Plant Defense Gene Regulation and Transcription Factor Dynamics

Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, USA

Corresponding Author:

Nidhi Rawat
Gulf Coast Research and Education Center
University of Florida, USA
Tel: 813-634-0000
E-mail: nrawat@ufl.edu

Received date: April 08, 2016; Accepted date: April 11, 2016; Published date: April 15, 2016

Citation: Rawat N (2016) Plant Defense Gene Regulation and Transcription Factor Dynamics. J Rice Res 4:e128. doi:10.4172/2375-4338.1000e128

Copyright: © 2016 Rawat N. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Rice Research: Open Access

Editorial

Plants respond to different pests and pathogens by activating a set of resistance genes that involve in substantial transcriptional reprogramming integrating hormonal, metabolic, and physiological movements [1]. These cumulative downstream defense responses alleviate pathogen and pest by subsequent local or systemic induced resistance. Hormone signaling and trans-acting regulatory factors/ Transcription factors (TFs) are the major factors that facilitate downstream defense responses in plants [2]. Approximately, 7% of plant genome coding sequences represent TFs [3]. Among many different type of TFs available in plants, the most common TFs mainly belong to six groups; AP2/ERF, MYB, BZIP, WRKY, MYC and NAC [4]. There is no exact mechanism or correlation between the type of TFs and plant defense signaling. AP2/ERF TFs were found to be mainly involved in Jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene (ET) signal transduction while, WRKY and bZIP TFs were mostly involved in salicylic acid (SA) mediated signal transduction. TFs encoding genes may be differentially regulated (up or down) by different stresses and substantial overlap occurs in the defense pathways allow integration of different defense signal and thereby, fine tune the Plant defense to pathogen/pest attack.

AP2/ERF

AP2/ERF (Apetala2/ethylene responsive factor) class of transcription factors constitute plant specific large family of TFs which is well-known for regulating biological responses to environmental stimuli [5]. AP2/ERF TFs constitutes ~163 members in rice and ~140 members in Arabidopsis [5]. The presence of one or two highly conserved 60 amino acid AP2 domain is the characteristic of AP2/ERF transcription factors [6,7]. AP2-like transcription factors are known to contain two AP2 domains while ERF-like factors has one AP2 domain. Ethylene-response elements (ERE), also known as the GCC-box (GCCGCC) binds with AP2/ERF proteins with a single AP2-domain in response to ET [8]. The GCC-box has been identified in many promoters of defense-responsive genes that are inducible by ET. The GCC-box is also found in the promoters of SA-inducible pathogenesisrelated (PR) genes, suggesting likely cross-talk between ET and SA pathways. In Arabidopsis, AP2/ERF proteins are also involved in JAinducible gene expression and known as octadecanoid-responsive AP2/ERF (ORA). Arabidopsis ORA59 positively regulates expression of JA- and ET-mediated defense-related genes [9]. ORA47 regulate JA biosynthetic genes via positive feedback regulation. AP2/ERF proteins, in combination with other transcription factors may regulate the crosstalk and differential defense gene regulation. For example, OsEBP2 (Oryza sativa ethylene-responsive-element binding protein 2) expression was identified as a downstream component of a signal transduction pathway in response to rice-blast fungus interaction and also found to be transiently induced by MeJA, ABA and ET treatments [10]. Other TF, OsEREBP1 was reported to be induced in rice and bacterial pathogen, Xanthomonas oryzaepv. oryzae (Xoo) interaction. Transcriptome analysis via Microarray and SSH cDNA library showed AP2 transcription factor were differentially up-regulated in incompatible rice-gall interactions [11-13].

MYB

MYB factors in plants have been implicated in JA signaling pathways that bind to (T/C)AAC(T/G)G and G(G/T)T(A/T) G(G/T)T type of DNA sequences [14]. The role of MYB TFs is mostly documented in regulating the biosynthesis primary and secondary metabolites [15]. Secondary metabolites such as glucosinolates and flavonoid are implicated in hypersensitive response (HR) against herbivores and microorganisms. MYB34/Arabidopsis P450 reductase (ATR1) and MYB29/PMG2 have been implicated in the regulation of glucosinolates [16]. AtMYB30 has been implicated as an activator of HR-related cell death and resistance against bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris [17]. The BOTRYTIS SUSCEPTIBLE 1(BOS1)/AtMYB108 was found to be involved in resistance against necrotrophic pathogens like B. cinerea and A. brassicicola [18]. MYB transcription factors also play roles in the defense response against insects. AtMYB44 was shown implicated in the plant defense against aphid [19]. Similarly, AtMYB102 has been reported to be effective in defense against the insect herbivore Pieris rapae via upregulation of a large number of genes that are involved in cell wall modifications [20]. MYB15 and WRKY40 TFs may play important roles in the transcriptional regulation of carbohydrate metabolism in citrus–HLB interactions [21,22]. AtMYB96-mediated abscisic acid (ABA) signals enhanced pathogen resistance response by inducing SA-biosynthesis via ABA-SA cross-talks [23].

bZIP

bZIP transcription factors are characterized by their basic leucine zipper (bZIP) domain which is involved in DNA binding [24]. Regularly spaced leucine residues are found in the vicinity of bZIP which are important for the homo and heterodimerization of the bZIP proteins. Lesions simulating disease resistance 1 (LSD1), a plantspecific zinc-finger protein is known to regulate cell death negatively by limiting nuclear translocation of AtbZIP10 [25]. AtbZIP10, a positive regulator of resistance gene-mediated hypersensitivity and reactive oxygen-induced cell death. Arabidopsis TGA family of bZIP transcription factors has been demonstrated in innate immunity [26]. The role of TGA has been documented in systemic acquired resistance (SAR) via SA-regulated redox change which allows interaction with NPR1 [27]. Rice rTGA2.1 has a negative impact on SAR by interacting with OsNPR1 and altering accumulation of the PR genes in response to bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (xoo) [28]. In contrast, OsbZIP1 may play a positive role in the SA-dependent signal transduction after Magnaporthe grisea attack [29]. Rice-gall midge incompatible interaction characterized by hypersensitive-mediated and non-hypersensitive related defense pathway [30-33]. Rawat et al. [34] found that TGA domain was mutated in the upstream promoter regions of PR10a in non-hypersensitive gall midge resistance, suggesting its role in HR mediated cell death. Arabidopsis TGA2 and TGA3 have diverse mechanism as TGA2 represses expression of PR-1 promoter in, while TGA3 acts as a transcriptional activator of PR-1 expression, in vivo [35].

WRKY

WRKY proteins represent a large class of DNA-binding proteins in plants and have specific binding affinity for the consensus W-box motif TTGAC(T/C) followed by a typical zinc-finger domain [36]. The genome of rice and Arabidopsis contains around 100 WRKY genes and 70 WRKY genes, respectively. WRKY factors were shown to have strong negative effect conferred by W-box motif for SA-mediated PR-1 gene expression in Arabidopsis [37]. In Arabidopsis , PAMP signaling and MAPK cascade (MEKK1–MKK4/MKK5–MPK3/MPK6) involve WRKY22 and WRKY29 proteins as transcriptional regulator after recognition of the flagellin fragment flg22 [38]. These WRKY factors are proposed to augment their expression levels by building a positive feedback loop via several WRKY binding sites in their own promoters. The induced expression of these WRKY factors would then allow induction of resistance to both bacterial and fungal pathogens [38]. WRKY33 is known for positive regulation of JA-induced defense genes and negative regulation of SA-related defense genes. WRKY28 is the only TF that is known to be suppressed by both JA and ET was found up-regulated after flg22 treatment [39]. Eight WRKY proteins (WRKY18, 38, 53, 54, 58, 59, 66, and 70) have been recognized as direct targets of NPR1 [40,41]. Up-regulation of OsWRKY13 gene in rice, after bacterial blight Xanthomonas oryzae pv oryzae (Xoo) and fungal blast Magnaportha grisea pathogens, leads to enhanced resistance in rice plant [42]. OsWRKY62 is a negative regulator of both types of plant immunity (PTI and ETI) [43].

MYC

MYC2 is a member of the basic Helix-Loop-Helix (bHLH) family of TFs that consists ~60 amino acids bipartite bHLH domain [44]. This domain contains a region with a large number of basic residues at the N-terminal side, which is involved in DNA binding. Like ZIP domains, the HLH domain play a role in homo-and/ or heterodimerization. Among various MYC TFs, MYC2 transcription factors is known to regulate JA-dependent physiological processes, drought tolerance, circadian clock and light signaling [45]. However, only a limited number of bHLH transcription factors such as AtMYC2/JIN1 have been found to be involved in JA- and ABA-regulated signaling induced by wounding and herbivory.

NAC

NAC (NAM, ATAF1/2, and CUC2) is a plant-specific family of transcription factors include a large family of proteins which contain a variable C-terminal domain and a highly conserved N terminal domain [46]. More than 100 NAC genes have been documented in the genomes of Arabidopsis and rice. NAC proteins appear to be unique transcription factors in plants and no homolog has been identified in other eukaryotes thus far [46]. NAC genes have been reported to be induced by pathogen infection in rice, Arabidopsis and other plant species [47]. ATAF1 and its barley homolog HvNAC6 positively regulate penetration against fungus B. graminis f. sp. hordei [48]. Virus-induced silencing of NAC TFs (ONAC122 and ONAC131 ) in rice increased susceptibility to blast disease suggesting their positive regulation in disease resistance against M. grisea [49]. A number of NAC proteins such as OsNAC4 have been reported inducing HR and cell death by activating PR genes [50].

References

1. Turner, JG, Ellis C, Devoto A (2002) The jasmonate signal pathway. The Plant Cell 14: S153-S164
2. Udvardi MK, Kakar K, Wandrey M, Montanari O, Murray J, et al. (2007) Legume transcription factors: global regulators of plant development and response to the environment. Plant Physiol 144: 538-549.
3. Rushton PJ, Bokowiec MT, Laudeman TW, Brannock JF, Chen X, et al. (2008) TOBFAC: the database of tobacco transcription factors. BMC bioinformatics 9: 53
4. Century K, ReuberTL, Ratcliffe OJ (2008) Regulating the regulators: the future prospects for transcription-factor-based agricultural biotechnology products. Plant Physiology 147: 20-29
5. Nakano T, Suzuki K, Fujimura T, Shinshi H (2006) Genome-wide analysis of the ERF gene family in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant physiol 140: 411-432
6. Fujimoto SY, Ohta M, Usui A, Shinshi H, Ohme-Takagi M (2000) Arabidopsis ethylene-responsive element binding factors act as transcriptional activators or repressors of GCC box��?mediated gene expression. The Plant Cell 12: 393-404
7. Licausi F, Ohme-Takagi M, Perata P (2013) APETALA2/Ethylene Responsive Factor (AP2/ERF) transcription factors: mediators of stress responses and developmental programs. New Phytologist 199: 639-649
8. Allen MD, Yamasaki K, Ohme-Takagi M, Tateno M, Suzuki M (1998) A novel mode of DNA recognition by a �?�?-sheet revealed by the solution structure of the GCC-box binding domain in complex with DNA. EMBO J 17: 5484-5496
9. Pr�?© M, Atallah M, Champion A, De Vos M, Pieterse CM, et al. (2008) The AP2/ERF domain transcription factor ORA59 integrates jasmonic acid and ethylene signals in plant defense. Plant Physiol 147: 1347-1357
10.  Lin R, Zhao W, Meng X, Peng YL (2007) Molecular cloning and characterization of a rice gene encoding AP2/EREBP-type transcription factor and its expression in response to infection with blast fungus and abiotic stresses. Physiol and Mol Plant Pathol 70: 60-68.
11. Lin R, Zhao W, Meng X, Peng YL (2007) Molecular cloning and characterization of a rice gene encoding AP2/EREBP-type transcription factor and its expression in response to infection with blast fungus and abiotic stresses. Physiol and Mol Plant Pathol 70: 60-68
12. Rawat N, Himabindu K, Neeraja CN, Nair S, Bentur JS (2013) Suppressive subtraction hybridization reveals that rice gall midge attack elicits plant-pathogen-like responses in rice. Plant Physiol Biochem 63: 122-130
13. Rawat N, Naga NC, Meenakshi SR, Nair S, Bentur JS (2012) A novel mechanism of gall midge resistance in the rice variety Kavya revealed by microarray analysis. Funct Integr Genomics 12: 249-264
14. Rawat N, Neeraja CN, Nair S, Bentur JS (2012) Differential gene expression in gall midge susceptible rice genotypes revealed by suppressive subtraction hybridization (SSH) cDNA libraries and microarray analysis. Rice 5: 8
15. Goyal A, Manoharachary C (2014) Future Challenges in Crop Protection Against Fungal Pathogens. Springer London, Limited
16. Baldoni E, Genga A, Cominelli E (2015) Plant MYB transcription factors: their role in drought response mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci 16: 15811-15851
17. Celenza JL, Quiel JA, Smolen GA, Merrikh H, Silvestro AR, et al. (2005) The Arabidopsis ATR1 Myb transcription factor controls indolic glucosinolate homeostasis. Plant Physiol 137: 253-262
18. Froidure S, Canonne J, Daniel X, Jauneau A, Bri�?¨re C, et al. (2010) AtsPLA2-a nuclear relocalization by the Arabidopsis transcription factor AtMYB30 leads to repression of the plant defense response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 15281-15286
19. Mengiste T, Chen X, Salmeron J, Dietrich R (2003) The Botrytis susceptible1 gene encodes an R2R3MYB transcription factor protein that is required for biotic and abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 15: 2551-2565
20. Liu R, L�?¼ B, Wang X, Zhang C, Zhang S, et al. (2010) Thirty-seven transcription factor genes differentially respond to a hairpin protein and affect resistance to the green peach aphid in Arabidopsis. J Biosci 35: 435-450
21. De Vos M, Denekamp M, Dicke M, Vuylsteke M, Van Loon LC, et al. (2006) The Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factor AtMYB102 functions in defense against the insect herbivore Pieris rapae. Plant Signal Behav 1: 305-311
22. Rawat N, Kiran SP, Du D, Gmitter FG, Deng Z (2015) Comprehensive meta-analysis, co-expression, and miRNA nested network analysis identifies gene candidates in citrus against Huanglongbing disease. BMC Plant Biol 15: 184
23. Du D, Rawat N, Deng Z, Gmitter Jr FG (2015) Construction of citrus gene coexpression networks from microarray data using random matrix theory. Horticulture Res 2: 15026
24. Seo PJ, Park CM (2010) MYB96-mediated abscisic acid signals induce pathogen resistance response by promoting salicylic acid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. New Phytol 186: 471-483
25. Jakoby M, Weisshaar B, Dr�?¶ge-Laser W, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Tiedemann, J, et al. (2002) bZIP transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci 7: 106-111
26. Kaminaka H, N�?¤ke C, Epple P, Dittgen J, Sch�?¼tze K, et al. (2006) bZIP10-LSD1 antagonism modulates basal defense and cell death in Arabidopsis following infection. EMBO J 25: 4400-4411
27. Kesarwani M, Yoo J, Dong X (2007) Genetic interactions of TGA transcription factors in the regulation of pathogenesis-related genes and disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 144: 336-346
28. Lindermayr C, Sell S, M�?¼ller B, Leister D, Durner J (2010) Redox regulation of the NPR1-TGA1 system of Arabidopsis thaliana by nitric oxide. The Plant Cell 22: 2894-2907
29. Fitzgerald HA, Canlas PE, Chern MS, Ronald PC (2005) Alteration of TGA factor activity in rice results in enhanced tolerance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. The Plant J 43: 335-347
30. Rawat, N. (2012). Identification and characterization of differentially expressed genes in rice involved in rice gall midge interactions (Doctoral dissertation, Dissertation, Osmania University).
31. Meng XB, Zhao WS, Lin RM, Wang M, Peng YL (2005) Identification of a novel rice bZIP-type transcription factor gene, OsbZIP1, involved in response to infection of Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 23: 301-302
32. Sama VS, Rawat N, Sundaram RM, Himabindu K, Naik BS, et al. (2014) A putative candidate for the recessive gall midge resistance gene gm3 in rice identified and validated. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 127: 113-124
33. Yasala AK, Rawat N, Sama VA, Himabindu K, Sundaram RM, et al. (2012) In silico analysis for gene content in rice genomic regions mapped for the gall midge resistance genes. POJ 5: 405-413
34. Bentur JS, Rawat N, Divya D, Sinha DK, Agarrwal R, et al. (2016) Rice��?gall midge interactions: battle for survival. J Insect Physiol 84: 40-49
35. Rawat N, Sinha DK, Rajenderakumar P, Shrivastava P, Neeraja CN, et al. (2010) Role of pathogenesis-related genes in rice-gall midge interactions. Current Science 99: 1361-1368
36. Johnson C, Boden E, Arias J (2003) Salicylic acid and NPR1 induce the recruitment of trans-activating TGA factors to a defense gene promoter in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 15: 1846-1858
37. Zhang Y, Wang L (2005) The WRKY transcription factor superfamily: its origin in eukaryotes and expansion in plants. BMC Evol Biol 5: 1
38. Lebel E, Heifetz P, Thorne L, Uknes S, Ryals J, et al. (1998) Functional analysis of regulatory sequences controlling PR-1 gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant J 16: 223-33
39. Asai T, Tena G, Plotnikova J, Willmann MR, Chiu WL, et al. (2002) MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature 415: 977-983
40. Navarro L, Zipfel C, Rowland O, Keller I, Robatzek S, et al. (2004) The transcriptional innate immune response to flg22. Interplay and overlap with Avr gene-dependent defense responses and bacterial pathogenesis. Plant Physiol 135: 1113-1128
41. Wang D, Amornsiripanitch N, Dong X (2006) A genomic approach to identify regulatory nodes in the transcriptional network of systemic acquired resistance in plants. PLoS Pathog 2: e123
42. Moore JW, Loake GJ, Spoel SH (2011) Transcription dynamics in plant immunity. Plant Cell 23: 2809-2820
43. Qiu D, Xiao J, Xie W, Liu H, Li X, et al. (2008) Rice gene network inferred from expression profiling of plants overexpressing OsWRKY13, a positive regulator of disease resistance. Mol Plant 1: 538-551
44. Peng Y, Bartley LE, Chen X, Dardick C, Chern M, et al. (2008) OsWRKY62 is a negative regulator of basal and Xa21-mediated defense against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in rice. Mol Plant 1: 446-458
45. Carretero-Paulet L, Galstyan A, Roig-Villanova I, Mart�?­nez-Garc�?­a JF, Bilbao-Castro JR, et al. (2010) Genome-wide classification and evolutionary analysis of the bHLH family of transcription factors in Arabidopsis, poplar, rice, moss, and algae. Plant physiol 153: 1398-1412
46. Woldemariam MG, Dinh ST, Oh Y, Gaquerel E, Baldwin IT, et al. (2013) NaMYC2 transcription factor regulates a subset of plant defense responses in Nicotiana attenuata. BMC Plant Biology 13: 73
47. Olsen AN, Ernst HA, Leggio LL, Skriver K (2005) NAC transcription factors: structurally distinct, functionally diverse. Trends Plant Sci 10: 79-87
48. Hegedus D, Yu M, Baldwin D, Gruber M, Sharpe A, et al. (2003) Molecular characterization of Brassica napus NAC domain transcriptional activators induced in response to biotic and abiotic stress. Plant Mol Bio 53: 383-397
49. Nuruzzaman M, Sharoni AM, Kikuchi S (2013) Roles of NAC transcription factors in the regulation of biotic and abiotic stress responses in plants. Front Microbial 4: 248
50. Sun L, Zhang H, Li D, Huang L, Hong Y, et al. (2013) Functions of rice NAC transcriptional factors, ONAC122 and ONAC131, in defense responses against Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Mol Biol 81: 41-56