Relationship Between Fish Length and Otolith Dimentions (Length, Width) and Otolith Weight of Sardinella sindensis, as Index for Environmental Studies, Persian Gulf, Iran

Dehghani M^1*, Kamrani E¹, Salarpouri A² and Kamali E²

¹Department of Marine Biology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, University of Hormozgan, P.O.Box: 3995, Bandar Abbas, Iran

²Department of Stock assessment, Persian Gulf and Oman Sea Ecological Research Institute, P.O.Box: 1597, Bandar Abbas, Iran

*Corresponding Author:

Dehghani M
Department of Marine Biology
Faculty of Basic Sciences
University of Hormozgan
P.O.Box: 3995, Bandar Abbas, Iran,
E-mail: mohsen.dehghani64@gmail.com

Received Date: December 31, 2014 Accepted Date: May 08, 2015 Published Date: May 20, 2015

Citation: Dehghani M, Kamrani E, Salarpouri A, Kamali E (2015) Relationship Between Fish Length and Otolith Dimentions (Length, Width) and Otolith Weight of Sardinella sindensis, as Index for Environmental Studies, Persian Gulf, Iran. J Fisheries Livest Prod 3:134. doi:10.4172/2332-2608.1000134

Copyright: © 2015 Dehghani M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Fisheries & Livestock Production

Abstract

In this study, relationships between fish length and otolith length, width and weight of Sardinella sindensis from Bandar Lengeh and Qeshm Island, Persian Gulf were analyzed. In total, 128 and 120 fishes collected from Commercial catches during March 2011-February 2012 in the Bandar Lengeh and Qeshm Island repectively. There were no significant differences between left and right otolith (t-test, P>0.05) and between males and females otolith (ANCOVA, P>0.05). For these reasons, only right otoliths were used for next analysis and data of each two sex were pooled. Relationships between length and otolith length, width and weight described by linear regression models and high correlation showed for all relationships. The highest correlation was between fish length and otolith length (Bandar Lengeh, R2=0.8722; Qeshm Island, R2=0.8661) and relashionship between fish length and otolith width was less correlation than other relathionships (Bandar Lengeh, R2=0.7355; Qeshm Island, R2=0.7275). These results showed that fish length and otolith growth have a positive relashionship, so can be useful tools for determining fish species, size and age.

Keywords

Fish length; Otolith dimentions; Sardinella sindensis; Persian gulf

Introduction

The inner ears of all teleost fishes contain three calcified structures, which acts as balance and hearing organs [1]. Otoliths serve as a permanent record of the life history of an individual fish [2], and they hold a wealth of information on daily age, size, growth and ontogeny of fishes [3]. Because otoliths are not resorbed in times of stress, and continue to grow throughout their life [4,5], they are one of the most reliable tools for determining the age of a fish, and Since age is used to establish growth rates of a fish species and age compositions of a certain population and to fisheries management, also otolith chemistry and microstructure analysis have developed greatly in the recent years and have showed a wide range of applications for stock identification and other environmental studies concerning fish habitats, study of the feeding ecology of fish predators, and determine the migration pathway of fishes [4,6-8] Such applications are not limited to ichthyology, but are widely extended to the study of the feeding ecology of fish predators, and to some aspects of palaeontology, stratigraphy, archaeology and zoogeography.

The size and shape of otoliths are variable according to species and size of fish [9]. By using the relationship between fish length and otolith dimensions (length, width, area, perimeter, thickness) and weight it is possible to identification and size-estimation of fish, prey size form stomach samples and analysis of digestive tract content of fishes, feeding on the others fishes, identifying fish stock and specially for age determination [10-15].

Sardines are small pelagic fishes that live in coastal waters of many seas and oceans. They feed on planktons and other hand, eaten by other fishes, so they are importance in marine food web [16,17]. In addition, sardines are consumed as fresh meal for humans and as commercial powder [18-20].

Many authors studied about various types of applications of sardine otolith. For example age, growth and mortality estimation, identification of fishes and their size, determine the fish stock and trace migration pathway of fish [21-29].

According to FAO, [20] Sardinella sindensis is the important commercial fish for Iran and Pakistan, but there is not any published information about otolith of this species. Otoliths tend to grow linearly in length and width with increasing fish size, and to grow linearly in thickness and weight with increasing fish age [30]. For most species, the relationship between otolith length and fish length can be described by a simple linear regression [31].

Under the hypothesis that there is strongly linear regression relationship between fish length and otolith dimensions and weight, the aim of this study is determining the relationships between fish length and otolith length, width and weight of S.sindensis, collected form Qeshm Island and Bandar Lengeh, Persian Gulf, Iran. For this reason, sampling were done during March 2011 to February 2012, and then the relationships between fish length and otolith dimensions and weight tested by using regression method.

Materials and Methods

Fishes were selected, randomly, from commercial catches that were done using purse seine nets. About 123 fishes were collected from coastal waters of Bandar Lengeh (26°55′27′N 54°88′14′E) and 128 fishes from Qeshm Island (26°41′43′N 55°37′06′E) in North of Persian Gulf (Iran) during March 2011 to February 2012 (Figure 1). Fishes were transported to the laboratory of Persian Gulf and Oman Sea Ecological Research Institute, Bandar Abbas.

First, total Length of fishes were measured to the nearest 0.1 mm, then sex determination was done under stereomicroscope. Chi-square test was performed for sex differences. Otoliths were extracted from heads of samples, cleaned and dried. Otolith weight was measured by using digital balance to the nearest 0.0001g. For measuring the otolith size, first, taking photo were performed under a stereo microscope linked to a video camera (Motic Image Plus 2), second, Otolith length and width were measured using imaging software (Motic 2) to the nearest 0.01 μm. Otolith Length is the distance from the midpoint of the rostrum at point A through the primordium to the posterior edge at point B. Width is the distance perpendicular to the length passing through the primordium (Figure 2) [15]. Differences between left and right otolith were tested by paired t-test and between males and females by using ANCOVA [32]. ANOVA was used to test for significant differences in area. Relationships between total fish length an otolith length and width described by linear equation as TL=a (L) b, where TL is total fish length, L is otolith length or otolith width, and a, b are constant coefficients. For express relationship between total length fish and otolith weight was used a linear equation like above equation that described as TL= a (OW) b, where OW is otolith weight. Regression method was analyzed by using Excel software (version 2007) for determining the relationships between fish length and otolith length, width and weight.

Results

n total, 128 fishes from Qeshm Island and 120 fishes from Bandar Lengeh collected (Figure 3). Chi-square test was performed assuming equal sex ratio and results with a degree of freedom, did not show significant differences between the sexes (X²=1.2, df=1, p>0.05) and (X²=1.125, df=1, p>0.05) for Bandar lengeh and Qeshm, respectively.

Minimum-maximum and mean fish lengths for Bandar Lengeh were 8.1 -18.3 and 12.7 cm respectively and those for Qeshm were 7.9- 18.6 and 12.9 cm, respectively. All measurement of left and right otoliths were tested and no significant differences were observed between left and right otolith (t-test, P>0.05) and between otoliths of female and males (ANCOVA, P>0.05), therefore, only right otolith used for next analysis and data of each two sex were pooled. Otolith length, width and weight measurements in addition fish length and weight are recorded in Table 1.

Table 1: Maximum, minimum, mean and standard deviation (SD) of fish length and otolith length, width and weight of S.sindensis from Bandar Lengeh and Qeshm Island (Persian Gulf).

Relationships between fish length and otolith length, weight and width were described by regression model and linear equation. The equation for otolith length and fish length was (OL=171.51 TL+ 257.63; R²=0.8661) for Qeshm Island and (OL=165.06 TL+401.64; R²=0.8661) for Bandar Lengeh. Regression models and linear equations of all relationships are shown in Figures 4-6. There were no significant differences in these analyses for two areas (ANOVA, P>0.05).

Discussion

In this study, relationship between fish length and otolith length, width and weight was analyzed by linear model. Otolith dimensions and weight had linearly correlated to total fish length. Relationships between fish length and otolith length for each two area showed highes positive correlathion, that is similar to results of Sardina Pilchardus from Adriatic Sea, Crotia, [33], those of Sardinops sagax from North America [34] S.sagax from Australia [35]and other fish species [10,36,37].

In current study, results of testing the different between right and left otoliths showed no significant difference, and no significant difference between males and females otolith. In addition, this test was similar for two sampling regions. These results are agree with results of other studies [38] but are differ from studies were done on Sardina Pilchardus from Adriatic Sea, Crotia, [33], Sardinops sagax from west coast of North America, [15], and were different from results of other fishes [39-41]. May be could said that fishes from different regions have different allometric growth of the otolith [24], also , the some reason for these different relationships in different studies may be differences of fish species, habitat, food availability and physiochemical factors of waters of environment that lives there [15,41], in addition, There are a number of things that could conceivably produce a shift in the otolith size-body size relationship in the commercial catch, including large changes in age or sex composition, or changes in regulations, gear, or fishing strategies, even different methods used for analysis [39,42].

Respect to the results of this study suggested that otolith dimensions increase as fish length increase and therefore, otolith growth can be correlated with fish growth. However, otolith length had more related to fish length growth and otolith width was lesser correlated to fish length than two other otolith dimensions. Therefore, otolith sizes can be a power proxy for estimate age and size of S. sindensis of this study and those of S.Lemuru form Australia [26] and other fishes [32,43].

Lombarte and Lleonart [44] suggested that otolith development occurs under dual regulation: genetic conditions regulate the form of the otolith, while environmental conditions, mainly temperature in carbonate-saturated waters, regulate the quantity of material deposited during the formation of the otolith. Butler et al. [24] reported that was not possible to use otolith weight with other data to estimate age of Pacific sardine.

The regression method is very appealing in its simplicity but has two drawbacks. It will often be necessary to transform predictors and (or) the predict and to obtain linear relationships, and even then, this is likely to achieve only approximate linearity. The second, and more serious, drawback is that this method produces asymptotically biased estimates of proportions at age [45] however, linear regressions between age-otolith size, unlike annulus counting methods, to estimate the age structure of the Sardines population need lesser time and cost [29,46].

These relationships are useful tools for studying feeding and for research on fish fossils [31,47] especially for determining fish size that important factor for fish stock monitoring and management. However, suggested that for better understanding about otolith growth, in future studies should be used the relationships between otolith weight and age, and survey about other otolith factors such as area, perimeter, thickness, circularity, and rectangularity.

Acknowledgements

We would like to appreciate the director and staffs of the Persian Gulf and Oman Sea Ecological Research Institute for contributions in laboratory facilities.

References

1. Popper AN, Ramcharitar J, Campana SE (2005) Why otolith? Insights from inner ear physiology and fisheries biology. Marine and Freshwater Research. 56: 497-507.
2. Belchier M, Clemmesen C, Cortes D, Doan T, Folkvord A, (2004) Recruitment studies: Manual on precision and accuracy of tools. ICES Techniques in Marine Environmental Sciences.
3. Gerard TL, Malca E(2011) Silver nitrate staining improves visual analysis of daily otolith increments. Journal of American Science. 7:120-124.
4. Mendoza RPR (2006)Otoliths and their applications in fishery science. Ribarstvo64 :82-102.
5. Yaremko ML (1996) Age determination in Pacific sardine, Sardinopssagax. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS.
6. Campana SE, Thorrold SR (2001)Otoliths, increments, and elements: keys to a comprehensive understanding of fish populations? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58: 30-38.
7. McFarlane G, Schweigert J, Hodes V, Detering J(2010) Preliminary study on the use of polished otoliths in the age determination of Pacific sardine (Sardinopssagax) in British Columbia waters. CalCOFI Rep. 51: 162-168.
8. Tuset VM, Lombarte A, ASSIS CA(2008) Otolith atlas for the western Mediterranean, north and central eastern Atlantic. SCI. MAR. 72: 7-198.
9. Eroglu M, Sen D(2009)Otolith size-total length relationship in Spiny eel, Mastacembelusmastacembelus (Banks&Solander, 1794) inhibiting in Karakaya Dam lake (Malatya, Turkey). J Fisheries Sci 3: 342-351.
10. Hunt JJ (1992) Morphological characteristics of otoliths for selected fish in the Northwest Atlantic. J.Northw. Atl. Fish. Sci. 13: 63-75.
11. Granadeiro JP, Silva MA(2000) The use of otoliths and vertebrae in the identification and size-estimation of fish in predator-prey studies.Cybium24: 383-393.
12. Khodadai M, Emadi H (2004) Aging of Epinepheluscoioides by using of section of sagita in province waters (Persian Gulf ,Khouzestan). Pajouhesh&Sazandegi 63: 2-11.
13. Pombo L, Elliott M, Rebelo, JE(2005) Ecology, age and growth of Atherinaboyeri and Atherina presbyter in the Ria de Aveiro, Portugal. Cybium. 29: 47-55. 
14. RizkallaSI, Bakhoum SA(2009)Some biological aspects of Atlantic stargazer Uranoscopusscaber Linnaeus, 1758 (Family: Uranoscopidae) in The Egyptian Mediterranean Water. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 9: 59-66.
15. Javor B, Lo N, Vetter R(2011) Otolithmorphometrics and population structure of Pacific sardine (Sardinopssagax) along the west coast of North America. FisheryBulletin 109:402–415.
16. Emmett RL, Brodeur RD, Miller TW, Pool SS, Krutzikowsky GYK, et.al.(2005)Pacific sardine (Sardinopssagax) abundance, distribution, and ecological relationships in the Pacific Northwest. CalCOFI Rep. 46: 122-143.
17. Salarouri A, Darvishi M, Safaei M, Akbar Zadeh G, AliSeraji F, et al.(2009) Biological survey on small pelagic fishes (sardine & anchovy) stocks in coastal waters of Hormozgan province (Qeshm Island & Bandar Lengeh) with emphasis on Sea surface temperature, Plankton.IranianFisheries Research Organization, Tehran, Iran.
18. Bennet PS, Nair PNR, Luther J, Annigeri GG, Rangans SS, et.al.(1992) Resource characteristics and stock assessment of lesser sardines in the Indian waters.Indian Journal of Fisheries. 39: 136-151.
19. Hill KT, Lo NCH, Macewicz BJ, Felix-Uraga R (2005) Assessment of the Pacific sardine (Sardinopssagaxcaerulea) population for U.S. management in 2006.
20. FAO (2011) Report of the FAO Workshop on the Status of Shared Fisheries Resources in the Northern Arabian Sea – Iran (Islamic Republic of), Oman and Pakistan. Muscat. Oman. 13–15.
21. Nair RV(1949)The growth rings on the otoliths of the Oil sardine, Sardinellalongiceps CUV and VAL. Curr. Sci. 18: 9-11.
22. Krzeptowski M (1983) Biological characteristics of the sardine (SardinapilchardusWalb) off west Sahara. ActaIchthyologicaetPiscatoria 13: 13-38.
23. Cergole MC, Valentini H(1994) Growth and mortalltyestlmates of Sardinellabrasiliensis in the Southeasternbrazillian bight. Bolm Inst. Oceanogr, S Paulo. 42:113-127.
24. Butler JL, Granados-G ML, Barnes JT, Yaremko M, Macewicz BJ(1996) Age composition, growth and maturation of the Pacific Sardine,Sardinopssagax, during 1994. Calif. Coop. Oceanic Fish. Invest. Rep. 37:152–159.
25. Watanabe Y, Nakamura M (1998) Growth trajectory of the larval Japanese sardine, Sardinopsmelanostictus, transported into the Pacific coastal waters off central Japan. Fish Bull 96: 900-907.
26. Gaughan D, Mitchell RWD(2000)The biology and stock assessment of the tropical sardine, Sardinellalemuru, off the mid-west coast of Western Australia. Fisheries, Western Australia.
27. Silva A, Carrera P, Masse J, Uriarte A, Santos M.B (2008) Geographic variability of sardine growth across the northeastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea. Fisheries research, Elsevier. 90: 56-69.
28. Mehanna SF, Salem M(2011) Population dynamics of rond sardine SardinellaauritaIin EL-ARISH waters, Southeastern Mediterranean, Egypt. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences1:286-294.
29. Ward TM, Burch P, Lvey RA(2012) South Australian sardine (Sardinopssagax) fishery: Stock Assessment Report 2012. Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture.
30. Donkers PD(2004) Age, Growth and Maturity of European Carp (Cyprinuscarpio) in Lakes Crescent and Sorell. Inland Fisheries Service, Tasmania, Australia.
31. Harvey JT, Loughlin TR, Perez MA, Oxman DS(2000) Relationship between fish size and otolith length for 63 species of fishes from the eastern North Pacific Ocean. NOAA Technical Report NMFS.
32. Matic-Skokoa S, Ferri J, Skeljo F, Bartulovic V, Glavic K, et.al(2011)Age, growth and validation of otolithmorphometrics as predictors of age in the forkbeard, Phycisphycis (Gadidae). Fisheries Research 112: 52-58.
33. Zorica B, Sinovcic G, VanjaCikesKec V (2010) Preliminary data on the study of otolith morphology of five pelagic fish species from the Adriatic Sea (Croatia). Actadriatica 51: 89-96.
34. Javor B(2013) Do shifts in otolith morphology of young Pacific Sardine (SardinopsSagax) reflect changing recruitment contributions from Northern and Southern stock? CalCOFI Rep. 54: 1-12.
35. Gaughan D, Craine M, Stephenson P, Leary T, Lewis P(2008) Regrowth of pilchard (Sardinopssagax) stocks off southern WA following the mass mortality event of   1998/99. Department of Fisheries, Western Australia.
36. Megalofoou P (2006) Comparison of otolith growth and morphology with somatic growth and age in young-of-the-year bluefin tuna. Journal of Fish Biology. 68: 1867-1878.
37. Ilkyaz AT, Metin G, Kinacigil HT(2011)The use of otolith length and weight measurements in age estimations of three Gobiidae species (Deltentosteusquadrimaculatus, Gobiusniger, andLesueurigobiusfriesii). Turk J Zool  35: 819-827.
38. JawadLA,Ambuali A, Al-MamryJM, Al-Busaidi HK(2011) Relationships between fish length and otolith length, width and weight of the Indian Mackerel Rastrelligerkanagurta (Cuvier, 1817) collected from the Sea of Oman. Ribarstvo. 69: 51-61.
39. Clark WG(1992) Estimation of Halibut body size from otolith size. International Pacific Halibut Commission 75: 1-31.
40. Sen D, Aydin R, Calta M(2001) Relationships between fish length and otolith length in the population of CapoetaCapoetaUmbla (Heckel, 1843) inhabiting hazar Lake, Elazic, Turkey. Arch. Pol. Fish. 9: 267-272.
41. Aydin R, Calta M, Sen D, Coban MZ(2004) Relationships between fish lengths and otolith length in the population of Chondrostomaregium (Heckel, 1843) Inhabiting Keban Dam Lake. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 7: 1550-1553.
42. Ma BS, Xie CX, Huo B, Yang XF, Huang HP(2010) Age and growth of a long-lived fish Schizothoraxo’connori in the YarlungTsangpo river, Tibet. Zoological Studies. 49: 749-759.
43. Metin G, Ilkyaz AT(2008) Use of otolith length and weight in age Determination of Poor Cod (TrisopterusminutusLinn., 1758). Turk J Zool. 32: 293-297.
44. Lombarte A, Lleonart J(1993)Otolith size changes related with body growth, habitat depth and temperature. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 37: 297-306.
45. Francis RICC, Campana SE(2004) Inferring age from otolith measurements: a review and a new approach. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 61: 1269-1284.
46. Ward TM, Rogers PJ, Stephenson P, Schmarr DW, Strong N, et al.(2005) Implementation of an Age Structured Stock Assessment Model for Sardine (Sardinopssagax) in South Australia. Report to the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences).
47. Al-Mamry J, Jawad L, Al-Busaid H, Al-Habsi S, Al-Rasbi S (2010) Relationships between fish size and otolith size and weight in the bathypelagic species, BeryxsplendensLowe, 1834 collected from the Arabian Sea coasts of Oman. Quad. Mus. stNat Livorno 23:79-84.

--