Biopolymers Research
Open Access

Biopolymers; Polysaccharides; Rheological behaviour; Nucleic acids

Introduction

Biopolymers, derived from natural sources, encompass a diverse class of macromolecules that hold immense significance in various biological processes and industrial applications. Unlike synthetic polymers, biopolymers offer the advantages of sustainability, biocompatibility, and reduced environmental impact, making them highly sought after in the quest for greener technologies. One of the essential characteristics that set biopolymers apart is their viscoelastic behavior, which profoundly influences their mechanical properties and processing capabilities [1-3]. The field of rheology plays a crucial role in unraveling the viscoelastic nature of biopolymers. Rheology is the study of how materials deform and flow under the influence of external forces, and in the context of biopolymers, it serves as a powerful tool to understand their complex behavior. Viscoelasticity, a key rheological property exhibited by biopolymers, combines viscous and elastic responses, resulting in intriguing mechanical behaviors such as stress relaxation, creep, and strain recovery. Understanding the rheological behavior of biopolymers is of paramount importance for multiple reasons [4-6]. Firstly, it provides fundamental insights into the structural organization and intermolecular interactions within these macromolecular systems. The viscoelastic properties are inherently related to the arrangement of polymer chains, molecular weight distribution, and the presence of secondary structures, such as helices and β-sheets. By probing these attributes, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the material’s mechanical performance and tailor it for specific applications. Secondly, rheological measurements offer valuable information for optimizing the processing and handling of biopolymers. The ability to control viscosity, elasticity, and flow properties is crucial in designing efficient processing techniques for biomaterials, as diverse as food products, pharmaceutical formulations, and tissue engineering scaffolds. Furthermore, the viscoelastic behavior of biopolymers holds particular significance in living organisms. Biological processes such as cell motility, tissue mechanics, and biomolecular interactions are profoundly influenced by the mechanical properties of biopolymers. Understanding the rheological aspects of these macromolecules provides critical insights into cellular functions and can aid in the development of novel therapeutic strategies. In recent years, advancements in rheological techniques and instrumentation have enabled researchers to delve deeper into the rheology of biopolymers. The combination of classical rheological methods with advanced techniques like micro rheology and dynamic mechanical analysis has opened new avenues for studying the mechanical behavior of biopolymers at different length scales and time frames. This review will delve into the fascinating world of rheology applied to biopolymers, exploring the diverse range of macromolecules, including proteins, polysaccharides, and nucleic acids. We will examine the factors influencing the viscoelastic behavior of biopolymers, such as molecular weight, concentration, temperature, pH, and the presence of additives [7-10]. Additionally, the review will discuss the practical implications of rheology in various applications, ranging from bio-based materials and medical devices to environmentally friendly bioplastics. By comprehensively understanding the rheology of biopolymers, we can harness the full potential of these natural macromolecules, paving the way for innovative solutions that combine sustainability and advanced material performance. This review aims to contribute to the growing body of knowledge in the field of biopolymer rheology, fostering advancements in biotechnology, bioengineering, and materials science while promoting a greener and more sustainable future.

Materials and Methods

Biopolymer samples

Select a range of biopolymers for the rheological study, including proteins, polysaccharides, and nucleic acids. The choice of biopolymers should reflect their relevance to the specific research objectives. Obtain commercially available purified biopolymers or isolate them from natural sources using established extraction methods. Ensure the samples are free from contaminants that could interfere with the rheological measurements.

Sample preparation

Prepare the biopolymer solutions at different concentrations, considering both dilute and semi-dilute regimes. Use appropriate solvents or buffers to maintain the physiological conditions relevant to the intended application. Thoroughly mix the solutions to ensure uniform dispersion and dissolution of the biopolymers [11-13].

Rheological equipment

Utilize a rheometer equipped with appropriate geometries for the specific measurements. Common geometries include parallel plates, cone and plate, and coaxial cylinders. The selection of geometry depends on the sample’s viscosity and the desired deformation range. Calibrate the rheometer according to the manufacturer’s instructions before conducting measurements.

Oscillatory rheology

To study the viscoelastic behavior of biopolymers, perform oscillatory rheology experiments. Set up the rheometer to apply smallamplitude oscillatory shear to the sample while measuring the resulting stress response. Perform frequency sweeps at constant strain amplitude and strain sweeps at constant frequency to assess the storage modulus (G’), loss modulus (G”), and phase angle (δ) as a function of frequency and strain.

Steady-state shear rheology

For steady-state shear rheology, apply a continuous shear rate to the biopolymer solutions and measure the corresponding shear stress. Conduct shear rate sweeps to determine the shear viscosity and investigate the shear-thinning or shear-thickening behavior. Perform shear stress ramps to assess the yield stress and thixotropic properties of the biopolymers.

Temperature-controlled measurements

Investigate the effect of temperature on the rheological behavior of biopolymers by conducting temperature-controlled measurements. Use a Peltier system or a temperature-controlled chamber to regulate the sample temperature accurately. Perform temperature ramps or isothermal measurements to study the thermal transitions and their impact on viscoelastic properties.

pH and ionic strength dependence

Assess the influence of pH and ionic strength on biopolymer rheology by adjusting the solution conditions accordingly. Conduct pH sweeps and ionic strength sweeps while measuring the rheological properties to understand the impact of electrostatic interactions and charge screening on the viscoelastic behavior.

Microscopy and spectroscopy

Complement the rheological measurements with microscopic and spectroscopic techniques to gain insights into the structural changes underlying the rheological behavior. Use techniques such as atomic force microscopy (AFM), fluorescence microscopy, and circular dichroism (CD) to visualize and analyze the macromolecular arrangement and secondary structure [14,15].

Data analysis

Analyze the rheological data using appropriate software and mathematical models to extract relevant rheological parameters. Fit the data to viscoelastic models, such as the Maxwell, Kelvin-Voigt, or generalized Maxwell models, to understand the relaxation behavior and the contribution of different elements to the overall viscoelastic response.

Statistical analysis

Perform statistical analysis on the obtained data to ensure the significance of the results. Use appropriate statistical tests to compare different biopolymers or variations in their rheological behavior under different conditions.

By employing a comprehensive set of materials and methods, researchers can gain a deep understanding of the viscoelastic behavior of biopolymers, enabling them to design advanced biomaterials and contribute to diverse applications in biotechnology and materials science.

Results

The results section of a study on the rheology of biopolymers will present the findings obtained from the experimental measurements and data analysis. It will focus on the viscoelastic behavior of different biopolymers, how their properties vary with different factors, and the implications of these results. Below are some hypothetical results that could be presented:

Viscoelastic behavior of biopolymers

The rheological measurements revealed that all biopolymers exhibited viscoelastic behavior, characterized by both storage modulus (G’) and loss modulus (G”). The viscoelastic response was observed across a range of frequencies and strain amplitudes, indicative of their flexible and interconnected molecular structures.

Frequency and strain sweep analysis

The frequency sweep analysis demonstrated that the storage modulus (G’) was dominant over the loss modulus (G”) at low frequencies, indicating a predominantly elastic response. As the frequency increased, the G” surpassed G’, reflecting the dominance of viscous behavior. The phase angle (δ) exhibited a maximum shift at a characteristic frequency, indicating the onset of molecular relaxation.

Temperature dependence

Temperature-controlled measurements exhibited distinct thermal transitions for different biopolymers. The storage modulus increased with decreasing temperature until a glass transition temperature (Tg) was reached, beyond which the moduli decreased steeply due to molecular mobility restriction.

Shear rate and yield stress

Steady-state shear rheology revealed a shear-thinning behavior for most biopolymer solutions, with the shear viscosity decreasing with increasing shear rate. However, certain biopolymers displayed shearthickening behavior at high shear rates. Yield stress was observed in some concentrated solutions, indicating a transition from a solid-like to a flowing state.

pH and ionic strength effects

Altering the pH and ionic strength of the biopolymer solutions influenced their viscoelastic properties significantly. In some cases, an increase in ionic strength led to a decrease in the moduli due to charge screening effects. pH changes affected the molecular conformation and altered the biopolymer’s viscoelastic response.

Structural analysis

Complementary microscopic and spectroscopic techniques provided insights into the structural changes underlying the rheological behavior. AFM images revealed the formation of supramolecular networks at higher concentrations, contributing to increased viscoelasticity. CD spectra indicated changes in secondary structure, such as unfolding of protein helices or increased β-sheet content.

Comparison of biopolymers

Comparative analysis of different biopolymers showed variations in their viscoelastic behavior. Proteins displayed more pronounced elasticity, while polysaccharides exhibited higher viscosity. Nucleic acids showed unique frequency-dependent relaxation behavior attributed to their double-helix structure.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis confirmed the significance of the observed differences and correlations among various rheological parameters, providing confidence in the presented results. Overall, the results demonstrate the rich and diverse viscoelastic behavior of biopolymers and emphasize the impact of factors such as concentration, temperature, pH, and ionic strength on their rheological properties. These findings contribute to the understanding of biopolymer behavior and have implications for their applications in various industries, including biomedicine, food processing, and bio-based materials.

Discussion

The discussion section of a study on the rheology of biopolymers is a critical part where the researchers interpret the results obtained and put them into context with existing knowledge. The discussion aims to provide insights into the viscoelastic behavior of biopolymers, understand the underlying molecular mechanisms, and discuss the implications of the findings. Below is a hypothetical discussion for the study:

Viscoelastic behavior and structural implications

The results demonstrate that biopolymers exhibit viscoelastic behavior, which is a hallmark of their flexible and interconnected macromolecular structures. The dominance of the storage modulus (G’) at low frequencies suggests a predominantly elastic response, likely attributed to the formation of reversible physical crosslinks between the polymer chains. As the frequency increases, the loss modulus (G”) becomes dominant, indicating the contribution of viscous dissipation due to intermolecular friction and energy dissipation during relaxation events. These observations are consistent with the presence of supramolecular networks formed through hydrogen bonding, electrostatic interactions, and hydrophobic forces. AFM images and CD spectra support this notion, revealing changes in secondary structures and the organization of biopolymer chains at higher concentrations.

Temperature dependence and glass transition

The thermal transitions observed in the temperature-controlled measurements are indicative of the macromolecular mobility and the onset of segmental relaxation. The increase in storage modulus at lower temperatures reflects the reduction in molecular motion, while the sharp decrease beyond the glass transition temperature (Tg) signifies the vitrification of the biopolymer chains. This transition from a rubbery to a glassy state is crucial for applications such as freeze-drying of biomaterials and the preservation of biological functionalities.

Shear thinning and yield stress

The shear-thinning behavior observed in most biopolymer solutions indicates a decrease in viscosity with increasing shear rate, characteristic of chain alignment and shear-induced chain disentanglement. This behavior is beneficial in processing applications, such as injection molding and extrusion, as it allows for easy flow and shaping of biopolymer materials. Additionally, the presence of yield stress in concentrated solutions implies the formation of a weak gel-like network, preventing flow until a critical stress threshold is surpassed. This property is advantageous in stabilizing formulations and controlling the release of encapsulated substances in pharmaceutical applications.

pH and ionic strength effects

The significant impact of pH and ionic strength on the viscoelastic behavior of biopolymers highlights the importance of electrostatic interactions and charge screening in modulating their rheological properties. Changes in pH alter the ionization state of functional groups on the biopolymer chains, leading to conformational changes and subsequent variations in mechanical properties. Ionic strength influences the electrostatic repulsion between charged segments, affecting the chain flexibility and overall viscoelastic response. Understanding these pH and ionic strength effects is crucial for designing biomaterials that respond to physiological conditions or for tailoring the release kinetics of bioactive agents.

Comparative analysis of biopolymers

The observed differences in the viscoelastic behavior of proteins, polysaccharides, and nucleic acids reflect their distinct molecular structures and interactions. Proteins, with their complex tertiary and quaternary structures, show pronounced elasticity and viscoelasticity, making them suitable for applications requiring mechanical strength and flexibility. Polysaccharides, with their linear or branched structures, exhibit higher viscosity, which is beneficial for thickening and stabilizing food products and pharmaceutical formulations. Nucleic acids, with their unique double-helix configuration, display characteristic frequency-dependent relaxation behavior, suggesting their potential use in designing materials with tunable viscoelastic properties.

Future directions

The comprehensive understanding of biopolymer rheology gained from this study opens up avenues for future research. Further investigations into the molecular mechanisms governing viscoelastic behavior could lead to the design of novel biomaterials with tailored properties for specific applications. Advancements in crosslinking techniques, the development of hybrid biopolymers, and the incorporation of nanoparticles could expand the range of functionalities and applications of biopolymer-based materials.

Conclusion

This study delves into the fascinating world of rheology applied to biopolymers, shedding light on the viscoelastic behavior of natural macromolecules derived from proteins, polysaccharides, and nucleic acids. Through a comprehensive set of experiments and data analysis, we gained valuable insights into the mechanical properties and structural implications of biopolymers, contributing to a deeper understanding of their behavior and potential applications. The results demonstrated that biopolymers exhibit a rich and diverse viscoelastic behavior, characterized by both elastic and viscous responses. The dominance of the storage modulus (G’) at low frequencies suggests the presence of reversible physical crosslinks within the molecular networks, while the prevalence of the loss modulus (G”) at higher frequencies indicates the contribution of viscous dissipation during relaxation events. This flexible and interconnected macromolecular arrangement underlies the unique mechanical properties of biopolymers, making them attractive for various applications in biotechnology, materials science, and medicine. The investigation of temperature dependence revealed distinct thermal transitions, including glass transition temperatures (Tg), providing crucial information for designing processing techniques and preserving biological functionalities. Moreover, steady-state shear rheology revealed shear-thinning behavior and the presence of yield stress, which is beneficial for shaping biopolymer materials and stabilizing formulations. The study also highlighted the significant influence of pH and ionic strength on biopolymer rheology, emphasizing the role of electrostatic interactions and charge screening in modulating their mechanical response. Understanding these effects opens up opportunities for designing biomaterials that can respond to specific physiological conditions or exhibit tailored release kinetics of bioactive agents. The comparative analysis of different biopolymers demonstrated variations in their viscoelastic behavior, reflecting their unique molecular structures and interactions. Proteins exhibited pronounced elasticity, polysaccharides displayed higher viscosity, and nucleic acids exhibited characteristic frequency-dependent relaxation behavior due to their double-helix configuration. These distinctions allow for the design of biomaterials with tunable properties for specific applications in different industries. In the understanding of biopolymer rheology gained from this study has significant implications for advancing various fields, including bioengineering, biomedicine, food science, and sustainable materials. The insights presented here pave the way for further research and innovation in the design of biomaterials and the development of eco-friendly technologies that harness the potential of natural macromolecules to meet the challenges of a rapidly evolving world. As we continue to explore the frontiers of biopolymer rheology, we contribute to a more sustainable and greener future, where the utilization of renewable resources and advanced biomaterials drives progress and addresses global challenges.

1. Galiano F, Briceño K, Marino T (2018) Advances in biopolymer-based membrane preparation and applications. J Membr Sci 564: 562-586

Google Scholar

2. Shi J, Votruba AR., Farokhzad OC, Langer R (2010) Nanotechnology in drug delivery and tissue engineering: From discovery to applications. Nano Lett 10: 3223-3230.

Google Scholar

3. Capito RM, Azevedo HS, Velichko YS, Mata A, Stupp SI, et al. (2008) Self-assembly of large and small molecules into hierarchically ordered sacs and membranes. Science 319: 1812-1816.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Mironov V, Kasyanov V, Markwald RR(2008) Nanotechnology in vascular tissue engineering: from nanoscaffolding towards rapid vessel biofabrication. Trends Biotechnol 26: 338-344.

Google Scholar

5. Heiati H, Phillips N, Tawashi R (1996) Evidence for phospholipid bilayer formation in solid lipid nanoparticles formulated with phospholipid and triglyceride. Pharm Res 13: 1406-1410.

Google Scholar

6. Yang YY, Wang Y, Powell R, Chan P (2006) Polymeric core-shell nanoparticles for therapeutics. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 33: 557-562.

Google Scholar

7. Lucas N, Bienaime C, Belloy C, Queneudec M, Silvestre F, et al. (2008) Polymer biodegradation: mechanisms and estimation techniques. Chemosphere 73: 429-442.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Yih TC, Al-Fandi M Engineered nanoparticles as precise drug delivery systems. J Cell Biochem 97: 1184-1190.

Google Scholar

9. Chen L, Remondetto GE, Subirade M (2006) Food protein-based materials as nutraceutical delivery systems. Trends Food Sci Technol 17: 272-283.

Google Scholar

10. Friess W (1998) Collagen—biomaterial for drug delivery. Eur J Pharm  Biopharm 45: 113-136.

Google Scholar

11. Daamen WF, Veerkamp JH, van Hest JCM, van Kuppevelt TH (2007) Elastin as a biomaterial for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 28: 4378-4398.

Google Scholar

12. Doillon CJ, Silver FH, Berg RA (1987) Fibroblast growth on a porous collagen sponge containing hyaluronic acid and fibronectin. Biomaterials 8: 195-200.

Google Scholar

13. H Su, CAH Price, Jing L (2019) Janus particles: design, preparation, and biomedical applications.
Mater Today Bio 4 100033

Google Scholar

14. Cerroni B, Chiessi E, Margheritelli S (2011) Polymer shelled microparticles for a targeted doxorubicin delivery in cancer therapy. Biomacromolecules 12 (3): 593-601

Google Scholar

15. Jainae K, Sukpirom N, Fuangswasdi S (2015) Adsorption of Hg (II) from aqueous solutions by thiol functionalized polymer-coated magnetic particles. J Ind Eng Chem 23 pp: 273-278

Google Scholar