Patients and their Caretakers Outcomes for Cancer Therapy Optimization
Received: 01-Apr-2023 / Manuscript No. jpcm-23-96617 / Editor assigned: 03-Apr-2023 / PreQC No. jpcm-23-96617 (PQ) / Reviewed: 17-Apr-2023 / QC No. jpcm-23-96617 / Revised: 21-Apr-2023 / Manuscript No. jpcm-23-96617(R) / Accepted Date: 27-Apr-2023 / Published Date: 28-Apr-2023 DOI: 10.4172/2165-7386.1000519
Introduction
In patients with advanced disease, palliative care should be incorporated into oncology practise, according to a growing body of research that has developed over the previous ten years. What is the best model of delivery, when is the best time to refer, who needs a referral the most, and how much palliative care should oncologists themselves be delivering are the questions that need to be answered instead of whether palliative care should be provided. Given the lack of palliative care resources globally, these inquiries are especially pertinent. We will first go through recent research exploring the effects of specialised palliative care on various health outcomes in this stateof- the-science review for practising cancer clinicians. After that, we will offer conceptual frameworks to promote coordinated, timely, and focused palliative treatment. The multidisciplinary team members of team-based palliative care are able to fully meet the complex care requirements of patients and their carers. The finest kind of timely palliative care aims to avert crises towards the end of life. Similar to targeted cancer medicines, focused palliative care entails selecting patients who are most likely to benefit from specialised palliative care measures. Last but not least, we will list the advantages and disadvantages of cutting-edge care delivery models such automated referral, embedded clinics, nurse-led palliative care, primary palliative care offered by oncology teams, and outpatient clinics. Further study is required to understand how various health systems may effectively personalise palliative care to deliver the appropriate amount of assistance to the appropriate patient in the appropriate place at the appropriate time.
Despite tremendous advancements in cancer therapies over the past few decades, morbidity and death among cancer patients remain high [1]. According to cross-sectional research, the average cancer patient has 8 to 12 symptoms, many of which go undiagnosed and untreated [2,3]. These patients frequently have unmet requirements for supportive care in addition to the physical symptom load, such as psychological distress and a desire for health knowledge and care planning. The fact that cancer incidence is rising globally due to an ageing population and that many patients with advanced cancer are living longer with an incurable illness due to increasingly potent cancer treatments further highlights the need for supportive care [4,5]. Oncologists have always been a major player in the provision of supportive care. Many doctors view supportive care as a crucial facet of cancer treatment and find joy in giving it [6,7]. Oncologists, who work in the front lines of cancer care, are frequently involved in treating side effects from therapy, talking about prognosis, enabling end-of-life talks, and referring patients to other disciplines. However, there are big differences in how oncologists suggest patients for supportive care and palliative care. It becomes more and more difficult for the oncology team to fully address supportive care demands as a result of the cancer treatment landscape becoming more complicated and busy clinics [8-11]. While this is happening, regular symptom distress screening is revealing even more cancer patients who require supportive care. As a result of a rapidly expanding body of knowledge and research, supportive care is also becoming more specialised in and of itself [12- 15]. Data outlining ideal primary palliative care delivery strategies by cancer teams alone are few. Oncology clinic nurses who have received training in a care management intervention that facilitates symptom assessment, participates in ACP, offers emotional support to patients and carers, and facilitates communication with other oncology team members were used in a pilot research. Patients, relatives, and oncologists found this paradigm to be workable and acceptable; a cluster RCT of this intervention is under underway. It should be noted that several RCTs showing increased quality of life when a palliative care team was also engaged used care provided by oncology teams alone as the control arm.
Acknowledgement
Not applicable.
Conflict of Interest
Author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2018) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 68:7-30.
- Portenoy RK, Thaler HT, Kornblith AB, Lepore JM, Friedlander-Klar H, et al. (1994) Symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress in a cancer population. Qual Life Res 3:183-189.
- Chang VT, Hwang SS, Feuerman M, Kasimis BS (2000) Symptom and quality of life survey of medical oncology patients at a veterans affairs medical center: a role for symptom assessment. Cancer 88:1175-1183.
- Whelan TJ, Mohide EA, Willan AR, Arnold A, Tew M, et al. (1997) The supportive care needs of newly diagnosed cancer patients attending a regional cancer center. Cancer 80:1518-1524.
- Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, Hamavid H, Moradi-Lakeh M, et al. (2015) The Global Burden of Cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol 1:505-527.
- Cherny NI, Catane R (2003) Attitudes of medical oncologists toward palliative care for patients with advanced and incurable cancer. Cancer 98:2502-2510.
- Hui D, Cerana MA, Park M, Hess K, Bruera E (2016) Impact of Oncologists’Attitudes Toward End-of-Life Care on Patients’ Access to Palliative Care. Oncologist 21:1149-1155.
- Bruera E, Hui D (2010) Integrating supportive and palliative care in the trajectory of cancer: Establishing goals and models of care. J Clin Oncol 28:4013-4017.
- Hui D, Kim SH, Kwon JH, Tanco KC, Zhang T, et al. (2012) Access to palliative care among patients treated at a comprehensive cancer center. Oncologist 17:1574-1580.
- Schenker Y, Crowley-Matoka M, Dohan D, Rabow MW, Smith CB, et al. (2013) Oncologist Factors That Influence Referrals to Subspecialty Palliative Care Clinics. J Oncol Pract 10:37-44.
- Hui D, Titus A, Curtis T, Ho-Nguyen VT, Frederickson D, et al. (2017) Implementation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System for Symptom Distress Screening at a Community Cancer Center: A Pilot Program. Oncologist 22:995-1001.
- Hui D, Parsons HA, Damani S, Fulton S, Liu J, Evans A, et al. (2011) Quantity, Design, and Scope of the Palliative Oncology Literature. Oncologist 16:694-1703.
- Temel JS, Greer JA, Admane S, Gallagher ER, Jackson VA, et al. (2011) Longitudinal perceptions of prognosis and goals of therapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a randomized study of early palliative care. J Clin Oncol 29:2319-2326.
- Greer JA, Pirl WF, Jackson VA, Muzikansky A, Lennes IT, et al.(2012) Effect of early palliative care on chemotherapy use and end-of-life care in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:394-400.
- Zimmermann C, Swami N, Krzyzanowska M, Hannon B, Leighl N, et al. (2014) Early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 383:1721-1730.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Citation: Faruq O (2023) Patients and their Caretakers Outcomes for CancerTherapy Optimization. J Palliat Care Med 13: 519. DOI: 10.4172/2165-7386.1000519
Copyright: © 2023 Faruq O. This is an open-access article distributed under theterms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricteduse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author andsource are credited.
Share This Article
Recommended Conferences
42nd Global Conference on Nursing Care & Patient Safety
Toronto, CanadaRecommended Journals
Open Access Journals
Article Tools
Article Usage
- Total views: 971
- [From(publication date): 0-2023 - Jan 27, 2025]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 877
- PDF downloads: 94