Journal of Paediatric Medicine & Surgery
Open Access

Mild contortion of cortical development; Pediatric epilepsy surgery; Intractable epilepsy

Introduction

According to Palmini’s bracket, the presence of “redundant” heterotopic neurons in the molecular subcase or white matter is classified as mild contortion of cortical development (mMCD). Redundant heterotopic neurons in white matter are a frequent pathological finding in numerous epilepsy surgery samples, either in insulation or near the epileptogenic lesion. Still, no exact pathomechanistic suppositions have arisen from this observation, and its part in the occasion of epilepsy is debatable. A many studies relating mMCD findings with clinical parameters have had small sample sizes and report inconsistent result. Thus, the International League against Epilepsy (ILAE) laid over their decision to include mMCD in the bracket of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) in.

Over the last decade in our center, we observed clinical features of cases with refractory epilepsy but veritably subtle neuropath logical findings in surgical samples. mMCD reckoned for 33 of cases who were pathologically diagnosed with mMCD, FCD I, II, orIII.12 These cases showed not only clinical donations of severe epilepsy but also surgical issues and longitudinal seizure control patterns after surgery that differed from those of cases with other forms of cortical contortion or adult mMCD cases with temporal lesions.

Then, we performed an experimental study to give farther sapience into the clinical features and surgical issues of pediatric cases with pathologically verified mMCD with the end of perfecting patient selection and relating optimal surgical interventions for this patient population [2-3].

Materials and Method

Cases and data collection

We linked 40 cases with pathologically verified mMCD at Severance Children’s Sanitarium in Seoul, Korea, from September 2003 to September 2015. All cases’ symptoms were medically intractable to further than two antiepileptic medicines (AEDs) with or without a ketogenic diet and were followed up for further than 3 times after surgery.

Standard protocol blessing

Presurgical evaluation

Presurgical evaluation included videotape EEG monitoring, MRI, PET, and interictal single- photon emigration motorized tomography (SPECT). The standard MRI was performed with conventional spin – echo T1- ladened sagittal, T2- ladened axial, coronal, faculty axial, and faculty coronal sequences. High- resolution T1- ladened threedimensional (3D) images have been added since 2006, and highresolution 3D faculty sequences have been added since 2010. Fresh tests, including fMRI, prolixity tensor imaging and fibre tractography, and ictal SPECT, were performed in named cases depending on feasibility.

Pathological analysis

A neuropathologist (S.H. Kim) re-evaluated mMCD according to Palmini’s and 2011 ILAE groups. Ectopic neurons that are immunohistochemically linked by NeuN in the white matter were semiquantitatively estimated when located a minimum of0.5 mm down from the argentine/ white matter discrimination, and ectopic neurons with redundant 20 cells/ mm2 were diagnosed as mMCD. Cases with associated pathologic lesions similar as FCD, benign experimental excrescence, and traumatic brain lesions due to head trauma, stroke, or infections were barred. When towel samples from multilobar resections were attained, each lobe was independently examined [4-5].

Neuropsychological assessment

Neuropsychological assessments were carried out using formalized tools, including the Bayley Scales of Infant Development and ageapplicable Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children, depending on patient age and cognitive capability. We calculated experimental quotient (experimental age/ chronological age × 100) or IQ defined scores 70 as intellectual disability.

Seizure outgrowth and postoperative seizure control pattern

We assessed seizure outgrowth annually according to ILAE groups as follows Class 1, fully seizure-free, no ambiences ; Class 2, only ambiences , no seizures; Class 3, 1 – 3 seizure days per time with or without ambiences ; Class 4, 4 seizure days per time to 50 reduction in birth seizure days with or without ambiences ; Class 5,= 50 reduction in birth seizure days to 100 increase in birth seizure days with or without ambiences ; and Class 6,= 100 increase in birth seizure days with or without ambiences . We also assessed the postoperative seizure control pattern according to the Neal etal. groups but modified it as follows Pattern A, no postoperative seizures; Pattern B (i.e., early seizure control), seizures only during the first 6 months postoperatively; Pattern C (i.e., shifting seizure control pattern), seizure control changed and was interspersed with absolution period (s) lasting at least 3 months; and Pattern D, seizures being at least yearly postoperatively with no ages of absolution.

Postoperative EEG findings

We distributed postoperative EEG findings as follows Grade 1, normal interictal EEG; Grade 2, focal epileptic discharges or bursts of slow swells in remaining operated lesions, including secondary coincidence; Grade 3, epileptiform discharge or bursts of slow swells in multifocal areas; and Grade 4, generalized slow shaft- surge (GSSW), generalized ferocious fast exertion( GPFA), or electrodecrement [6-7].

Discussion

This study characterized the clinical features, surgical outgrowth, and seizure control patterns of a large number of pediatric cases with verified mMCD. Early onset of seizures generalised or multifocal interictal EEG abnormalities, a significant likelihood of intellectual disability, and multilobar lesions were all related with this illness. Further than half (67.5) of cases presented with nonage- onset EE similar as West pattern or LGS, suggesting FCD type I and type IIa. Therefore, mMCD is associated with a significant degree of epileptogenicity, and its features differ from those seen in cases with focal epilepsy, which have circumscribed and well- located FCD pathology.

An early report questioned the certainty of mMCD with negative MRI finding, 4 and clinical inflexibility is milder for mMCD than for other forms of pathology similar as FCD type II, with seizure freedom set up in 63 of mMCD cases. Last time, another study compared clinical features and seizure issues between mMCD and FCD cases. The high proportion of mMCD cases in their surgical cohort and rate of negative MRI lesions among mMCD cases were analogous to those in our study, but their clinical donations differed, again suggesting those seen in a former mMCD study. An explanation for the disagreement between former and present studies might be because the former studies substantially included grown-ups with unilobar temporal resection. That is, our pediatric mMCD cohort may be clinically different than preliminarily described cohorts of adult mMCD cases with temporal preference. Who linked mMCD as an essential pathological finding associated with a significant degree of epileptogenicity and reported a 52 rate of seizure freedom among pediatric epilepsy surgery cases.10 therefore; the disagreement between adult and pediatric studies may be related to differences in brain development or epileptogenic neuronal networks. For illustration, the establishment of an epileptogenic network at an early stage of brain development may affect in more wide vulnerability to seizures [8-9].

The presence of mMCD poses challenges to surgery because the signs of focal abnormality aren't incontinently apparent in MRI, particularly in veritably youthful age groups. We endured difficulties in directly diagnosing lesions due to a high rate of negative MRI lesions and subtle pattern of MRI findings constantly observed at the argentinewhite matter junction, which is affected by myelination status. The crucial findings from our MRI results were (1) a high proportion of negative or subtle lesions, suggesting that we attained only a regard of the abnormality, and (2) blurred boundaries at the argentinewhite matter junction. Although there are many descriptions of MRI features of mMCD or the recently honoured complaint reality “mild contortion of cortical development with oligodendroglia hyperplasia and epilepsy” (MOGHE), which shares analogous pathological findings with mMCD, our results are harmonious with those of former studies. In particular, coronal slices in which the lesion appeared in the anterior-posterior axis helped depict the blurred boundaries toward white matter in further detail compared with axial slices. Therefore, considering both the myelination process in youthful smarts and the pattern of subtle MRI abnormalities in coronal slices in radial sequence could ameliorate the yield of MRI positivity, which would help identify surgical campaigners [10].

Conclusion

Being lower of a suggestion for surgery, characterization of mMCD was likely deficient in terms of pathology, clinical profile, and treatment plan. This study linked mMCD in children as an important pathologic finding related to a significant degree of epileptogenicity, with resective surgery furnishing positive issues. Still, as these cases showed an unstable postsurgical control pattern, treatment of their intractable epilepsy poses remaining challenges, and fresh longitudinal studies are demanded to achieve the most salutary issues.

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to expose. We confirm that we've read the Journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is harmonious with those guidelines.

1. Evgeniou E, Loizou P (2013) Simulation-based surgical education. ANZ J Surg 83:619-23.

Indexed at , Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Wignall GR, Denstedt JD, Preminger GM, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS, et al. (2008). Surgical simulation: a urological perspective. J Urol 179:1690-1699

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Tavakol M, Mohagheghi MA, Dennick R (2008) Assessing the skills of surgical residents using simulation. J Surg Educ 65:77-83.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Tan SS, Sarker SK (2011)   Simulation in surgery: a review. Scott Med J 56:104-109.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Khan R, Scaffidi MA, Grover SC, Gimpaya N, Walsh CM, et al. (2019)  Simulation in endoscopy: Practical educational strategies to improve learning. World J Gastrointest Endosc 11:209-218.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Sadideen H, Alvand A, Saadeddin M, Kneebone R (2013) surgical experts: born or made? Int J Surg 11:773-8.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Camargo C, Gonçalves J, Rodríguez-Sedano FJ, Costa P, García-Peñalvo FJ, et al. (2021) Systematic Literature Review of Realistic Simulators Applied in Educational Robotics Context. Sensors  21-12:4031

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Robb HD, Scrimgeour G, Boshier PR, Balyasnikova S, Brown G, et al. ( 2021)  Current and possible future role of 3D modelling within oesophagogastric surgery: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 11:045546.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Moxley A, Baxter L, White P (2019) Improving medical student preparedness for practice in line with the General Medical Council's outcomes for graduates: a pilot study. Future Healthc J 6:18-19.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Ferguson J, Middleton R, Alvand A, Rees J (2017)  Newly acquired arthroscopic skills: Are they transferable during simulator training of other joints? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Atheros 25:608-615.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref