determined from rainfall reference evapotranspiration relationship. End of growing season was the cessation of the rainy season plus the time required to evapotranspiration 100 mm of stored soil water. There was a humid period, when rainfall exceeds ETo, at Masha District. So, surplus stored soil water was available to continue the growing season beyond the cessation of the rainy season. The rainy season was assumed to close down after 25th November or 330 DOY (day of the year) when 3 days cumulative rainfall was less than 50% of the 5day cumulative ETo when soil water balance become 0.5

Length of growing period (LGP) is a main factor in deciding on the maturity of cultivars to be grown in dissimilar rainfall regime.it was determined through subtraction of the SOS from the EOS total seasonal rainfall (mm). Therefore, this inducts the potential plant production time. Accordingly, the average length of growing period during the period of study is 294 days. The shortest growing period, recorded only has 256 days (in 1984), while the longest growing period equals 352 days (in 1999).

These results of the initial soil test analysis showed that the soils at the sites were low in fertility, acidic, with low amounts of total N, organic carbon, total and extractable phosphorus and exchangeable bases (Table 2). This could be attributed to the poor management of crop residue, thus resulting in nutrient reduction and the decline in soil fertility. The crop response to added organic and mineral fertilizer at different season is expected to show responses on crops and soils.

Soil parameters Soil 2016 Belg (short rain season February to May) Soil 2016. Meher
(long rain season-June to October)
References
Value Rating  Value Rating
Bd (g cm-3) 1.37 Medium 1.38 Medium [30]
PD (g cm-3) 2.58 Medium 2.6 Medium [30]
%porosity 46.80   46.92   [31]
%Sand 45 - 48 -  
%Slit 31 - 30 -  
pH
(1:2.5)
5.01 Strongly acidic 4.8 Very strongly acidic [29]
EC(uscm-1) 169 Ver low 85 Very low [32]
N (g kg-1) 0.1 Low 0.08 Low [29]
Exchangeable Ca (cmol (+) kg-1 soil) 6.5 Medium 6.3 Medium [33]
Exchangeable Mg (cmol (+) kg-1 soil) 2.1 Modrate 1.4 Modrate [33]
Exchangeable K (cmol (+) kg-1 soil) 0.42 High 0.36 High [33]
Exchangeable Na (cmol (+) kg-1 soil) 0.06 Very low Nill Very low [34]
CEC (cmol (+) kg-1 soil) 20 Medium 19.3 Medium [35]
Pbs (%) 45.4 Medium 41.7 Medium [35]
Exchangeable Al (cmol (+) kg-1 soil) 2.01 High 2.46 High [36]
Exchangeable acidity (cmol (+) kg-1 soil) 3.83 High 3.82 High [36]
O.C(g kg-1) 1.2 Low 1.02 Low [29]
N (g kg-1) 0.1 Low 0.08 Low [29]
C: N 12 Low 12.75 low [35]
Available P (mg kg-1) 5.5 Low 5 Low [37]
Cu (mg kg-1) (DTPA) 8 High 6 High [37]
Fe (mg kg-1) (DTPA) 120 High 80 High [37]
Zn (mg kg-1) (DTPA) 1.5 High 1.2 High [37]
Mn(mgkg-1) (DTPA) 25 High 20 High [37]

Table 2: Physical and chemical characteristics of soil of the experimental sites before planting in Belg and mehre cropping season at Masha south-western Ethiopia.

Following the rating of total N of <0.05% as very low, 0.05-0.12 low, 0.12-0.25 Medium, >0.25 high N status as indicated Tekalign et al. [29] the surface Soils of both the belg and meher season qualify low status of N.

Prior to planting, surface (0-20 cm) soil samples, from five spots across the experimental fields, were collected in a zigzag pattern, in 2016 belg and mehre cropping seasons, composited and analyzed in Teppi Soil Testing Research Centre for soil physico-chemical properties as per the procedures are given in experiment I and the results are depicted in Table 2.

The soil physico-chemical analysis of the study sites revealed that the soils of the experimental field were loam in texture in both belg and mehre cropping season. The results also indicated that the soil of belg and mehre cropping season are strongly and very strongly acidic with pH of 5.2 and 4.8, respectively. The soils have low organic carbon, total N (g kg-1) and available P (ppm) Na and medium in exchangble base, CEC and high in micronutrient cation Fe Mn Cu Zn both in belg and meher season and for trace exchangeable sodium [30-37].

Soil Data

The pedon was located in the farmer's field (Latitude 070,07’’47’) and (Longitude 350.50’’9’). The land was under cultivation for more than 50 years following traditional practice (maize fallow cereals) or cereals fallow legume or potato- legume-potato.

Soil profile description was made from the 2-m deep pit on the experimental site. Following the WRB classification system soil morphological data such as horizon boundary, soil colour when moist and dry, structure, consistency, root abundance and carbonate were identified in the field while soil physical properties (soil texture, bulk density, particle density, porosity, and soil chemical properties like ph, O.C, T.N, C:N, available Phosphorous, Ca, Mg, K, Na, TEB, Exchangeable acidity, Exchangeable Aluminum were analyzed in teppi at the soil laboratory of Teppi Soil Testing Research Centre. The soil parameters used are listed in Tables 3- 5.

Horizon Depth (cm) Texture Color Consistency Structure Roots Horizon Boundary Carbonates
Moist Dry
Ap 0-25 SCL  drb (5YR ¾) drb (5YR 4/4) Fr, ss, and s 1 fgr Many fine gs eo
AB 25-70 SCL db (7.5YR ¾) drb (5YR ¾) Ss, s and p 2 msbk Many fine ds eo
Bt 70-130 SL drb (7.5YR ¾) drb (5YR 3/3) ss, s and p 3 msbk Few fine dw eo
BC 130-160+ SL sb (7.5YR 3/8) drb (5YR3/4) ss, s and p 3 msbk none di eo

Table 3: Main morphological character of the pedon at Abelo area Masha District. 1) SL=sandy loam; SCL=sandy clay loam; SL=sandy loam, 2) drb=dark reddish brown; db=dark brown; sb=strong brown; 3) fr=friable; s=sticky; ss=slightly sticky; p=plastic 4) sbk=sub-angular blocky; w-f=weak fine, 5) d=diffuse; g=gradual; i=irregular; s=smooth: w=Wavy: eo=No effervescence.

Soil horizon Soil depth pH in H2O pH in KCL ΔpH EXac- (cmol (+) Kg-1 soil) EXa (cmol (+) Kg-1 soil) O.C (g Kg-1) N (g Kg-1) C: N Av. P (mgKg-1) Av.K (mgKg-1)
Ap 0-25 4.49 4.2 0.25 3.58 2.52 1.87 0.13 14.38 8.5 54
AB 25-70 5.1 4.5 0.7 3.2 2.3 1.66 0.12 13.83 6.4 43
Bt 70-130 5.2 4.4 1.2 2.72 2.1 1.36 0.1 13.6 5.6 29
BC 130-160+ 5.2 4.5 1 2.4 1.8 1.3 0.1 13 3.4 25

Table 4: selected soil Chemical Characteristics of soils of Abelo area Masha District. EXac= acidity, EXa=Exchangeable aluminium, Av. P=available phosphorous, Av.K=Available potassium.

(cmol (+) kg-1 soil)
Soil depth Soil horizon Ca Mg K Na TEB Ac Al CEC ECEC CEC
clay
PAls (%) PAcs (%) PBS (%)
0-25 Ap 7.12 2.16 0.41 0.01 9.69 3.58 2.52 19.5 13.28 43.5 13.59 15.91 49.69
25-70 AB 6.55 2.14 0.39 trace 9.08 3.2 2.3 19.2 12.28 40.83 11.97 16.66 47.29
70-130 Bt 6.43 2.02 0.34 trace 8.79 2.72 2.1 21.4 11.51 46.41 9.81 12.71 41.07
130-160+ BC 5 1.5 0.32 trace 6.82 2.4 1.8 18.8 9.22 37.6 11.11 11.11 36.27

Table 5: Selected soil Chemical Characteristics of soils of Abelo area Masha District (continued) TEB=Total exchangeable bases; Ac=Acidity; CECsoil and CECclay=Cation exchange capacity of the soil and clay fraction, respectively; ECEC=Effective cation exchange capacity; PAls, PACs and PBS=Percentage of Al saturation, acid saturation and base saturation, respectively.

Key morphological properties of the profile are shown in Table 3. This profile is well drained with friable moist consistency and slightly hard to hard when dry. The profile is very deep (>160 cm), with weak friable subangular blocky (0-25 cm), medium to strong sub angular blocky dark brown to strong brown colors (Table 3).

The moist color of soil

The consistency in profile with depth (0-25 cm) was friable sticky and slightly plastic when (dry, moist and wet) depth of (25-70 cm) depth within profile slightly friable, slightly sticky and plastic and depth of (70-130 cm) within profile was slightly hard stick and moderately plastic and (130-160 cm) depth hard very sticky and moderately plastic when (dry, moist wet) moderate medium subangular block in (25-70 cm) soil depth strong coarser sub angular block in third and fourth (70-130 and 130-160 cm) soil depth.

The structure of soil in the profile with in-depth showing strong variation from surface to subsurface horizon revealing that there is strong variability in the development of soil structure weak fine and granular structure was observed in the upper 25 cm sampling depth. The root distribution of profile was many fines in the surface layer (0-25 cm) to common fine in the second and third (25-70 and 70-130 cm) and not at the extreme bottom (130-160 cm).

No effervescences were observed in all depth within profile in addition to dilute 10% HCl indicated the absence of calcium carbonate.

Positive value for ΔpH indicates negatively charged clay surface. There is slight increase in soil pH. Soil pH value measured in water were higher than the respective value measured in Kcl solution n throughout the profile (Table 4) the decreased in pH when measured in Kcl indicates appreciable quantity of exchangeable hydrogen(H) had been realized into soil solution through exchange reaction with K in Kcl solution

The lowest soil pH (H2o) 4.49 and pH (Kcl) 4.2 which is strongly acidic value (pH<5.5) values were recorded on the surface soil of profile this might be due to continuous removal of basic cations by high yielding crop variety, oxidation of organic matter and leaching of basic cation leads to the low calcium saturation and continues release of acid cations from the acidic parent materials.

The highest total carbon (1.77), total nitrogen (0.14) and C:N ratio was recorded in surface horizon the content of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen and C:N ratio decreased consistently with increasing soil depth within profile.

The highest concentration of available phosphorus (8.5) by Bray II method and available potassium (54) by curve method in surface horizon (Ap) and decreases consistently in bottom horizon (BC) with depth [38-43].

CEC clay=CEC of soil–(%OM*200)/ %Clay

Pals=Exchangeable Al/CEC × 100

PAcs=Exchangeable Acidity/CEC × 100

PBS (%)=Exch. Na+Ca+Mg+K/ CEC × 100

The highest exchangeable bases calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg+2), potassium (K+) were recorded in the surface horizon (Ap) and decreased linearly with depth to the last horizon (BC). This is clearly related to organic matter (plant and animal residue) degradation in the last horizon (BC). Exchangeable potassium level above 0.2 cmol (+) Kg-1 suggests that plant response to application of potassium fertilizer is not possible particularly when addition organic amendment is added that replaces heavy removal of the crop by harvesting.

The highest Exchangeable acidity (3.58 cmol (+) Kg-1 soil) and exchange aluminum (2.52 cmol (+) Kg-1 soil) was higher in surface horizon and almost decreases linearly with depth from surface (Ap) to bottom horizon (BC) respectively and the contribution of exchangeable aluminum to exchange acidity were 70.39, 71.8, 77.20, 75 In abelo area Masha district south-western Ethiopia, large proportions of exchangeable acidity were due to exchangeable Al (Table 4). The highest aluminium and acid saturation percentage of (13.59) in surface horizon (Ap) and (16.66) in the second horizon(AB) respectively and decrease linearly to (11.11) of both acid and aluminium saturation percentage Acid saturation percentage of >10 will affect plant growth and this can be toxic to sensitive plant such as Cabbage, carrot, tomato, pepper, cotton, brassica, but tolerant plant like Soybean, maize, lupine, groundnut, Potato, Teff can be grown under current condition or without lime The highest CEC (21.4 cmol (+) Kg-1 soil) and CEC clay (46.41 cmol (+) Kg-1 soil) was recorded in (Bt) horizon this indicates the presence of accumulation of highly weather able minerals in the horizon and there is general decrease of CEC of soil and clay down profile while the highest ECEC (13.28 cmol (+) Kg-1 soil) was recorded in surface horizon(Ap) and decreased linearly down profile. This decreases with depth due to strong association with organic carbon which also decreases linearly with depth. The saturation of the CEC with basic cations calcium (Ca+2 cmol (+) Kg-1 soil), magnesium (Mg+2 cmol (+) Kg-1 soil), potassium (K+cmol (+) Kg-1 soil), sodium (Na +cmol (+) Kg-1 soil)) decreases linearly from 49.69 percent at top horizon (0-25) to about 36.27 percent at last most horizon (130-160), causing a great decrease in the amount of exchangeable nutrient cations in middle and lower horizons. In essence, intensive weathering results in acid soils that are naturally infertile the percent base saturation was <50% throughout profile this indicated that the low soil fertility status of profile.

CaSP=Exchangeable Ca/CEC × 100

MgSP= Exchangeable Mg/CEC × 100

The ratio of calcium to magnesium is in the range 3.06-3.33, below the range of 4-6 indicating that calcium (Ca+2) is deficient or external application of calcium (Ca+2 cmol (+) kg-1 soil), is required to maintain soil fertility and leaching is the predominant translocation, pedogenetic process. Overall, the result shows that the ratio of Ca/Mg values was below 4.0, telling deficiency of calcium [34] the condition is more series at low pH. Especially more series in plant with fibrous root system facing difficult to take nutrients from deeper horizon in search of leached nutrients

The high Mg/K ratios in pedon indicates that the soil has developed from mafic parent materials and values of Mg/K ratios are in the range of 4.41 in surface horizon (Ap) to 6.68 in subsurface horizon (BC). These ranges are being considered favourable for most crops showing magnesium is available to crop the overall K/TEB (total exchangeable bases) ratios are above 0.02 which is said to be favourable for most tropical crops.

Calcium saturation percentage (CSP), magnesium saturation percentage (MSP), potassium saturation percentage, acid saturation percentage(AcSP) and aluminum saturation percentage (ASP) were calculated as the ratio of the exchangeable Calcium, magnesium, and potassium to CEC of soil samples taken from the respective horizon. The lowest Calcium saturation percentage (26.88) in the surface horizon (Ap) and almost increased linearly down profile which is below optimum ranges of 65% to 75%. Cation saturation range reflecting external application calcium-containing material must be added for better crop production or for a higher soil calcium, increase the lime application. The lowest cation saturation percentage for magnesium (8.06) in surface horizon (Ap) and increased linearly with depth bottom horizon (10.80) which is below the optimum range of 10 to 15% of cation saturation for magnesium. These conditions may prevent the growth of plants if dolomite or other materials are not added to correct the proportion. Cation saturation percentage value for potassium ranged from 1.61 in the subsurface horizon (BC) to (2.13) in the 2nd horizon (AB); all ranges are in optimum saturation value of 1-5%, so there is no need of potassium-containing fertilizer as an amendment.

Table 6 presents the data on soil texture. The soil texture was sandy clay loam in the upper and middle horizons and, sandy clay in the 3rd and bottom horizons with an overall average texture of sandy clay loam (53% sand, 34.25% clay, 12.75% silt). Results on bulk density, particle density, and total porosity are presented in Table 6. The mean bulk density and particle density ranged from (1.32 and 2.71 Mgm-3) in the lowest horizon (BC) to (1.36 and 2.76 Mgm-3) in the surface horizon (Ap), with an overall average of 1.345 and 2.7462 Mgm-3 respectively (Table 6). The low bulk and particle density in the most bottom layer (Ap) can be attributed to increasing clay content down the profile (Table 6). Soil bulk density has a major impact on the dynamics of water and air in the soil and crop root development which ultimately affects crop growth and yield.

Soil depth Soil horizon Ca/Mg Mg/K K/TEB Calcium saturation percentage Magnesium saturation percentage
0-25 Ap 3.33 4.41 0.05 26.88 8.06
25-70 AB 3.18 4.92 0.046 33.48 10.52
70-130 Bt 3.28 5.79 0.038 34.67 10.56
130-160+ BC 3.06 6.68 0.035 33.08 10.80

Table 6: Soil nutrient ratios of the pedon at abelo area, Masha District.

The lowest porosity in the surface horizon (50.83) and it increases with increasing depth in bottom horizon (51.25) though this indicates there is slight increase in total porosity of soil with depth this shows factors that decrease bulk density of soil such as increase in clay content improves total porosity of soil.

Since porosity is calculated from the relation between bulk density and particle density of soil, it is very much influenced by the soil bulk density and the particle density for any given soil, the lower the bulk densities, the more compacted the soil is and the lower the pore space as also observed in this profile, Therefore, organic matter addition is required to improve porosity or any features that can reduce bulk density and these soils were categorized as sandy clay loam, in the upper (Ap) and second middle horizon(AB) and Sandy clay in third (Bt) and bottom horizon (BC).

The liner declines of silt/clay ratio of (0.46) in surface horizon (Ap) to 0.35 in bottom most horizon (Bt)with depth also implies weathering of coarse particles, thus indicate advanced soil development also implies that the rate of weathering increase with increase in soil depth and shows the presence of clay migration.

A soil profile representative of typical soils of Abelo area Masha District, south-west Ethiopia, was dug to study its morphology, soil physico-chemical characteristics and to classify it using two internationally known soil classification systems. Disturbed and undisturbed soil samples were taken from designated pedogenic horizons for physical and chemical analysis in the laboratory. Soil morphological observations revealed that the pedon is well drained and very deep with dark brown to dark yellowish-brown topsoil overlying brown to strong brown sandy clay loam to sandy clay subsoil (Table 7).

 Soil depth (cm) Soil horizon % sand % slit % clay Silt/clay ratio Textural class  Bd
(gcm-3)
Pd
(gcm-3)
% porosity
0-25 Ap 56 14 30 0.46 sandy clay loam 1.36 2.766 50.83
25-70 AB 54 13 33 0.39 Sandy clay loam 1.35 2.758 51.05
70-130 Bt 52 12 36 0.35 Sany clay 1.35 2.7528 50.96
130-160+ BC 50 12 38 0.31 sandy clay 1.32 2.708 51.25

Table 7: Selected soil Physically Characteristics of soils of Abelo area Masha District.

Clay eluviations-illuviation is a dominant process influencing soil formation in the study area as indicated by the clay gradient between the eluvial and illuvial horizons and the presence of clay cutans in the subsoil. The soil is characterized by weak fine sub angular blocky throughout its pedon depth. Laboratory analysis indicates that the soil is very strongly acid (pH 4.6-5.0) throughout the profile, has very low N (20 mg kg-1) in the topsoil and low OC (0.6-1.25%). The pedon has low CEC (6.0-12.0 cmol (+) kg-1) and low base saturation (<50%). Using field and laboratory analytical data, the representative pedon was classified to the series level of the USDA Soil Taxonomy as Abelo, fine-loamy, siliceous, thermic, Rhodic Paleudults and to Tier-2 of WRB as Rhodic Nitosols Ortho dystric. The general fertility of the soils of the area is discussed highlighting their potentials and constraints (Table 8).

USDA soil taxonomy FAO - WRB Soil Classification
 Order Suborder Great group Subgroup Family Series Reference Soil  Group WRB soil
name
Ultisols Udults Paleudults Rhodic Paleudults fine-loamy, siliceous,
thermic, Rhodic Paleudults
Abelo, fine-loamy, siliceous,
thermic, Rhodic Paleudults
Nitosols Rhodic Nitosols Ortho dystric  

Table 8: Summary of the morphological and diagnostic features of the Pedon at Abelo area,Masha District.

Conclusion

Continuous cultivation without application of organic and inorganic fertilizer amendment have enhanced the degradation of selected soil chemical properties under the research farm, however, soil fertility status of the farmer's field that was continuous cultivate indicating that farmers have conservation based. Implementing integrated soil fertility management could improve the existing soil condition and replace the degraded soil chemical properties moreover soil analysis alone cannot go beyond the detection of toxicity sufficiency or deficiency level therefore soil analysis along with field experiments are crucial in giving conclusive recommendation on soil management for sustainable production and productivity of soil in the abelo area Masha distinct sheka zone south-west Ethiopia.

References

  1. Adejumo SA, Togun AO, Adediran JA, Ogundiran MB (2010) Effects of compost application on remediation and the growth of maize planted on lead-contaminated soil.
  2. Dell’Angelo J, D’Odorico P, Rulli MC (2017) Threats to sustainable development posed by land and water grabbing. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 27: 120-128.
  3. Zeleke G, Agegnehu G, Abera D, Rashid S (2010) Fertilizer and soil fertility potential in Ethiopia. Constraints and opportunities for enhancing the system. IFPRI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, p: 42.
  4. EPA (Environmental Protection Authority) (2012) National Report of Ethiopia, the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20). Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa.
  5. Gashaw T, Bantider A, Hagos GS (2014) Land degradation in Ethiopia: causes, impacts and rehabilitation techniques. Journal of Environment and Earth Science 4: 98–105.
  6. Nwite JM (2017) Importance of soil organic matter in fertility maintenance and productivity under farming management system. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences 11: 1–9.
  7. Bedru S (2007) Land use/land cover changes in Andracha and Masha Woredas of Sheka Zone, SNNP Regional State. A clue for advocacy and informed decision making. In: Mesresha Fetene: Forests of Sheka: Multidisciplinary case studies on the impact of land use/land cover change, Southwest Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: MELCA Mahiber, pp: 21-56.
  8. Behailu A (2010) Land use and land cover analysis and modeling in South Western Ethiopia: The case of selected resettlement kebeles in Masha Woreda, Ethiopia.
  9. Moti J, Mokonnen Y, Adugna T, Mitiku H, Ansha Y, et al. (2011) Impact of resettlement on the livelihood, food security and natural resource utilization in Ethiopia. Dryland Coordination Group (DCG) Report No. 65.
  10. Kassa H, Dondeyne S, Poesen J, Frankl A, Nyssen J (2016) The transition from the forest- to cereal-based agricultural systems: a review of the drivers of land-use change and degradation in southwest ethiopia. Land Degradation and Development 28: 431–449.
  11. Engdawork A, Bork H (2016) Farmers' Perception of Land Degradation and Traditional Knowledge in Southern Ethiopia-Resilience and Stability. Land Degradation and Development.
  12. Mekonnen GT, Abiy G (2014) Review on Overall Status of Soil and Water Conservation System and Its Constraints in Different Agro-Ecology of Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Natural Sciences Research 4: 59–70.
  13. Agyeman K, Osei-Bonsu I, Berchie JN, Osei MK, Mochiah MB (2014) Effect of poultry manure and different combinations of mineral fertilizers on growth and yield of four tomato varieties in Ghana. Agricultural Science 2: 27-34.
  14. White PJ, Brown PH (2010) Plant nutrition for sustainable development and global health. Annals of Botany 105: 1073–1080.
  15. Balthazar MM, Abel KK, Shigeru A, Hiroo O, Gerson IN (2003) Pedological characteristics, general fertility, and classification of some benchmark soils of Morogoro District, Tanzania. African Journal of Science and Technology, Science and Engineering Series 4: 101-112.
  16.  Zewide I, Mohammed A, Tulu S (2016) Potato (solanum tuberosum L.) growth and tuber quality, soil nitrogen and phosphorus content as affected by different rates of nitrogen and phosphorus at masha district in southwestern ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Research 11: 95-104.
  17. Zewide I, Mohammed A, Tulu S (2012) Effect of different rate of nitrogen and phosphorus on yield and yield components of potato (solanum tuberosum L.) at Masha District, Southwestern Ethiopia. International J Soil Science 7: 146-156.
  18. Beccaluva L, Bianchini G, Wilson BM (2011) Volcanism and evolution of the African lithosphere. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 478.
  19. Kazmin VO (1972) Geological map of ethiopia 1:2,000,000. Geological survey of ethiopia, ministry of mines, energy and water resources, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  20. Dewitte O, Jones A, Spaargaren O, Breuning MH, Brossard M, et al. (2013) Harmonisation of the soil map of Africa at the continental scale. Geoderma 211: 138-153.
  21. Feyissa A, Mebrate M (1994) Provenance trial of Cordia Africana. In: Provenance trials of some exotic and indigenous tree species. Forestry Research Centre, Addis Abeba, pp: 81-96.
  22. Schmitt AK, Vazquez JA (2006) Alteration and remelting of nascent oceanic crust during continental rupture: Evidence from zircon geochemistry of rhyolites and xenoliths from the Salton Trough, California. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 252: 260–274.
  23. Central Statistical Agency (2011) Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, National Census report of 2011, Statistical Reports. Central Statistical Authority, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  24. Mahiber M (2005) Impacts of Lc/Lu change in Sheka zone, South-western part of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Unpublished.
  25. SZCTGCD (2008) Sheka Zone Culture and Tourism and Government Communication Department, Report.
  26. NTFP (2008) Non-Timber Forest Products Research and Development Project in SW Ethiopia. Baseline description of project area: Summary of participatory appraisal data at kebele and zonal level. Wageningen, p: 45
  27. Masha Woreda Office of Agriculture (MWOA) (2016) Masha woreda office of agriculture 2011’s Annual reports.
  28. Fazzini M, Bisci C, Billi P (2015) The climate of ethiopia. In: Billi P, Landscapes and Landforms of Ethiopia: Springer,  Netherlands, pp: 65-87.
  29. Tekalign T, Haque L, Aduayi EA (1991) Soil, Plant, Water, Fertilizer, Animal Manure and Compost Analysis Manual. Plant Science Division Working Document NO. 13. International Livestock Center for Africa. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  30. Barauah TC, Barthakulh HP (1997) A textbook of soil analysis. Vikas Publishing House. New Delhi, India, p: 334.
  31. Hillel D (2004) Introduction to Environmental Soil Physics. Elsevier Academic Press.
  32. EthioSIS (Ethiopia Soil Information System) (2014) Soil fertility status and fertilizer recommendation atlas for Tigray regional state, Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  33. Food and Agriculture Organization (2006) Plant nutrition for food security: A guide for integrated nutrient management. FAO, fertilizer and plant nutrition bulletin 16, Rome, Italy.
  34. Landon JR (1991) Booker Tropical Soil Manual. A handbook for soil survey and agricultural land evaluation in the tropics and subtropics. Longman Scientific and Technical Publishers, Essex, p: 474.
  35. Hazelton P, Murphy B (2007) Interpreting Soil Test Results. What do all the numbers mean? Cisro Publishing, p: 152.
  36. Fenton G, Helyar K (2007) Soil acidification, in Soils: Their properties and management, Oxford University Press, Melbourn.
  37. Jones JB (2003) Agronomic Handbook: Management of Crops, Soils, and their fertility. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, USA, p: 482.
  38. Mengel K, Kirkby EA (1996) Principles of Plant Nutrition. Panama Publishing Cporation, New Delhi, India, p: 314.
  39. Stern R, Rijks D, Dale I, Knock J (2006) INSTAT Climate Guide. Statistical Service Center. University of Reading UK.
  40. Reddy SJ (1990) Methodology: Agro-climatic Analogue Technique and Applications as relevant to dry land agriculture. Agro climatology Series, p: 60.
  41. Kassam, AH, Kowal JM, Sarrof S (1978) Report on the Agro Ecology Zones-Project Methodology and Results for AFRMA, World Soll Resources Report 40: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
  42. Girma M, Fikadu G, Gizachew L (2011) The potential impacts of climate change maize farming system complex in Ethiopia: Towards retrofitting adaptation and mitigation options. In: Proceedings of the 3rd National Maize Workshop of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Citation: Isreal Z, Tana T, Wogi L, Mohammed A (2018) Soil Morphology, Physico-Chemical Properties and Classification of Typical Soils of Abelo Area Masha District South Western Ethiopia. Adv Crop Sci Tech 6: 341. DOI: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000341

Copyright: © 2018 Isreal Z, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top