Journal of Fisheries & Livestock Production
Open Access

Selective fishing gear; Sustainable fisheries; Turtle excluder devices; Trawl net modifications

Introduction

The sustainability of commercial fisheries is increasingly threatened by overfishing, bycatch, and habitat degradation, leading to significant ecological and economic consequences [1]. Traditional fishing methods often lack selectivity, resulting in the unintended capture of non-target species, including juvenile fish, endangered marine mammals, sea turtles, and seabirds. This not only disrupts marine biodiversity but also reduces the availability of future fish stocks, undermining long-term fisheries productivity [2].

To address these challenges, the development and implementation of selective fishing gear have gained global attention. Selective fishing technologies are designed to target specific species while minimizing the capture of unwanted organisms and reducing environmental damage [3]. Innovations such as bycatch reduction devices (BRDs), turtle excluder devices (TEDs), modified trawl nets, and hook-and-line systems have proven effective in enhancing sustainability in commercial fisheries. Additionally, emerging solutions like biodegradable fishing gear, acoustic deterrents, and real-time electronic monitoring systems further improve fishing efficiency while protecting marine ecosystems. This paper examines the latest advancements in selective fishing gear, evaluating their effectiveness, environmental impact, and adoption challenges. By integrating science-driven innovations, policy support, and industry collaboration, selective fishing technologies can contribute to responsible fisheries management, ensuring a balance between economic viability and ecological sustainability for future generations [4].

Discussion

Selective fishing gear plays a critical role in promoting sustainable fisheries by minimizing bycatch, reducing habitat destruction, and improving the overall efficiency of fishing operations [5]. Traditional fishing methods often result in the unintended capture of non-target species, including juvenile fish, marine mammals, and endangered species, which disrupts marine biodiversity and depletes fish stocks. Various selective fishing technologies, such as bycatch reduction devices (BRDs), turtle excluder devices (TEDs), modified trawl nets, and hook-and-line systems, have been developed to address these issues. BRDs and TEDs have been particularly effective in trawl fisheries by allowing non-target species to escape, reducing mortality rates among vulnerable marine organisms. Modified trawl nets, including square mesh panels and separator panels, enhance selectivity by allowing smaller fish to escape, while semi-pelagic trawls minimize seafloor damage, preserving critical marine habitats [6].

Other innovative approaches, such as biodegradable fishing gear and acoustic deterrents, have also shown promise in reducing the environmental footprint of commercial fishing [7]. Biodegradable nets and traps help mitigate ghost fishing, where lost gear continues to harm marine life, while acoustic deterrents and visual cues reduce accidental entanglements of marine mammals and seabirds. Additionally, real-time electronic monitoring systems, including cameras and sensors, have improved compliance with fishing regulations, ensuring that sustainable practices are enforced and documented. Despite these advancements, several challenges hinder the widespread adoption of selective fishing gear. High initial costs, resistance to change among fishers, lack of awareness and training, regulatory inconsistencies, and variability in gear effectiveness pose significant barriers. Many small-scale fishers, in particular, struggle with the financial burden of transitioning to new gear, while others remain skeptical about its impact on catch efficiency and profitability [8].

To overcome these challenges, governments and industry stakeholders must work together to provide financial incentives, strengthen regulatory frameworks, and promote educational initiatives that highlight the long-term benefits of selective fishing gear [9]. Subsidies, tax benefits, and grants can help offset the costs associated with adopting new gear, while stricter regulations can mandate its use in commercial fisheries. Collaboration between researchers, fishers, and policymakers is essential to drive innovation and develop practical, species-specific gear solutions. Future advancements in AI-powered fishing technology, biodegradable materials, and real-time species detection could further enhance the sustainability of commercial fisheries. By integrating technological progress, policy enforcement, and fisher engagement, selective fishing gear can contribute to a more responsible and ecologically balanced fishing industry, ensuring the long-term health of marine ecosystems and the economic viability of global fisheries [10].

Conclusion

The adoption of selective fishing gear is a crucial step toward achieving sustainability in commercial fisheries. By minimizing bycatch, protecting marine biodiversity, and reducing habitat destruction, these technologies help balance the economic needs of the fishing industry with environmental conservation. Innovations such as bycatch reduction devices (BRDs), turtle excluder devices (TEDs), modified trawl nets, biodegradable fishing gear, and real-time electronic monitoring systems have demonstrated significant success in making fisheries more selective and eco-friendly. However, challenges such as high implementation costs, resistance from fishers, regulatory gaps, and variability in effectiveness must be addressed to encourage widespread adoption.

Moving forward, a multi-faceted approach involving financial incentives, policy enforcement, industry collaboration, and continuous technological advancements is necessary to enhance the adoption and efficiency of selective fishing gear. Governments should implement supportive regulations and funding programs, while fishers must be provided with adequate training and resources to facilitate the transition. Ongoing research and development in AI-driven fishing technologies, real-time monitoring, and eco-friendly materials will further improve the sustainability of commercial fishing practices. By integrating innovation with strong governance and industry cooperation, selective fishing gear can help build a more resilient and environmentally responsible fisheries sector, ensuring the long-term health of marine ecosystems and the sustainability of global fish stocks.

References

1. CSA (2022) Agricultural Sample Survey, Volume II report on livestock and livestock characteristics (private peasant holdings). Central Statistical Agency (CSA): Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Google Scholar

2. FAO (2010) Chicken genetic resources used in smallholder production systems and opportunities for their development. FAO Smallholder Poultry Production Paper NO. 5.

Google Scholar

3. Solomon D (2007) Suitability of hay box brooding technology to the rural household poultry production system. Inter J Res Sust Develop World Agri CIPAV, Cali, Colombia.

Google Scholar

4. Biazen A, Mengistu U, Negassi A, Getenet A, Solomon A, et al. (2019b) FAO Poultry Sector Ethiopia, Animal Production and Health Livestock Country Reviews. No. 11. Rome.

Google Scholar

5. Shapiro BI, Gebru G, Desta S, Negassa A, Nigussie K, et al. (2015) Ethiopia livestock master plan. ILRI Project Report. Inter Live Res Inst (ILRI).

Google Scholar

6. CSA (2020) Agricultural Sample Survey Volume II report on livestock and livestock characteristics (private peasant holdings). Central Statistical Agency (CSA): Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Google Scholar

7. Kumsa B, Beyecha K, Geloye M (2008) Ectoparasites of sheep in three agro-ecological zones in central Oromia, Ethiopia. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 79: 1-7.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Fitsum M, Aliy M (2014) Poultry Production System and Role of Poultry Production in Tigray Region, Northern Ethiopia: A Review. J Biol Agri Healthc 4: 27.

Google Scholar

9. Solomon D (2007) Suitability of hay box brooding technology to the rural household poultry production system. Inter J Res Sust Develop World Agri CIPAV, Cali, Colombia.

Google Scholar

10. CSA (2022) Agricultural Sample Survey, Volume II report on livestock and livestock characteristics (private peasant holdings). Central Statistical Agency (CSA): Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Google Scholar