ISSN: 2376-127X

Journal of Pregnancy and Child Health
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Research Article   
  • J Preg Child Health, Vol 6(6)

Prevalence and Determinants of Contraceptive Use among Saudi Women: A Descriptive National Study (2019)

Muna M Alawwad1, Fahad A Alamri2 and Samar A Amer2,3,4*
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ministry of Health (MOH), Saudi Arabia
2Department of Family Medicine, Ministry of Health (MOH), Saudi Arabia
3Deparment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
4Agency of Public Health, Ministry of Health (MOH), Saudi Arabia
*Corresponding Author: Samar A Amer, Scientific Consultant, Agency of Public Health Ministry of Health (MOH), Saudi Arabia, Tel: +966561428493, Email: dr_samar11@yahoo.com

Received: 07-Oct-2019 / Accepted Date: 08-Nov-2019 / Published Date: 15-Nov-2019

Abstract

Background: Contraception is an effective mean of Family Planning (FP) and fertility control, promotes maternal and child health. It is interesting to explore the perception and use of contraceptives among Saudi women. So this study aims to determine the prevalence of contraceptives use (types), to study some determinants of the contraceptions used, to assess the availability and satisfaction of the family health planning services and to record their opinion about the current situation in KSA. This study will provide up-to-date situational analysis helping the health policymakers.

Methodology: A cross-sectional study targeting 1215 Saudi women who fulfilling the inclusion criteria. A Multistage sampling technique was used to randomly select women from Primary Health Care Centers (PHCCs) all over the 20 health regions in KSA. Using a well-structured pretested questionnaire composed of four main parts to collect the data after an exempt IRP approval and informed written consent. The data analyzed using the appropriate tests using the Spss program version 22.

Result: A wide age range (16-49 y) with the mean age of 37.5. The majority (56.7%) were university-educated or above, 93.1% were married. The prevalence of the current contraception use is 68.8%. The most common methods for contraception were OCP, IUD, coitus interruption and condom in order (42.1, 15.6, 7.8 and 5.7%) respectively. The main causes for using contraception is birth control 55.4%, don't want to get pregnant (31.2%) and medical causes (17.8%). The main sources used for contraception methods, were HCP, relatives, friends (38.2%, 36.5%, 21. 8%) and bought from pharmacies, private clinics and then private hospitals (54.8%, 20.2%, 18.5%).

Conclusion: The contraceptive pills are the commonest contraceptive methods used among Saudi women. Appropriate strategies should be implemented to raise awareness and provide services.

Keywords: Contraception; Saudi women; Family Planning Services (FPS)

Abbrevations

Health Care Providers (HCPs); Birth Rate (BR); Family Planning Services (FPS); Companied OCP; Intrauterine Device (IUD); Primary Health Care Centres (PHCC); Kingdom Saudi Arabia (KSA); Saudi Arabia (SA)

Introduction

Contraception is unique among medical interventions in the breadth of its positive outcomes. An effective means of Family Planning (FP) and fertility control promotes maternal and child health [1]. Its use reduces the number of high- risk pregnancies, lower the level of properly and improperly abortions and reduce the health problems of infants such as lower birth weight and higher mortality with facilitating spacing of births. Finally, Effective contraception improves the social and economic role of women in society [2].

Among the Saudi population, condom use is the second most commonly used method after pills, which matches the trend of developed countries, where Condoms and male sterilization are among the least used contraceptive methods [3]. The reverse is true in developing countries, where four modern contraceptive methods, oral contraceptives, IUDs, injectable and female sterilization are the most widely used methods among married women [4-6].

The use of contraceptives influenced by many factors, such as, health care workers support, spouses, males' support, views of other women, marital status, desire for more children, myths and misconceptions on modern methods, socio-economic status of the women and accessibility [7-9].

Although current contraceptive methods are efficacious, safe and cost-effective [10-12], but most countries still have high contraceptive failure rates. So counseling and increased use of long-term reversible and irreversible methods have been effective in reducing failure rates [5].

Rational, Saudi Arabian community getting a rapid change in the socio-demographic pattern, especially the changes concerned with women's health style, work and education, which consequently change their attitude toward family planning and the use of contraceptives [3]. Various global and local organizations, private sectors and governments still aiming to maximize contraceptive use [13].

Aims

• To determine the prevalence of contraceptives use (types)

• To assess the availability and satisfaction of the family health planning services

• To record their opinion about the current situation in KSA

Methodology

A period of cross-sectional study, targeting 1215 Saudi women whom fulfilling the inclusion criteria, aged 15-<50 y and without any mental or psychological disorders. Attending Primary Health Care Centers (PHCCs) all over the 20 health regions in Kingdom Saudi Arabia (KSA).

Sampling methods

Multi-stage sample, the sample size was calculated using the Open Epi web. Saudi females aged between 15-50 y were 50,70,470 in Saudi Arabia. With 95% confidence interval and using a prevalence about 44.8% of contraception among Saudi women to be 620 participants will be doubled for the design effect to be 124, then proportionally divided into all 20 regions all-overs KSA, proportionated to the total no. of females in each region (with a minimum no. of 60 females from each region), then divided to represent different cultural levels to, PHCCS inside the town: PHCCS outside the town (3:1) or (2:1) according to the females distribution in each health region [3].

Data collection instrument

Using a well-structured pretested pre-coder and an Arabic questionnaire, the data collected during January and February 2019 composed from four parts. The first part includes, demographic information e.g. the age, educations, occupation, monthly income marital status. The second part includes, the obstetric history and prevalence of contraceptive use and the used type of contraceptive. The third part includes, some determinants of contraception use e.g. counselling, knowledge, intention, motivation and Attitude). The fourth part include, assessing the accessibility and the current situation among Saudi females to the usage of contraceptives.

The data collection was collected by a well-trained Health Care Providers (HCPS), through systematic random sample (started with the regestirated women number five then every fourth, until completing the sample size) to select women after selecting the PHC centers by multistage technique to collect the data as (PHCCS) facility based sample to represent women from all over the KSA (inside and outside the town).

Statistical analysis

Data was analyzed by using SPSS (version 20) and for quantitative data summarized mean, Standard Deviation (SD), median and range were used. While frequency (F) and percentage (%) were used for qualitative data summarization. P-value ≤ 0.05 considered as significant and 95% of confidence interval, which is 80% the power of the study.

Ethical considerations

Participants got informed written consent before answering the questionnaire and their identity was anonymous. Besides, an exempt approval was taken from the ethical committee of the research center at King Fahad Medical City No. 18-407E on 8th August 2018.

Results

The respondent rate was 97.98%, the participants' detailed demographic data and obstetric history are shown in Table 1. A total of 1215 female participants adequately responded to the questionnaire. A wide age range was included from (16-49) with the mean age of 37.5 y. As regards the education level, the majority (56.7%) were universityeducated or above, 93.1% were married of whom, only 12.1% had no children. The majority (63.4%) working but not in the medical field, 70% with sufficient outcome. About 20% visited the PHCC for ante or post-natal aims (Tables 1 and 2).

Place Sample
size
Inside the town
75%
Outside the town
15%
Makkah 2*80 60
Such as (Hajj Street-Awali-Azizi-Mujahideen-plan of law)
20
Such as jjjum-Karana-one-Shamia-Assqan
Jeddeah 2*100 75
E.g ( Majid-Naim-Salameh-an old airport
25
Such as (Shawak-Amm-Morgan
Taif 2*60 40
E.g (Vesaliah-Awadah-…)
The middle of the corniche - the Great Sail - its soil - time
Qunfudah 2*30 20
Such as Khalidiya-Sharqiyah
25
Mazeilif-one of Bani Zayed
Riyadh 2*250 175
E.g (Muroj-Suwaidi al-Gharbi - First Badr-Al-Dariyah - Northern Nasim
75
North Aqiq-Shakra-Al-Rawdah neighborhood-Khamisiyah - Mazahmieh
Madinah 2*65 45
Such as Khubiz, Odeid, Hamidiya, Bandar, and Shmeiri
20
Such as an ox-sourcing-amulet
Qassim 2*40 30
Shamasi-King Abdul Aziz-Asharqia-Eastern Dahi
10
khabera-khaseba-Qusayba
Eastern Province 2*90 60
Badr district 1-Khobar-Qdih-Ras Tanura
30
Aireh-Ateeq-Ain Dar Al Jadida
Hafr Al Batin 2*40 30
Abu Mousi-Azizia-Mohammadia
10
Zibbeh-patch
Hasa 2*30 20
His illustrious people-Khalaf-Khalidiya-Faisaliyah
10
Khreis-Faisalieh-Beren
ASSER 2*50 35
Abha-Nemis-Meet-Sira Obaid-Dars
15
Khomeh-Khamis Mutair-Tarbash-Jubail
Bisha 2*30 20
South of the city-sat Olaya-Bashayer-triangular
10
Afra-Khazmi-Naqie-Sabeeh
Tabuk 2*30 20
Back-Sliman-cut-kindergarten
10
Baysa-Bir Hermas
Hail 2*30 20
East-Badeh Park-West Park -Ajara
10
Shamli-Jabbah-ekaa -fekar
Northern borders 2*30 20
Khalidiya-Salhiya Middle-Rafha East or West
10
Such as(Rawdet Habash-shoawbaa)
Gazan 2*50 35
Sunday - Flight - Airport
15
Manshah-Regma-Homsa-Abu Aris
Najran 2*30 20
Bosom - Arissa-Rajala-Fahd South-North Fahd
10
Khalidiya-Al-Azaziyah-wadeaa-Sultan
Hollow 2*30 20
Abu Qasr-Dakar-markets and rain
10
Center of North Fayyad Tabargal
Quraysh 2*30 20
Vesalia-al Mozarei-Airport
10
Ghatti-Aqeelah-Issawih

Table 1: Shows the sample size distribution all over the KSA with numbers and PHCCs names examples.

  (Mean ± SD) F (Range) %
Age (y) 37.9 ± 9.7 16-49
The level of education
Illiterate 59 3.9
Primary/(read and write ) 116 8.8
High/Secondary 331 27.3
University or above 709 56.7
The occupation
Not working (housewife) 446 36.7
Working in the medical field) 123 10.1
Working but not in the medical field 646 53.2
The income
Insufficient 273 22.1
Sufficient 837 70.3
Sufficient and more 103 7.7
The marital status
Widow 30 3.4
Not married 22 1.8
Married 1110 91.3
Divorced 53 4.3
Aim of PHCCs visit
Antenatal care 231 17.5
Post-partum care 46 3.8
Other causes 938 77.2
The children (N=1193)
Don’t have 153 12.9
Median number of children 3 (0-7)
Age of last children (median ) 1 y (5 d-14 y)
Abortion history (N=1193)
No history of abortion 998 83.7
Median number of abortions 1 (0-7 times)
The parous history (N=1193)
No previous deliveries (p=0) 67 5.6
(nulliparous-multipara ) 1101 94.3
The delivery method history(T=1139)
Vaginal delivery 722 65.6
Caesarean section 165 14.9
Both 214 19.4

Table 2: Shows the socio-demographic data and obstetric history.

The prevalence of current contraceptive use among Saudi women living all over KSA was 74.7%. With a variation in length and use of each method, regards the history of contraception methods use among participants. 89.6% using oral contraception (mainly 38.7% less than 1 y), 28.5% using breastfeeding (mainly 71.4% less than 1 y) and 27.6% using intrauterine device (mainly 51.8% from 1 y to 3 y). Only about 3% reported pregnancy (failure rate) with the highest prevalence in safe period, then in coitus interruption. Out of the 25.3% whom never used contraception mainly due to medical causes, husband refusal and planning to get pregnant (35.5%, 31.9% and 24.4%). 41.9% of Saudi females reported that contraception has a positive effect on their health, 20.1% don't know, only 6.8% reported that it does not affect (Tables 3 and 4) (Figures 1 and 2).

  F %
The prevalence of previous contraception use (1215)
No 307 25.3
Yes 908 74.7
    From married 77.1
The causes of didn't use contraception method (T=307)*
The husband refuses 98 31.9
Planned to get pregnant 75 24.4
Useless 13 4.2
Fear from Complications and hazards 55 17.9
Religious factors 12 3.9
Medical causes 109 35.5
Others (need to know more, psychological & social) 88 28.7
*multiple answers allowed

Table 3: Shows the prevalence and some determinants of contraception use among Saudi females.

  Total
F
(%)
<1 y
F
(%)
1y-<3y
F
(%)
3-5 y
F
(%)
>5 y
F
(%)
Pregnancy rate
F (%)
The oral contraception pills 814
(89.6)
315 (38.7) 255 (33.13) 38
(4.7)
30
(3.7)
3(0.4)
From pregnancies=8.3
Don’t know its type (263=32.3)
Companied OCP (148=18.2)
Progestin only OCP (403=49.5)
Intrauterine device (IUD) 251
(27.6)
76
(30.3)
130
(51.8)
23
(9.16)
22
(8.76)
6(2.4)
From pregnancies=16.7
Injection 49
(5.4)
40
(81.6)
7
(14.3)
2
(4.08)
0
(0.00)
1(2.04)
From pregnancies=2.7
Patches 96
(10.6)
73
(76.04)
21
(21.88)
1
(1.04)
1
(1.04)
2(2.08)
From pregnancies=5.6
condom 194
(21.4)
130
(67.0)1
44
(22.68)
11
(5.7)
9
(4.63)
0
(0.00)
Ligation 5
(0.6)
3
(60.00)
2
(40.00)
0
(0.00)
0
(0.00)
0
(0.00)
Safe period 169
(18.6)
106
(62.72)
36
(21.3)
13
(7.69)
14
(8.28)
9 (5.3)
From pregnancies=25.
The withdrawal method (coitus interruption) 240
(26.4)
140
(58.33)
62
(25.8)
15
(6.25)
23
(9.58)
8(3.33)
Pregnancies=22.2
Others (natural herbs-breastfeeding-amenorrhea+vaginal washes ) 287
(3.1)
200
(69.70)
83
(28.9)
4
(1.3)
0
(0.0)
7( 2.43)
Pregnancies=19.44
Total number per each duration 1929 1083
(56.1)
640
(33.2)
107
(5.54)
99
(5.13)
-
Total (1155) - - - - 36(3.05)
Married ( 3.1)
*multiple answers allowed

Table 4: Shows the history of contraception methods use and failure (Pregnancy) rate*.

pregnancy-and-child-health-systems-Bar-chart

Figure 1: Bar chart shows the Frequency distribution of contraception methods use among Saudi females, 2019.

pregnancy-and-child-health-systems-Saudi-females

Figure 2: Bar chart shows the Saudi females opinion about the use of contraception in (%).*multiple answers allowed

As regards the main sources of knowledge about the used contraception methods in descending order were HCP, relatives, friends (38.2%, 36.5% and 21.8%). The majority of husbands (53.9%) support contraception use. The pharmacies, private clinics and then private hospitals (54.8%, 20.2% and 18.5%) were the main sources of the used contraception as in Table 5.

  F %
The sources of knowledge about contraception methods(T=908)
Friends 198 21.8
Relatives 332 36.5
Mass media 145 15.9
Health care providers (HCPs) 347 38.2
Others 123 13.5
Your husband supporting the contraception use
No 180 18.8
Yes 489 53.9
To some what 239 26.3
Sources of the used contraception methods (T=908)
PHCCs 53 5.8
Pharmacy 498 54.8
Private clinics 183 20.2
Private hospitals 168 18.5
Governmental hospitals 82 9.03

Table 5: Shows the family planning knowledge and services among Saudi females.

The prevalence of the current contraception use is 68.8%. The most common methods for contraception were OCP, IUD, coitus interruption and Condom in descending orders (42.1, 15.6, 7.8 and 5.7% ) respectively. The main causes of using contraception are birth control 55.4%, don't want to get pregnant (31.2%) and medical causes (17.8%) (Table 6).

  F %
The prevalence of current contraception use (1215)    
No 379 31.19
Yes 836 68.8
The frequency of current contraception methods uses (T=836)    
Oral contraception pills (OCP) 352 42.1
• Don’t know=31(8.8)
31 3.70
• Combined=221(62.8)
221 26.43
• Progesterone only pill=110(31.3)
110 13.16
Intrauterine device (IUD) 130 15.6
Injection 16 1.9
Patches 19 2.3
Condom 65 7.8
Tubal ligation 5 0.59
Safe period 38 4.5
Coitus interruption (he withdrawal method) 130 15.6
Others 80 6.6
Aim of the used contraception methods use (T=836)*    
Birth plan 463 55.4
Don’t want to get pregnant 261 31.2
Self-achievement -job progress 64 7. 7
Social causes 63 7.5
Financial causes 72 8.6
Medical causes 149 17.8
Others (husband diseases-separation-stressed-well breeding kids) 64 7.7
*Multiple answers allowed

Table 6: Shows the frequency of current contraception among Saudi females.

Figure 3 shows that the overall prevalence of the encountered and known contraceptive side effects is (74.04%). The most commonly encountered side effects were weight gain (49.0%), headache (34.8%) and mood swings (anxiety-stress) (30.5%). Interestingly, individuals with high school degree or less, reported significantly less contraceptive use (p=0.03, odds ratio=0.53, 95% CI=0.3-0.95) compared to individuals who had a master degrees or above. However, age, years of marriage and number of children were not shown to have any significant effects on contraception use among the participants (Figure 3).

pregnancy-and-child-health-systems-contraception-side-effects

Figure 3: Bar chart shows the prevalence of the encountered and known contraception side effects.

As the regards, the participants’ satisfactions with the provided FPS in PHCCs only about 33% of participants were satisfied with the FPS. About 45% reported that the tools or trained HCPs are unavailable. As regards to the Saudi’s women assessment to the current situation in KSA, the majority (55.7%) reported that the BR should be the same. while only 27.7% reported than in KSA there is no barriers. Although the majority 44.3% reported their insufficient knowledge, but the social and cultural, unavailable services and religious factors were the main barriers (51.9%, 33% and 27.1%) respectively (Tables 7 and 8).

  Satisfied Borderline Unsatisfied Not available
FPS in PHCCs 584 (48.0) 163 (13.4) 71 (5.8) 397 (32.6)
The sufficiency of the FPS in PHCCs 426 (35.0) 233 (19.2) 94 (7.7) 462 (38.0)
The tools of FPS in PHCCs 400 (32.9) 191 (15.7) 74 (6.1) 550 (45.2)
The HCPs of FPS in PHCCs 422 (34.7) 203 (16.7) 85 (7.0) 505 (45.2)

Table 7: The Saudi female’s satisfaction with the provided Family Planning Services (FPS) in PHCCs.

  F %
The KSA birth rate(BR) needs
Increased 338 27.8
Decreased 200 16.4
The same 677 55.7
The contraception use barriers in KSA
Don’t know 249 20.5
No barriers 337 27.7
Yes, have 348 28.6
May be 281 23.1
The barriers of contraception use in KSA are (842)*
Didn’t have sufficient knowledge 373 44.3
Economic causes 185 21.8
Religious causes 228 27.1
Cultural and social causes 437 51.9
The FPs don’t available in the PHCCs 278 33
Insufficient time for consultations 38 4.5
The mode of transmission to PHCCs (*) 50 5.9
Others 221 26.2
*multiple answers allowed, (*)-Insufficient or unavailable

Table 8: Shows the participants opinion about current situation in KSA.

Discussion

Recently, the use of Contraceptives in nearly every country use has increased [14]. However, only a limited number and old similar studies were conducted among Saudi women. So, it is interesting to explore the perception and use of contraceptives, such issues will help the health policymakers and physicians to clearly assess and adequately response [3].

Our results show 68.9% of Saudi women using contraceptives method at least one continuous year, which is consistent with a few local studies [15]. However, different results reported in EL Qassem studies on married women revealed that 86.1% and 44.4% of the participants used contraception [16,17]. These inconsistencies can be explained by that, the used sample excluded nulliparous females and the study location.

The frequency of OCP usage is 89.9% which is higher than recent Saudi Arabia reports [18]. This higher rate may have attributed to the community-based sample rather than the official government data and 91.3% of the participants were married. Moreover, in KSA, the contraceptives are available over the counter and the different variety of contraceptive health service is free. This might lead to underestimating the realistic contraceptives use. However, this rate is higher than the world reported rate (63.1%) and nearly equal to the developed countries rate (67.4% ) [19].

It's very important to identifying the most common types of contraception used among Saudi women because, it can be used by physicians to determine appropriate approaches to educating women about the use indications, methods and the expected side effects of contraception. The most popularly used method is oral pills (89.6%) this could be attributed to that the main source of knowledge about contraception were the relatives and friends (58.3%), who had and share their limited experience. This is consistent with other studies that have reported the popularity of OCP [20-24]. Thus, highlighted the necessity for increased public awareness.

As regards the ranking of the used contraceptive methods, these results are nearly consistent with Saudi Arabia's reported data in which OCPS, followed by IUDs, tubal ligation and the condom [18]. However, tubal ligation was only (0.59%) the lowest rate this may be due to the traditions and islamic culture which reject permanent sterilization that may accept a temporary delay of pregnancy and the official data reports are usually hospital-based records. However, among married women in developing countries, the most widely used four methods are oral contraceptives, IUDs, injectable and female sterilization, while in our study injections were only 1.9% [25].

The male contraception (condom ) ranked the fourth method (7.9%) among studied participants was inconsistent with, the recent United Nation's report (2007) worldwide showed that condoms are the second most commonly used method after pills in KSA which matches the trend of developed countries [5]. This may be due to traditional cultures or may reflect underreporting due to shy users [19]. In developing countries, condoms and male sterilization are among the least used of all contraceptive methods. The reverse is true in developed countries, in which condoms are the major method of family planning [18].

Regarding the basis of choosing contraception among Saudi women, we found 2 main factors: We founded that the HCPs had a limited role in providing contraception information. Only 38%, reflects the family power and 58.3% community conservative culture, which tends to be less reliable compared to the medical advice. This fact considered as the main factor for the low knowledge level regarding contraceptive methods and the spread of common misconceptions. This is consistent with many local studies [20,21].

Evidence shows that two years is the best birth interval for better infants and children [26]. The majority of the Saudi women uses contraception less than one year (56.1%) and 33.2% which less than what reported among traditional healers in Nigeria whom prefers a child spacing period (2-3 y) [27]. Quran guided Muslims indirectly to the optimum birth interval period by specifying a suggested time of 24 months for breastfeeding and the period of pregnancy and suckling to range from 24 to 30 months (Holy Quran 2:233, 31:14, 46:15). So a minimum birth interval ranging from 2.5-3.0 years is adequate. It was therefore surprising that only 33.2% in this study from an Islamic background practiced a gap from one to less than three years as a birth space.

The using rate of modern contraception methods (patches and injection) is 4.2%, that can be attributed to the poor knowledge regarding the variety of contraceptive methods. In agreement with the recent surveys in 60 developing countries that reported only 37 countries, had 95% of married women who knew at least one contraceptive method [28,29]. The knowledge gap restricts women's choice for the use of contraceptives [3].

Reasons for using or not using contraception may vary significantly from one society to the other due to the variations in cultural, educational or even religious backgrounds. Consequently, knowing the factors that affecting their choices helping in identifying the appropriate interventions and the necessary actions. Globally, preventing unintended pregnancy is the main reason for contraception use [30]. As the same results reported among Saudi women in preventing unintended pregnancies (birth plan 55.2% and don't want to get pregnancy 31.4%) and treating certain conditions (18.7%).

While, the main reasons for not using contraception are medical causes (35.5%), husband refusal (31.5%) and fear from hazards or complications (17.9%) this can be attributed to that the limited role of medical advice as a source of information (38.0%) among women in choosing or adopting this practice, which leads to the spread of misinformation about contraception.

However, nearly 41% of the studied Saudi women knowing the positive impact of contraceptives use on women's health and less than 10% known the positive impact of contraception as regards (community, social, economic, and child health) which requires more attention to the cultural misconceptions regarding contraceptives.

While 51.9% of participants reported sociocultural barriers, which is an actual barrier as nearly 31% reported that the husband refuse is a cause of not use and only 18.8% reported that their husbands do not support contraception use.

Islam is the main religion in the Saudi religious society and (only a few of the participants reported that being Haram or not allowed in Islam or Children are a blessing from God), 27.7% expected its role as barrier for using contraception. while in real its effects 3.9% on actual practice. So religious barrier is not a major reason. This finding is inconsistent with local studied this inconsistency may be due to the variations in the degree of religiosity and social culture from one area to another in different Saudi provinces [15,16]. Compared with Islamic Arab countries which are nearby supposed to be the same culture, the majority showed a lower contraception user rate than Saudi Arabia, ranging from and 61.8% in Bahrain, 58.3% in Syria, 43.2% in Qatar, 27.5% in the United Arab Emirates and 23.1% in Yemen [5]. This variation could be attributed to the variation in the local culture of these countries towards contraceptive use.

The assessment of the actual incidence of side effects contraception is important. As it points to the most commonly reported side effects among Saudi women to physicians and their potential gaps to experience side effects of which they do not know. The side effects among Saudi women showed that there was no disparity from the world reported results, weight gain (49.0%) because the about 45% of the Saudi women used hormonal contraceptive methods. However studies reported that long-acting injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate is the only hormonal contraceptive that is consistently associated with weight gain an average of 11.2 lb (5.1 kg) over 36 months. Whereas women who used combined oral contraceptives did not gain any weight [31,32].

The second common reported side effects were a headache (34.85%) because the mean age of the studied women was 37.5 y, headache is more common during the first cycle of combined oral contraceptives and in women who are older than 35 y [33]. Mood swings (30.1%) as reported that Depo-Provera was associated with an increased rate of depression, which can persist after discontinuation of therapy, which is inconsistently with studied that reported number of significant differences in effect on mood have been found among various combined oral contraceptives [34-37]. Hair loss (24.5%), menstrual disturbances and irregular bleeding (20.5%) are common in the first months of combined oral contraceptive use and need reassurance menstrual disturbances is also considered the main cause of discontinuing hormonal contraceptives [24]. If it persists more than three months, an alternative method should be considered and the patient needs to be evaluated for other causes [34]. Moreover, the percentage of unintended pregnancy is about 5.2%.

In general, the majority of adverse effects related mainly to the hormonal contraceptives, usually diminish to be acceptance with continued use of the same method. Reassurance is the only required treatment as will resolve within three to five months [35]. Educating patients about common adverse effects help to establish realistic expectations [24,36].

Although KSA population expected to double, reaching 77.2 million by 2050, growing at 2.65% per annum, this will have a significant impact on healthcare demand in terms of quality, quantity and type of healthcare facilities [37]. Only 16.4% of Saudi women reported that the BR should be decreased and 55.7% reported its should be the same.

However, our study also reported more details about the Saudi women satisfaction with the provided FPS in PHCCs, only about 33% of participants were satisfied with all studied FPS, about 45% of them reported that the tools of FPS and trained HCPs are unavailable. The provision of contraceptive services, like all areas of healthcare, has been affected by changes in the structure of healthcare financing and the rise of managed care which covers preventative care, including routine gynecologic checkups and some reversible contraceptive services and supplies [38].

However, not all managed care plans cover the process of obtaining contraceptive services and methods which add burdens on women seeking contraceptive care. These burdens include prior authorization requirements that may cause some women to delay care or forgo sensitive care, which a woman may not want to disclose to her primary care physician, in agreement with U.S.A [39].

The influence of "Social desirability response bias" is a possible explanation for this finding. Socially desirable responding is the tendency for participants to present a favorable image of themselves [40]. Participant may choose the answers with the most socially acceptable values, either to avoid criticism or to gain social approval [41]. Therefore, it is very important determinants. As it points to the potential for gaps women to experience barriers, of which they do not know [42,43]. Furthermore, it provides physicians and stakeholders with knowledge of the most commonly reported barriers.

Limitations

As cross sectional study cannot be used to analyze behavior over a period of time, it does not help to determine cause and effect. As this is an information self-reporting bias (answering a questionnaire or responding agreeing to be interviewed), there is a tendency for respondents to provide what they believe to be socially acceptable answers rather than the truth, especially with regard to behavioural aspects and, recall bias about the past history and behavior information.

Strengths

It's a recent comprehensive study and only a few studies have been conducted addressing the use and determinants of contraception in Saudi women, it was conducted to address the gaps. First, the present study results can be generalized included a large sample (n=1215), which was sampled in a represented way to all the 20 healthy regions (from inside and outside the countries). Second, unmarried and nulliparous females were included, which gives an insight into contraception use among all social groups. Third, this study has assessed the encountered side effects among Saudi women, which has not been assessed previously. Moreover, this study provides a basis, on which physicians can further target their actions toward educating contraceptive users. Yet it also provides an opportunity to analyze and understand their contraception practices.

Recommendations

We recommend sustained efforts to raise awareness and motivation for proper contraceptive use through campaigns, facilitating the process of obtaining such resources and providing sources of information with facilitating access to more information, education and communication with the couples in reproductive age. Activating and increasing the role of mass media in raising public awareness about the benefits and modern contraception methods contraceptives and to dispel misconceptions (Table 9).

Source Title Website Comment
Association of Reproductive Health Professionals Method Match http://www.arhp.org/methodmatch/ Interactive tool for patients to choose most appropriate methods with comprehensive information on each method
Association of Reproductive Health Professionals You Decide Tool Kit http://arhp.org/publications-and-resources/clinical-practice-tools/you-decide Comprehensive source of tools for physicians to help patients choose appropriate contraception
Bridging the Gap Foundation Managing Contraception http://www.managingcontraception.com Patient education and patient Web-based self-research
Planned Parenthood Health Topic: Birth Control http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/birth-control-4211.htm Patient education and patient Web-based self-research
Princeton University and the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals Emergency Contraception Website http://ec.princeton.edu/ Information on and assistance in obtaining emergency contraception
World Health Organization Family Planning: A Global Handbook for Providers http://www.infoforhealth.org/globalhandbook/handbook.pdf Comprehensive, simplistic reference for contraception counselling and practical management of adverse effects
World Health Organization Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/9789241563888/en/index.html Determination of safe contraceptive options

Table 9: Lists resources for physicians and patients (Hormonal Contraceptives: Online Resources).

• We Recommend future detailed frequent and local studies, because knowledge of such issues helps health policymakers and physicians to understand the situation more clearly and respond to the information appropriately.

• Appropriate well-structured strategies should be implemented to provide efficient FPs in PHCS through proving the following: Family planning service providers, regular comprehensive updated training courses on the FPS, the contraceptive methods and application tools depending on women population proportionated ratio, ensure the services are available in all PHCCs, continuous follow up and on job training to ensure the quality of the provided services and marketing the presence of services of this service.

• Patient education can decrease the chances of unanticipated adverse effects of hormonal contraceptives.

Conclusion

In KSA, the contraceptives user rate is higher than the normal user rates in the world and nearly equal to developed countries. The contraceptive pills are the commonest contraceptive methods used among Saudi women, followed by the IUD and withdrawal methods. There were knowledge gaps and cultural misconceptions about the benefit and methods of contraception.

References

  1. Oye-Adeniran BA, Adewole IF, Umoh AV, Oladokun A, Ghadegesin A, et al. (2006) Community-based study of contraceptive behaviour in Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health 10: 90-104.
  2. Dardano K, Burkman R (2008) Clinical aspects of oral contraceptive use. Glob Libr Women's Med.
  3. Sheeha MA (2010) Women attending primary care centers in Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia. Int J Health Sci 4: 11-21.
  4. Albezrah NA (2015) Use of modern family planning methods among Saudi women in Taif, KSA. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 4: 990-994.
  5. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/dataset/contraception/wcu2017.asp
  6. Kenny L (2004) Contraception, sterilization and termination of pregnancy. In: Luesley DM, Baker PN (Eds), Obstetrics and Gynecology: An evidence-based textbook for MRCOG Arnold. 1st edn. London pp: 514-523 .
  7. Kamal SMM (2012) Childbearing and the use of contraceptive methods among married adolescents in Bangladesh. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 17: 144-154.
  8. Samandari G, Speizer IS, O'Connell K (2010) The role of social support and parity in contraceptive use in Cambodia. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 36: 122-131.
  9. Lee RB, Nacionales LP, Pedroso L (2009) The influence of local policy on contraceptive provision and use in three locales in the Philippines. Reprod Health Matters 17: 99-107.
  10. Trussell J (2011) Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 83: 397-404.
  11. Grimes DA (1992) The safety of oral contraceptives: Epidemiologic insights from the first 30 years. American J Obstetrics Gynecol 166: 1950-1954.
  12. Trussell J, Lalla AM, Doan QV, Reyes E, Pinto L, et al. (2009) Cost-effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States. Contraception 79: 5-14.
  13. Kumar N (2016) Met and unmet needs for family planning: A global issue. EC Gynaecol 3: 281-289.
  14. Albezrah N (2015) Use of modern family planning methods among Saudi women in Taif, KSA. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 4: 990-994.
  15. Elgharabway RM, Ahmed AS, Alsuhaibani RA (2015) Awareness, prevalence and determinants of birth control methods use among women in Saudi Arabia. Int Arch Med 8: 245.
  16. Rutsein S (2002) Effects of birth interval on mortality and health, multivariate cross-country analysis, MACRO International presentation at USAID, July 2000. In: Venugopal VS, Upadhyay UD (Eds), Birth spacing, three to five saves lives. Balti-more, Johns Hopkin Bloomberg School of Public Health, Population information program 2002. Population Reports, series L, No. 13.
  17. Kenny L (2004) Contraception, sterilization and termination of pregnancy. In: Luesley DM, Baker PN (Eds), Obstetrics and gynecology: An evidence based text book for MRCOG Arnold. 1st Edition. London. Pp: 514-523.
  18. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Healthcare Overview(2018) The pulse: 8th edn, p: 4.
  19. harabway RM, Ahmed AS, Alsuhaibani RA (2015) Awareness, prevalence and determinants of birth control methods use among women in Saudi Arabia. Int Arch Med 8: 245.
  20. Jabbar FA, Wong SS, Al-Meshari AA (1988) Practice and methods of contraception among Saudi women in Riyadh. Fam Pract 5: 126-128.
  21. Rasheed P, Al-Dabal BK (2007) Birth interval: Perceptions and practices among urban-based Saudi Arabian women. East Mediterr Health J 13: 881-892.
  22. Lwanga SK, Lemeshow S (1991) Sample size determination in health studies: A practical manual. World Health Organization, Geneva.
  23. Moreau C, Cleland K, Trussell J (2007) Contraceptive discontinuation attributed to method dissatisfaction in the United States. Contraception 76: 267-272.
  24. World Health Organization (2004) Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use. 2nd edition, WHO. Geneva.
  25. Gallo MF, Lopez LM, Grimes DA, Carayon F, Schulz KF, et al. (2008) Combination contraceptives: Effects on weight. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1: CD003987.
  26. Obisesan KA, Adeyemo AA, Ohaeri JU, Aramide FA, Okafor SI (1997) The family planning aspects of the practice of traditional healers in Ibadan, Nigeria. West Afr J Med 16: 184-190.
  27. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/international-programs/about/idb.html
  28. Akakpo B (1998) Safer young motherhood in Ghana. Planned Parenthood Challenges. pp: 19-20
  29. Bella H, Al-Almaie SM (2005) Do children born before and after adequate birth intervals do better at school? J Trop Pediatr 51: 265-270.
  30. Alhusain F, Alkaabba F, Alhassan N, Alotaibi S, Breakeit S, et al. (2018) Patterns and knowledge of contraceptive methods use among women living in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Health Sci 7: 121-126.
  31. Berenson AB, Rahman M (2009) Changes in weight, total fat and percent body fat and central-to-peripheral fat ratio associated with injectable and oral contraceptive use. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200: 329.e1–e8.
  32. Loder EW, Buse DC, Golub JR (2005) Headache as a side effect of combination estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives: A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193: 636-649.
  33. Frost JJ, Darroch JD (2008) Contraceptive Use and Unintended Pregnancy. Glob Libr Womens med.
  34. The Alan Guttmacher Institute (1994) Uneven and unequal: Insurance coverage and reproductive health services. The Alan Guttmacher Institute, New York.
  35. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins Gynecology (2006) ACOG practice bulletin no. 73: Use of hormonal contraception in women with coexisting medical conditions. Obstet Gynecol 107: 1453-1472.
  36. Berenson AB1, Odom SD, Breitkopf CR, Rahman M (2008) Physiologic and psychologic symptoms associated with the use of injectable contraception and 20 microg oral contraceptive pills. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199: 351.e1–e12.
  37. Grossman N (2010) Managing adverse effects of hormonal contraceptive. Am Fam physician 82: 1499-1506.
  38. Information and Knowledge for Optimal Health (INFO) Project. The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  39. Hashmi SS (1996) Shy/silent users of contraceptives in Pakistan. Pak Dev Rev 35: 705-717.
  40. Johnson T, Fendrich M (2002) Validation of the Crowne‐Marlowe social desirability scale. pp: 1661-1666.
  41. King M, Bruner G (2000) Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing. Psychol Market 17: 79-103.
  42. Moreau C, Trussell J, Gilbert F, Bajos N, Bouyer J (2007) Oral contraceptive tolerance: Does the type of pill matter? Obstet Gynecol 109: 1277-1285.

Citation: Alawwad MM, Alamri FA, Amer SA (2019) Prevalence and Determinants of Contraceptive Use among Saudi Women: A Descriptive National Study (2019). J Preg Child Health 6:424.

Copyright: © 2019 Alawwad MM, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top