Journal of Health Care and Prevention
Open Access

Alcoholism; Evidence-based treatment; Patient-centered care; Veterans health administration

Introduction

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) remains a significant public health issue, particularly among military veterans, with profound implications for physical, mental, and social well-being. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) plays a pivotal role in addressing the healthcare needs of veterans, including the provision of evidence-based treatment for alcoholism. However, ensuring the integration of such treatment within patient-centered primary care settings presents a complex challenge. This article examines the landscape of evidence-based treatment for alcoholism and patient-centered primary care within the VHA, aiming to identify gaps, barriers, and opportunities for improvement [1].

Prevalence and impact of alcoholism among veterans: Alcoholism is prevalent among veterans, with rates significantly higher than those in the general population. Factors such as combat exposure, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and transition difficulties contribute to the increased risk of AUD among veterans. The consequences of alcoholism extend beyond individual health, affecting familial relationships, employment status, and overall quality of life [2].

Evidence-based treatment for alcoholism in the VHA: The VHA offers a range of evidence-based treatments for alcoholism, including pharmacotherapy, psychosocial interventions, and integrated care models. These treatments are supported by robust clinical evidence and guidelines. However, challenges persist in ensuring equitable access, engagement, and retention in alcohol treatment programs among veterans [3].

Patient-centered primary care in the VHA: Patient-centered care is a core principle of healthcare delivery within the VHA, emphasizing the importance of personalized, holistic, and collaborative approaches. Primary care serves as the foundation for delivering patient-centered services, encompassing preventive care, chronic disease management, and coordination of specialty services. The VHA has implemented various initiatives to enhance patient-centeredness, such as the Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) model [4].

Integration of alcoholism treatment and primary care: Integrating evidence-based treatment for alcoholism within patient-centered primary care settings offers several potential benefits, including improved access, coordination, and continuity of care. However, barriers such as stigma, workforce shortages, and limited resources hinder the seamless integration of these services. Strategies for overcoming these barriers include workforce training, telehealth innovations, and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Challenges and opportunities: Several challenges must be addressed to optimize the delivery of evidence-based treatment for alcoholism while maintaining patient-centeredness in primary care. These include addressing workforce shortages, enhancing cultural competence, expanding telehealth capabilities, and fostering a culture of collaboration and innovation. Opportunities exist for leveraging technology, implementing quality improvement initiatives, and engaging veterans as partners in care [5-8].

Conclusion

Effective management of alcoholism among veterans requires a multifaceted approach that integrates evidence-based treatment within patient-centered primary care settings. While challenges persist, the VHA is well-positioned to lead innovations in this domain through strategic investments, partnerships, and continuous quality improvement efforts. By addressing barriers and leveraging opportunities, the VHA can enhance the delivery of comprehensive, personalized care for veterans struggling with alcohol use disorders.

Future Directions

Future research should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of integrated care models for alcoholism treatment within the VHA, exploring innovative strategies for enhancing patient engagement and retention, and identifying disparities in access and outcomes among diverse veteran populations. Additionally, efforts to strengthen collaboration between the VHA and community-based organizations could further extend the reach and impact of alcoholism treatment initiatives.

Acknowledgment

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Al-Ani R, Al Obaidy A, Hassan F (2019) Multivariate analysis for evaluation the water quality of Tigris River within Baghdad City in Iraq. Iraqi J Agric Sci 50: 331-342.

Google Scholar,

2. Blann KL, Anderson JL, Sands GR, Vondracek B (2009) Effects of agricultural drainage on aquatic ecosystems: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 39: 909-1001.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross ref

3. Boynton W, Kemp W, Keefe C (1982) A comparative analysis of nutrients and other factors influencing estuarine phytoplankton production. In Estuarine comparisons 69-90.

Google Scholar,

4. Samet J, Dominici F, Curriero F, Coursac I, Zeger S (2000) Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 US cities, 1987-1994. N Engl J Med 343: 1742-17493.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross ref

5. Goldberg M, Burnett R, Bailar J, Brook J, Bonvalot Y, et al. (2001) The association between daily mortality and ambient air particle pollution in Montreal, Quebec 1. Nonaccidental mortality. Environ Res 86: 12–25. 

Indexed at, Cross ref

6. Brook RD, Franklin B, Cascio W, Hong YL, Howard G, et al. (2004) Air pollution and cardiovascular disease – a statement for healthcare professionals from the expert panel on population and prevention science of the American Heart Association. Circulation 109: 2655-26715.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross ref

7. Dobbin NA, Sun L, Wallace L, Kulka R, You H, et al. (2018) The benefit of kitchen exhaust fan use after cooking - An experimental assessment. Build Environ 135: 286-296. 

Google Scholar, Cross ref

8. Kang K, Kim H, Kim DD, Lee YG, Kim T (2019) Characteristics of cooking-generated PM10 and PM2.5 in residential buildings with different cooking and ventilation types. Sci Total Environ 668: 56-66.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross ref