Journal of Mucosal Immunology Research
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Mini Review   
  • J Mucosal Immunol Res 2018: 107, Vol 2(1)

PGP3 is a Chlamydial Plasmid-Encoded Virulence Factor

Hou C1* and Zhong G2*
1Department of Dermatovenereology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Rd, Tianjin 300052, China
2Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
*Corresponding Author(s): Hou C, Department of Dermatovenereology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Rd, Tianjin 300052, China, Tel: 86-13821150956
Zhong G, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, China, Tel: 210-567-1169, Fax: 210-567-1169, Email: Zhongg@UTHSCSA.EDU

Received: 04-Jan-2018 / Accepted Date: 15-Jan-2018 / Published Date: 18-Jan-2018

Abstract

Sexually transmitted infections with Chlamydia can lead ectopic pregnancy and tubal infertility. However, the precise pathogenic mechanisms remain unclear. The chlamydial cryptic plasmid is known to play a critical role in chlamydial pathogenesis in the genital tract. C. muridarum depleted of plasmid or deficient in the plasmid-encoded pGP3 protein was highly attenuated in ascending infection and inducing upper genital tract pathology, demonstrating that the plasmid-encoded pGP3 is a key virulence factor. pGP3 was found to neutralize the antichlamydial activity of the host antimicrobial peptides particularly the cathelicidin peptide LL-37 (human) or CRAMP (mice). This pGP3- mediated neutralization was dependent on Pgp3 to form stable complexes with LL-37. The complex formation was further mapped to the middle domain of pGP3. These observations suggest that Chlamydia may secrete Pgp3 for trapping antimicrobial peptides during chlamydial spreading from cell to cell in the genital tract mucosal tissue. The tertial structure of pGP3 reveals that pGP3 may also directly participate in the induction of tubal inflammation by activating TNF signaling pathway. Finally, pGP3 was recently reported to be essential for chlamydial colonization in the gastrointestinal tract. Thus, careful analyses of pGP3 functionality may reveal novel information on how Chlamydia interacts with its host and induces pathologies in the upper genital tract.

Keywords: Chlamydia muridarum; Virulence factor; pGP3; Antimicrobial peptides; LL-37

Introduction

Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common cause of sexually transmitted bacterial infections worldwide, and women carry the major burden of the infection. Although the symptoms of the sexually transmitted C. trachomatis infection can be mild or absent, the infection, if not treated appropriately, can ascend to the upper genital tract to induce inflammatory pathologies such as tubal fibrosis and hydrosalpinx, leading to severe complications like ectopic pregnancy or infertility [1]. Despite the extensive research on chlamydial biology, the pathogenic mechanism of C. trachomatis has not yet been elucidated. The species C. muridarum , which naturally infects mice, has been extensively used to study the pathogenic mechanisms and immune responses of C. trachomatis [2-8]. This is because genital tract infection of mice with C. muridarum induces hydrosalpinx [3,9], closely mimicking the tubal pathology induced by C. trachomatis in humans.

Most chlamydial organisms contain a highly conserved cryptic plasmid that encodes 8 open reading frames (ORFs), designated pORF1-8 or pGP1-8 [10,11]. The plasmid is thought to play an important role in chlamydial pathogenesis since plasmid-free trachoma serovar A organisms failed to cause pathology in primate ocular tissues [12] and plasmid-free C. muridarum organisms were highly attenuated in ascending infection and pathogenicity in mouse upper genital tract [7]. All eight plasmid transcripts [13] are translated into proteins during chlamydial infection [10] and extensive efforts have been made to define the functions of these proteins. By using deletion and introducing premature termination mutation analyses, it is confirmed that pGP1, 2 and 6 are plasmid maintenance factors [14-16], pGP4 is a positive regulator of genes that are dependent on plasmid for expression[14,15], pGP5 acts as a negative regulator of the same plasmid-dependent genes [16]. Importantly, pGP3 represents a major virulence factor in C. muridarum pathogenesis since pGP3 deficiency largely phenocopied plasmid deficiency when infecting animals [17,18].

PGP3 is essential for chlamydial pathogenicity

The C. muridarum murine model-based studies have revealed that both ascending infection and tubal inflammation are required for chlamydial induction of hydrosalpinx in mice [19]. When C. muridarum transformants are deficient in pGP3, -4, or -7, they were evaluated for pathogenicity in mice, the transformants deficient in either pGP3 or -4 failed to induce hydrosalpinx in mice following intravaginal infection. The pGP3-deficient C. muridarum reduced survival in the mouse lower genital tract and decreased ascending to the mouse upper genital tract, suggesting that pGP3 was essential for C. muridarum ascension. Furthermore, pGP3-deficient C. muridarum , after directly delivered to the oviduct, was highly attenuated in inducing hydrosalpinx, suggesting that pGP3 may promote chlamydial induction of tubal inflammation [17]. Thus, the plasmid-encoded pGP3 may enhance chlamydial pathogenicity by both promoting ascending infection and inducing tubal inflammation. This conclusion is consistent with the following observations: First, of the plasmidencoded proteins [10,20], pGP3 was the only secreted protein that accumulated in the host cell cytosol at late stages of chlamydial infection [10]. Since Chlamydiae complete their biosynthesis inside the inclusion body, any chlamydial proteins that are secreted outside the inclusion may be used by chlamydial organisms as virulence factors for interacting with the infected host. Second, pGP3 is immunogenic in women who have been infected with C. trachomatis via either the genital tract [21,22] or the ocular route [23,24], suggesting that Pgp3 is highly accessible to the host immune system. Third, pGP3 formed a stable trimer [25] with a C-terminal trimerization domain similar to the receptor binding domain of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF- α) [26], which suggests that pGP3 may be able to induce tubal inflammatory responses by activating TNFR1 pathway. Finally, pGP3- deficient C. trachomatis serovar L2 was also attenuated in infecting the mouse genital tract and inducing inflammatory responses [18]. The question is how pGP3 promotes chlamydial ascension and tubal pathology.

Pgp3 may promote chlamydial ascending infection by targeting antimicrobial peptides

Cationic peptides that possess antimicrobial activities are defined as antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), including human alpha-defensins (HADs) or human neutrophil peptides (HNPs), human beta-defensins (HBDs), and cathelicidin LL-37 [27-30]. LL-37 is a C-terminal 37- amino-acid peptide starting with double leucines (LL) cleaved from human cationic antimicrobial protein 18 (hCAP18) that contains a highly conserved amino-terminal cathelin-like domain and a variable carboxy-terminal domain [27, 29]. The mouse orthologue of LL-37 is called cathelin-related antimicrobial peptide (CRAMP) [31]. HNPs are produced mainly by neutrophils, while HBDs are produced by epithelial cells. Interestingly, LL-37 or CRAMP is produced by both epithelial cells and neutrophils. These extracellular AMPs possess a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity by inducing pore formation in the bacterial membrane and represent a potent first line of host defense [29,32].

Chlamydial intracellular infection starts with the entry of an infectious elementary body (EB) into an epithelial cell by endocytosis. EB differentiates to a noninfectious but metabolically active reticulate body (RB) in the cytoplasmic inclusion body. After replication, the progeny RBs differentiate back to EBs that exit the infected cells to invade other cells [33].The spreading process inevitably exposes the progeny EBs to the extracellular mucosal environment where numerous host mucosal effectors, such as AMPs, are available for attacking EBs. The antichlamydial activity of AMPs was supported by two observations. One is in vitro study in which the antichlamydial activity of 9 AMPs was evaluated. The cathelicidin LL-37 or the mouse homologue CRAMP displayed the highest antichlamydial activity, followed by human beta defensin 3 (HBD3) and human neutrophil peptide 2 (HNP2) [34]. Another observation is that MyD88 deficiency significantly increased mouse susceptibility to C. muridarum ascending infection [35,36] indicating that the MyD88-dependent AMPs may contribute to the prevention of chlamydial ascension. To ascend to the upper genital tract, the C. trachomatis EB organisms must overcome these host defense mechanisms. The chlamydial chromosome-encoded serine protease CPAF that is secreted into host cell cytosol during infection has been shown to degrade LL-37 and neutralize its antichlamydial activity [37].

PGP3 is the only secreted protein among all the 8 chlamydial plasmid encoded ORFs, which is accumulated in the infected cell cytosol at late stages of infection [10]. Upon the lysis of the infected cells, the pre-stored cytosolic Pgp3 may be released into the extracellular environment prior to the EB releasing, which is consistent with the observation that pGP3 is immunogenic during chlamydial infection in humans and animals [20,21]. The released pGP3 is able to confront the extracellular AMPs and neutralize their antichlamydial activity so that the progeny EBs subsequently released can safely infect the next target cell. Indeed, the antichlamydial activity of the cathelicidin LL-37 or CRAMP was prevented by preincubating LL-37 or CRAMP with pGP3 [34]. The inhibition of the LL-37 antichlamydial activity by pGP3 was confirmed by both monitoring the chlamydial protein synthesis and titrating the live chlamydial organism recovery [34].

PGP3 Neutralizes Antichlamydial Activity of Cathelicidin LL-37 by Forming Stable Complexes

Many bacterial species have been selected to evolve strategies for evading AMPs via releasing soluble factors to trap [38,39] or degrade the antimicrobial peptides [40-43]. CPAF may cleave AMPs while pGP3 may trap AMPs by forming stable complexes. Indeed, in a GST pull-down assay, GST-pGP3 fusion protein precipitated all LL-37 into the pellet fraction while GST alone failed to do so [34]. Most interestingly, the pGP3-LL-37 complexes were highly stable since most of the complexes remained intact after boiling in 2% SDS lysis sample buffer [34]. This stable complex formation was validated in a Biocorebased affinity measurement assay, which showed stable binding even during elution phase [34]. However, the chemical basis of the stable complexes between pGP3 and LL-37 remains unknown. Determining whether the complex formation involves hydrophobic or covalent interactions or both will provide useful information for developing pGP3 into medically useful reagents.

Furthermore, the stable interactions of pGP3 with LL-37 were mapped to the middle domain of pGP3. The pGP3 middle domain (pGP3m) but not pGP3c or pGP3n not only formed SDS/boilingresistant complexes with LL-37 but also neutralized antichlamydial activity of LL-37 [34]. This finding is consistent with the structural observation that pGP3m forms triple helixes that are flexible for interacting with other molecules [26]. The above in vitro observations have led to the conclusion that pGP3 may promote chlamydial ascending infection via pGP3m-mediated neutralization of LL-37/ CRAMP.

Future Study

Many innate immune effectors, including the expression of AMPs, are regulated by MyD88-mediated signaling pathways [44]. Chlamydial ascension occurs very rapidly [45,46], it is likely that the major host obstacles for inhibiting chlamydial ascension are regulated by innate pathways such as the MyD88-depdent pathway. This hypothesis is consistent with the observation that mice deficient in MyD88 allowed more severe ascending infection [35,36]. The question is whether MyD88-deficiency can rescue the ascending infection by C. muridarum -deficient in pGP3 or pGP3m. If the answer is yes, the next step is to define the MyD88-regulated effectors responsible for preventing C. muridarum ascension. The most likely candidate may be CRAMP. If true, mice deficient in CRAMP should also be able to rescue the ascending infection by C. muridarum -deficient in pGP3 or pGP3m.

Besides promoting chlamydial ascension in the genital tract, pGP3 is also required for chlamydial colonization in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract [47]. Since chlamydial spreading from the genital to the GI tract correlates with chlamydial induction of hydrosalpinx in the upper genital tract, it is reasonable to hypothesize that pGP3 may promote chlamydial pathogenicity in the upper genital tract by promoting chlamydial colonization in the GI tract. Thus, investigating how Pgp3 promotes chlamydial colonization in the GI tract is medically relevant although Chlamydia is not a GI tract pathogen.

Since chlamydial colonization in the GI tract alone is not pathogenic in animals [48] and not associated with any pathologies in humans, the question whether chlamydia is a commensal species in the GI tract has been raised. Thus, it is possible that Chlamydia may have acquired the plasmid or pGP3 for improving its fitness in the GI tract. It will be both interesting and medically significant to investigate how pGP3 improves chlamydial colonization in the GI tract.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by The National Nature Science Fund of China grant# 81301469 (to SH) and US National Institutes of Health grant# R01AI121989 (to GZ).

References

  1. Budrys NM, Gong S, Rodgers AK, Wang J, Louden C, et al. (2012) Chlamydia trachomatis Antigens Recognized by Women With Tubal Factor Infertility, Normal Fertility, and Acute Infection.Obstet Gynecol 119: 1009-1016.
  2. Morrison RP, Caldwell HD (2002) Immunity to murine chlamydial genital infection. Infect Immun 70: 2741-2751.
  3. Shah AA, Schripsema JH, Imtiaz MT, Sigar IM, Kasimos J, et al. (2005) Histopathologic changes related to fibrotic oviduct occlusion after genital tract infection of mice with Chlamydia muridarum. Sex Transm Dis 32: 49-56.
  4. De la Maza LM, Peterson EM (2002) Vaccines for Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 3: 980-986.
  5. Murthy AK, Li W, Chaganty BK, Kamalakaran S, Guentzel MN, et al (2011) Tumor necrosis factor alpha production from CD8 T cells mediates oviduct pathological sequelae following primary genital Chlamydia muridarum infection. Infect Immun 79: 2928-2035.
  6. Rockey DD, Wang J, Lei L, Zhong G (2009) Chlamydia vaccine candidates and tools for chlamydial antigen discovery. Expert Rev Vaccines 8: 1365-1377.
  7. O’Connell CM, Ingalls RR, Andrews CW Jr, Scurlock AM, Darville T (2007) Plasmid-deficient Chlamydia muridarum fail to induce immune pathology and protect against oviduct disease. J Immunol 179: 4027-4034.
  8. Lei L, Chen J, Hou S, Ding Y, Yang Z, et al. (2014) Reduced live organism recovery and lack of hydrosalpinx in mice infected with plasmid-free Chlamydia muridarum. Infect Immun 82: 983-992.
  9. De la Maza LM, Pal S, Khamesipour A, Peterson EM (1994) Intravaginal inoculation of mice with the Chlamydia trachomatis mouse pneumonitis biovar results in infertility. Infect Immun 62: 2094-2097.
  10. Li Z, Chen D, Zhong Y, Wang S, Zhong G (2008) The chlamydial plasmid-encoded protein pgp3 is secreted into the cytosol of Chlamydia-infected cells.Infect Immun 76: 3415-3428.
  11. Thomas NS, Lusher M, Storey CC, Clarke IN (1997) Plasmid diversity in Chlamydia.Microbiology 143: 1847-1854.
  12. Kari L, Goheen MM, Randall LB, Taylor LD, Carlson JH, et al. (2011) Generation of targeted Chlamydia trachomatis null mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 7189-7193.
  13. Pearce BJ, Fahr MJ, Hatch TP, Sriprakash KS (1991) A chlamydial plasmid is differentially transcribed during the life cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis.Plasmid26: 116-122.
  14. Song L, Carlson JH, Whitmire WM, Kari L, Virtaneva K, et al. (2013) Chlamydia trachomatis plasmid-encoded Pgp4 is a transcriptional regulator of virulence-associated genes.Infect Immun 81: 636-644
  15. Gong S, Yang Z, Lei L, Shen L, Zhong G (2013) Characterization of Chlamydia trachomatis plasmid-encoded open reading frames.J Bacteriol 195: 3819-3826.
  16. Liu Y, Chen C, Gong S, Hou S, Qi M, et al. (2014) Transformation of Chlamydia muridarum reveals a role for Pgp5 in suppression of plasmid-dependent gene expression. J Bacteriol 196: 989-998.
  17. Liu Y, Huang Y, Yang Z, Sun Y, Gong S, et al. (2014) Plasmid-encoded Pgp3 is a major virulence factor for Chlamydia muridarum to induce hydrosalpinx in mice. Infect Immun 82: 5327-5335.
  18. Ramsey KH, Schripsema JH, Smith BJ, Wang Y, Jham BC, et al. (2014) Plasmid CDS5 influences infectivity and virulence in a mouse model of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital infection.Infect Immun 82: 3341-3349.
  19. Chen J, Zhang H, Zhou Z, Yang Z, Ding Y, et al. (2014) Chlamydial induction of hydrosalpinx in 11 strains of mice reveals multiple host mechanisms for preventing upper genital tract pathology.PloS One9: e95076.
  20. Carlson JH, Whitmire WM, Crane DD, Wicke L, Virtaneva K, et al. (2008) The Chlamydia trachomatis plasmid is a transcriptional regulator of chromosomal genes and a virulence factor. Infect Immun 76: 2273-2283.
  21. Li Z, Zhong Y, Lei L, Wu Y, Wang S, et al. (2008) Antibodies from women urogenitally infected with C. trachomatis predominantly recognized the plasmid protein pgp3 in a conformation-dependent manner. BMC Microbiol 8: 90-95.
  22. Wang J, Zhang Y, Lu C, Lei L, Yu P, et al. (2010) A genome-wide profiling of the humoral immune response to Chlamydia trachomatis infection reveals vaccine candidate antigens expressed in humans. J Immunol 185: 1670-1680.
  23. Lu C, Zeng H, Li Z, Lei L, Yeh IT, et al. (2012) Protective immunity against mouse upper genital tract pathology correlates with high IFN gamma but low IL-17 T cell and anti-secretion protein antibody responses induced by replicating chlamydial organisms in the airway. Vaccine 30: 475-485.
  24. Chen D, Lei L, Lu C, Galaleldeen A, Hart PJ, et al. (2010) Characterization of Pgp3, a Chlamydia trachomatis plasmid-encoded immunodominant antigen. J. Bacteriol 192: 6017-6024.
  25. Galaleldeen A, Taylor AB, Chen D, Schuermann JP, Holloway SP, et al. (2013) Structure of the Chlamydia trachomatis immunodominant antigen Pgp3. J Biol Chem 288: 22068-22079.
  26. Kościuczuk EM, Lisowski P, Jarczak J, Strzałkowska N, Jóźwik A, et al. (2012) Cathelicidins: family of antimicrobial peptides. A review. Mol Biol Rep39: 10957-10970.
  27. Anaya-López, JL, López-Meza JE, Ochoa-Zarzosa A (2013) Bacterial resistance to cationic antimicrobial peptides. Crit Rev Microbiol 39: 180-195.
  28. Gallo RL, Hooper LV (2012) Epithelial antimicrobial defence of the skin and intestine. Nat Rev Immunol 12: 503-516.
  29. Choi KY, Chow LN, Mookherjee N (2012) Cationic host defence peptides: multifaceted role in immune modulation and inflammation.J Innate Immun4: 361-370.
  30. Gallo RL, Kim KJ, Bernfield M, Kozak CA, Zanetti M, et al. (1997) Identification of CRAMP, a cathelin-related antimicrobial peptide expressed in the embryonic and adult mouse.J Biol Chem 272: 13088-13093.
  31. Korting HC, Schöllmann C, Stauss-Grabo M, Schäfer-Korting M (2012) Antimicrobial peptides and skin: a paradigm of translational medicine.Skin Pharmacol Physiol 25: 323-334.
  32. Hybiske K, Stephens RS (2007) Mechanisms of host cell exit by the intracellular bacterium Chlamydia.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 11430-11435.
  33. Hou S, Dong X, Yang Z, Li Z, Liu Q, et al. (2015) Chlamydial plasmid-encoded virulence factor Pgp3 neutralizes the antichlamydial activity of human cathelicidin LL-37.Infect Immun 83: 4701-4709.
  34. Chen L, Lei L, Chang X, Li Z, Lu C, et al. (2010) Mice deficient in MyD88 Develop a Th2-dominant response and severe pathology in the upper genital tract following Chlamydia muridarum infection.J Immunol 184: 2602-2610.
  35. Frazer LC, Sullivan JE, Zurenski MA, Mintus M, Tomasak TE, et al. (2013) CD4+ T cell expression of MyD88 is essential for normal resolution of Chlamydia muridarum genital tract infection.J Immunol 191: 4269-4279.
  36. Tang L, Chen J, Zhou Z, Yu P, Yang Z, et al. (2015) Chlamydia-secreted protease CPAF degrades host antimicrobial peptides.Microbes Infect 17: 402-408.
  37. Frick IM, Åkesson P, Rasmussen M, Schmidtchen A, Björck L (2003) SIC, a Secreted Protein of Streptococcus pyogenes That Inactivates Antibacterial Peptides.J Biol Chem 278: 16561-16566.
  38. Frick IM, Shannon O, Åkesson P, Mörgelin M, Collin M, et al. (2011) Antibacterial activity of the contact and complement systems is blocked by SIC, a protein secreted by Streptococcus pyogenes.J Biol Chem286: 1331-1340.
  39. Diacovich L, Gorvel JP (2010) Bacterial manipulation of innate immunity to promote infection.Nat Rev Microbiol 8: 117-128.
  40. Potempa J, Pike RN (2009) Corruption of innate immunity by bacterial proteases.J Innate Immun 1: 70-87.
  41. Schmidtchen A, Frick IM, Andersson E, Tapper H, Björck L (2002) Proteinases of common pathogenic bacteria degrade and inactivate the antibacterial peptide LL 37.Mol Microbiol 46: 157-168.
  42. Karlsson C, Andersson ML, Collin M, Schmidtchen A, Björck L, et al. (2007) SufA–a novel subtilisin-like serine proteinase of Finegoldia magna.Microbiology153: 4208-4218.
  43. Warner N, Núñez G (2013) MyD88: a critical adaptor protein in innate immunity signal transduction.J Immunol 190: 3-4.
  44. Campbell J, Huang Y, Liu Y, Schenken R, Arulanandam B, et al. (2014) Bioluminescence imaging of Chlamydia muridarum ascending infection in mice. Plos One 9: e101634.
  45. Zhang Y, Shao L, Li X, Zhong G (2017) Uterotubal junction prevents chlamydial ascension via innate immunity. PloS One 12: e0183189.
  46. Shao L, Zhang T, Melero J, Huang Y, Liu Y, et al. (2017) The genital tract virulence factor pGP3 is essential for Chlamydia muridarum colonization in the gastrointestinal tract.Infect Immun 86: e00429-e00517.
  47. Wang L, Zhu C, Zhang T, Tian Q, Zhang N, et al. (2017) Non-pathogenic colonization with Chlamydia in the gastrointestinal tract as oral vaccination for inducing transmucosal protection. Infect Immun pii: IAI.00630-00717.
Top