ISSN: 2329-910X
Clinical Research on Foot & Ankle
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business
Research Article Open Access
Proposal of a Surgical Security Checklist in Podiatric Surgery
| Manuel Cohena Jimenez,Jaime Garcia Paris,Antonio Cordoba-Fernandez*Jose Maria Juarez-Jimenez,Pedro Montano Jimenez | ||
| Department of Podiatry, University of Sevilla, C/Avicenna s/n, 41009, Sevilla, Spain | ||
| Corresponding Author : | Dr. Antonio Córdoba-Fernández Department of Podiatry University of Sevilla, C/Avicenna s/n 41009, Sevilla, Spain Tel: 034 954486539 E-mail: acordoba@us.es |
|
| Received January 07, 2014; Accepted January 13, 2014; Published January 19, 2014 | ||
| Citation: Jiménez MC, París JG, Córdoba-Fernández A, Juárez-Jiménez JM, Jiménez PM (2014) Proposal of a Surgical Security Checklist in Podiatric Surgery. Clin Res Foot Ankle 2:126. doi:10.4172/2329-910X.1000126 | ||
| Copyright: © 2014 Jiménez MC, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | ||
Related article at Pubmed Scholar Google |
||
Visit for more related articles at Clinical Research on Foot & Ankle
Abstract
The authors propose a surgical security check-list adapted to the podiatric surgery. This check-list is based on the Surgical Security Checklist proposed by the World Health Organization. The proposed document contains 18 items divided into two groups: those which are checked before the surgery and those which must be verified after it, before the patient leaves the operating room. The checklist is characterized as being an easy-to- use tool, it requires a short time and permits to systematically increase the patient safety. The authors think that the result is a checklist that is easy to fill and that improves the patient safety in the podiatric surgery.
| Keywords | |
| Surgical checklist; Podiatric surgery; Podiatric patient safety | |
| Introduction | |
| Patient safety is a recurrent matter in recent years. Health care can cause damages; there are several authors that have already anticipated it before. Since the time of Hippocrates ( 5th century BC , 460 BC ) with “primum non nocere” to Florence Nightingale (1820-1910 ) who argued the following: “ It may seem surprising that the first thing you need to ask in a hospital is to not been harmed “. In the 90s Leape et al. confirmed in a study that two thirds of the adverse effects were avoidable [1]. In 1998 the Institute of Medicine demonstrated that in the U.S. there were between 44,000 and 98,000 preventable deaths. Such statistics produced greater concern among health professionals and political organizations; this led to an increase in the performance of this kind of studies in order to improve the patient safety in Health Care. According to most studies the leading causes of the increase in adverse events [2-4] are: the use of drugs, nosocomial infection and complications in surgery. | |
| Being the perioperative surgical complication rate in the industrialized countries from 0.4 to 0.8% and the major complications rate 3-17% [2-4]. In industrialized countries, nearly half of all adverse events are related to the surgery [5], most of them are preventable. | |
| In 2007 the World Alliance for Patient Safety launched the Global Challenge “Safe Surgery Saves Lives” and focused on four areas: the prevention of surgical wound infections, the safe anesthesia, the safe surgical equipment and the measuring of surgical services. In 2008 the “Surgical security checklist” was launched as a simple and easy-to-use tool that ensures the patient safety. This was spread worldwide thanks to the fact that it has properties of simplicity, generalized applicability and mediation [5]. | |
| The effectiveness of the surgical security checklist is demonstrated [6-8]. The document presented in attachment emerges from the need of adapting the checklist to the podiatric peculiarities [9-11] and more specifically to the podiatric clinic area at the University of Seville. The specific characteristics of this podiatric field are the following: it concerns a private nature and an outpatient basis, therefore it makes difficult the preoperative control and any possible postoperative complication. We use local or loco regional anesthesia in most interventions. | |
| We know that the performance of the professional activity predominates in the examination rooms or private centers; although increasingly more often surgery is performed in concerted hospitals and with the support of an anesthesiologist who uses a type of spinal anesthesia or sedation. The numbers of participants that intervene in the surgical procedure depend on each professional and each center. These kinds of characteristics require an adaptation of the Surgical Safety checklist proposed by the World Alliance for Patient Safety for podiatric surgery. The aim of this work is a proposal of a checklist that has been adapted to the specific field of podiatric surgery. | |
| Method | |
| The proposed document contains 18 items that must be verified by the professionals involved in the surgical procedure. These items should be checked before and after the surgery, before the patient leaves the operating room (Table 1). | |
| The checklist for podiatric surgery was designed to be completed by a person trained in patient safety. This person is responsible for the checklist and has the authority to stop the procedure if any of the items is not checked properly. | |
| After checking the list, the person responsible for the checklist and the podiatrist surgeon must sign the document that will be attached to the patient’s medical history. | |
| Discussion | |
| Nowadays the need of a quality health care is not questioned; it should include strategies to ensure the safety of patients. There are many studies about the implementation of the Surgical Safety Checklist in Health Sciences, Medicine and Nursing, mostly in public and private hospital setting, and also in other disciplines such as Dentistry [11]. | |
| The checklist of podiatric surgical safety is an easy-to-use tool which does not require much time for its implementation. It entails no procedure that currently we do not make at any podiatric surgery; it is only a verification of what we already do. It offers a systematic and orderly way to check elements in order to increase the safety of our patients, and avoid mistakes. In our opinion the fulfillment of the surgical security checklist and its inclusion in the medical history of the podiatric patient is an important endorsement from the legal point of view, since it avoids legal claims and it takes into account the medicallegal nature of the medical history. | |
| The proposed checklist is adapted to be used in the area of Podiatric clinical area at the University of Seville. Unlike the proposal of the World Alliance for Patient Safety our checklist is made in two different moments by the same person. Another aspect that we should take into account is the nature of outpatient podiatric surgery, which makes us pay more attention, if possible, and the importance of the preoperative and postoperative care instructions before leaving our facility. The use of local anesthesia offers a great advantage in podiatric surgery and in the postoperative period. Before the patient leaves the center, it must be verified that the patient is clinically fine and that he has understood the postoperative instructions, and also what to do in case of complications. At the end of the process, the list must be signed by the podiatrist and the person responsible for completing it. Both must verify is completed before signing the Checklist. | |
| The effectiveness of the checklist has been recognized by other authors in the prevention of surgical complications. Takala stated in his study that the list takes into account the security aspects [12], which facilitates its recall and application. Verdaasdonk notes that the standardization of surgical procedures facilitates the implementation of care protocols instead of relying only on the memory; the result is that less errors [13] are made, and both indicate that the incorporation of this tool in clinical practice improves morbidity caused by the occurrence of surgical complications [14-16]. | |
| The checklist of podiatric surgical safety is very useful to prevent complications. On the one hand, it aids to include scientific evidence in clinical practice; this increases the number of barriers to the identification and reduction of complications of surgical practice. On the other hand, it is based on sequential checks of concrete actions that help to improve the memory and the perception of potential welfare risks. Finally it generates a culture of safety among the involved professional, encouraged teamwork and monitoring errors. | |
| Conclusion | |
| Checklist of Podiatric Surgery Surgical Safety is a useful and valid tool that improves the patient safety standards in the area Podiatric Clinic of the University of Seville. We believe that if we investigate more about this research area; it can bring significant advances to the profession and also it will help to propose improvements in healthcare quality in Podiatry. | |
| Acknowledgements | |
| We acknowledge the help rendered to all people from Area of podiatry clinic of the University of Seville in the preparation of the manuscript. | |
References
- id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="1">Leape LL, Lawthers AG, Brennan TA, Johnson WG (1993) Preventing medical injury. QRB Qual Rev Bull 19: 144-149.
- id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="2">Gawande AA, Thomas EJ, Zinner MJ, Brennan TA (1999) The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. Surgery 126: 66-75.
- id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="3">Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, et al. (2009) Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Eng J Med 360: 491-499.
- id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="4">Kable AK, Gibberd RW, Spigelman AD (2002) Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia. Int J Qual Health Care 14: 269-276.
- id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="5">World alliance for patient safety (2008) WHO guidelines for safe surgery. Geneva: World Health Organization.
- id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="6">Peyré SE, Peyré CG, Hagen JA, Sullivan ME (2010) Reliability of a procedural checklist as a high-stakes measurement of advanced technical skill. Am J Surg 199: 110-114.
- id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="7">Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Dziekan G, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, et al. (2010) Safe Surgery: Saves Lives Investigators and Study Group. Effect of a 19-item surgical safety checklist during urgent operations in a global patient population. Ann Surg 251: 976-980.
- id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="8">Wilson I, Walker I (2009) The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist: the evidence. J Perioper Pract 19: 362-364.
- id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="9">Vats A, Vincent CA, Nagpal K, Davies RW, Darzi A, et al. (2010) Practical challenges of introducing WHO surgical checklist: UK pilot experience. BMJ 340: b5433.
- id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="10">Keane MJ, Marshall SD (2010) Implementation of the World Health Organisation Surgical Safety Checklist: implications for anaesthetists. Anaesth Intensive Care 38: 397-398.
- id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="11">Perea-Pérez B, Santiago-Sáez A, García-Marín F, Labajo González E (2011) Proposal for a 'surgical checklist' for ambulatory oral surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40: 949-954.
- id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="12">Takala RS, Pauniaho SL, Kotkansalo A, Helmiö P, Blomgren K, et al. (2011) A pilot study of the implementation of WHO surgical checklist in Finland: improvements in activities and communication. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 55: 1206-1214.
- id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="13">Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, Widhiasmara PP, Dankelman J (2009) Requirements for the design and implementation of checklists for surgical processes. Surg Endosc 23: 715-726.
- id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="14">Askarian M, Kouchak F, Palenik CJ (2011) Effect of surgical safety checklists on postoperative morbidity and mortality rates, Shiraz, Faghihy Hospital, a 1-year study. Qual Manag Health Care 20: 293-297.
- id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="15">Wæhle HV, Haugen AS, Søfteland E, Hjälmhult E (2012) Adjusting team involvement: a grounded theory study of challenges in utilizing a surgical safety checklist as experienced by nurses in the operating room. BMC Nurs 11: 16.
- id="Reference_Titile_Link" value="16">Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AS, et al. (2011) Changes in safety attitude and relationship to decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality following implementation of a checklist-based surgical safety intervention. BMJ: 102-107.
Relevant Topics
Recommended Journals
Article Tools
Article Usage
- Total views: 15685
- [From(publication date):
January-2014 - Nov 21, 2024] - Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views : 11110
- PDF downloads : 4575
Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
Journals by Subject
Clinical & Medical Journals
International Conferences 2024-25