Journal of Molecular Pharmaceutics & Organic Process Research
Open Access

Positive selection; Centrality; Protein-protein interaction networks; Yeast; Fruit flies; Evolution; Systems biology

Introduction

Protein-protein interactions play a crucial role in cellular processes and are the building blocks of complex biological systems. Understanding the evolutionary dynamics of PPI networks is essential for deciphering the molecular mechanisms that underlie cellular function and disease. In this article, we explore the concepts of positive selection and centrality in the context of PPI networks in yeast and fruit flies and discuss their implications for evolutionary biology and systems biology [1].

Positive selection in PPI networks

Positive selection refers to the process by which beneficial genetic variations are favored and spread through a population over time. In the context of PPI networks, positive selection can shape the evolution of protein interactions by influencing the amino acid residues involved in protein binding or altering the overall network architecture. Positive selection can lead to the emergence of novel interactions, the optimization of existing interactions, or the elimination of disadvantageous interactions.

Several studies have investigated positive selection in PPI networks of yeast and fruit flies, two model organisms widely used in biological research [2]. These studies have identified specific proteins or protein domains that have undergone positive selection, suggesting their functional importance in adaptive processes. For example, in yeast, the interaction between the mating-type proteins MATα1 and MATa2, which is crucial for sexual reproduction, shows evidence of positive selection. Similarly, in fruit flies, proteins involved in the immune response, such as Toll-like receptors, have exhibited signatures of positive selection, indicating their role in host defense.

Centrality in PPI networks

Centrality measures in PPI networks quantify the importance of individual proteins or nodes based on their connectivity and influence within the network. Centrality metrics, such as degree centrality, between ness centrality, and closeness centrality, provide insights into the functional relevance and potential essentiality of proteins within a network. Proteins with high centrality are often involved in key biological processes and are likely to be essential for cellular viability.

In both yeast and fruit fly PPI networks, centrality analyses have revealed interesting patterns. For instance, in yeast, proteins involved in DNA repair and replication tend to exhibit high centrality, reflecting their critical role in maintaining genome integrity. In fruit flies, proteins associated with developmental processes, such as the Hox gene family, are highly central, indicating their importance in regulating body patterning and embryonic development [3].

Interplay between positive selection and centrality

The interplay between positive selection and centrality in PPI networks is a fascinating area of research. Positive selection can influence the evolutionary trajectory of central proteins, potentially leading to the acquisition of new functions or the optimization of existing functions. Conversely, highly central proteins may be more likely to experience positive selection due to their functional significance and potential for adaptation [4].

Several studies have investigated the relationship between positive selection and centrality in yeast and fruit fly PPI networks. These studies have found that central proteins are more likely to undergo positive selection compared to non-central proteins. This observation suggests that positive selection acts preferentially on proteins with key roles in cellular processes, emphasizing the significance of centrality in driving evolutionary innovation [5].

Discussion

The study of positive selection and centrality in protein-protein interaction networks of yeast and fruit flies provides valuable insights into the evolutionary dynamics of these networks and the functional importance of individual proteins within them. In this discussion, we delve deeper into the implications and findings related to positive selection and centrality in the context of yeast and fly PPI networks [6].

Positive selection is a process that drives the fixation of beneficial genetic variations in a population over time. In PPI networks, positive selection can influence the evolution of protein interactions by modifying amino acid residues involved in binding or altering the overall network architecture. Studies examining positive selection in yeast and fruit fly PPI networks have identified specific proteins or protein domains that have undergone positive selection. This indicates their functional importance in adaptive processes. For example, in yeast, the mating-type proteins MATα1 and MATa2, which are critical for sexual reproduction, show evidence of positive selection. Similarly, in fruit flies, proteins involved in the immune response, such as Toll-like receptors, have exhibited signatures of positive selection, highlighting their role in host defense [7].

Centrality measures in PPI networks quantify the importance of individual proteins based on their connectivity and influence within the network. Highly central proteins are often involved in key biological processes and are likely to be essential for cellular viability. In yeast and fruit fly PPI networks, centrality analyses have revealed interesting patterns. For instance, in yeast, proteins involved in DNA repair and replication tend to exhibit high centrality, reflecting their critical role in maintaining genome integrity. In fruit flies, proteins associated with developmental processes, such as the Hox gene family, are highly central, indicating their importance in regulating body patterning and embryonic development [8].

The interplay between positive selection and centrality in PPI networks is a fascinating area of research. Positive selection can shape the evolutionary trajectory of central proteins, potentially leading to the acquisition of new functions or the optimization of existing functions. Conversely, highly central proteins may be more likely to experience positive selection due to their functional significance and potential for adaptation. Several studies investigating the relationship between positive selection and centrality in yeast and fruit fly PPI networks have observed that central proteins are more likely to undergo positive selection compared to non-central proteins. This suggests that positive selection acts preferentially on proteins with key roles in cellular processes, emphasizing the significance of centrality in driving evolutionary innovation [9].

Understanding the interplay between positive selection and centrality in PPI networks provides valuable insights into the evolutionary dynamics of protein interactions. It helps unravel the complex mechanisms that govern the evolution of biological systems and provides a foundation for further research in evolutionary and systems biology. By studying these concepts in model organisms like yeast and fruit flies, scientists gain fundamental knowledge that can be extrapolated to a wide range of organisms, including humans.

Overall, the investigation of positive selection and centrality in yeast and fruit fly PPI networks contributes to our understanding of the evolutionary processes shaping protein interactions and the functional significance of individual proteins within these networks. Further research in this area holds the potential to uncover additional insights into the principles governing the evolution and functioning of biological systems [10].

Conclusion

The study of positive selection and centrality in yeast and fruit fly PPI networks provides valuable insights into the evolutionary dynamics of protein interactions. Positive selection shapes the emergence, optimization, and elimination of protein interactions, while centrality metrics highlight the functional importance of individual proteins within the network. Understanding the interplay between positive selection and centrality helps unravel the complex mechanisms that govern the evolution of biological systems and provides a foundation for further research in evolutionary and systems biology.

By exploring these concepts in model organisms like yeast and fruit flies, scientists gain fundamental knowledge that can be extrapolated to a wide range of organisms, including humans. Continued investigations into positive selection and centrality in PPI networks promise to deepen our understanding of the intricate interplay between evolution, network architecture, and cellular function.

Conflict of Interest

None

Acknowledgement

None

1. Russu, Eliza, Adrian Vasile Mureșan, Daniela Elena Nedelea, Raluca Niculescu, et al. (2023) Polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) vs. Polyester (Dacron®) Grafts in Critical Limb Ischemia Salvage. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20: 212-220.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Shu J, Santulli G (2018) Update on peripheral artery disease: Epidemiology and evidence-based facts. Atherosclerosis. 275: 379-381.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Conte MS, Bradbury AW, Kolh P, White JV, Dick F, et al. (2019)  Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg 69: 3-125.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Panigada M, Bottino N, Tagliabue P (2020)  Hypercoagulability of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: a report of thromboelastography findings and other parameters of hemostasis. J Thromb 18: 1738-1742.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Giannis D, Ziogas IA, Gianni P (2020) Coagulation disorders in coronavirus infected patients: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV and lessons from the past. J Clin Virol 127: 104-105.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Harrison SL, Fazio-Eynullayeva E, Lane DA, Underhill P, Lip GYH, et al. (2020)  Comorbidities associated with mortality in 31,461 adults with COVID-19 in the United States: a federated electronic medical record analysis.  PLoS Medicine 17-106-109.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

7. Dye TD, Bogale S, Hobden C, Tilahun Y, Deressa T, et al. (2011) Experience of Initial Symptoms of Breast Cancer and Triggers for Action in Ethiopia. Int J Cancer 5: 2012-2015.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

8. Anderson BO, Shyyan R, Eniu A, Smith R, Yip CH, et al. (2006) Breast cancer in limited-resource countries  an overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative 2005 guidelines. Breast J 12: 12-15.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

9. Chow, Loh, Wong, Cheng, Fung, et al.  (2007)  Using a community-based outreach program to improve breast health awareness among women in Hong Kong. Public Health Nurs 24: 125-128.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

10. Bener, Ayoubi, Moore, Basha, Joseph, et al.  (2009)  Do we need to maximize breast cancer screening awareness Experience with an endogamous society with high fertility. Asian Pac J Cancer 10: 599-604.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at