Journal of Obesity and Metabolism
Open Access

Obesity; Patient perceptions; Integrated care; Chronic diseases; Holistic Approach; Healthcare management

Introduction

Obesity represents a multifaceted health challenge with farreaching implications for individuals and healthcare systems globally [1]. Beyond its physical manifestations, obesity is intricately linked to a spectrum of chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disorders, diabetes, and metabolic syndromes. This introduction provides a contextual overview of the study, delving into the patient’s perspective on obesity management and the consideration of associations with other persistent illnesses. By exploring patient discernments, the aim is to inform healthcare strategies that holistically address both obesity and its interconnected comorbidities. Obesity has reached epidemic proportions worldwide, posing a significant public health concern. Its association with other chronic diseases amplifies the complexity of its management and necessitates a comprehensive healthcare approach. Chronic conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and metabolic syndromes often coexist with obesity [2], influencing disease progression and treatment outcomes.

While the clinical aspects of obesity and its associations with other chronic diseases are well-documented, understanding the patient’s perspective is crucial for developing patient-centered and effective healthcare strategies [3]. This study seeks to explore patient discernments, attitudes, and expectations regarding obesity management, particularly in the context of integrated care that addresses both obesity and concurrent chronic illnesses. The primary aim of this study is to elucidate patient perspectives on obesity management concerning the associative consideration for other persistent illnesses. Specific objectives include exploring patient awareness of the interconnections between obesity and chronic diseases, understanding challenges in managing these conditions separately, and examining the impact of integrated care on patient motivation and self-efficacy.

Obesity management strategies that incorporate the patient’s viewpoint and consider the associations with other chronic diseases are likely to be more effective and patient-centered [4 ]. The study’s findings may inform healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers in developing holistic and integrated care approaches that address the broader health context of individuals with obesity. A qualitative research design involving in-depth interviews was chosen to capture the richness and depth of patient perspectives. Participants, diagnosed with obesity and one or more chronic diseases, were recruited to ensure diverse insights reflecting varied health experiences.

The subsequent sections of the paper will present the study’s methodology, results, and discussions, providing a comprehensive exploration of patient discernments on obesity management in the context of associative consideration for other persistent illnesses. In summary, this study seeks to bridge the gap in understanding patient perspectives on obesity management within the broader framework of associated chronic diseases. By doing so [5], it aims to contribute valuable insights to the ongoing discourse on patient-centered healthcare strategies that address the complexities of obesity and its interconnected health implications.

Methods and Materials

A qualitative research design, specifically employing in-depth interviews, was chosen to explore the nuanced perspectives of patients regarding obesity management and its associations with other chronic diseases. Participants were recruited purposefully to ensure diversity in experiences. Inclusion criteria encompassed individuals diagnosed with obesity and at least one other chronic disease, such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, or metabolic syndromes. Recruitment occurred across various healthcare settings, including primary care clinics and specialty departments [6].

Prior to participation, all eligible individuals were provided with detailed information about the study’s purpose, procedures, and potential outcomes. Informed consent was obtained from each participant, ensuring voluntary and informed participation. Indepth interviews were conducted to allow participants to express their perceptions, experiences, and opinions openly. Interviews were semi-structured, guided by a set of open-ended questions designed to explore awareness of obesity-related chronic diseases, challenges in managing these conditions, and the impact of integrated care on patient perspectives. Probing questions were used to delve deeper into participants’ responses and uncover rich, qualitative data.

Sampling continued until data saturation was achieved, ensuring that no new themes or insights emerged from subsequent interviews. Saturation was monitored iteratively throughout the data collection process. Thematic analysis was employed to identify patterns [7], themes, and commonalities within the interview data. Initial coding involved categorizing responses into key themes related to patient perceptions of obesity management and its associations with other chronic diseases. Subsequent refinement of themes and interpretation of findings were conducted collaboratively by the research team. Rigor was maintained through methods such as member checking, where participants were given the opportunity to review and confirm the accuracy of their interview transcripts. Peer debriefing and regular team meetings were conducted to discuss emerging themes and ensure consistency in data interpretation.

Ethical approval was obtained from the relevant institutional review board, ensuring that the study adhered to ethical principles in research. Confidentiality and anonymity of participants were rigorously maintained throughout the study. The research team acknowledged and considered their own perspectives and potential biases during data collection and analysis to enhance the credibility and reflexivity of the study. The researchers maintained a reflexive stance, recognizing their own perspectives and potential influence on the research process. Reflexivity was achieved through ongoing reflection and transparent documentation of decisions made during the study. By employing a qualitative approach, this study aimed to capture the depth and complexity of patient discernments about obesity management in the context of other chronic diseases. The methodological rigor and ethical considerations ensured the trustworthiness of the findings, contributing to a nuanced understanding of the patient’s perspective in this critical healthcare domain.

Results and Discussions

Participants demonstrated a varied awareness of the associations between obesity and other chronic diseases. While some expressed a clear understanding of the interconnected nature of these health conditions, others exhibited limited awareness [8]. The variability in awareness underscores the importance of patient education initiatives that highlight the links between obesity and associated chronic diseases.Tailoring communication strategies based on individual health literacy levels may enhance overall awareness. Participants frequently highlighted challenges in managing obesity and other chronic conditions separately. Fragmented healthcare systems and communication gaps among healthcare providers were common concerns. The identified challenges emphasize the need for integrated care models that foster collaboration among healthcare professionals. Addressing both obesity and associated chronic diseases in a coordinated manner may enhance overall patient outcomes.

Participants who experienced integrated care that considered both obesity and other chronic diseases reported increased motivation for self-management. Recognizing the interconnectedness of their health conditions positively influenced their commitment to lifestyle modifications. Integrated care approaches align with a patient-centered model, acknowledging the holistic nature of health [9]. By addressing multiple health concerns simultaneously, healthcare providers can leverage patient motivation for improved adherence to treatment plans. Participants expressed heightened self-efficacy when receiving integrated care that considered both obesity and other chronic diseases. The perception of comprehensive support positively influenced their confidence in managing their health. Integrated care models contribute to patient empowerment by addressing the broader health context. Enhanced self-efficacy may lead to sustained lifestyle changes, contributing to better long-term health outcomes.

Patient experiences and perspectives varied widely, influenced by factors such as the severity of obesity, the specific chronic diseases involved, and individual coping mechanisms. Recognizing the heterogeneity in patient experiences underscores the importance of personalized care plans. Tailoring interventions based on individual needs and preferences may optimize the effectiveness of obesity management strategies. Participants expressed a preference for patientcentered care that considered their unique health circumstances. The desire for shared decision-making and collaborative care emerged as common themes.

The findings support the implementation of patient-centered care models that actively involve patients in decision-making processes. This approach fosters a sense of agency and ensures that care plans align with individual priorities and preferences. The study’s qualitative nature may limit generalizability, and the sample size could impact the breadth of perspectives captured. Future research could explore the experiences of specific subgroups, such as those with particular chronic diseases or diverse socioeconomic backgrounds, to provide a more nuanced understanding of patient discernments [10]. In conclusion, the results and discussions highlight the complex landscape of patient perceptions regarding obesity management and its associative consideration for other chronic diseases. Integrated care approaches that address the interconnected nature of health conditions emerge as pivotal in fostering patient awareness, motivation, and self-efficacy. The study underscores the importance of tailoring care strategies to individual needs and preferences to optimize patient outcomes in the context of obesity and associated chronic illnesses.

Conclusion

This qualitative study delving into patient discernments about obesity management in relation to associative consideration for other persistent diseases has provided valuable insights into the complex interplay between obesity and chronic health conditions. The findings underscore several key points that hold implications for healthcare practice, policy, and future research. The study revealed varying levels of awareness among patients regarding the associations between obesity and other chronic diseases. Enhancing patient education and promoting holistic awareness are critical components of effective obesity management. Healthcare providers should play a pivotal role in conveying the interconnected nature of health conditions to empower patients with knowledge. Participants consistently emphasized the challenges associated with managing obesity and other chronic diseases in isolation. Integrated care models that consider the holistic health of individuals emerged as influential in motivating patients and enhancing their self-efficacy. The study advocates for a shift towards comprehensive care strategies that address the broader health context. Patient-centered care was identified as a crucial aspect of successful obesity management. Participants expressed a desire for shared decision-making and collaborative care plans that acknowledge their unique health circumstances. Tailoring interventions based on individual needs and preferences is essential to optimize patient engagement and adherence. The study highlighted the variability in patient experiences influenced by factors such as the severity of obesity, specific chronic diseases, and individual coping mechanisms. Recognizing this heterogeneity is paramount for developing personalized and effective care strategies. The study’s findings have direct implications for healthcare practice, emphasizing the importance of integrated and patient-centered care approaches. Healthcare providers should consider obesity within the broader context of a patient’s health, actively involving them in decision-making processes to enhance motivation and self-efficacy.

The study suggests avenues for future research, including exploring the experiences of specific subgroups and conducting longitudinal studies to assess the long-term impact of integrated care models on patient outcomes. Additionally, investigating the role of digital health interventions in supporting holistic obesity management could be a promising area of exploration. In conclusion, the discernments shared by patients regarding obesity management highlight the need for a paradigm shift in healthcare approaches. Moving beyond isolated management of conditions, embracing integrated care models, and adopting patient-centered strategies are essential steps toward more effective and holistic obesity management. As the healthcare landscape evolves, understanding and integrating patient perspectives will be instrumental in shaping comprehensive and personalized approaches to address the challenges posed by obesity and its associations with other chronic diseases.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Kitabchi AE, Umpierrez GE, Miles JM, Fisher JN (2009) Hyperglycemic crises in adult patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 32: 1335-1343.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Puls HA, Haas NL, Franklin BJ, Theyyunni N, Harvey CE, et al. (2021) Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis associated with SGLT2i use: case series. Am J Emerg Med 44: 11-13.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Haas NL, Gianchandani RY, Gunnerson KJ, Bassin BS, Ganti A, et al. (2018) The two-bag method for treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis in adults. J Emerg Med 54: 593-599.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Zezza M, Kosinski C, Mekoguem C, Marino L, Chtioui H, et al. (2019) Combined immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab causing acute-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus following a single administration: two case reports. BMC Endocr Disord 19: 144.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Yoo MJ, Long B, Brady WJ, Holian A, Sudhir A, et al. (2021) Immune checkpoint inhibitors: an emergency medicine focused review. Am J Emerg Med 50: 335-344.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Mae S, Kuriyama A, Tachibana H (2021) Diabetic ketoacidosis as a delayed immune-related event after discontinuation of nivolumab. J Emerg Med 60: 342-344.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Godwin Jl, Jaggi S, Sirisena I, Sharda P, Rao AD, et al. (2017) Nivolumab-induced autoimmune diabetes mellitus presenting as diabetic ketoacidosis in a patient with metastatic lung cancer. J Immunothe Cancer 5: 40.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Kotwal A, Haddox C, Block M, Yogish C, Kudva YC, et al. (2019) Immune checkpoint inhibitors: an emerging cause of insulin-dependent diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res and Care 7: e000591.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Nikouline A, Brzozowski M (2021) New DKA in a geriatric patient on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a case report. CJEM 23: 712-714.

Indexed at, Gsoogle Scholar, Crossref

10. Maamari J, Yeung SCJ, Chaftari PS (2019) Diabetic ketoacidosis induced by a single dose of pembrolizumab. Am J Emerg Med 37: 376.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref