Review on a Nanomaterials Mechanisms-Induced Oxidative Stress and Toxicity
Received: 25-Oct-2017 / Accepted Date: 05-Nov-2017 / Published Date: 17-Nov-2017 DOI: 10.4172/2168-9806.1000185
Abstract
The review reveals the recent trends of nano-materials in biomedical applications and an overview to discuss the commercialization of nano-materials. Due to innovative ideas in nano-materials created a lot of new discoveries in the medical, consumer sectors and industrial applications. The properties of nano-materials lead to a quite interest in a various applications in biomedical field such as structural and physicochemical properties. In a biological activity; toxicities of a nanoparticle are frequently reported. In the presence of acellular factors such as size, composition, particle surface and presence of metals in a nano-materials induces oxidative stress and it creates a pathway for patho physiological effects includes fibrosis, genotoxicity and injuries in a skin. Zinc oxide acts as an antioxidant for reducing oxidative stress and it acts as a protective agent for an immune system in a biomedical fields. This review summarizes biomedical applications of a nano-materials and the role of an oxidative stress.
Keywords: Antibacterial; Antifungal; Biomedical; Oxidative stress; Biomaterials
Introduction
Nanotechnology plays a vital role in many applications in the different areas of medicine, biotechnology, electronics, drug delivery, aerospace engineering, material science, cosmetics and biosensors. The properties of nano-materials have a wide range of applications in medicine, clothing and cosmetics. The properties raise a various probability factors in a day-to-day environmental process such as in a metal based nanoparticle and carbon nanotubes, due to the presence of intrinsic properties, it increases wide applications in commercial products [1-2]. In optoelectronics, inorganic nano-materials such as nano rods, nanowires and quantum dots are used due to very interesting optical and electrical properties. The properties of nanomaterials mainly depend on their size and shape of a nanomaterial. By using different synthetic techniques, size and shape of nano-materials can be tuned. Organic solar cells, OLEDS etc., are the applications of optoelectronic devices based on an inorganic material. The principle of an optoelectronic devices mainly based on photoinduction process such as electron and energy transfer. Devices depend upon the efficiency of photo induction and it is important criteria to understand the process used in both organic/Inorganic nano-materials, which can be used in organic/inorganic optoelectronic devices. In biomedical applications, nano-materials regenerate biological tissues, generating cures and artificial proteins are also manufactured. In the upcoming years, computers can be manufactured using biochemical and organic salts. The parameters of nano-materials created wide research interests in its toxic behavior [3]. Fabrication of micro technology-based smart devices in both silicon and flexible materials, for online biofilm monitoring including different sensors impedance, pH, dissolved oxygen and ion concentration. Development of flexible sensing devices to evaluate the corneal barrier function in a non-invasive way by measuring the bio impedance changes of the different co meal layers. To study the oxidative stress, nano-materials have been deposited directly on inside organelles or on the cellular surface. This review describes the biomedical applications based on metal based nano-materials.
Reactive oxygen species generation
Hydroxyl radical, singlet oxygen and superoxide peroxides are a chemically reactive chemical species which contains oxygen [4]. In cell signaling and homeostasis, reactive oxygen species are formed as a natural byproduct of metabolism of oxygen [5]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) increases due to an environmental stress (e.g., UV or heat exposure) and results in significant damages to cell structures namely oxidative stress [6]. ROS are studied on a variety of species. The role of ROS has positive effects such as induction of genes and ion mobilization systems. It implies a controlled cellular function. ROS acts on a cardiovascular disease, programmed cell death or apoptosis and ischemic injury. Species examples are stroke and heart attack. Harmful effects in reactive oxygen species are to damage RNA or DNA oxidations of polyunsaturated fatty acids in lipids, oxidation of amino acids in proteins, oxidative specific enzymes. The principle mechanism of cytotoxicity in metal oxide particles is to induce ROS [7]. The generation of free radicals influence active transcription factors, intracellular calcium concentrations and modulate cytokine production.
Cancer therapy
For a destruction of cancer cells, photodynamic cancer therapy is used. This principle is based on a laser generating atomic oxygen. Special dyes are used for generating reactive oxygen species and it is used for the treatment for a cancer, to remove the cancer tissues when it is exposed to a light radiation. The side effect can be resolved by enclosing the dye molecule inside a porous nanoparticle [8] and it is not spread to any other parts of the body. By using dyes, generating oxygen would not be affected and nanoparticles allow the oxygen freely to diffuse out. Nanosized materials such as silver are used in pharmaceutical companies as antimicrobial formulations and dressings.
Antibacterial agent delivery
The antibacterial properties of ZnO-doped TiO2 nano-materials have also been investigated in recent years [9]. ZnO-doped Ti-based nano-fibers promote antimicrobial effects against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus sp. in the presence of cell membrane disruption and cytoplasmic leakage. The following materials ZnCl2/TiO2, Zn (Ac)2/ TiO2, Zn (NO3)2/TiO2, and ZnSO4/TiO2 follows the subsequent order: ZnSO4ZnCl2 Zn (NO3)2 Zn(Ac) 2, can be used as antibacterial agents and the highest antibacterial activity has been observed for ZnSO4/TiO2 and is possibly ascribed to improved surface acidity [10]. It has also been reported that zinc can be incorporated into titanium dioxide to achieve good bacterial inhibition ability [11].
Mechanisms of a nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress
Nano-materials such as CNT, fullerenes and metal oxides are induced by oxidative stress. The three factors in nanoparticles induce reactive oxygen species are mainly (i) proxidant functional groups present in a reactive surface of a nanoparticle (ii) In a transition metalbased nanoparticle, active redox cycling acts and (iii) Particle-cell interactions. In a reactive oxygen species (ROS), sources mainly depend on the particle-cell interactions and physicochemical parameters.
Interaction of a particle-cell via oxidation generation
Nano-materials are self-oxidative in nature and reacts with cells to induce reactive oxygen species and activate the NADPH - like enzyme systems. In lung epithelial cells, alveolar macrophages (AM) and neutrophils are the ROS inducers. Phagocytic cells including neutrophils and alveolar macrophages induce the reactive oxygen species in the internalization of nanoparticles. The physicochemical properties of nano-materials attribute the phagocytic oxidation in the internal parts. In silica and quartz particles, inflammation induces ROS due to surface based radical generating properties in nano-materials. Adsorption of chemicals in a nanoparticle surface drives the oxidation stress (Table 1).
Oxidants | Description |
---|---|
O2-, superoxide anion | One-electron reduction state of O2, formed in many auto oxidation reactions and by the electron transport chain. Rather un reactive but can release Fe2+ from iron-sulfur proteins and ferritin. Undergoes dismutation to form H2O2 spontaneously or by enzymatic catalysis and is a precursor for metal-catalyzed OH formation [14]. |
H2O2, hydrogen peroxide | Two-electron reduction state, formed by dismutation of •O2- or by direct reduction of O2. Lipid soluble and thus able to diffuse across membranes [15]. |
•OH, hydroxyl radical | Three-electron reduction state, formed by Fenton reaction and decomposition of peroxynitrite. Extremely reactive, will attack most cellular components [16]. |
ROOH, organic hydro peroxide | Formed by radical reactions with cellular components such as lipids and nucleobases [17]. |
RO•, alkoxy and ROO•, peroxy radicals | Oxygen centred organic radicals. Lipid forms participate in lipid per oxidation reactions. Produced in the presence of oxygen by radical addition to double bonds or hydrogen abstraction [18]. |
HOCl, hypochlorous acid | Formed from H2O2 by myeloperoxidase. Lipid soluble and highly reactive. Will readily oxidize protein constituents, including thiol groups, amino groups and methionine [19]. |
ONOO-, peroxynitrite | Formed in a rapid reaction between •O2- and NO•. Lipid soluble and similar in reactivity to hypochlorous acid. Protonation forms peroxynitrous acid, which can undergo homolytic cleavage to form hydroxyl radical and nitrogen dioxide [20]. |
Table 1: Oxidants and its description.
Potential risks
Nanotechnology marketing risks for human health and environment depends upon the toxicity. By using cosmetics and medicine, nanoparticles entered the human body and accumulate in cells. The health effects of such nanoparticles are unknown. Historical experience with unintended consequences of technologies, such as drug resistance to antibiotics or the persistence of chemicals such as DDT in the environment, teaches us to take precautions. Long, Jeffrey [12] of the Naval Research Laboratory (Washington, DC) points out that viruses are already nano biotechnological objects and that humankind’s history with viruses reinforces the need for continuous monitoring of the potential effects of newly designed and fabricated nano-materials. A European commission–National science foundation workshop held early this year discussed the societal aspects of nanotechnology. Participants concluded [13] “Nano-biotechnology could dramatically improve public health, but there is concern that technical developments could cause unforeseen adverse effects. Studies are needed to determine what environmental and health risks are associated with nanomaterial.” Medical nanotechnologies are entering industrial production, mainly for diagnostics, drugs, and therapies. In the longer term, nanotechnology may help improve implants and even let blind people see. Nonetheless, governments must stimulate scientists to monitor possible health risks of nanoparticles that may accumulate in the body [14-20].
Biosensors
Modern technologies provide powerful tools to fabricate the porous structures of biomaterials and to enhance the natural biosynthetic systems for targeted applications [21]. Porous architectures have been fabricated using different techniques, such as solvent casting, particulate leaching, gas foaming, phase separation, electro spinning, porogen leaching, fiber mesh, rapid prototyping, and freeze drying, to meet the requirements of different applications. Biosensors, a biological sensing element and a specific molecular recognition which is often used to generate the concentration dependent signals [22]. Several biopolymers are available for microbial encapsulation in porous matrices to hold the microorganisms for water purification, bio molecule production, and ethanol production. Attempts have been made to remove heavy metals and organic pollutants from contaminated water using porous biomatrices. Bio-based porous materials have been used to incorporate antimicrobial agents to food packaging materials for food preservation. Porous materials prepared from biopolymers also play a key role in energy conservation and heat reduction by acting as thermal insulators in building constructions [23]. The sensitivity and specificity depend on the biological recognition system [24,25]. Since the development of enzyme-based sensors for glucose by Clark and Lyons [26], improvements have been made in terms of the sensitivity, selectivity, and reproducibility as a result of rapid developments in nanotechnology and nano-materials-based biosensors. In order to improve the performance of biosensors, TiO2 nano-materials such as nanoparticles, nano-fibers encapsulated TiO2 nano-composites have been used in bio-sensing devices for enzymes, antibodies, microorganisms, and DNA. Nanostructured TiO2 biosensors are sensitive, selective, fast, and reproducible for the detection of various chemical and biochemical compounds such as glucose, hydrogen peroxide, and cancer cells because of their superior properties including nontoxicity, large surface area, uniform and excellent biocompatibility. Hepatocytes survive in 3D matrices prepared with various types of polymers, such as collagen, proteoglycan, fibronectin, and laminin. Porous chitosan scaffolds were fabricated by lyophilization for cultivation of rat hepatocytes. Scaffolds with a porosity of 90% and mean pore sizes ranging from 50 μm to 200 μm were obtained using this method. Hydroxyapatite is a main constituent of bone mineral and widely used as a bioactive material for bone tissue engineering applications. Hydroxyapatite and gelatin composite scaffolds were prepared using solvent casting combined with freeze drying. Results showed that the prepared scaffold had an open, interconnected porous structure with a pore size of 80-400 nm [27].
Conclusion
The incorporation of biomedical and biosensor in the advance instruments have its own advantages when compared to the conventional detection techniques as it is selective, sensitive, robust, convenient, and rapid detection methods employed in medical, agriculture and food related field. The introduction of nano-materials in applications provides us with opportunities for establishing a new generation of biomedical technologies. Nanomaterial’s based applications have great attention in the process control, food analysis, biomedical and in industries. In future, developing effective technologies for rapid production of large amounts of nanomaterial based high quality specifications and relatively low cost will be of huge interest. Also, further research studies should focus on developing multifunctional nano-material’s and making the biomedical technology more robust and accessible.
References
- Maynard AD, Baron PA, Foley M, Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, et al. (2004) Exposure to carbon nanotube material: aerosol release during the handling of unrefined single-walled carbon nanotube material. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health A 67: 87-107.
- Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311: 622-627.
- Huang Y, Wu C, Aronstam R (2010) Toxicity of transition metal oxide nanoparticles: recent insights from in vitro Studies. Materials 3: 4842-4859.
- Hayyan M, Hashim MA, AlNashef IM (2016) Superoxide Ion: Generation and Chemical Implications. Chem Rev 116: 3029-3085.
- Devasagayam T, Tilak JC, Boloor KK, Ketaki S, Saroj SG (2004) Free Radicals and Antioxidants in Human Health: Current Status and Future Prospects. Journal of Association of Physicians of India 52: 796.
- Torres ME, Saucedo-Vázquez JP, Kroneck PM (2015) Sustaining Life on Planet Earth: Metalloenzymes Mastering Dioxygen and Other Chewy Gases. In: The dark side of dioxygen. Kroneck PM, Torres ME (Editors). Metal Ions in Life Sciences, pp: 1-12.
- Wang L, Mercer RR, Rojanasakul Y (2010) Direct fibrogenic effects of dispersed single-walled carbon nanotubes on human lung fibroblasts. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health A 73: 410-422.
- Roy I, Ohulchanskyy TY, Pudavar HE, Bergey EJ, Oseroff AR, et al. (2003) Ceramic-based nanoparticles entrapping water-insoluble photosensitizing anticancer drugs: a novel drug-carrier system for photodynamic therapy. J Am Chem Soc 125: 7860-7865.
- Amna T, Hassan MS, Barakat NA, Pandeya DR, Hong ST, et al. (2012), Antibacterial activity and interaction mechanism of electrospun zinc-doped titania nanofibers, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93: 743-751.
- Wang Y, Xue X, Yang H (2014) Modification of the antibacterial activity of Zn/TiO2 nano-materials through different anions doped. Vacuum 101: 193-199.
- Hu H, Zhang W, Qiao Y, Jiang X, Ding C (2012) Antibacterial activity and increased bone marrow stem cell functions of Zn- incorporated TiO2 coatings on titanium. Acta Biomaterialia 8: 904-915.
- Long Jeffrey W, Dunn B, Debra R, Rolison, et al. (2004) Three-dimensional battery architectures. Chemical Reviews 104: 4463-4492.
- Rolison DR, Long JW, Lytle JC, Fischer AE, Rhodes CP, et al. (2009) Multifunctional 3D nanoarchitectures for energy storage and conversion. Chemical Society Reviews 38: 226-252.
- Huang YC, Wu, Aronstam R (2010) Toxicity of transition metal oxide nanoparticles: recent insights from in vitro Studies. Materials 3: 4842-4859.
- Fubini B, Hubbard A (2003) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) generation by silica in inflammation and fibrosis. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 34: 1507-1516.
- Johnston HJ, Hutchison G, Christensen FM, Peters S, Hankin S (2010) A review of the in vivo and in vitrotoxicity of silver and gold particulates: particle attributes and biological mechanisms responsible for the observed toxicity. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 40: 328-346.
- Orster GO, Maynard A, Donaldson K, Castranova V, Fitzpatrick J (2005) Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy. Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2: 8.
- Wilson MR, Light body JH, Donaldson K, Sales J, Stone V (2002) Interactions between ultrafine particles and transition Metals in vivo and in vitro. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 184: 172-179.
- Xia T, Kovochich M, Brant J, Hotze M, Sempf J, et al. (2006) Comparison of the abilities of ambient and manufactured nanoparticles to induce Cellular toxicity according to an oxidative stress paradigm. Nano Letters 6: 1794-1807.
- Deshpande A, Narayanan PK, Lehnert BE (2002) Silica induced generation of extra cellular factor(s) increases reactive oxygen species in human bronchial epithelial cells. Toxicological Sciences 67: 275-283.
- Driscoll KE, Howard BW, Carter JM, Janssen YMW, Mossman BT, et al. (2001) Mitochondrial-derived oxidants and quartz activation of chemokine gene expression. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 500: 489-496.
- Fadeel B, Kagan VE (2003) Apoptosis and macrophage clearance of neutrophils: regulation by reactive oxygen species. Redox Report 8: 143-150.
- Kaviyarasu K, Ayeshamariam A, Manikandan E, Kennedy J, Ladchumananandasivam R (2016) Solution processing of CuSe quantum dots: Photocatalytic activity under RhB for UV and visible-light solar irradiation. Materials Science and Engineering: B 210: 1-9.
- Thevenot DR, Tóth K, Durst RA, Wilson GS (1999) Electrochemical Biosensors: Recommended Definitions and Classification. Pure Appl Chem 71: 2333.
- Buch RM, Rechnitz GA (1989) Intact chemoreceptor-based biosensors: responses and analytical limits, Biosensors 4: 215.
- Clark LC, Lyons C (1962) Electrode systems for continuous monitoring in cardiovascular surgery. Annals of the New York Academy of sciences 102: 29-45.
- Arasu MV, Duraipandiyan V, Agastian P, Ignacimuthu S (2008) Antimicrobial activity of Streptomyces spp. ERI-26 recovered from Western Ghats of Tamil Nadu. Journal de Mycologie Médicale/Journal of Medical Mycology 18: 147-153.
Citation: Geetha N, Prabhavathi G, Ayeshamariam A, Beevi AH, Punithavelan N, et al. (2017) Review on a Nanomaterials Mechanisms-Induced Oxidative Stress and Toxicity. J Powder Metall Min 6: 185. DOI: 10.4172/2168-9806.1000185
Copyright: © 2017 Geetha N, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Share This Article
Recommended Journals
Open Access Journals
Article Tools
Article Usage
- Total views: 5260
- [From(publication date): 0-2017 - Nov 19, 2024]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 4469
- PDF downloads: 791