Police Resiliency: An Integration of Individual and Organization

Research Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health School of Public Health and Health professions University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo

Visit for more related articles at International Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience

These occupational challenges contribute to an increased physical and psychological stress load, marking police work as a precursor to pathological outcomes. However, there is little work that explores salutary influences which can help officers become more resistant to the impact of stress. The development of socially based resiliency may be one such technique.

Evidence suggests that resiliencehas a moderating influence on stress (Aldwin, Levenson, & Spiro, 1994; Armeli, Gunthert, & Cohen, 2001; Paton, Violanti, & Smith 2003). There are specific characteristics that make individuals or organizations more or less resilient to stress than others (Maddi, 2002; Maddi & Khosaba, 2005; Youseff & Luthans, 2005; Walsh, 2002; Luthar, Chicchetti & Becher, 2000). Taken together, these factors suggest that resilience is not so much a trait as it is a process of integration of available resources such as groups or organizations (Siebert, 2002).

The police organization plays an important role in the process of officer resilience (Siebert, 2002). Police officers respond to stressful incidents as members of agencies whose climate influences their thoughts and actions (Paton, Smith Ramsay, & Akande, 1999). The police organization can influence the individual and organizations can change the course of individual reaction from pathogenic decline to adaptation. Higgins, 1994 and Sledge, 1980 also suggest that coping style and social cohesion could act to cognitively integrate the stressful experience. The salutogenic effects of resilience and social integration suggests that the group can facilitate the active process of self-righting and growth.

Additionally, because police officers are called upon repeatedly to deal with increasingly complex and threatening incidents, it is also appropriate to expand the scope of resiliency within the context of the organization to include the development of one’s capacity to deal with future events (Klein, Nicholls, & Thomalla, 2003). Each negative stressful event an officer encounters leads to an attempt to cope, which forces them to learn about their own capabilities and available organizational support networks.

In sum, an approach integrating individual and organization resiliency has far wider implications than simply focusing on the pathology of stress and trauma. Organizational and individual resiliency together can have a meaningful impact on the more effective management of psychological harm. In the long term, reduced personal stress has the potential for positive health outcomes in this difficult occupation.

References

1. Aldwin C.M., Levenson M.R., & Spiro A. III. (1994).  Vulnerability and resilience to combat exposure: Can stress have lifelong effects? Psychology and Aging, 9, 34-­44.
2. Armeli S, Gunthert, K.C., & Cohen L.H. (2001). Stressor appraisals, coping, and post-event outcomes: The dimensionality and antecedents of stress-related growth. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20, 366-395.
4. Higgins G.O. (1994).  Resilient adults: Overcoming a cruel past. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Klein R., Nicholls R., &Thomalla F. (2003). Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept? Environmental Hazards,5, 35-45
7. Luthar S., Cicchetti D., & Becher B. (2000). The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543-562.
9. Maddi S. (2002). The story of hardiness: twenty years of theorizing, research, and practice. Consulting Psychology Journal, 54, 173-185.
11. Maddi S., Khosaba D. (2005). Resilience at Work: How to Succeed No Matter What Life Throws at You. New York: Amacom.
13. Paton D., Smith L.M., Ramsay R., &Akande D. (1999). A structural re-assessment of the Impact of Event Scale: The influence of occupational and cultural contexts. In: Gist R, Lubin B, (Eds.). Response to Disaster. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis
14. Paton, D., Violanti, J.M., & Smith, L.M. (2003).Promoting Capabilities to manage posttraumatic stress: Perspectives on resilience. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.
16. Siebert A. (2002). How resilience works. Letter to editor.Harvard Business Review, 121.
18. Sledge W.H., Boydstun J.A., &Rahe A.J. (1980). Self-concept changes related to war capitivity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 430-443.
20. Walsh F. (2002). A family resilience framework: Innovative practice applications. Family Relations, 51, 30-139.
22. WeickK.E.,& Sutcliffe K.M. (2007). Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty. 2 ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
23. Youssef C.M.,&Luthans F. (2005).  Resiliency development of organizations, leaders & employees: Multi-level theory building for sustained performance. In: Gardner W., Avolio B.J., Walumbwa F.O., (Eds.) Authentic Leadership The­ory and Practice. Origins, Effects, and Development.Oxford: Elsevier.