Seasonal Variations of Zooplankton in Al-Hammar Marsh-Southern Iraq

Shaker G Ajeel¹, Ali AZ Douabul^2* and Mohammad F Abbas¹

¹Department of Marine Biology, Marine Science Centre, University of Basrah, Iraq

²Department of Marine Environmental Chemistry, Marine Science Centre, University of Basrah, Iraq

*Corresponding Author:

Ali AZ Douabul
Department of Marine Environmental Chemistry
Marine Science Centre
University of Basrah, Iraq
Tel: +9644278344
E-mail: adouabul@mscbasra.org

Received Date: November 06, 2015; Accepted Date: November 12,2015; Published Date: November 18, 2015

Citation: Ajeel SG, Douabul AA, Abbas MF (2015) Seasonal Variations of Zooplankton in Al-Hammar Marsh-Southern Iraq. J Ecosys Ecograph 5:173. doi:10.4172/2157-7625.1000173

Copyright: © 2015 Ajeel SG, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography

Abstract

Zooplankton samples were collected seasonally from three stations in the south of Al-Hammar Marshes southern Iraq by Plankton net (0.090 mm mesh-size and 40 cm mouth aperture) during 2011. Physical and chemical parameters of the water were studied such as, water temperature, salinity, pH and dissolved oxygen. The population density of zooplankton ranged between 717 ind /m3 at third station (Al-Sallal) in winter to 1209879 ind/m3 at first station (Al-Mashab) in Spring. The important groups of zooplankton in the study area were Cirriped larvae (88.5%), and Cladocera (10.6%). The highest value of average density of Cirriped larvae and Cladocera was recorded in spring.

Keywords

Zooplankton; Density; Al-Hammar Marshes

Introduction

Zooplanktons invariably form an integral component and significantly contribute to biological productivity of freshwater communities [1]. Due to their importance as food for fish, zooplanktons have been studied from various inland ecosystems of Iraq. Information on the ecology of this group of organisms in Iraqis Al-Hammar Marshes, however, is still limited. Zooplankton may also offer insight on productivity of other group of organisms. The rate of zooplankton production can be used as a tool to estimate the exploitable fish stock of an area [2]. In marsh environments zooplankton are good ecological indicators due to their wide physiological tolerances among species. Also, due to their place in the aquatic food chains, changes in population abundance may cascade both up and down. Furthermore, environmental perturbation [3].

Zooplankton research ecosystems near Basrah has a history of over 90 years, starting with Gurney [4], who first identified several species of zooplankton from lower Mesopotamia, the mouth of the Shatt Al- Arab River, and the Tigris River, near the city of Amara, he found 77 taxa belonging to Rotifera, Cladocera and Copepoda. Mohammad [5] research followed, with collections and identifications of cladocerans from southern Iraq. This latter study included the Shatt Al-Arab from the mouth of Khour Al-Amaya to Qurna, where fifteen new species to Iraq were found and a unique species assemblage downstream observed. AL-Hammed [6] studied the zooplankton of the inland waters of Iraq. Khalaf et al. [7] investigated crustaceans, particularly, the Cladocera of the middle and southern region of Iraq, where twenty-three species of Cladocera were described from the marshes extending from the Qurna to Chebaish.

In Shatt Al-Arab River from 1982 – 1984, Salman et al. [8] studied the seasonal abundance of zooplankton, and found that Cladocera was the dominant group, with as much as 68% of species count, followed by Copepoda. Additionally, Al-Saboonchi et al. [9] investigated the seasonal changes in the quality and quantity of zooplankton in Al-Hammar Marshes near Garmat-Ali River, were 21 genera belonging to three groups, Rotifera, Cladocera and Copepoda were identified. Abdul-Hussein et al. [10] surveyed the Rotifera in northern Shatt Al- Arab River. Ajeel et al. [11] found that the peak of density of Simocephalus vetulus in a pond in (Garmat Ali) at Basrah occurred during February 1997. And Ajeel et al. [12] recorded 23 species of Cladocera including six new records to the Shatt Al-Arab River. Whereas, AL-Zubaidi et al. [13] studied the zooplankton of the southern Shatt Al-Arab River. Later Ajeel [14] investigated the zooplankton of the North Shatt Al-Arab, Shatt Al-Basrah and Khour Al-Zubair Canal. Then Ajeel et al. [14] surveyed the zooplankton of Garmat-Ali River. Abbas [15] study abundance of Cladocera and some other zooplankton and diversity in the Northern part of Shatt Al-Arab River. Ajeel et al. [16] (unpublished) study diversity of Cladocera of the Shatt Al-Arab River, Southern Iraq. A high diversity of zooplankton has been recorded in ecosystems around Basrah City. Marshes were found to be dominated by taxa 1 [9,17] whereas lotic systems were dominated by taxa 2 [12,13,15,18], indicating predominance of Cladocera, Cirriped larvae and Copepoda.

In the Al-Chabaish, Al-Hammar and Al-Fuhud marshes of southern Iraq, Al-Qarooni [19] studied the abundance and occurrence of some zooplankton and snails, to find the density of zooplankton range from 5150 ind/m³ during May in Al-Hammar marshes to 425450 ind/m³ during March in Al-Fuhud marsh. Whereas Al-Jizani [20] investigated the effect of organic pollution on the diversity and abundance of plankton in Shatt Al-Arab River, Al-Ashaar and Al-Rabat channels [20] she noted that sovereignty was for the Rotifera followed Copepoda then Cladocera. While Ajeel et al. [21] studied the seasonal abundance of zooplankton in the southern Iraqi Marshes, and in other study, Ajeel et al. [21] calculated the secondary productivity of Simocephalus vetulus in a temporary pool in Basra. Finally Abbas [15] recorded 23 species of Cladocera in northern Shatt Al-Arab River and Hammadi [22] study the ecology of Rotifera in five station of the Shatt Al-Arab River, Rotifera dominated the zooplankton at all the stations. Density of zooplankton ranged between 1.36 and 836.31 ind/L, while Rotifera density ranged between 1.09 and 650.99 ind/L. He record about 165 species of Rotifera, 59 species were new records to Iraq. Finally, report of Salman et al. [8] about zooplankton southern Iraq.

However, the most studies of this review were mainly concerned with the taxonomy of Cladocera and to a lesser extent of Copepoda, whereas the latter articles were investigating the abundance and distribution of Cladocera and Copepoda and only few papers were concerned with rotiferan abundance. Therefore, there is no thorough investigation of the various groups of zooplankton throughout different stations in Basrah and for one complete year. For this reason and for estimating the zooplankton production in various localities in Basrah, which has not been conducted before, the present study was carried out. Most of the reported studies on zooplankton in ecosystems of southern Iraq focus on one or a few taxonomic groups. Few studies extended investigations to include equally important groups of zooplankton. Moreover, studies lacked adequate temporal cover. In this study, we present a more thorough investigation of the abundance and distribution of zooplankton in southern Iraq, including several species assessed over a one-year time period.

Materials and Methods

Methods of sample collection

Zooplankton samples, dissolved oxygen, pH, water temperature and water salinity were collected from three stations located in the southern area of the Al-Hammar marshes (Figure 1). Zooplankton collection was done with a flow meter-mounted, 40 cm diameter, 0.90 mm mesh size plankton net [23]. The net was towed in the mornings at a speed of 1 m/s for 10 minutes. Collections were done in January, March, July and October. Net content was emptied into a 500 ml plastic bottle and fixed in 4% formalin immediately after towing. Samples were preserved in alcohol in laboratory after 24 hours for species identification and counting. A 10 ml subsample was taken for samples consisting of large numbers of zooplankton A Bogorov chamber placed under a dissecting scope was used in species and counting. Identification and counting was conducted in replicates of three to control for measurement error. Species identification was done using keys [24-26]. Species abundance was presented as individuals per cubic meter, calculated by extrapolating samples and from plankton net flowmeter reading.

Figure 1: Map of low Mesopotamia showing the sampling stations.

Results

Environmental factors

Water quality parameters varied according to seasonal norms. Temperature ranged from 14.5 to 28.8°C, salinity from 1.3 to 3.2% pH from 5.1 to 8.4 and dissolved oxygen from 4.1 to 11.0 mg/L (Table 1).

Table 1: Seasonally variations of water parameters at three stations southern of Al-Hammar marshes.

Density of zooplankton

Density of zooplankton ranged from 717 to 1.2 million ind/m³ with an average and standard deviation of 1.14 × 105 ind/m³, ± 345458 respectively (Figure 2). Crustacea dominated samples with over 99% of samples by number, its ranged between 657 ind/m³ at Al-Sallal station during winter and 1.2 million ind/m³ at Al-Mashab station during spring, and the average density and standard deviation was 114196 ind/m³ and ± 345610 respectively. The relationship (R) between the temperature and the density of zooplankton was 0.1773.

Figure 2: The density of zooplankton (ind/m³) at study area.

Cirripede larvae the most abundant groups of zooplankton in the study area were comprised (88.5%), then Cladocera (10.6%) and Copepoda (0.4%). Cladocera, peaked at the Hareer region (41971 ind/m³ ) in the spring. Moina affinis dominated, followed by Diaphanosoma brachyurum (Figure 3). The dominant zooplankton groups (ind/m³ ) in south Al-Hammar Marshes during the period of study explained in Figure 4.

Figure 3: The Cladocera percentage of the total zooplankton at study area.

Figure 4: Seasonal distribution of the dominant zooplankton groups (ind/m³) in South Al-Hammar Marshes during the period of study.

Copepoda peaked in summer (1095 ind/m³). Calanoida were observed only once at Al-Mashab region during winter. Cyclopoida, were highest (552 ind/m³) during autumn at Hareer station. Harpacticoida, were highest (58 ind/m³) during spring at the Al- Mashab station. Copepod nauplii, peaked (603 ind/m³) during summer at the Hareer station. Rotifera peaked during autumn at the Hreer (3632 ind/m³) and Al-Sallal (2134 ind/m³) stations (Table 1). Due to our small mesh size, rotifer generally showed a very low density (Table 2).

Table 2: Zooplankton density (ind./m³) at Al-Hammar Marshes collected from January – December 2011.

The correlation between the zooplankton and physical and chemical characteristics of the three stations that have been drawn by the statistical program Canoco explain in Figure 5.

Figure 5: The correlation between Zooplankton and environmental parameters that have been measured using statistical system Canoco.

Which observed the Cirripede larvae were weak positive relationship with all factors, whereas the Oligochaeta, Ostracoda, Annelida, Fish larvae, Foraminifera, Gastropoda, Insect larvae, Rotifers, Amphipoda, Nauplii and Copepoda low positive relationship with dissolved oxygen and negative relationship with other factors. While Cladocera, Zoea of shrimp and zoea of crab had been linked positive relationship with all factors except dissolved oxygen as recorded negative.

Discussion

Zooplankton community structure is an important indicator of ecosystem health and plays an important role in cascading trophic effects [27]. They occupy an intermediate position in the food web, and mediate the transfer of energy from lower to higher trophic level [28], thus they represent an important link in the aquatic food chain and contribute significantly to secondary production in freshwater ecosystems [29]. The diversity of phytoplankton can influence the diversity of zooplankton, or vice versa, and both can be affected by the environmental factors [30].

The type of the aquatic environment directly affected by the number of different conditions, including the water temperature, water depth, currents, ammonia content, phytoplankton, DOC, etc., The present study showed that the density of zooplankton community in South Al- Hammar Marshes was different according to seasons. In general, the maximum density was observed in spring and summer seasons, while low density was observed in the winter and autumn seasons. The spring season is most favorable period for the growth and multiplication of zooplankton species. The similar results were also obtained by Al-Saboonchi et al. [9] in Garma marshes, Ajeel et al. [12] in Shatt Al-Arab and some temporary ponds in Basrah, Ajeel et al. [14] in Garmat Ali River and Al-Qarooni [19] in Al-Fuhud marshes. This could possibly be due to higher phytoplankton population concentration in the former season in the Shatt Al-Arab River [31], in Garma marshes [9] and in the marshes near the Qurna [32].

Cirripede larvae dominated zooplankton in this study. This finding is in agreement with that reported by Abbas [15] in the northern part of the Shatt AL-Arab River. Water quality is a strong determinate of phytoplankton and zooplankton dynamics, as well as diversity in aquatic systems [33,34]. Hence, the diversity of zooplankton communities is used for assessing the productivity vis-à-vis fishery resource, fertility and health status of the ecosystem [35].

Water quality can be regard as a network of variables (pH, oxygen concentration, temperature etc.,) that are linked and co linked; any changes in these physical and chemical variables can affect aquatic biota in a variety of ways. Dissolved oxygen (DO) is an important aquatic parameter whose presence is vital to aquatic fauna. It plays crucial role in life processes of animals. High concentration of DO was recorded during winter; these findings are in agreement with [36]. This may be due to low solubility at low temperature and high degradation of organic substances. This is due to the fact that it is a permanent water body receiving substantial nutrients from a nearby source.

Cladocera is the main component of the zooplankton in lakes, it is not very important in the oceans, and there are only a few species in coastal and brackish areas. If they are abundant, they reproduce by parthenogenesis and usually become in large numbers [37]. The results show that some species of Cladocera were dominant, such as Moina affinis and Diaphanosoma brachyurum. these two species had a wide range of tolerance to the different environmental conditions, The same finding has been also reported by Mangalo et al. [38] whom formed these two species are the most numerous in the Tigris River out of eight species that have been recorded in that River., Khalaf et al. [39] carried out at Al- Zaafaraniyah pools, Abbas [15] at the Northern part of Shatt AL-Arab River, Salman et al. [3] at Al-Hawizah, Al-Hammar and Central Marsh, southern Iraq. Some species of Cladocera have appeared in a limited time and were very few in numbers such as Dunhevedia crassa, Alonella diaphana, Ceriodaphnia rigaudi and Sida sp. The reason behind this may be the narrow limit of tolerances of these species to the environmental conditions prevailed in this region. Cirripede larvae were by far the most important group of zooplankton in the study area, comprising 88.5% of the total population, and the seasonal variation in the total zooplankton population was governed mostly by variations in this group. This dominance of Cirriped larvae was documented previously in the Shatt Al-Arab River [15,16].

The most common and severe problem is the enrichment of water by a nutrient that increases the biological growth and renders the water bodies unfit for diverse uses. Nutrients that are present in fertilizers as well as in domestic and industrial wastewater have been identified as main cause for changing the trophic status of water bodies from oligotrophic to mesotrophic to eutrophic. Although zooplankton exists under a wide range of environmental condition, yet many species are limited by dissolved oxygen, pH, salinity and other physico-chemical factors [40].

The present results indicated that Al-Hammar marshes are oligohaline brackish water according to Reid [41] classification. Sabri et al. [42] pointed out to the various uses of water and high groundwater levels in areas of central and southern Iraq which may lead to higher levels of salinity, besides the water coming from the Arabian Gulf during high tide may play a significant role in increasing the salinity of the studied area. The present study showed that salinity and dissolved oxygen are adversely affected by temperature, and this agreed with several previous studies conducted on the Shatt Al-Arab, such as Al-Jizani [20] and Al-Mahmoud et al. [43] and others on the inland Iraqi waters such as Al-Lami [44] and Al-Qarooni [19], while temperature had a positive impact on pH. Moreover, there are many factors affect the pH, including the decrease or increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide due to the processes of photosynthesis, which lead to the consumption of carbon dioxide and then reduce the values of the pH [42,45].

Zooplanktons are useful indicator of future fisheries health because they are a food source of organisms at higher trophic levels [46]. Table 3 shows a comparison of the density of zooplankton, Copepods, Cladocera and Cirriped larvae (ind/m³) in the current study compared with the previous studies in different regions and different stations at Marshes and Shatt Al-Arab. It was shown that the high density was in Al-Hammar Marshes and the reason is due to the bloom or increase of Cirripede larvae which reached more than a million ind/m³, and that was due to the impact of Shatt Al-Arab on these water bodies in Al- Hammar Marshes was more than that of Tigris and Euphrates. Our results for the high abundance of Cirripede larvae in the Al-Hammar Marshes were due mostly to the influence of the Shatt Al-Arab River and secondarily to the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers.

Table 3: Density of zooplankton, Copepods, Cladocera and Cirripede larvae (ind/m³) in different stations at Marshes and Shatt Al-Arab River.

The Marshes usually rich in nutrients so they are rich in phytoplankton and zooplankton, but the changes significantly in recent years due to water shortages have affected a significant impact on the productivity of the region. The changes of salinity that occurred in the Shatt Al-Arab and Marshes in recent years because of a lack of water and the salt front access affected to increase the density of zooplankton, especially Cirripede larvae.

References

1. Sharma S, Sharma BK (2008) Zooplankton diversity in floodplain lakes of Assam. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 290: 1-307.
2. Twari LR, Nair VR (1991) Contribution of zooplankton to the fishery of Daramtar creek adjoining Bombay harbour. J Indian Fish Ass 21: 15-19.
3. Salman SD, Abbas MF, Ghazi AH, Ahmed HK, Akash AN, et al. (2014) Seasonal changes in zooplankton communities in the re-�ooded Mesopotamian wetlands, Iraq. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 1-16.
4. Gurney RMA (1921) Freshwater Crustacea collected by Dr. PA Buxton in Mesopotamia and (Persia). J Bombay natural History Society 27: 835-844.
5. Mohammad MB (1965) A faunal study of the Cladocera of Iraq. Bull Biol Res Center 1: 1-11.
6. AL-Hammed MI (1966) Immunological study on the inland water of Iraq. Bull Iraq Nat HistMus 3: 1-21.
7. Khalaf AN, Smirnov MN (1976) On littoral Cladocera of Iraq. Hydrobiologia 51: 91-94.
8. Salman SD, Ali MH, Mohammad HH, Abaas MF (2012) Final report zooplankton in southern Iraq. Marine Science Center 24.
9. AL-Saboonchi AA, Barak NA, Mohamed AM (1986) Zooplankton of Garma marshes, Iraq. J BiolSciRrs 17: 33-40.
10. Abdul-Hussein MM, AL-Saboonchi AA, Ghani AA (1989) Brachionid rotifers from Shatt AL-Arab River, Iraq. Mar Mesop 4: 1-17.
11. Ajeel SG, Ali MH, Salman SD (200 0 ) Population dynamics of Simocephalus vetulus (Crustacea: Cladocera) in Basrah. Mar Mesop 15: 593-612.
12. Ajeel SG, Ali MH, Salman SD (2001) Cladocera from Shatt Al-Arab and some temporary ponds in Basrah. Mari Mesop 16: 309-329.
13. AL-Zubaidi AMH, Salman SD (2001) Distribution and abundance of zooplankton in the Shatt AL-Arab estuary, North West Arabian Gulf, Mar Mesop 16: 187-199.
14. Ajeel SG (2004) Abundance and distribution of zooplankton in some waters in southern region of Iraq. Mar Mesop 19: 95-115.
15. Abbas MF (2010) Abundance of Cladocera and some other zooplankton and Diversity in the Northern part of Shatt Al-Arab river. M.Sc. Thesis, college of Education University Basrah 114 (In Arabic).
16. Ajeel SG, Abaas MF (2013) Abundance and diversity of Cladocera in South Al-Hammar Marshes - Southern Iraq. Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Biological Sciences Series 35 : 253-266.
17. Salman SD, Marina BA, Ali MH, Oshana VK (1986) Zooplankton studies. In: Final report: The 18-month marine pollution monitoring and research programme in Iraq. Marine Science Centre of Basrah University 136-166.
18. Ajeel SG, Abdulla SB, Mohammad HH (2004) Abundance and distribution of the zooplankton in the Garmat Ali river. Basrah J AgriSci 17: 167-178.
19. Al-Qarooni IHM (2005) Abundance and occurrence studies on some of zooplankton and aquatic snails in Al- Chabaish, Al- Hammar and Al- Fuhud marshes southern Iraq. M.Sc. Thesis - college of Education - University of Basra 97 (In Arabic).
20. Al-Jizani HRG (2005) Organic pollution and its impact on the diversity and abundance of plankton in the Shatt al-Arab, Al-Ashaar and Al-Robat Channel. M.Sc. Thesis, college of Education UnivesityBasrah 82.
21. Ajeel SG, Khalaf TA, Mohammad HH, Abbas MF (2006) Distribution of zooplankton in the Al-Hawizah, Al-Hammar marshes and Al-Izze river south of Iraq. Marsh Bulletin 1: 140-153.
22. Hammadi NS (2010) An ecological study of the Rotifera of Shatt Al-Arab region. Ph.D. Thesis, College of Agriculture University of Basrah 351.
23. De Bernardi R (1984) Methods for the estimation of Zooplankton abundance. In: Downing JA, RigIer FH(eds.), A manual on methods for the assessment of secondary Productivity in Fresh Waters., BP Hand book No. 17 Blakwell, Oxford Press.
24. Brook JL (1959)Cladocera. In: Edmondson WT (eds.) ward whippets fresh water biology. John wiley and Sons Inc 587- 656.
25. Lilljeborg W (1982) Cladocerasueciae. Almqvist and wiksell international Stockholm / Sweden 701.
26. Balcer MD, Korda NL, Dodson SI (1984) Zooplankton of the great lakes. A guide to the identification and ecology of the common crustacean species. The University of Wisconsin Press 174.
27. Guevara G, Lozano P, Reinoso G, Villa F (2009)Horizontal and seasonal patterns of tropical zooplankton from the eutrophic Prado Reservoir (Colombia). Limnologica - Ecology and Management of Inland Waters 39: 128-139.
28. Waters TF (1977) Secondary production in inland waters. Advances in Ecological Research 10: 11-164.
29. Sharma BK (1998) Faunal Diversity in India: Rotifera. Zoological Survey of India, Envis Centre, 57-70.
30. Chou WR, Fang LS, Wang WH, Tew KS (2012) Environmental influence on coastal phytoplankton and zooplankton diversity: a multivariate statistical model analysis. Environ Monit Assess 184: 5679-5688.
31. Hameed HA (1978) Studies on the ecology of phytoplankton of Shatt Al-Arab River at Basrah, Iraq. M. Sc. Thesis University of Basrah.
32. Al-Zubaidi AMH (1985) Ecological study on the phytoplankton in some marshes area near Al-Qurna city south Iraq. M.Sc. Thesis University of Basrah.
33. Nasrollahzadeh HS, Bin Din Z, Foong SY, Makhlough A (2008) Trophic status of the Iranian Caspian Sea based on water quality parameters and phytoplankton diversity. Continental Shelf Research 28: 1153-1165.
34. Ramdani M, Elkhiati N, Flower RJ, Thompson JR, Chouba L, et al. (2009) Environmental influences on the qualitative and quantitative composition of phytoplankton and zooplankton in North African coastal lagoons. Hydrobiologia 622: 113-131.
35. Stottrup JG (2000) Theelusivecopepods: Theirproductionandsuitabilityinmarine aquaculture. Aquaculture Res 31: 703-711.
36. Annalakshmi G, Amsath A (2012) Studies on the hydrobiology of river Cauvery and its tributaries Arasalar from Kumbakonam region (Tamilnadu, India) with reference to zooplankton. IJABPT 3: 325-336.
37. Schram FR (1986) Cladocera. Crustacea Oxford University Press, NewYork 387-398.
38. Mangalo HH, Akbar MM (1986) Seasonal variation in population density of zooplankton in the lower reaches of Diyala river, Baghdad-Iraq. J BiolScien Res 17: 99-114.
39. Khalaf AN, Shihab AF (1979) Seasonal variation in the populations of Moinamacrocopa Strauss and MoinamicruraKurz (Crustacea: Cladocera) in Zoafaraniyh pools. Hydrobiologia 62: 75-77.
40. Ahmad U, Parveen S, Khan AA, Kabir HA, Mola HRA, et al. (2011) Zooplankton population in relation to physico-chemical factors of a sewage fed pond of Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India. Biology and Medicine 3 Special Issue: 336-341.
41. Reid GK (1961) Ecology of inland water and estuaries. Reinhold Publ Corp New York 375.
42. Sabri AW, Ali ZH, Thejar LA, Shawkat SF, Kassim TI (1989) Vertical distribution zooplanktonic species in Samarra impoundment (Iraq). Proc 5th SciConf/SRC 5: 256-264.
43. Al-Mahmood HKH, Al-Shawi IJM, Al-Imarah FJ (2008) Survey for the evaluation of physical- chemical parameters of Shatt Al-Arab Waters, Basrah City (1974-2005). Basrah J AgricScispecial issue: 433-448.
44. Al-Lami AA (1998) The environmental effects of the Al-Therthar arm on the Tigris River before entering the Baghdad city. Ph.D. Thesis. College of Science University of Al-Mistansirea 123 (In Arabic).
45. Al-Mosawi AHA, Hussain NA (1992) The physical and chemical properties of water in southern Ahwar of Iraq.In: Hussain NA (edn.) Ahwar of Iraq: Environmental Approach. Marine Science Centre, University of Basrah, 299(In Arabic).
46. Davies OA, Tawari CC, Abowei JFN (2009) Zooplankton of Elechi Creek, Niger Delta Nigeria. Environ Ecol 26: 2441-2346.
47. Ajeel SG, Salman SD, Ali MH (2008) Zooplankton of Basrah district, Southern Iraq. Marsh bulletin 3: 171-191.
48. Al-Zubaidi AMH (1998) Distribution and abundance of the zooplankton in the Shatt Al-Arab estuary and North-West Arabian Gulf.Ph.D. ThesisUniversity of Basrah 125.
49. Morad MSS (2011) Zooplankton in Iraqi Marine Coastal and Estuarine Brackish Water and their Role as Hosts of Some Parasites. M.Sc. Thesis - college of Education,University of Basrah 116.
50. Hussain NA, Hussein SA, Altameme RA, Rissan AK, Tahir MA, et al. (2006) Final report appendix c marshlands monitoring activities. Agriculture reconstruction and development program for Iraq (ARDI).
51. Al-Sodani HM, Abed JM, Al-Essa SAK, Hammadi NS (2007) Quantitative and qualitative study on zooplankton in restored southern Iraqi marshes. Marsh Bulletin 2: 43-63.