Journal of Cancer Diagnosis
Open Access

Pancreatic cancer; Diagnosis; Imaging techniques; Biomarkers; Histopathology; Computed Tomography (CT); Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS); Fine-needle aspiration (FNA); Immunohistochemistry; Next-generation sequencing (NGS); Liquid biopsy; Genetic predisposition; Artificial intelligence (AI)

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive and deadliest forms of cancer. Despite being less common than other types, it has a high mortality rate due to its typically late diagnosis and rapid progression. Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is crucial for improving the prognosis and survival rates [1]. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the various diagnostic methods and challenges associated with pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies, characterized by its silent progression and poor prognosis [2]. Accounting for approximately 3% of all cancers in the United States, it remains a formidable challenge due to its asymptomatic nature in the early stages and resistance to conventional therapies [3]. This aggressive cancer typically originates in the exocrine cells of the pancreas, with adenocarcinoma being the most common type [4]. Despite advances in medical technology and research, pancreatic cancer continues to have one of the lowest survival rates among all cancers, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 10% [5].

The pancreas plays a vital role in both endocrine and exocrine functions, contributing to the body's digestive processes and glucose metabolism [6]. Its deep location in the abdomen and complex anatomy further complicate early detection and surgical intervention. Symptoms often manifest only in the advanced stages, when the tumor has already metastasized to other organs, leading to a delayed diagnosis [7].

Early diagnosis is crucial for improving the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients. However, the current diagnostic tools and techniques often fail to detect the disease at a manageable stage [8]. This review aims to provide an in-depth overview of the various diagnostic modalities available for pancreatic cancer, exploring their strengths, limitations, and recent advancements. By understanding these diagnostic approaches, healthcare professionals can better navigate the complexities of this disease and potentially improve early detection and patient outcomes [9,10].

Understanding pancreatic cancer

The pancreas is a glandular organ located behind the stomach that plays a crucial role in digestion and blood sugar regulation. Pancreatic cancer occurs when malignant cells form in the tissues of the pancreas. The most common type is pancreatic adenocarcinoma, which originates in the exocrine cells responsible for producing digestive enzymes. Less common types include neuroendocrine tumors, which arise from the hormone-producing cells of the pancreas.

Symptoms and early detection

Pancreatic cancer is often asymptomatic in its early stages, making early detection challenging. When symptoms do appear, they can be nonspecific and easily attributed to other conditions. Common symptoms include:

• Jaundice (yellowing of the skin and eyes)
• Unexplained weight loss
• Abdominal pain that radiates to the back
• Loss of appetite
• Nausea and vomiting
• New-onset diabetes or worsening of existing diabetes

Due to the vague nature of these symptoms, patients often receive a diagnosis at an advanced stage when the cancer has already metastasized.

Diagnostic methods

Imaging techniques

Computed tomography (CT) scan: CT scans are commonly used to visualize the pancreas and surrounding structures. They provide detailed cross-sectional images that help identify tumors, determine their size, and assess the extent of spread to nearby organs and lymph nodes. CT scans with contrast enhancement are particularly useful in distinguishing pancreatic cancer from other conditions.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): MRI uses magnetic fields and radio waves to produce detailed images of the pancreas. It is particularly effective in evaluating soft tissues and detecting small tumors. MRI is often used when CT scans are inconclusive or when more precise imaging is needed.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS): EUS involves inserting a thin, flexible tube with an ultrasound probe into the stomach and duodenum to obtain high-resolution images of the pancreas. EUS allows for fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to collect tissue samples for biopsy, making it a valuable tool for both diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.

Positron emission tomography (PET) scan: PET scans involve injecting a small amount of radioactive glucose into the bloodstream. Cancer cells, which have a higher metabolic rate than normal cells, absorb more of the radioactive substance and appear as bright spots on the scan. PET scans are often combined with CT scans (PET-CT) to provide both metabolic and anatomical information, aiding in the detection of metastases.

Blood tests

Tumor markers: Certain substances, known as tumor markers, can be elevated in the blood of pancreatic cancer patients. The most commonly used tumor marker for pancreatic cancer is CA 19-9 (carbohydrate antigen 19-9). Elevated levels of CA 19-9 can indicate the presence of pancreatic cancer, but it is not specific and can also be elevated in other conditions such as pancreatitis and bile duct obstruction. Therefore, CA 19-9 is used in conjunction with other diagnostic methods.

Blood glucose levels: Since the pancreas is involved in insulin production, changes in blood glucose levels can be an indicator of pancreatic dysfunction. New-onset diabetes or worsening of pre-existing diabetes in conjunction with other symptoms may prompt further investigation for pancreatic cancer.

Biopsy and histopathological examination

A definitive diagnosis of pancreatic cancer requires a biopsy, where a sample of tissue is taken from the suspected tumor and examined under a microscope. There are several methods for obtaining a biopsy:

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA): As mentioned earlier, EUS allows for the collection of tissue samples through FNA. This method is minimally invasive and highly accurate, making it a preferred choice for obtaining biopsy samples.

CT-guided or ultrasound-guided biopsy: In cases where EUS is not feasible, CT-guided or ultrasound-guided biopsy may be performed. A needle is inserted through the skin and guided to the tumor using imaging techniques.

Laparoscopy: Laparoscopy is a surgical procedure in which a camera and instruments are inserted into the abdomen through small incisions. It allows for direct visualization of the pancreas and other organs, enabling biopsy and assessment of the extent of disease spread.

Staging of pancreatic cancer

Staging is a crucial aspect of pancreatic cancer diagnosis, as it determines the extent of the disease and guides treatment decisions. The most commonly used staging system for pancreatic cancer is the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM system, which classifies the disease based on:

T (Tumor): Size and extent of the primary tumor.

N (Nodes): Presence and extent of regional lymph node involvement.

M (Metastasis): Presence of distant metastasis.

Pancreatic cancer is typically divided into four stages:

Stage I: Cancer is confined to the pancreas and has not spread to nearby lymph nodes or distant sites.

Stage II: Cancer has spread to nearby tissues and organs but not to distant sites.

Stage III: Cancer has spread to major blood vessels around the pancreas and possibly to nearby lymph nodes.

Stage IV: Cancer has spread to distant organs, such as the liver, lungs, or peritoneum.

Challenges in pancreatic cancer diagnosis

Late presentation

One of the biggest challenges in pancreatic cancer diagnosis is the late presentation of symptoms. Since the early stages of the disease are often asymptomatic, the majority of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage when the cancer has already spread, limiting treatment options and reducing the likelihood of successful outcomes.

Non-specific symptoms

The symptoms of pancreatic cancer, such as abdominal pain, weight loss, and jaundice, are non-specific and can be attributed to a variety of other conditions. This often leads to delays in seeking medical attention and misdiagnosis.

Lack of effective screening methods

Unlike other cancers such as breast or colorectal cancer, there are no effective screening methods for pancreatic cancer in the general population. Current screening methods, such as imaging and blood tests, are not sensitive or specific enough to detect the disease in its early stages.

Biological complexity

Pancreatic cancer is biologically complex, with multiple genetic mutations and molecular alterations. This complexity makes it difficult to identify specific biomarkers for early detection and to develop targeted therapies.

Advances in pancreatic cancer diagnosis

Despite the challenges, there have been significant advances in the field of pancreatic cancer diagnosis. Some of the promising developments include:

Molecular and genetic testing

Advances in molecular and genetic testing have led to the identification of specific genetic mutations and alterations associated with pancreatic cancer. This has opened up new avenues for targeted therapies and personalized treatment approaches. For example, testing for mutations in the KRAS, BRCA1, and BRCA2 genes can provide valuable information for treatment planning.

Liquid biopsies

Liquid biopsies involve analyzing blood samples for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and other biomarkers. This non-invasive method has the potential to detect pancreatic cancer at an earlier stage and monitor treatment response. Although still in the research phase, liquid biopsies hold promise for improving early detection and disease monitoring.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms are being developed to analyze imaging data and identify patterns that may indicate the presence of pancreatic cancer. These technologies have the potential to improve the accuracy and efficiency of diagnosis, particularly in detecting early-stage disease.

Advanced imaging techniques

New imaging techniques, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound and advanced MRI protocols, are being explored to improve the visualization of pancreatic tumors. These techniques aim to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of imaging studies, enabling earlier and more accurate diagnosis.

Conclusion

Pancreatic cancer remains a formidable challenge due to its late presentation, non-specific symptoms, and lack of effective screening methods. However, advances in imaging techniques, molecular testing, and artificial intelligence offer hope for improving early detection and diagnosis. Continued research and collaboration among scientists, clinicians, and healthcare professionals are essential to develop more effective diagnostic tools and ultimately improve outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer. Early diagnosis remains the key to improving survival rates and offering patients a better chance at successful treatment. Pancreatic cancer remains a formidable challenge in the field of oncology due to its asymptomatic early stages, rapid progression, and high mortality rate. The diagnostic process is fraught with difficulties, primarily due to the deep anatomical location of the pancreas and the nonspecific nature of early symptoms. Despite these challenges, significant strides have been made in improving diagnostic accuracy through advancements in imaging techniques, biomarker identification, and genetic profiling.

While pancreatic cancer continues to pose significant diagnostic challenges, ongoing advancements in medical research and technology offer hope for more effective detection and improved patient prognosis. Early and accurate diagnosis remains the cornerstone of effective treatment, underscoring the importance of continuous innovation and clinical vigilance in the fight against this devastating disease.

1. Parham G (2010) cervical cancer prevention in HIV-infected women in resource-limited settings. HIV Therapy 4: 625-628.

Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, De Sanjose S, Saraiya M, et al. (2020) Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. THE LANCET-Global Health 8: 191-203.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Singh D, Vignat J, Lorenzoni V, Eslahi M, Ginsburg O, et al. (2023) Global estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2020: a baseline analysis of the WHO Global Cervical Cancer Elimination Initiative. Lancet 2023; 11: 197-206.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Zhao J, Xu L, Sun J, Song M, Wang L, et al. (2023) Global trends in incidence, death, burden and risk factors of early-onset cancer from 1990 to 2019. BMJ Oncology 2: 49.

Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Fernandez E (2020) Climate Change Will Give Rise to More Cancers. UCSF Research Journal.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Kingsland J (2020) how might climate change affects the spread of viruses? MedicalNewsToday.
7. Smith JS, Green J, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Appleby P, Peto J, Plummer M, et al (2003) Cervical cancer and use of hormonal contraceptives: a systematic review. Lancet 361: 1159-67.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Rabkin CS, Biggar RJ, Baptiste MS, Abe T, Kohler BA, et al. (1993) Cancer incidence trends in women at high risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Int J Cancer 55:208-12.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Mapanga W, Brown GB, Singh E (2019) Knowledge, attitudes and practices of young people in Zimbabwe on cervical cancer and HPV, current screening methods and vaccination. BMC cancer 19: 843.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Coutinho RA (2000) highly active antiretroviral therapy and incidence of cancer in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 1823.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref