ISSN:2167-7964

Journal of Radiology
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Image Article   
  • OMICS J Radiol 2022, Vol 11(11): 410
  • DOI: 10.4172/2167-7964.1000410

Quantitative Liver Capability Analysis Using MR Imaging

Tamada Akirha*
Department of Radiology, University of Freiburg, Germany
*Corresponding Author: Tamada Akirha, Department of Radiology, University of Freiburg, Germany, Email: Tamada_a@yahoo.com

Received: 03-Nov-2022 / Manuscript No. roa-22-82177 / Editor assigned: 05-Nov-2022 / PreQC No. roa-22-82177 (PQ) / Reviewed: 19-Nov-2022 / QC No. roa-22-82177 / Revised: 22-Nov-2022 / Manuscript No. roa-22-82177 (R) / Published Date: 29-Nov-2022 DOI: 10.4172/2167-7964.1000410

Image Article

Quantitative evaluation of liver capability is important not only for observing that function but also for evaluating the liver reserve prior to surgery [1].

Since Indocyanine Green is only removed from distribution by the liver, the Plasma Disappearance Rate has been regarded as an important tool for quantitatively evaluating liver function [2]. However, to our knowledge, there is no established method for the quantitative anatomically based assessment of segmental liver capability (Figure 1).

radiology-Real

Figure 1: Real-time MRI imaging of Liver.

It has been established that a quantitative liver function test, such as the ICG clearance test, and the Future Remnant Liver Volume are significant predictors of postoperative liver failure and mortality [1,3].However, because the heterogeneity of the liver function could not be taken into account with volumetry, an accurate assessment of the segmental liver reserve may not be possible [4].

Gadoxetate disodium is a paramagnetic hepatobiliary contrast specialist that has the ability to combine the characteristics of a hepatocellular contrast agent and extracellular agents. The same transportation frameworks (for instance the Natural Anion Shipping Polypeptides, OATPs) are seen as obligated for take-up of gadoxetate disodium and ICG in hepatocytes. As a result, gadoxetate disodiumimproved MR imaging may serve as the foundation for a useful method for quantitatively assessing postoperative liver disappointment, such as ICG clearance, while also allowing for anatomic delineation of hepatic function.

References

  1. Seyama Y, Kokudo N (2009) Assessment of liver function for safe hepatic resection. Hepatol Res 39: 107-116.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Sakka SG (2007) Assessing liver function. Curr Opin Crit Care 13: 207-214.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Suda K, Ohtsuka M, Ambiru S, Kimura F, Shimizu H, et al. (2009) Risk factors of liver dysfunction after extended hepatic resection in biliary tract malignancies. Am J Surg 197: 752-758.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Yamada A (2012) Quantitative Evaluation of Liver Function within MR Imaging. OMICS J Radiol 1: e109.
  8. Google Scholar

Citation: Akirha T (2022) Quantitative Liver Capability Analysis Using MR Imaging. OMICS J Radiol 11: 410. DOI: 10.4172/2167-7964.1000410

Copyright: © 2022 Akirha T. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top