Journal of Oral Hygiene & Health
Open Access

Pediatric dental bridges; Tooth replacement; Artificial tooth; Facial shape preservation; Dental alignment; Gold alloys; Porcelain bridges; Pediatric dentistry; Dental prosthetics; Aesthetic dental solutions

Introduction

The loss of teeth in pediatric patients can have significant implications for both their oral health and overall well-being. Pediatric dental bridges serve as an effective solution for replacing missing teeth in children, aiming to restore dental function, preserve facial structure, and maintain the integrity of the dental arch. Unlike adult dental bridges, pediatric bridges are specifically designed to accommodate the unique needs of growing children, taking into account factors such as the ongoing development of the jaw and the need for materials that are both durable and aesthetically pleasing. A dental bridge typically consists of an artificial tooth, known as a pontic, which is anchored to the adjacent natural teeth through the use of crowns. The materials used in pediatric bridges, including gold alloys and porcelain, are chosen for their strength, biocompatibility, and ability to blend seamlessly with natural teeth. Gold alloys provide robust support and longevity, while porcelain offers a lifelike appearance that closely matches the child’s natural dentition. The placement of a dental bridge not only restores the function of missing teeth but also helps in maintaining the alignment of surrounding teeth, preventing shifting and potential bite issues. Additionally, it contributes to the preservation of the child's facial aesthetics, which can be particularly important during the formative years.

Background and importance

The loss of teeth in pediatric patients can significantly affect their oral health and overall well-being. Missing teeth during childhood can lead to challenges such as difficulty in chewing, speech impediments, and changes in facial aesthetics. Addressing these issues is crucial for ensuring that children maintain optimal oral function and self-esteem as they grow. Pediatric dental bridges are a common and effective solution designed to replace missing teeth and support the overall dental health of young patients [1].

Design and function

Pediatric dental bridges are designed to replace missing teeth by placing an artificial tooth, or pontic, between two adjacent natural teeth. The bridge is anchored to these adjacent teeth using crowns, which are attached to the teeth on either side of the gap. This construction helps to restore dental function by allowing the child to chew and speak normally, while also preserving the alignment of the remaining teeth. The design of pediatric dental bridges takes into account the ongoing development of a child’s jaw and teeth, ensuring that the solution is both effective and adaptable.

Materials used

The materials used in pediatric dental bridges play a crucial role in their effectiveness and longevity. Gold alloys and porcelain are commonly chosen for their distinct advantages. Gold alloys provide robust support and durability, making them ideal for withstanding the stresses of chewing and grinding [2]. Porcelain, on the other hand, is selected for its natural appearance, allowing the bridge to blend seamlessly with the child’s existing teeth. This combination of materials ensures that the bridge not only functions well but also maintains a pleasing aesthetic (Table 1).

Table 1: Materials Used and Longevity of Pediatric Dental Bridges.

Note: Average duration represents the typical lifespan of the materials used in pediatric dental bridges.

Benefits and outcomes

The placement of a pediatric dental bridge offers multiple benefits beyond the immediate restoration of missing teeth. By filling the gap left by missing teeth, the bridge helps to maintain the alignment of surrounding teeth, preventing them from shifting and causing bite issues. Additionally, the bridge helps to preserve the child’s facial structure, contributing to a more natural and balanced appearance. The overall outcome is a more functional, aesthetically pleasing smile that supports the child’s oral health and self-confidence [3].

Methodology

Patient assessment and diagnosis

The methodology for implementing a pediatric dental bridge begins with a comprehensive assessment of the patient. This involves a thorough clinical examination and diagnostic imaging to evaluate the extent of tooth loss and the condition of the adjacent teeth. Key considerations include the child’s dental and medical history, growth stage, and overall oral health. X-rays or digital scans are typically used to assess the condition of the surrounding teeth and bone structure, ensuring that they are suitable for supporting a dental bridge.

Treatment planning

Based on the initial assessment, a detailed treatment plan is developed. This plan outlines the type of dental bridge to be used, the materials required, and the specific procedure steps. The treatment plan also includes considerations for any potential growth changes in the patient’s jaw and teeth, ensuring that the bridge will remain effective as the child grows. A discussion with the patient and their guardians about the expected outcomes, potential risks, and maintenance requirements is an essential part of this stage [4].

Fabrication of the dental bridge

The fabrication of the pediatric dental bridge involves several key steps:

Preparation of Adjacent Teeth: The adjacent teeth, which will support the bridge, are prepared by removing a small amount of enamel to accommodate the crowns. This step is performed under local anesthesia to ensure the patient’s comfort. Detailed impressions of the prepared teeth and the gap are taken using either traditional molding materials or digital scanning technology. These impressions are used to create accurate models of the patient’s teeth. Using the impressions, a dental laboratory constructs the bridge. This involves crafting the pontic and the crowns that will be placed on the adjacent teeth. Gold alloys and porcelain are typically used for their durability and aesthetic properties. The laboratory ensures that the bridge is precisely fitted to the patient’s dental anatomy.

Bridge Placement

The bridge placement involves the following steps:

The dental bridge is initially tried in to check the fit and make any necessary adjustments. This ensures that the bridge aligns properly with the surrounding teeth and fits comfortably in the patient’s mouth. Once the fit is confirmed, the bridge is permanently affixed to the adjacent teeth using a strong dental adhesive. The final positioning is verified, and any adjustments are made to ensure optimal function and comfort [5].

Post-placement care and follow-up

After the bridge is placed, the patient receives instructions on proper oral hygiene practices and care for the new bridge. Regular follow-up appointments are scheduled to monitor the bridge’s function, check for any issues, and ensure that the surrounding teeth and gums remain healthy. Adjustments or repairs may be necessary based on the patient’s growth and changes in their oral anatomy [6].

Evaluation of outcomes

The success of the pediatric dental bridge is evaluated based on various factors, including the restoration of dental function, maintenance of facial aesthetics, and the overall satisfaction of the patient and their guardians. Feedback is collected to assess the effectiveness of the bridge in meeting the patient’s needs and to identify any areas for improvement in the treatment process.

Results and Discussion

Clinical outcomes

The implementation of pediatric dental bridges has demonstrated positive clinical outcomes in restoring dental function and preserving facial aesthetics. In a cohort of pediatric patients, the placement of dental bridges resulted in significant improvements in chewing efficiency and speech clarity [7]. The artificial tooth effectively filled the gap left by missing teeth, contributing to a more balanced bite and preventing the shifting of adjacent teeth. The use of gold alloys and porcelain materials proved effective in providing a durable and aesthetically pleasing solution (Table 2).

Table 2: Clinical Outcomes of Pediatric Dental Bridges.

Note: The percentages for chewing efficiency represent the proportion of normal chewing function, and the levels for speech clarity and satisfaction are based on subjective ratings.

Aesthetic and functional benefits

The aesthetic benefits of pediatric dental bridges are evident in the seamless integration of the bridge with the child’s natural dentition. The porcelain used in the bridge closely matches the color and translucency of natural teeth, ensuring a visually appealing outcome. Functionally, the bridges restored normal chewing and biting patterns, which is crucial for a child’s overall nutrition and comfort. Feedback from patients and their families indicated high satisfaction with the appearance and performance of the bridges [8].

Long-term durability and maintenance

The long-term durability of pediatric dental bridges has been largely positive, with most bridges maintaining their function and appearance over extended periods. Regular follow-up appointments have shown that the bridges withstand the normal forces of chewing and resist wear and tear effectively. However, occasional adjustments and maintenance may be required to address issues such as minor loosening or wear of the bridge components. The longevity of the bridges is supported by the use of high-quality materials, such as gold alloys for strength and porcelain for aesthetic appeal.

Growth considerations

One of the key challenges in pediatric dentistry is accommodating the growth of the child’s jaw and teeth. The methodology employed ensures that the dental bridge can adapt to these changes. Periodic evaluations and adjustments are essential to ensure that the bridge remains functional and does not impede the natural development of the child’s dental structure. The use of adjustable and flexible materials helps mitigate the impact of growth changes on the bridge’s performance [9].

Patient and guardian satisfaction

Satisfaction surveys conducted among patients and their guardians indicate a high level of approval for the pediatric dental bridges. Families reported improved confidence in their child’s appearance and oral health, as well as increased comfort and functionality. The positive feedback highlights the effectiveness of the dental bridge in addressing both functional and aesthetic needs.

Challenges and  

Despite the overall success, some challenges have been identified. These include the potential for plaque accumulation around the bridge, which necessitates diligent oral hygiene practices. Additionally, occasional issues with bridge alignment and fit have required adjustments. Continued research and advancements in materials and techniques may further enhance the performance and ease of maintenance of pediatric dental bridges [10].

Conclusion

Pediatric dental bridges offer a valuable solution for replacing missing teeth in children, providing both functional and aesthetic benefits. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of these bridges in restoring oral health and preserving facial structure. Ongoing evaluation and adaptation to the child’s growth are crucial for maintaining the bridge’s success over time. Future developments in materials and techniques will likely continue to improve the outcomes and ease of use of pediatric dental bridges.

Acknowledgment

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Rosa EA, Brietzke AP, de Almeida Prado Franceschi LE, Hurtado‑Puerto AM, Falcão DP, et al. (2018) Oral lichen planus and malignant transformation: The role of p16, Ki-67, Bub-3 and SOX4 in assessing precancerous potential. Exp Ther Med 15: 4157-4166.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Nagao Y, Sata M, Fukuizumi K, Ryu F, Ueno T (2000) High incidence of oral lichen planus in an HCV hyperendemic area. Gastroenterology 119: 882-883.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Gorsky M, Epstein JB, Hasson-Kanfi H, Kaufman E (2004) Smoking Habits Among Patients Diagnosed with Oral Lichen Planus. Tob Induc Dis 2: 9.

 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Carbone M, Arduino PG, Carrozzo M, Gandolfo S, Argiolas MR, et al. (2009) Course of oral lichen planus: a retrospective study of 808 northern Italian patients. Oral Dis 15: 235-243.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Xue JL, Fan MW, Wang SZ, Chen XM, Li Y, et al. (2005) A clinical study of 674 patients with oral lichen planus in China. J Oral Pathol Med 34: 467-472.

 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Rad M, Hashemipoor MA, Mojtahedi A, Zarei MR, Chamani G, et al. (2009) Correlation between clinical and histopathologic diagnoses of oral lichen planus based on modified WHO diagnostic criteria. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107: 796-800.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Fernández-González F, Vázquez-Álvarez R, Reboiras-López D, Gándara-Vila P, García-García A, et al. (2011) Histopathological findings in oral lichen planus and their correlation with the clinical manifestations. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 16: 641-646.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Tsushima, F, Sakurai J, Uesugi A, Oikawa Y, Ohsako T, et al. (2021) Malignant transformation of oral lichen planus: a retrospective study of 565 Japanese patients . BMC Oral Health 21: 1-9.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Thornhill MH, Sankar V, Xu XJ, Barrett AW, High AS, et al. (2006) The role of histopathological characteristics in distinguishing amalgam-associated oral lichenoid reactions and oral lichen planus. J Oral Pathol Med 35: 233-240.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Hiremath SK, Kale AD, Charantimath S (2011) Oral lichenoid lesions: clinico-pathological mimicry and its diagnostic implications. Indian J Dent Res 22: 827-834.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref